Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 3/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Article

Identification of Sentinel Lymph Nodes Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Breast Cancer

Authors: Naresh Kumar Saidha, Rohit Aggarwal, Arijit Sen

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become the standard of care in axillary staging of breast cancer patients who are clinically node negative as it reduces the morbidity of axillary nodal dissection. SLN biopsy using blue dye and radioisotopes have high identification rates but its limitations include anaphylaxis, disposal of radioactive waste, and potential second surgery in up to 35% of patients who show nodal metastases on SLN biopsy. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has the potential for SLNs to be identified without the aforementioned risks. CEUS involves the administration of intravenous contrast agents containing microbubbles of perfluorocarbon or nitrogen gas. The bubbles greatly affect ultrasound backscatter and increase vascular contrast in a similar manner to intravenous contrast agents used in CT and MRI. It is safe and easily performed with no requirement for ionizing radiation and no risk of nephrotoxicity. Microbubbles are taken up by lymph nodes when injected directly into tissues, including sub-areolar injection in the breast cancer patient. This method may prove valuable in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ, where operative SLN biopsy remains controversial, and in women undergoing prophylactic mastectomies for high risk. This technique may also have a role after neoadjuvant chemotherapy where frequently there is fibrosis in the treated SLNs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fisher B, Bauer M, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Fisher ER (1983) Relation of number of positive axillary nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer. Cancer 52:1551–1557CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Bauer M, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Fisher ER (1983) Relation of number of positive axillary nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer. Cancer 52:1551–1557CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Jatoi I, Hilsenbeck SG, Clark GM, Osborne CK (1999) Significance of axillary lymph node metastasis in primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:2334–2340CrossRefPubMed Jatoi I, Hilsenbeck SG, Clark GM, Osborne CK (1999) Significance of axillary lymph node metastasis in primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:2334–2340CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Goldberg BB, Merton DA, Liu JB, Thakur M, Murphy GF, Needleman L et al (2004) Sentinel lymph node in a swine model with melanoma: contrast-enhanced lymphatic US. Radiology 230:727–734CrossRefPubMed Goldberg BB, Merton DA, Liu JB, Thakur M, Murphy GF, Needleman L et al (2004) Sentinel lymph node in a swine model with melanoma: contrast-enhanced lymphatic US. Radiology 230:727–734CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Duff M, Hill AD, McGreal G, Walsh S, McDermott EW, O’Higgins NJ (2001) Prospective evaluation of the morbidity of axillary clearance for breast cancer. Br J Surg 88:114–117CrossRefPubMed Duff M, Hill AD, McGreal G, Walsh S, McDermott EW, O’Higgins NJ (2001) Prospective evaluation of the morbidity of axillary clearance for breast cancer. Br J Surg 88:114–117CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference McMasters KM, Giuliano AE, Ross MI et al (1998) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: not yet the standard of care. N Engl J Med 339:990–995CrossRefPubMed McMasters KM, Giuliano AE, Ross MI et al (1998) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: not yet the standard of care. N Engl J Med 339:990–995CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cody HS III. (1999) Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer. Oncology 13:25–34PubMed Cody HS III. (1999) Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer. Oncology 13:25–34PubMed
8.
go back to reference Cimmino VM, Brown AC, Szocik JF et al (2001) Allergic reactions to isosulfan blue during sentinel node biopsy: a common event. Surgery 130:439–442CrossRefPubMed Cimmino VM, Brown AC, Szocik JF et al (2001) Allergic reactions to isosulfan blue during sentinel node biopsy: a common event. Surgery 130:439–442CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hwang RF, Krishnamurthy S, Hunt KK et al (2003) Clinico-pathologic factors predicting involvement of non-sentinel axillary nodes in women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 10:248–254CrossRefPubMed Hwang RF, Krishnamurthy S, Hunt KK et al (2003) Clinico-pathologic factors predicting involvement of non-sentinel axillary nodes in women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 10:248–254CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sever A, Jones S, Cox K, Weeks J, Mills P, Jones P (2009) Preoperative localization of sentinel lymph nodes using intradermal microbubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg. 96:1295–1299CrossRefPubMed Sever A, Jones S, Cox K, Weeks J, Mills P, Jones P (2009) Preoperative localization of sentinel lymph nodes using intradermal microbubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg. 96:1295–1299CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bobrow L, Pinder S (2004) Histopathology and the SLN. In: Bobrow L, Pinder S (eds) Sentinel lymph node biopsy handbook: new start. Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, pp 88–94 Bobrow L, Pinder S (2004) Histopathology and the SLN. In: Bobrow L, Pinder S (eds) Sentinel lymph node biopsy handbook: new start. Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, pp 88–94
12.
go back to reference Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW et al (2011) Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 305(6):569–575CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW et al (2011) Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 305(6):569–575CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Galimberti V, Cole BF, Zurrida S, Viale G, Luini A, Veronesi P et al (2013) Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23–01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 14:297–305CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Galimberti V, Cole BF, Zurrida S, Viale G, Luini A, Veronesi P et al (2013) Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23–01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 14:297–305CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Sever AR, Mills P, Jones SE, Cox K, Weeks J, Fish D et al (2011) Preoperative sentinel node identification with ultrasound using microbubbles in patients with breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:251CrossRefPubMed Sever AR, Mills P, Jones SE, Cox K, Weeks J, Fish D et al (2011) Preoperative sentinel node identification with ultrasound using microbubbles in patients with breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:251CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Harlow SP, Krag DN, Julian TB, Ashikaga T, Weaver DL, Feldman SA et al (2005) Prerandomization surgical training for the NSABP-B32 trial—a randomization phase III clinical trial to compare sentinel node resection to conventional axillary dissection in clinically node negative breast cancer. Ann Surg 241:48–54PubMedPubMedCentral Harlow SP, Krag DN, Julian TB, Ashikaga T, Weaver DL, Feldman SA et al (2005) Prerandomization surgical training for the NSABP-B32 trial—a randomization phase III clinical trial to compare sentinel node resection to conventional axillary dissection in clinically node negative breast cancer. Ann Surg 241:48–54PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Britton PD, Provenzano E, Barter S et al (2009) Ultra-sound guided percutaneous axillary lymph node core biopsy: how often is the sentinel lymph node being biopsied? Breast 18:13–16CrossRefPubMed Britton PD, Provenzano E, Barter S et al (2009) Ultra-sound guided percutaneous axillary lymph node core biopsy: how often is the sentinel lymph node being biopsied? Breast 18:13–16CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Carmon M, Olsha O, Rivkin L, Spira RM, Golomb E (2006) Intraoperative palpation for clinically suspicious axillary sentinel lymph nodes reduces the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Breast J 12:199–201CrossRefPubMed Carmon M, Olsha O, Rivkin L, Spira RM, Golomb E (2006) Intraoperative palpation for clinically suspicious axillary sentinel lymph nodes reduces the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Breast J 12:199–201CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference van Rijk MC, Deurloo EE, Nieweg OE et al (2006) Ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology can spare breast cancer patients unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 13:31–35CrossRefPubMed van Rijk MC, Deurloo EE, Nieweg OE et al (2006) Ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology can spare breast cancer patients unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 13:31–35CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Holwitt DM, Swatske ME, Gillanders WE et al (2008) Scientific Presentation Award: the combination of axillary ultrasound and ultrasound-guided biopsy is an accurate predictor of axillary stage in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. Am J Surg 196:477–482CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Holwitt DM, Swatske ME, Gillanders WE et al (2008) Scientific Presentation Award: the combination of axillary ultrasound and ultrasound-guided biopsy is an accurate predictor of axillary stage in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. Am J Surg 196:477–482CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Identification of Sentinel Lymph Nodes Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Breast Cancer
Authors
Naresh Kumar Saidha
Rohit Aggarwal
Arijit Sen
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0975-7651
Electronic ISSN: 0976-6952
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-017-0646-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 3/2018 Go to the issue