Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Hypnosis in Dentistry | Study protocol

Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with pain education and clinical hypnosis in individuals with chronic low back pain: study protocol for a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial

Authors: Guilherme Luis Santana Luchesi, Anne Kastelianne França da Silva, Otávio Henrique Borges Amaral, Vanessa Cristina Godoi de Paula, Fabrício José Jassi

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) suffer with functional, social, and psychological aspects. There is a growing number of studies with multimodal approaches in the management of these patients, combining physical and behavioral therapies such as osteopathic manipulative treatment, associating pain education and clinical hypnosis. The aim of the present study will be to evaluate the effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) associated with pain neuroscience education (PNE) and clinical hypnosis (CH) on pain and disability in participants with CLBP compared to PNE, CH, and sham therapy.

Methods

A randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted in participants aged 20–60 years with CLBP who will be divided into two groups. Group 1 will receive PNE and CH associated with OMT, and G2 will receive PNE, CH, and sham therapy. In both groups, 4 interventions of a maximum of 50 min and with an interval of 7 days will be performed. As primary outcomes, pain (numerical pain scale), pressure pain threshold (pressure algometer), and disability (Oswestry Disability Questionnaire) will be evaluated and, as a secondary outcome, global impression of improvement (Percent of Improvement Scale), central sensitization (Central Sensitization Questionnaire), biopsychosocial aspects (Start Beck Toll Questionnaire), and behavior of the autonomic nervous system (heart rate variability) will be assessed. Participants will be evaluated in the pre-intervention moments, immediately after the end of the protocol and 4 weeks after the procedures. Randomization will be created through a simple randomized sequence and the evaluator will be blinded to the allocation of intervention groups.

Discussion

The guidelines have been encouraging multimodal, biopsychosocial approaches for patients with CLBP; in this sense, the results of this study can help clinicians and researchers in the implementation of a model of treatment strategy for these patients. In addition, patients may benefit from approaches with minimal risk of deleterious effects and low cost. In addition, it will enable the addition of relevant elements to the literature, with approaches that interact and do not segment the body and brain of patients with CLBP, allowing new studies in this scenario.

Trials registration

Date: September 4, 2021/Number: NCT05042115.
Literature
1.
go back to reference James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 Diseases and Injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789–858.CrossRef James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 Diseases and Injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789–858.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lall MP, Restrepo E. The biopsychosocial model of low back pain and patient-centered outcomes following lumbar fusion. Orthop Nurs. 2017;36:(3)213–21.CrossRef Lall MP, Restrepo E. The biopsychosocial model of low back pain and patient-centered outcomes following lumbar fusion. Orthop Nurs. 2017;36:(3)213–21.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Garcia JBS, Hernandez-Castro JJ, Nunez RG, Pazos MAR, Aguirre JO, Jreige A, et al. Prevalence of low back pain in Latin America. Pain Physician. 2014;17:379–91.CrossRef Garcia JBS, Hernandez-Castro JJ, Nunez RG, Pazos MAR, Aguirre JO, Jreige A, et al. Prevalence of low back pain in Latin America. Pain Physician. 2014;17:379–91.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Carregaro RL, Tottoli CR, da Silva RD, Bosmans JE, da Silva EN, van Tulder M. Low back pain should be considered a health and research priority in Brazil: lost productivity and healthcare costs between 2012 to 2016. PLoS One. 2020;15:1–15.CrossRef Carregaro RL, Tottoli CR, da Silva RD, Bosmans JE, da Silva EN, van Tulder M. Low back pain should be considered a health and research priority in Brazil: lost productivity and healthcare costs between 2012 to 2016. PLoS One. 2020;15:1–15.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Knezevic NN, Candido KD, Vlaeyen JWS, Van Zundert J, Cohen SP. Low back pain. Lancet. 2021;398:78–92 Elsevier Ltd.CrossRef Knezevic NN, Candido KD, Vlaeyen JWS, Van Zundert J, Cohen SP. Low back pain. Lancet. 2021;398:78–92 Elsevier Ltd.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference George SZ, Fritz JM, Silfies SP, Schneider MJ, Beneciuk JM, Lentz TA, et al. Interventions for the management of acute and chronic low back pain: revision 2021. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2021;51:CPG1–60.CrossRef George SZ, Fritz JM, Silfies SP, Schneider MJ, Beneciuk JM, Lentz TA, et al. Interventions for the management of acute and chronic low back pain: revision 2021. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2021;51:CPG1–60.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dal Farra F, Risio RG, Vismara L, Bergna A. Effectiveness of osteopathic interventions in chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2021;56:102616 Elsevier Ltd.CrossRef Dal Farra F, Risio RG, Vismara L, Bergna A. Effectiveness of osteopathic interventions in chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2021;56:102616 Elsevier Ltd.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Louw A, Zimney K, Puentedura EJ, Diener I. The efficacy of pain neuroscience education on musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review of the literature. Physiother Theory Pract. 2016;32:332–55 Taylor & Francis.CrossRef Louw A, Zimney K, Puentedura EJ, Diener I. The efficacy of pain neuroscience education on musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review of the literature. Physiother Theory Pract. 2016;32:332–55 Taylor & Francis.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Moseley GL, Butler DS. Fifteen years of explaining pain: the past, present, and future. J Pain. 2015;16:807–13 Elsevier Inc.CrossRef Moseley GL, Butler DS. Fifteen years of explaining pain: the past, present, and future. J Pain. 2015;16:807–13 Elsevier Inc.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Thompson T, Terhune DB, Oram C, Sharangparni J, Rouf R, Solmi M, et al. The effectiveness of hypnosis for pain relief: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 controlled experimental trials. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;99:298–310 Elsevier.CrossRef Thompson T, Terhune DB, Oram C, Sharangparni J, Rouf R, Solmi M, et al. The effectiveness of hypnosis for pain relief: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 controlled experimental trials. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;99:298–310 Elsevier.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:1–42.CrossRef Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:1–42.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Howick J, Webster RK, Rees JL, Turner R, Macdonald H, Price A, et al. TIDieR-Placebo: a guide and checklist for reporting placebo and sham controls. PLoS Med. 2020;17:1–15.CrossRef Howick J, Webster RK, Rees JL, Turner R, Macdonald H, Price A, et al. TIDieR-Placebo: a guide and checklist for reporting placebo and sham controls. PLoS Med. 2020;17:1–15.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Butler D. Explain Pain. Adelaide: Noi Group; 2003. Butler D. Explain Pain. Adelaide: Noi Group; 2003.
16.
go back to reference Williams RM, Ehde DM, Day M, Turner AP, Hakimian S, Gertz K, et al. The chronic pain skills study: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing hypnosis, mindfulness meditation and pain education in Veterans. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020;90:105935 Elsevier.CrossRef Williams RM, Ehde DM, Day M, Turner AP, Hakimian S, Gertz K, et al. The chronic pain skills study: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing hypnosis, mindfulness meditation and pain education in Veterans. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020;90:105935 Elsevier.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference DeStefano LA. Greenman’s principles of manual medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia; 2017. DeStefano LA. Greenman’s principles of manual medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia; 2017.
18.
go back to reference Snow RJ, Seffinger MA, Hensel KL, Wiseman R. American Osteopathic Association guidelines for osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for patients with low back pain. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016;116:536–49. Snow RJ, Seffinger MA, Hensel KL, Wiseman R. American Osteopathic Association guidelines for osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for patients with low back pain. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016;116:536–49.
19.
go back to reference (ECOP) EC on OP. In: Giusti R, editor. Glossary of Osteopapathic Terminology. Third Edit. Philadelphia: Bethesda; 2017. (ECOP) EC on OP. In: Giusti R, editor. Glossary of Osteopapathic Terminology. Third Edit. Philadelphia: Bethesda; 2017.
20.
go back to reference Cerritelli F, Verzella M, Cicchitti L, D’Alessandro G, Vanacore N. The paradox of sham therapy and placebo effect in osteopathy: a systematic review. Med (United States). 2016;95. Cerritelli F, Verzella M, Cicchitti L, D’Alessandro G, Vanacore N. The paradox of sham therapy and placebo effect in osteopathy: a systematic review. Med (United States). 2016;95.
21.
go back to reference Fernandes WVB, Blanco CR, Politti F, Lanza FDC, Lucareli PRG, Corrêa JCF. The effect of a six-week osteopathic visceral manipulation in patients with non- specific chronic low back pain and functional constipation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19:1–8.CrossRef Fernandes WVB, Blanco CR, Politti F, Lanza FDC, Lucareli PRG, Corrêa JCF. The effect of a six-week osteopathic visceral manipulation in patients with non- specific chronic low back pain and functional constipation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19:1–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Meissner K. The placebo effect and the autonomic nervous system: evidence for an intimate relationship. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2011;366:1808–17.CrossRef Meissner K. The placebo effect and the autonomic nervous system: evidence for an intimate relationship. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2011;366:1808–17.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Costa LOP, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Pozzi GC, et al. Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: Which one is the best? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:2459–63.CrossRef Costa LOP, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Pozzi GC, et al. Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: Which one is the best? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:2459–63.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Den Bandt HL, Paulis WD, Beckweé D, Ickmans K, Nijs J, Voogt L. Pain mechanisms in low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis of mechanical quantitative sensory testing outcomes in people with nonspecific low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019;49:698–715.CrossRef Den Bandt HL, Paulis WD, Beckweé D, Ickmans K, Nijs J, Voogt L. Pain mechanisms in low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis of mechanical quantitative sensory testing outcomes in people with nonspecific low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019;49:698–715.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Vigatto R, Alexandre NMC, Filho HRC. Development of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:481–6.CrossRef Vigatto R, Alexandre NMC, Filho HRC. Development of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:481–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3115–24.CrossRef Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3115–24.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kamper SJ, Ostelo RWJG, Knol DL, Maher CG, de Vet HCW, Hancock MJ. Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:760–766.e1 Elsevier Inc.CrossRef Kamper SJ, Ostelo RWJG, Knol DL, Maher CG, de Vet HCW, Hancock MJ. Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:760–766.e1 Elsevier Inc.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Caumo W, Antunes LC, Elkfury JL, Herbstrith EG, Sipmann RB, Souza A, et al. The central sensitization inventory validated and adapted for a Brazilian population: psychometric properties and its relationship with brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Pain Res. 2017;10:2109–22.CrossRef Caumo W, Antunes LC, Elkfury JL, Herbstrith EG, Sipmann RB, Souza A, et al. The central sensitization inventory validated and adapted for a Brazilian population: psychometric properties and its relationship with brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Pain Res. 2017;10:2109–22.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Pilz B, Vasconcelos RA, Marcondes FB, Lodovichi SS, Mello W, Grossi DB. The Brazilian version of start back screening tool - translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability. Brazilian J Phys Ther. 2014;18:453–61.CrossRef Pilz B, Vasconcelos RA, Marcondes FB, Lodovichi SS, Mello W, Grossi DB. The Brazilian version of start back screening tool - translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability. Brazilian J Phys Ther. 2014;18:453–61.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Vanderlei LCM, Pastre CM, Hoshi RA, Carvalho TD d, Godoy MF d. Basic notions of heart rate variability and its clinical applicability. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2009;24:205–17.CrossRef Vanderlei LCM, Pastre CM, Hoshi RA, Carvalho TD d, Godoy MF d. Basic notions of heart rate variability and its clinical applicability. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2009;24:205–17.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Godoy M, Takakura I, Correa P. Relevância da análise do comportamento dinâmico não-linear (Teoria do Caos) como elemento prognóstico de morbidade e mortalidade em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica. Arq ciênc saúde. 2005;12:167–71. Godoy M, Takakura I, Correa P. Relevância da análise do comportamento dinâmico não-linear (Teoria do Caos) como elemento prognóstico de morbidade e mortalidade em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica. Arq ciênc saúde. 2005;12:167–71.
32.
go back to reference Tarvainen MP, Niskanen JP, Lipponen JA, Ranta-aho PO, Karjalainen PA. Kubios HRV - heart rate variability analysis software. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;113:210–20 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.CrossRef Tarvainen MP, Niskanen JP, Lipponen JA, Ranta-aho PO, Karjalainen PA. Kubios HRV - heart rate variability analysis software. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;113:210–20 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Catai AM, Pastre CM, Godoy MF d, Silva E d, Takahashi AC d M, Vanderlei LCM. Heart rate variability: are you using it properly? Standardisation checklist of procedures. Brazilian J Phys Ther. 2020;24:91–102 Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia.CrossRef Catai AM, Pastre CM, Godoy MF d, Silva E d, Takahashi AC d M, Vanderlei LCM. Heart rate variability: are you using it properly? Standardisation checklist of procedures. Brazilian J Phys Ther. 2020;24:91–102 Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–91.CrossRef Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–91.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kolahi J, Bang H, Park J. Towards a proposal for assessment of blinding success in clinical trials: Up-to-date review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009;37:477–84.CrossRef Kolahi J, Bang H, Park J. Towards a proposal for assessment of blinding success in clinical trials: Up-to-date review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009;37:477–84.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference McCoy CE. Understanding the intention-to-treat principle in randomized controlled trials. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18:1075–8.CrossRef McCoy CE. Understanding the intention-to-treat principle in randomized controlled trials. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18:1075–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with pain education and clinical hypnosis in individuals with chronic low back pain: study protocol for a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial
Authors
Guilherme Luis Santana Luchesi
Anne Kastelianne França da Silva
Otávio Henrique Borges Amaral
Vanessa Cristina Godoi de Paula
Fabrício José Jassi
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-07040-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue