Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 6/2013

01-07-2013 | Original Article

Imaging quality of F-18-FDG PET/CT in the inpatient versus outpatient setting

Authors: Xuexian Yan, Jian Kang, Yanli Zhou, Ramisa Ehsan, Raghuveer Halkar, Kimberly E. Applegate, David M. Schuster

Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study is to investigate potential differences in the image quality of inpatient versus outpatient F-18-FDG PET/CT to provide evidence for appropriate policies and procedures to be promulgated on inpatient referrals.

Methods

100 consecutive inpatient and 100 outpatient F-18-FDG PET/CT scans were compared from the same time period and PET/CT scanner. Each study was evaluated for a subjective overall rating (optimal vs. suboptimal), and also by objective measurements (SUVmean) in four background structures (brain, blood pool, liver, and muscle).

Results

96 outpatient scans were rated optimal and 4 suboptimal whereas corresponding numbers for inpatient scans were 77 and 23 (p < 0.001). Of the objective indices, cerebellar SUV was significantly different in inpatient versus outpatient (5.3 vs. 6.9; p < 0.001) as well as suboptimal versus optimal rated groups (4.8 vs. 6.3; p < 0.001). While mean blood glucose was higher for inpatients (108.01 vs. 101.49 mg/dl; p = 0.017), it was not significantly different between optimal and suboptimal exams. Linear regression analysis between blood glucose levels and cerebellar uptake revealed an inverse relationship (R = −0.38, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

There was a significantly higher number of inpatient PET/CT scans rated as suboptimal in comparison to outpatient scans. Decreased cerebellar uptake was present in suboptimal rated studies and in inpatient studies. Altered biodistribution is thus a potential etiology of reduced scan quality among inpatients. These findings, if duplicated among other readers and centers, may form the basis of quality control recommendations for inpatient PET/CT ordering patterns.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T, Kinahan PE, Charron M, Roddy R, et al. A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med. 2000;41(8):1369–79.PubMed Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T, Kinahan PE, Charron M, Roddy R, et al. A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med. 2000;41(8):1369–79.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, Siegel BA, Lowe VJ, Lyman GH, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(3):480–508.PubMedCrossRef Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, Siegel BA, Lowe VJ, Lyman GH, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(3):480–508.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bouffet E, Frappaz D, Pinkerton R, Favrot M, Philip T. Burkitt’s lymphoma: a model for clinical oncology. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1991;27(4):504–9.CrossRef Bouffet E, Frappaz D, Pinkerton R, Favrot M, Philip T. Burkitt’s lymphoma: a model for clinical oncology. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1991;27(4):504–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jhanwar YS, Straus DJ. The role of PET in lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1326–34.PubMed Jhanwar YS, Straus DJ. The role of PET in lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1326–34.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Delbeke D, Coleman RE, Guiberteau MJ, Brown ML, Royal HD, Siegel BA, et al. Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(5):885–95.PubMed Delbeke D, Coleman RE, Guiberteau MJ, Brown ML, Royal HD, Siegel BA, et al. Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(5):885–95.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Lindholm P, Minn H, Leskinen-Kallio S, Bergman J, Ruotsalainen U, Joensuu H. Influence of the blood glucose concentration on FDG uptake in cancer—a PET study. J Nucl Med. 1993;34(1):1–6.PubMed Lindholm P, Minn H, Leskinen-Kallio S, Bergman J, Ruotsalainen U, Joensuu H. Influence of the blood glucose concentration on FDG uptake in cancer—a PET study. J Nucl Med. 1993;34(1):1–6.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Team RDC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011. Team RDC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011.
8.
go back to reference Adams MC, Turkington TG, Wilson JM, Wong TZ. A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(2):310–20.CrossRef Adams MC, Turkington TG, Wilson JM, Wong TZ. A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(2):310–20.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nahmias C, Wahl LM. Reproducibility of standardized uptake value measurements determined by 18F-FDG PET in malignant tumors. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(11):1804–8.PubMedCrossRef Nahmias C, Wahl LM. Reproducibility of standardized uptake value measurements determined by 18F-FDG PET in malignant tumors. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(11):1804–8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Paquet N, Albert A, Foidart J, Hustinx R. Within-patient variability of (18)F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(5):784–8.PubMed Paquet N, Albert A, Foidart J, Hustinx R. Within-patient variability of (18)F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(5):784–8.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Retif P, Jegouic C, Slosman DO. Quality assessment of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in clinical setting: definition of standard quality control parameters for patients treated for lymphoma. Nucl Med Commun. 2011;32(9):794–801.PubMedCrossRef Retif P, Jegouic C, Slosman DO. Quality assessment of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in clinical setting: definition of standard quality control parameters for patients treated for lymphoma. Nucl Med Commun. 2011;32(9):794–801.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Graham MM, Badawi RD, Wahl RL. Variations in PET/CT methodology for oncologic imaging at U.S. academic medical centers: an imaging response assessment team survey. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(2):311–7.PubMedCrossRef Graham MM, Badawi RD, Wahl RL. Variations in PET/CT methodology for oncologic imaging at U.S. academic medical centers: an imaging response assessment team survey. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(2):311–7.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wong KP, Sha W, Zhang XL, Huang SC. Effects of administration route, dietary condition, and blood glucose level on kinetics and uptake of 18F-FDG in mice. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:800–7.PubMedCrossRef Wong KP, Sha W, Zhang XL, Huang SC. Effects of administration route, dietary condition, and blood glucose level on kinetics and uptake of 18F-FDG in mice. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:800–7.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Groot MD, Meeuwis APW, Kok PJM, Corstens FH, Oyen WJ. Influence of blood glucose level, age and fasting period on non-pathological FDG uptake in heart and gut. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:98–101.PubMedCrossRef Groot MD, Meeuwis APW, Kok PJM, Corstens FH, Oyen WJ. Influence of blood glucose level, age and fasting period on non-pathological FDG uptake in heart and gut. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:98–101.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kushner M, Tobin M, Alavi A, Chawluk J, Rosen M, Fazekas F, et al. Cerebellar glucose consumption in normal and pathologic states using fluorine-FDG and PET. J Nucl Med. 1987;28(11):1667–70.PubMed Kushner M, Tobin M, Alavi A, Chawluk J, Rosen M, Fazekas F, et al. Cerebellar glucose consumption in normal and pathologic states using fluorine-FDG and PET. J Nucl Med. 1987;28(11):1667–70.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Growdon WA, Bratton TS, Houston MC, Tarpley HI, Regen DM. Brain glucose metabolism in the intact mouse. Am J Physiol. 1971;221:1738–45.PubMed Growdon WA, Bratton TS, Houston MC, Tarpley HI, Regen DM. Brain glucose metabolism in the intact mouse. Am J Physiol. 1971;221:1738–45.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Nomori H, Watanabe K, Ohtsuka T, Naruke T, Suemasu K, Uno K, et al. Visual and semiquantitative analyses for F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning in pulmonary nodules 1 cm to 3 cm in size. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:984–9.PubMedCrossRef Nomori H, Watanabe K, Ohtsuka T, Naruke T, Suemasu K, Uno K, et al. Visual and semiquantitative analyses for F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning in pulmonary nodules 1 cm to 3 cm in size. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:984–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Obrzut S, Pham RH, Vera DR, Badran K, Hoha CK. Comparison of lesion-to-cerebellum uptake ratios and standardized uptake values in the evaluation of lung nodules with 18F-FDG PET. Nucl Med Commun. 2007;28(1):7–13.PubMedCrossRef Obrzut S, Pham RH, Vera DR, Badran K, Hoha CK. Comparison of lesion-to-cerebellum uptake ratios and standardized uptake values in the evaluation of lung nodules with 18F-FDG PET. Nucl Med Commun. 2007;28(1):7–13.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Keyes JW Jr. SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? J Nucl Med. 1995;36(10):1836–9.PubMed Keyes JW Jr. SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? J Nucl Med. 1995;36(10):1836–9.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Kim CK, Gupta NC, Chandramouli B, Alavi A, et al. Standardized uptake values of FDG: body surface area correction is preferable to body weight correction. J Nucl Med. 1994;35(1):164–7.PubMed Kim CK, Gupta NC, Chandramouli B, Alavi A, et al. Standardized uptake values of FDG: body surface area correction is preferable to body weight correction. J Nucl Med. 1994;35(1):164–7.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Tatsumi M, Clark PA, Nakamoto Y, Wahl RL. Impact of body habitus on quantitative and qualitative image quality in whole-body FDG-PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30(1):40–5.PubMedCrossRef Tatsumi M, Clark PA, Nakamoto Y, Wahl RL. Impact of body habitus on quantitative and qualitative image quality in whole-body FDG-PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30(1):40–5.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Imaging quality of F-18-FDG PET/CT in the inpatient versus outpatient setting
Authors
Xuexian Yan
Jian Kang
Yanli Zhou
Ramisa Ehsan
Raghuveer Halkar
Kimberly E. Applegate
David M. Schuster
Publication date
01-07-2013
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Electronic ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-013-0714-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 6/2013 Go to the issue