Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 6/2018

01-12-2018

Identifying Primary Care Physicians Continuing Education Needs by Examining Clinical Practices, Attitudes, and Barriers to Screening Across Multiple Cancers

Authors: Brenna Lynn, Alexandra Hatry, Chloe Burnett, Lisa Kan, Tunde Olatunbosun, Bob Bluman

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Population-based cancer screening for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancers improves patient outcomes, yet screening rates remain low for some cancers. Despite studies investigating physician perceptions and practices for screening, many have focused on individual cancers and lack primary care physicians’ (PCPs) realities around screening for multiple cancers. We surveyed 887 PCPs in British Columbia (BC) to examine practices, beliefs, barriers, and learning needs towards cancer screening across breast, cervical, colorectal, prostate, as well as hereditary predisposition to cancer. Survey results identified differences in PCPs belief in the benefit of screening for recommended and non-recommended routine cancer screening, PCPs adherence to screening guidelines for some cancers and physician comfort and patient testing requests related to physician gender for gender sensitive tests. Further, across cancers, screening barriers included patients with multiple health concerns (41%), limited time to discuss screening (36%), and lack of physician financial compensation to discuss screening (23%). The study highlighted the need for more physician education on screening programs, referral criteria, follow-up processes, and screening guidelines. Conferences (73%), self-directed (46%), small group workshops (42%), hospital rounds (41%), and online CME/CPD (39%) were highly preferred (4+5) for learning about cancer screening. The results suggest a need to improve awareness and adherence to screening guidelines and recommended practices, as well as to provide educational opportunities which address knowledge and practice gaps for physicians.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Canadian Cancer Statistics (2016) Canadian Cancer Society’s Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics. Canadian Cancer Society, Toronto, 2016 October. Report No: ISSN0835-2976 Canadian Cancer Statistics (2016) Canadian Cancer Society’s Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics. Canadian Cancer Society, Toronto, 2016 October. Report No: ISSN0835-2976
2.
go back to reference Sasieni P, Castanon A, Cuzick J (2009) Effectiveness of cervical screening with age: population based case-control study of prospectively recorded data. BMJ (Clin Res ed) 339:b2968CrossRef Sasieni P, Castanon A, Cuzick J (2009) Effectiveness of cervical screening with age: population based case-control study of prospectively recorded data. BMJ (Clin Res ed) 339:b2968CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Strumpf Erin C, Chai Z, Kadiyala S (2010) Adherence to cancer screening guidelines across Canadian provinces: an observational study. BMC Cancer 10:304CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Strumpf Erin C, Chai Z, Kadiyala S (2010) Adherence to cancer screening guidelines across Canadian provinces: an observational study. BMC Cancer 10:304CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Feeley TH, Cooper J, Foels T, Mahoney MC (2009) Efficacy expectations for colorectal cancer screening in primary care: identifying barriers and facilitators for patients and clinicians. Health Commun 24:304–315CrossRefPubMed Feeley TH, Cooper J, Foels T, Mahoney MC (2009) Efficacy expectations for colorectal cancer screening in primary care: identifying barriers and facilitators for patients and clinicians. Health Commun 24:304–315CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cardarelli R, Kurian AK, Pandya V (2010) Having a personal healthcare provider and receipt of adequate cervical and breast cancer screening. J Am Board Fam Med : JABFM 23:75–81CrossRefPubMed Cardarelli R, Kurian AK, Pandya V (2010) Having a personal healthcare provider and receipt of adequate cervical and breast cancer screening. J Am Board Fam Med : JABFM 23:75–81CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wender RC (1993) Cancer screening and prevention in primary care. Obstacles for physicians. Cancer 72:1093–1099CrossRefPubMed Wender RC (1993) Cancer screening and prevention in primary care. Obstacles for physicians. Cancer 72:1093–1099CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Davis D, Davis ME, Jadad A, Perrier L, Rath D, Ryan D, Sibbald G, Straus S, Rappolt S, Wowk M, Zwarenstein M (2003) The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7405.33 Davis D, Davis ME, Jadad A, Perrier L, Rath D, Ryan D, Sibbald G, Straus S, Rappolt S, Wowk M, Zwarenstein M (2003) The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​327.​7405.​33
8.
go back to reference Davis D, O'Brien MAT, Freemantle N, Wolf FM, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A (1999) Impact of formal continuing medical education do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA 282:867–874CrossRefPubMed Davis D, O'Brien MAT, Freemantle N, Wolf FM, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A (1999) Impact of formal continuing medical education do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA 282:867–874CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Davis D, Galbraith R (2009) Continuing medical education effect on practice performance: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines. Chest 135:42S–48SCrossRefPubMed Davis D, Galbraith R (2009) Continuing medical education effect on practice performance: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines. Chest 135:42S–48SCrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Curran V, Solberg S, Mathews M, Church J, Buehler S, Wells J, Lopez T (2005) Prostate cancer screening attitudes and continuing education needs of primary care physicians. J Cancer Educ: Off J Am Assoc Cancer Educ 20:162–166CrossRef Curran V, Solberg S, Mathews M, Church J, Buehler S, Wells J, Lopez T (2005) Prostate cancer screening attitudes and continuing education needs of primary care physicians. J Cancer Educ: Off J Am Assoc Cancer Educ 20:162–166CrossRef
12.
go back to reference McGregor SE, Hilsden RJ, Yang H (2010) Physician barriers to population-based, fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening programs for average-risk patients. Can J Gastroenterol = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie 24:359–364CrossRefPubMed McGregor SE, Hilsden RJ, Yang H (2010) Physician barriers to population-based, fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening programs for average-risk patients. Can J Gastroenterol = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie 24:359–364CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Levy S, Dowling P, Boult L, Monroe A, McQuade W (1992) The effect of physician and patient gender on preventive medicine practices in patients older than fifty. Fam Med 24:58–61PubMed Levy S, Dowling P, Boult L, Monroe A, McQuade W (1992) The effect of physician and patient gender on preventive medicine practices in patients older than fifty. Fam Med 24:58–61PubMed
14.
go back to reference Yarnall KSH, Pollak KI, Østbye T, Krause KM, Lloyd Michener J (2003) Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health 93:635–641CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yarnall KSH, Pollak KI, Østbye T, Krause KM, Lloyd Michener J (2003) Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health 93:635–641CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Grol R, Grimshaw J (2003) From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 362(9391):1225–1230CrossRefPubMed Grol R, Grimshaw J (2003) From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 362(9391):1225–1230CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Williamson PM (1975) The adoption of new drugs by doctors practising in group and solo practice. Soc Sci Med 9(4–5):233–236CrossRefPubMed Williamson PM (1975) The adoption of new drugs by doctors practising in group and solo practice. Soc Sci Med 9(4–5):233–236CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Dochy F, Segers M, Van den Bossche P, Gijbels D (2003) Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis. Learn Instr 13:533–568CrossRef Dochy F, Segers M, Van den Bossche P, Gijbels D (2003) Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis. Learn Instr 13:533–568CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Marinopoulos SS, Dorman T, Ratanawongsa N, Wilson LM, Ashar BH, Magaziner JL, Miller RG, Thomas PA, Prokopowicz GP, Qayyum R, Bass EB (2007) Effectiveness of continuing medical education. Evid Report/Technol Assess 149:1–69 Marinopoulos SS, Dorman T, Ratanawongsa N, Wilson LM, Ashar BH, Magaziner JL, Miller RG, Thomas PA, Prokopowicz GP, Qayyum R, Bass EB (2007) Effectiveness of continuing medical education. Evid Report/Technol Assess 149:1–69
20.
go back to reference Pathman DE, Konrad TR, Freed GL, Freeman VA, Koch GG (1996) The awareness-to-adherence model of the steps to clinical guideline compliance. The case of pediatric vaccine recommendations. Med Care 34(9):873–889CrossRefPubMed Pathman DE, Konrad TR, Freed GL, Freeman VA, Koch GG (1996) The awareness-to-adherence model of the steps to clinical guideline compliance. The case of pediatric vaccine recommendations. Med Care 34(9):873–889CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Identifying Primary Care Physicians Continuing Education Needs by Examining Clinical Practices, Attitudes, and Barriers to Screening Across Multiple Cancers
Authors
Brenna Lynn
Alexandra Hatry
Chloe Burnett
Lisa Kan
Tunde Olatunbosun
Bob Bluman
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-017-1240-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Journal of Cancer Education 6/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine