Skip to main content
Top

08-04-2024 | Hysterectomy | General Gynecology

Intra- and post-operative outcomes of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program in laparoscopic hysterectomy

Authors: Caglar Erkan, Hasan Ali Inal, Aysel Uysal

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the effect of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol on perioperative and post-operative outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomies (LHs) performed for benign gynecological diseases.

Methods

This prospective study was conducted with randomized 100 participants who underwent LH between 1 January and 31 December, 2022. A standard care protocol was applied to 50 participants (Group 1, control) and the ERAS protocol to the other 50 (Group 2, study). Length of hospitalization was compared between the groups as the primary outcome, and the duration of the operation, the amount of bleeding, post-operative nausea-vomiting, gas discharge time, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and complications as the secondary outcomes.

Results

No statistically significant difference was seen between the groups in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, operation indications, surgical procedures applied in addition to hysterectomy, operative time, pre-operative and post-operative hemoglobin levels, amount of bleeding, or drain use (p > 0.05). However, a statistically significant difference was observed in terms of nausea (60% vs. 26%, p = 0.001), vomiting (28% vs. 10%, p = 0.040), duration of gassing (17.74 ± 6.77 vs. 14.20 ± 7.05 h, p = 0.012), length of hospitalization (41.78 ± 12.17 vs. 34.12 ± 10.90 h, p = 0.001), analgesic requirements (4.62 ± 1.36 vs. 3.34 ± 1.27 h, p < 0.001), or VAS scores at the 1st (5.86 ± 1.21 vs. 4.58 ± 1.31, p < 0.001), 6th (5.16 ± 1.12 vs. 4.04 ± 1.08, p < 0.001), 12th (4.72 ± 1.12 vs. 3.48 ± 1.12, p < 0.001), 18th (4.48 ± 1.21 vs. 3.24 ± 1.34, p < 0.001), and 24th (4.08 ± 1.29 vs. 3.01 ± 1.30, p < 0.001) hours.

Conclusion

The findings of this study show that the ERAS protocol has a positive effect on peri- and post-operative outcomes in LH. Further prospective studies are now needed to confirm the validity of the results.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Inal ZO, Inal HA (2018) Comparison of abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies in a tertiary care hospital in Turkey. Ir J Med Sci 187:485–491CrossRefPubMed Inal ZO, Inal HA (2018) Comparison of abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies in a tertiary care hospital in Turkey. Ir J Med Sci 187:485–491CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Schmitt JJ, Carranza Leon DA, Occhino JA, Weaver AL, Dowdy SC, Bakkum-Gamez JN et al (2017) Determining optimal route of hysterectomy for benign indications: clinical decision tree algorithm. Obstet Gynecol 129:130–138CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schmitt JJ, Carranza Leon DA, Occhino JA, Weaver AL, Dowdy SC, Bakkum-Gamez JN et al (2017) Determining optimal route of hysterectomy for benign indications: clinical decision tree algorithm. Obstet Gynecol 129:130–138CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Hur HC, Donnellan N, Mansuria S, Barber RE, Guido R, Lee T (2011) Vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 118:794–801CrossRefPubMed Hur HC, Donnellan N, Mansuria S, Barber RE, Guido R, Lee T (2011) Vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 118:794–801CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Joshi GP, Kehlet H (2019) Postoperative pain management in the era of ERAS: an overview. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 33:259–267CrossRefPubMed Joshi GP, Kehlet H (2019) Postoperative pain management in the era of ERAS: an overview. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 33:259–267CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mulayim B, Karadag B (2018) Do we need mechanical bowel preparation before benign gynecologic laparoscopic surgeries: a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest 83:203–208CrossRefPubMed Mulayim B, Karadag B (2018) Do we need mechanical bowel preparation before benign gynecologic laparoscopic surgeries: a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest 83:203–208CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Uyanıklar ÖÖ, Türk P, Aslan K, Aslan EK, Özden O, Gürlüer J et al (2023) How does the ERAS protocol work in patients who underwent cesarean section? HERMES study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 161:168–174CrossRefPubMed Uyanıklar ÖÖ, Türk P, Aslan K, Aslan EK, Özden O, Gürlüer J et al (2023) How does the ERAS protocol work in patients who underwent cesarean section? HERMES study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 161:168–174CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Yilmaz G, Akca A, Kiyak H, Salihoglu Z (2020) Comparison of enhanced recovery protocol with conventional care in patients undergoing minor gynecologic surgery. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 15:220–226PubMed Yilmaz G, Akca A, Kiyak H, Salihoglu Z (2020) Comparison of enhanced recovery protocol with conventional care in patients undergoing minor gynecologic surgery. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 15:220–226PubMed
9.
go back to reference Ozturk Inal Z, Gorkem U, Inal HA (2020) Effects of preoperative anxiety on postcesarean delivery pain and analgesic consumption: general versus spinal anesthesia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 33:191–197CrossRefPubMed Ozturk Inal Z, Gorkem U, Inal HA (2020) Effects of preoperative anxiety on postcesarean delivery pain and analgesic consumption: general versus spinal anesthesia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 33:191–197CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Luchristt D, Brown O, Kenton K, Bretschneider CE (2021) Trends in operative time and outcomes in minimally invasive hysterectomy from 2008 to 2018. Am J Obstet Gynecol 224:202.e1-202.e12CrossRefPubMed Luchristt D, Brown O, Kenton K, Bretschneider CE (2021) Trends in operative time and outcomes in minimally invasive hysterectomy from 2008 to 2018. Am J Obstet Gynecol 224:202.e1-202.e12CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 152:292–298CrossRefPubMed Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 152:292–298CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Cao F, Li J, Li F (2012) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:803–810CrossRefPubMed Cao F, Li J, Li F (2012) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:803–810CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Dahabreh IJ, Steele DW, Shah N, Trikalinos TA (2015) Oral mechanical bowel preparation for colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58:698–707CrossRefPubMed Dahabreh IJ, Steele DW, Shah N, Trikalinos TA (2015) Oral mechanical bowel preparation for colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58:698–707CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Nelson G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Kalogera E, Glaser G, Altman A, Meyer LA et al (2019) Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations-2019 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer 29:651–668CrossRefPubMed Nelson G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Kalogera E, Glaser G, Altman A, Meyer LA et al (2019) Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations-2019 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer 29:651–668CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Minig L, Biffi R, Zanagnolo V, Attanasio A, Beltrami C, Bocciolone L et al (2009) Early oral versus “traditional” postoperative feeding in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing intestinal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1660–1668CrossRefPubMed Minig L, Biffi R, Zanagnolo V, Attanasio A, Beltrami C, Bocciolone L et al (2009) Early oral versus “traditional” postoperative feeding in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing intestinal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1660–1668CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Miller TE, Thacker JK, White WD, Mantyh C, Migaly J, Jin J et al (2014) Enhanced Recovery Study Group. Reduced length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol. Anesth Analg 118:1052–1061CrossRefPubMed Miller TE, Thacker JK, White WD, Mantyh C, Migaly J, Jin J et al (2014) Enhanced Recovery Study Group. Reduced length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol. Anesth Analg 118:1052–1061CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rollins KE, Lobo DN (2016) Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in elective major abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 263:465–476CrossRefPubMed Rollins KE, Lobo DN (2016) Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in elective major abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 263:465–476CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Smith MD, McCall J, Plank L, Herbison GP, Soop M, Nygren J (2014) Preoperative carbohydrate treatment for enhancing recovery after elective surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (8):CD009161 Smith MD, McCall J, Plank L, Herbison GP, Soop M, Nygren J (2014) Preoperative carbohydrate treatment for enhancing recovery after elective surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (8):CD009161
19.
go back to reference Park SH, Choi MS (2018) Meta-analysis of the effect of gum chewing after gynecologic surgery. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 47:362–370CrossRefPubMed Park SH, Choi MS (2018) Meta-analysis of the effect of gum chewing after gynecologic surgery. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 47:362–370CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Darouiche RO, Wall MJ Jr, Itani KM, Otterson MF, Webb AL, Carrick MM et al (2010) Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N Engl J Med 362:18–26CrossRefPubMed Darouiche RO, Wall MJ Jr, Itani KM, Otterson MF, Webb AL, Carrick MM et al (2010) Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N Engl J Med 362:18–26CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ajuzieogu OV, Amucheazi AO, Nwagha UI, Ezike HA, Luka SK, Abam DS (2016) Effect of routine preoperative fasting on residual gastric volume and acid in patients undergoing myomectomy. Niger J Clin Pract 19:816–820CrossRefPubMed Ajuzieogu OV, Amucheazi AO, Nwagha UI, Ezike HA, Luka SK, Abam DS (2016) Effect of routine preoperative fasting on residual gastric volume and acid in patients undergoing myomectomy. Niger J Clin Pract 19:816–820CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Yilmaz N, Cekmen N, Bilgin F, Erten E, Ozhan MÖ, Coşar A (2013) Preoperative carbohydrate nutrition reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to preoperative fasting. J Res Med Sci 18:827–832PubMedPubMedCentral Yilmaz N, Cekmen N, Bilgin F, Erten E, Ozhan MÖ, Coşar A (2013) Preoperative carbohydrate nutrition reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to preoperative fasting. J Res Med Sci 18:827–832PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Kleiman AM, Chisholm CA, Dixon AJ, Sariosek BM, Thiele RH, Hedrick TL et al (2020) Evaluation of the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol implementation on maternal outcomes following elective cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth 43:39–46CrossRefPubMed Kleiman AM, Chisholm CA, Dixon AJ, Sariosek BM, Thiele RH, Hedrick TL et al (2020) Evaluation of the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol implementation on maternal outcomes following elective cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth 43:39–46CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Peng J, Dong R, Jiao J, Liu M, Zhang X, Bu H et al (2021) Enhanced recovery after surgery impact on the systemic inflammatory response of patients following gynecological oncology surgery: a prospective randomized study. Cancer Manag Res 13:4383–4392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Peng J, Dong R, Jiao J, Liu M, Zhang X, Bu H et al (2021) Enhanced recovery after surgery impact on the systemic inflammatory response of patients following gynecological oncology surgery: a prospective randomized study. Cancer Manag Res 13:4383–4392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference de Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Leal FS, Dantas DC, Anabuki NT, de Souza AM, Silva E Lima VP et al (2014) Preoperative education in cholecystectomy in the context of a multimodal protocol of perioperative care: a randomized, controlled trial. World J Surg 38:357–362 de Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Leal FS, Dantas DC, Anabuki NT, de Souza AM, Silva E Lima VP et al (2014) Preoperative education in cholecystectomy in the context of a multimodal protocol of perioperative care: a randomized, controlled trial. World J Surg 38:357–362
26.
go back to reference Katz J, McCartney CJ (2002) Current status of preemptive analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 15:435–441CrossRefPubMed Katz J, McCartney CJ (2002) Current status of preemptive analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 15:435–441CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Wijk L, Franzen K, Ljungqvist O, Nilsson K (2014) Implementing a structured Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol reduces length of stay after abdominal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93:749–756CrossRefPubMed Wijk L, Franzen K, Ljungqvist O, Nilsson K (2014) Implementing a structured Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol reduces length of stay after abdominal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93:749–756CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Yoong W, Sivashanmugarajan V, Relph S, Bell A, Fajemirokun E, Davies T et al (2014) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Team for Gynaecology and Anaesthesia. Can enhanced recovery pathways improve outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy? Cohort control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:83–89CrossRefPubMed Yoong W, Sivashanmugarajan V, Relph S, Bell A, Fajemirokun E, Davies T et al (2014) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Team for Gynaecology and Anaesthesia. Can enhanced recovery pathways improve outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy? Cohort control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:83–89CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Kilpiö O, Härkki PSM, Mentula MJ, Väänänen A, Pakarinen PI (2020) Recovery after enhanced versus conventional care laparoscopic hysterectomy performed in the afternoon: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 151:392–398CrossRefPubMed Kilpiö O, Härkki PSM, Mentula MJ, Väänänen A, Pakarinen PI (2020) Recovery after enhanced versus conventional care laparoscopic hysterectomy performed in the afternoon: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 151:392–398CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Inania M, Sharma P, Parikh M (2022) Role of enhanced recovery after surgery in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Access Surg 18:186–190CrossRefPubMed Inania M, Sharma P, Parikh M (2022) Role of enhanced recovery after surgery in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Access Surg 18:186–190CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Intra- and post-operative outcomes of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program in laparoscopic hysterectomy
Authors
Caglar Erkan
Hasan Ali Inal
Aysel Uysal
Publication date
08-04-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07469-3