Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 3/2013

01-06-2013 | Original Paper

Immediate postoperative morbidity in patients with indwelling double-J stent versus overnight-externalized ureteral catheter after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, randomized study

Authors: Alejandro Mercado, Mario I. Fernández, Pedro Recabal, Daniela Fleck, Rodrigo Ledezma, Francisco Moya, Francisco Sepúlveda, Roberto Vilches, Diego Reyes, Fernando Marchant

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The conventional technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) ends by placing a nephrostomy tube within the access tract. However, feasibility and safety of tubeless PNL have been widely demonstrated. In this modification, a ureteral stent is usually left in place instead of the nephrostomy tube. The aim of this study is to compare the use of a postoperative indwelling double-J stent versus an overnight-externalized ureteral catheter in patients undergoing tubeless PNL. Sixty-eight patients undergoing tubeless PNL were randomized either for a postoperative double-J stent (group 1) or for an overnight-externalized ureteral catheter (group 2). Outcomes evaluated included postoperative pain, hospital stay length, incidence of hemorrhagic complications, residual lithiasis and urinary leakage. Groups were similar according to age, sex, body mass index and stone burden. There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative pain, incidence of perirenal hematomas, residual lithiasis and urinary leakage. However, patients in group 1 presented longer hospital stays (3.7 ± 1.7 vs. 1.9 ± 0.3 days; p < 0.001) and greater hematocrit drops (4.9 ± 2.2 vs. 2.1 ± 1.8 %; p < 0.001). Our results confirm that among patients undergoing tubeless PNL, both alternatives (i.e. leaving a double-J stent or an overnight-externalized ureteral catheter) are reliable and safe. However, further considerations, like the need of double-J stent removal under cystoscopy, need to be taken into account when deciding which modality to use.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J, Gerspach J, Kurts S, Stout L (1997) Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 157(5):1578–1582PubMedCrossRef Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J, Gerspach J, Kurts S, Stout L (1997) Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 157(5):1578–1582PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yuan H, Zheng S, Lui L, Han P, Wang J, Wei Q (2011) The efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Res 39(5):401–410PubMedCrossRef Yuan H, Zheng S, Lui L, Han P, Wang J, Wei Q (2011) The efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Res 39(5):401–410PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ni S, Qiyin C, Tao W, Liu L, Jiang H, Han R, Wang C (2011) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with less pain and shorter hospitalization compared with standard or small bore drainage: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Urology 77(6):1293–1298PubMedCrossRef Ni S, Qiyin C, Tao W, Liu L, Jiang H, Han R, Wang C (2011) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with less pain and shorter hospitalization compared with standard or small bore drainage: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Urology 77(6):1293–1298PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Borges CF, Fregonesi A, Silva DC, Sasse AD (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. doi:10.1089/end.2010.0231 (Epub ahead of print) Borges CF, Fregonesi A, Silva DC, Sasse AD (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2010.​0231 (Epub ahead of print)
6.
go back to reference Zilberman DE, Lipkin ME, de la Rossette JJ, Ferrandino MN, Mamoulakis C, Laguna MP, Preminger GM (2010) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy—the new standard of care? J Urol 184(4):1261–1266PubMedCrossRef Zilberman DE, Lipkin ME, de la Rossette JJ, Ferrandino MN, Mamoulakis C, Laguna MP, Preminger GM (2010) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy—the new standard of care? J Urol 184(4):1261–1266PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Marchant F, Recabal P, Fernandez MI, Osorio F, Benavides J (2011) Postoperative morbidity of tubeless versus conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective and comparative study. Urol Res 39(6):477–481PubMedCrossRef Marchant F, Recabal P, Fernandez MI, Osorio F, Benavides J (2011) Postoperative morbidity of tubeless versus conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective and comparative study. Urol Res 39(6):477–481PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Mouracade P, Spie R, Lang H, Jacqmin D, Saussine C (2008) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what about replacing the double-J stent with a ureteral catheter. J Endourol 22(2):273–275PubMedCrossRef Mouracade P, Spie R, Lang H, Jacqmin D, Saussine C (2008) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what about replacing the double-J stent with a ureteral catheter. J Endourol 22(2):273–275PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lojanapiwat B, Soonthornphan S, Wudhikarn S (2001) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients. J Endourol 15(7):711–713PubMedCrossRef Lojanapiwat B, Soonthornphan S, Wudhikarn S (2001) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients. J Endourol 15(7):711–713PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mandhani A, Goyal R, Vijjan V, Dubey D, Kapoor R (2007) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy—should a stent be an integral part? J Urol 178:921–924PubMedCrossRef Mandhani A, Goyal R, Vijjan V, Dubey D, Kapoor R (2007) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy—should a stent be an integral part? J Urol 178:921–924PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gonen M, Ozturk B, Ozkardes H (2009) Double-j stenting compared with one night externalized ureteral catheter placement in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 23(1):27–31PubMedCrossRef Gonen M, Ozturk B, Ozkardes H (2009) Double-j stenting compared with one night externalized ureteral catheter placement in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 23(1):27–31PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Telha KA, Alba’adani TH, Alkohlany KM, Al-Adimy AO, Alnono IH (2010) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy with double-j stent compared with external ureteral catheter to decrease postoperative complications. Saudi Med J 31(10):1137–1140PubMed Telha KA, Alba’adani TH, Alkohlany KM, Al-Adimy AO, Alnono IH (2010) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy with double-j stent compared with external ureteral catheter to decrease postoperative complications. Saudi Med J 31(10):1137–1140PubMed
Metadata
Title
Immediate postoperative morbidity in patients with indwelling double-J stent versus overnight-externalized ureteral catheter after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, randomized study
Authors
Alejandro Mercado
Mario I. Fernández
Pedro Recabal
Daniela Fleck
Rodrigo Ledezma
Francisco Moya
Francisco Sepúlveda
Roberto Vilches
Diego Reyes
Fernando Marchant
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0555-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Urolithiasis 3/2013 Go to the issue