Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2024

24-06-2023 | Hysteroscopy | Review

Fertility, pregnancy and perioperative outcomes after operative hysteroscopy for uterine septum: a network meta-analysis

Authors: Dimitrios Rafail Kalaitzopoulos, Maria Zografou Themeli, Georgios Grigoriadis, Maurizio D. Alterio, Salvatore Giovanni Vitale, Stefano Angioni, Angelos Daniilidis

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 3/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Septate uterus is a congenital malformation associated with adverse reproductive and pregnancy outcomes. It remains controversial whether hysteroscopic septoplasty should be recommended for the treatment of septate uterus, and it is also unclear if different hysteroscopic methods have more favorable outcomes. This study aims to compare the available hysteroscopic techniques of septoplasty for fertility, reproductive, and perioperative outcomes.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. We searched Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases up to April 2023 without language restrictions. Eligible studies had to compare two or more different methods of hysteroscopic septoplasty in women with septate uterus and report on fertility and pregnancy outcomes after a follow-up. Perioperative outcomes were also examined. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers using a standardized form. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Form and Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2).

Results

Out of 561 studies identified, 9 were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The comparison of different hysteroscopic septoplasty techniques based on the energy used showed higher pregnancy rates after mechanical septoplasty in comparison to electrosurgery, while miscarriage and live birth rates were comparable. Laser vs. electrosurgery and mechanical techniques of septoplasty had comparable pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates. The network meta-analysis after comparing every different method used showed significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate in scissor group in comparison to resectoscope. No significant differences were found among the techniques regarding miscarriage rate and live birth rate.

Conclusion

In summary, this systematic review and network meta-analysis suggests that hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissors is associated with higher pregnancy rates compared to resectoscope. However, the limited evidence available and small sample sizes in the included studies indicate that these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further studies are required to determine the effectiveness of various hysteroscopic techniques and guide clinical decision-making in the management of this condition.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC (2008) Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update 14(5):415–429CrossRefPubMed Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC (2008) Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update 14(5):415–429CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Chan YY et al (2011) The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 17(6):761–771CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chan YY et al (2011) The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 17(6):761–771CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Pfeifer S et al (2016) Uterine septum: a guideline. Fertil Steril 106(3):530–540CrossRef Pfeifer S et al (2016) Uterine septum: a guideline. Fertil Steril 106(3):530–540CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Venetis CA et al (2014) Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online 29(6):665–683CrossRefPubMed Venetis CA et al (2014) Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online 29(6):665–683CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Carrera M et al (2022) Effect of hysteroscopic metroplasty on reproductive outcomes in women with septate uterus: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 29(4):465–475CrossRefPubMed Carrera M et al (2022) Effect of hysteroscopic metroplasty on reproductive outcomes in women with septate uterus: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 29(4):465–475CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Rikken JFW et al (2021) Septum resection versus expectant management in women with a septate uterus: an international multicentre open-label randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 36(5):1260–1267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rikken JFW et al (2021) Septum resection versus expectant management in women with a septate uterus: an international multicentre open-label randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 36(5):1260–1267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Regan L, Backos M, Rai R (2011) The investigation and treatment of couples with recurrent first-trimester and second-trimester miscarriage. RCOG Green Top Guideline 17:1–17 Regan L, Backos M, Rai R (2011) The investigation and treatment of couples with recurrent first-trimester and second-trimester miscarriage. RCOG Green Top Guideline 17:1–17
10.
go back to reference Dason ES, Mathur S, Murji A (2021) Hysteroscopic septoplasty: many techniques, little evidence. Fertil Steril 116(5):1426–1427CrossRefPubMed Dason ES, Mathur S, Murji A (2021) Hysteroscopic septoplasty: many techniques, little evidence. Fertil Steril 116(5):1426–1427CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Daniilidis A et al (2020) Reproductive outcome after operative hysteroscopy for uterine septum: scissors or diathermy? Minerva Ginecol 72(1):36–42CrossRefPubMed Daniilidis A et al (2020) Reproductive outcome after operative hysteroscopy for uterine septum: scissors or diathermy? Minerva Ginecol 72(1):36–42CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Dural O et al (2015) The impact of the techniques of hysteroscopic septoplasty on the reproductive outcomes in patients with septate uterus. Fertil Steril 104(3):e176CrossRef Dural O et al (2015) The impact of the techniques of hysteroscopic septoplasty on the reproductive outcomes in patients with septate uterus. Fertil Steril 104(3):e176CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cararach M et al (1994) Hysteroscopic incision of the septate uterus: scissors versus resectoscope. Hum Reprod 9(1):87–89CrossRefPubMed Cararach M et al (1994) Hysteroscopic incision of the septate uterus: scissors versus resectoscope. Hum Reprod 9(1):87–89CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Parsanezhad ME et al (2006) Hysteroscopic metroplasty of the complete uterine septum, duplicate cervix, and vaginal septum. Fertil Steril 85(5):1473–1477CrossRefPubMed Parsanezhad ME et al (2006) Hysteroscopic metroplasty of the complete uterine septum, duplicate cervix, and vaginal septum. Fertil Steril 85(5):1473–1477CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Candiani GB et al (1991) Argon laser versus microscissors for hysteroscopic incision of uterine septa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 164(1, Part 1):87–90CrossRefPubMed Candiani GB et al (1991) Argon laser versus microscissors for hysteroscopic incision of uterine septa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 164(1, Part 1):87–90CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Colacurci N et al (2007) Small-diameter hysteroscopy with versapoint versus resectoscopy with a unipolar knife for the treatment of septate uterus: a prospective randomized study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(5):622–627CrossRefPubMed Colacurci N et al (2007) Small-diameter hysteroscopy with versapoint versus resectoscopy with a unipolar knife for the treatment of septate uterus: a prospective randomized study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(5):622–627CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Litta P et al (2008) Resectoscope or versapoint for hysteroscopic metroplasty. Int J Gynecol Obstet 101(1):39–42CrossRef Litta P et al (2008) Resectoscope or versapoint for hysteroscopic metroplasty. Int J Gynecol Obstet 101(1):39–42CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Heinonen PK (1997) Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies after abdominal or hysteroscopic metroplasty or no surgical treatment. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4(3):311–317CrossRefPubMed Heinonen PK (1997) Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies after abdominal or hysteroscopic metroplasty or no surgical treatment. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4(3):311–317CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Roy KK et al (2021) A prospective randomized comparative clinical trial of hysteroscopic septal resection using conventional resectoscope versus mini-resectoscope. J Hum Reprod Sci 14(1):61–67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Roy KK et al (2021) A prospective randomized comparative clinical trial of hysteroscopic septal resection using conventional resectoscope versus mini-resectoscope. J Hum Reprod Sci 14(1):61–67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Yang L et al (2021) Cold scissors versus electrosurgery for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 100(17):e25676CrossRefPubMed Yang L et al (2021) Cold scissors versus electrosurgery for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 100(17):e25676CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Candiani GB et al (1990) Repair of the uterine cavity after hysteroscopic septal incision. Fertil Steril 54(6):991–994CrossRefPubMed Candiani GB et al (1990) Repair of the uterine cavity after hysteroscopic septal incision. Fertil Steril 54(6):991–994CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Yang JH et al (2013) Optimal waiting period for subsequent fertility treatment after various hysteroscopic surgeries. Fertil Steril 99(7):2092–6.e3CrossRefPubMed Yang JH et al (2013) Optimal waiting period for subsequent fertility treatment after various hysteroscopic surgeries. Fertil Steril 99(7):2092–6.e3CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Berkkanoglu M et al (2008) What is the best time to perform intracytoplasmic sperm injection/embryo transfer cycle after hysteroscopic surgery for an incomplete uterine septum? Fertil Steril 90(6):2112–2115CrossRefPubMed Berkkanoglu M et al (2008) What is the best time to perform intracytoplasmic sperm injection/embryo transfer cycle after hysteroscopic surgery for an incomplete uterine septum? Fertil Steril 90(6):2112–2115CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Panagiotopoulos M, Tseke P, Michala L (2022) Obstetric complications in women with congenital uterine anomalies according to the 2013 European society of human reproduction and embryology and the European society for gynaecological endoscopy classification: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 139(1):138–148CrossRefPubMed Panagiotopoulos M, Tseke P, Michala L (2022) Obstetric complications in women with congenital uterine anomalies according to the 2013 European society of human reproduction and embryology and the European society for gynaecological endoscopy classification: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 139(1):138–148CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Mollo A et al (2009) Hysteroscopic resection of the septum improves the pregnancy rate of women with unexplained infertility: a prospective controlled trial. Fertil Steril 91(6):2628–2631CrossRefPubMed Mollo A et al (2009) Hysteroscopic resection of the septum improves the pregnancy rate of women with unexplained infertility: a prospective controlled trial. Fertil Steril 91(6):2628–2631CrossRefPubMed
29.
Metadata
Title
Fertility, pregnancy and perioperative outcomes after operative hysteroscopy for uterine septum: a network meta-analysis
Authors
Dimitrios Rafail Kalaitzopoulos
Maria Zografou Themeli
Georgios Grigoriadis
Maurizio D. Alterio
Salvatore Giovanni Vitale
Stefano Angioni
Angelos Daniilidis
Publication date
24-06-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 3/2024
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07109-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2024

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2024 Go to the issue