Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2009

01-05-2009

Hydroxy-propyl-methyl-cellulose is a safe and effective lifting agent for endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps

Authors: A. Arezzo, N. Pagano, F. Romeo, G. Delconte, C. Hervoso, M. Morino, A. Repici

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is today the treatment of choice for flat and sessile colorectal lesion, the only concern being completeness of resection. One of the major issues is the choice of the infiltrating substance to enable a long-lasting cushion under the lesion. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate safety and efficacy of hydroxy-propyl-methyl-cellulose (HPMC) injection for this purpose.

Patients

All flat and sessile lesions of the colon and rectum larger than 20 mm and considered suitable for EMR were included. In all cases 0.8% HPMC solution was injected through a 23G needle, in quantity according to the endoscopist’s indication. Primary endpoints of the study were: (1) ability to perform en bloc resection of the lesions by using this new injection means, (2) complete resection rate, and (3) early and late complication rate.

Results

We resected 27 flat, sessile, or laterally spreading lesions up to 60 mm (28 mm average). Mean dose of HPMC injected was 10.2 ml (range 8–40 ml). Median procedure time was 32 min (range 15–105 min). En bloc resection was achieved in up to 21 cases (78%). Histologically detected complete tumour removal was achieved in 23 lesions, whereas lateral margins could not be properly evaluated in 4 cases due to coagulation artefacts. No perforation was observed. Procedural spurting bleeding was managed by epinephrine injection in one case and clip application in the remaining. Two case of local recurrence of adenomatous tissue were observed at 3 and 12 months, and treated by EMR. No complication related to the use of HPMC was observed.

Conclusions

Injection of HPMC for EMR resulted safe and effective, allowing en bloc resection in the majority of cases with a limited number of complications. Continued progress in the field will include more outcomes research and techniques simplification.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ishiguro A, Uno Y, Ishiguro Y, Munakata A, Morita T (1999) Correlation of lifting versus non-lifting and microscopic depth of invasion in early colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 50:329–333PubMedCrossRef Ishiguro A, Uno Y, Ishiguro Y, Munakata A, Morita T (1999) Correlation of lifting versus non-lifting and microscopic depth of invasion in early colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 50:329–333PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kim MH, Lee SK, Seo DW, Won SY, Lee SS, Min YI (2001) Tumors of the major duodenal papilla. Gastrointest Endosc 54:609–620PubMedCrossRef Kim MH, Lee SK, Seo DW, Won SY, Lee SS, Min YI (2001) Tumors of the major duodenal papilla. Gastrointest Endosc 54:609–620PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fleischer D (2000) Endoscopic mucosal resection: (not) made in the USA (so commonly). A dissection of the definition, technique, use, and controversies [editorial]. Gastrointest Endosc 52:440–444PubMedCrossRef Fleischer D (2000) Endoscopic mucosal resection: (not) made in the USA (so commonly). A dissection of the definition, technique, use, and controversies [editorial]. Gastrointest Endosc 52:440–444PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Technology status report evaluation, Endoscopic mucosal resection (2000) Gastrointest Endosc 52:831–837 Technology status report evaluation, Endoscopic mucosal resection (2000) Gastrointest Endosc 52:831–837
5.
go back to reference Sakai P, Maluf Filho F, Iryia K, Moura EG, Tomishigue T, Scabbia A et al (1996) An endoscopic technique for resection of small gastrointestinal carcinomas. Gastrointest Endosc 44:65–68CrossRef Sakai P, Maluf Filho F, Iryia K, Moura EG, Tomishigue T, Scabbia A et al (1996) An endoscopic technique for resection of small gastrointestinal carcinomas. Gastrointest Endosc 44:65–68CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fleischer DE, Wang GQ, Dawsey S, Tio TL, Newsome J, Kidwell J et al (1996) Tissue band ligation followed by snare resection (band and snare): a new technique for tissue acquisition in the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 44:68–72PubMedCrossRef Fleischer DE, Wang GQ, Dawsey S, Tio TL, Newsome J, Kidwell J et al (1996) Tissue band ligation followed by snare resection (band and snare): a new technique for tissue acquisition in the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 44:68–72PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Torii A, Sakai M, Kajiyama T, Kishimoto H, Kin G, Inoue K et al (1995) Endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy as curative endoscopic surgery; analysis of 24 cases of early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 42:475–479PubMedCrossRef Torii A, Sakai M, Kajiyama T, Kishimoto H, Kin G, Inoue K et al (1995) Endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy as curative endoscopic surgery; analysis of 24 cases of early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 42:475–479PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yamamoto H, Yube T, Isoda N, Sato Y, Sekine Y, Higashizawa T et al (1999) A novel method of endoscopic mucosal resection using sodium hyaluronate. Gastrointest Endosc 50:251–256PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto H, Yube T, Isoda N, Sato Y, Sekine Y, Higashizawa T et al (1999) A novel method of endoscopic mucosal resection using sodium hyaluronate. Gastrointest Endosc 50:251–256PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yamamoto H (1999) A successful single-step endoscopic resection of a 40 millimeter flat-elevated tumor in the rectum: endoscopic mucosal resection using sodium hyaluronate. Gastrointest Endosc 50:701–704PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto H (1999) A successful single-step endoscopic resection of a 40 millimeter flat-elevated tumor in the rectum: endoscopic mucosal resection using sodium hyaluronate. Gastrointest Endosc 50:701–704PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Feitoza A, Gostout CJ, Burgart LJ, Burkert A, Herman LJ, Rajan E (2003) Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose: a better submucosal fluid cushion for endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 57:41–47PubMedCrossRef Feitoza A, Gostout CJ, Burgart LJ, Burkert A, Herman LJ, Rajan E (2003) Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose: a better submucosal fluid cushion for endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 57:41–47PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
go back to reference Ravalico G, Tognetto D, Baccara F, Lovisato A (1997) Corneal endothelial protection by different viscoelastics during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 23:433–439PubMed Ravalico G, Tognetto D, Baccara F, Lovisato A (1997) Corneal endothelial protection by different viscoelastics during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 23:433–439PubMed
13.
go back to reference Smith SG, Lindstrom RL (1991) 2% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose as a viscous surgical adjunct. A multicenter prospective randomized trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 17:839–842PubMed Smith SG, Lindstrom RL (1991) 2% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose as a viscous surgical adjunct. A multicenter prospective randomized trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 17:839–842PubMed
14.
go back to reference Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon, Rectum (1997) Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma. Kanehara, Tokyo Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon, Rectum (1997) Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma. Kanehara, Tokyo
15.
go back to reference Kudo S, Tamegai Y, Ymano H et al (2001) Endoscopic mucosal resection of the colon: the Japanese technique. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 11:519–535 Kudo S, Tamegai Y, Ymano H et al (2001) Endoscopic mucosal resection of the colon: the Japanese technique. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 11:519–535
16.
go back to reference Yeh RW, Triadafilopoulos G (2005) Submucosal injection: safety cushion at what cost [editorial]? Gastrointest Endosc 62:943–945PubMedCrossRef Yeh RW, Triadafilopoulos G (2005) Submucosal injection: safety cushion at what cost [editorial]? Gastrointest Endosc 62:943–945PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kashimura K, Matsuura T, Nakamura N, Kakushima N, Kodashima S, Ono S, Kobayashi K, Hashimoto T, Yamamichi N, Tateishi A, Shimizu Y, Oka M, Ichinose M, Omata M (2005) Tissue damage of different submucosal injection solutions for EMR. Gastrointest Endosc 62:933–942PubMedCrossRef Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kashimura K, Matsuura T, Nakamura N, Kakushima N, Kodashima S, Ono S, Kobayashi K, Hashimoto T, Yamamichi N, Tateishi A, Shimizu Y, Oka M, Ichinose M, Omata M (2005) Tissue damage of different submucosal injection solutions for EMR. Gastrointest Endosc 62:933–942PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Uraoka T, Fujii T, Saito Y, Sumiyoshi T, Emura F, Bhandari P, Matsuda T, Fu KI, Saito D (2005) Effectiveness of glycerol as a submucosal injection for EMR. Gastrointest Endosc 61:736–740PubMedCrossRef Uraoka T, Fujii T, Saito Y, Sumiyoshi T, Emura F, Bhandari P, Matsuda T, Fu KI, Saito D (2005) Effectiveness of glycerol as a submucosal injection for EMR. Gastrointest Endosc 61:736–740PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kashimura K et al (2004) Comparison of various submucosal injection solutions for maintaining mucosal elevation during endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 36:579–583PubMedCrossRef Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kashimura K et al (2004) Comparison of various submucosal injection solutions for maintaining mucosal elevation during endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 36:579–583PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Matsui Y, Inomata M, Izumi K et al (2004) Hyaluronic acid stimulates tumor-cell proliferation at wound sites. Gastrointest Endosc 60:539–543PubMedCrossRef Matsui Y, Inomata M, Izumi K et al (2004) Hyaluronic acid stimulates tumor-cell proliferation at wound sites. Gastrointest Endosc 60:539–543PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Storr-Paulsen A, Larsen M (1991) Long-term results of extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber lens implantation: sodium hyaluronate 1% vs hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 2%. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 69:766–769CrossRef Storr-Paulsen A, Larsen M (1991) Long-term results of extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber lens implantation: sodium hyaluronate 1% vs hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 2%. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 69:766–769CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Liesegang TJ, Bourne WM, Ilstrup DM (1986) The use of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose in extracapsular cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol 102:723–726PubMed Liesegang TJ, Bourne WM, Ilstrup DM (1986) The use of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose in extracapsular cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol 102:723–726PubMed
23.
go back to reference Alio JL, Mulet ME, Shalaby AM, Attia WH (2002) Phacoemulsification in the anterior chamber. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:67–75PubMedCrossRef Alio JL, Mulet ME, Shalaby AM, Attia WH (2002) Phacoemulsification in the anterior chamber. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:67–75PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Heng PW, Chan LW, Easterbrook MG, Li X (2001) Investigation of the influence of mean particle size and number of polymer particles on the release of aspirin from swellable hydrophilic matrix tablets. J Control Release 76:39–49PubMedCrossRef Heng PW, Chan LW, Easterbrook MG, Li X (2001) Investigation of the influence of mean particle size and number of polymer particles on the release of aspirin from swellable hydrophilic matrix tablets. J Control Release 76:39–49PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Katzhendler I, Mader K, Friedman M (2000) Structure and hydration properties of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose matrices containing naproxen and naproxen sodium. Int J Pharm 200:161–179PubMedCrossRef Katzhendler I, Mader K, Friedman M (2000) Structure and hydration properties of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose matrices containing naproxen and naproxen sodium. Int J Pharm 200:161–179PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Siepmann J, Kranz H, Peppas NA, Bodmeier R (2000) Calculation of the required size and shape of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose matrices to achieve desired drug release profiles. Int J Pharm 201:151–164PubMedCrossRef Siepmann J, Kranz H, Peppas NA, Bodmeier R (2000) Calculation of the required size and shape of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose matrices to achieve desired drug release profiles. Int J Pharm 201:151–164PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Toda I, Shinozaki N, Tsubota K (1996) Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose for the treatment of severe dry eye associated with Sjogren’s syndrome. Cornea 15:120–128PubMedCrossRef Toda I, Shinozaki N, Tsubota K (1996) Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose for the treatment of severe dry eye associated with Sjogren’s syndrome. Cornea 15:120–128PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Osborn E, Baum JL, Ernst C, Koch P (1976) The stability of ten antibiotics in artificial tear solutions. Am J Ophthalmol 82:775–780PubMed Osborn E, Baum JL, Ernst C, Koch P (1976) The stability of ten antibiotics in artificial tear solutions. Am J Ophthalmol 82:775–780PubMed
29.
go back to reference Obara S (1992) Primary dermal and eye irritability tests of hydrophobically modified hydroxypropyl methylcellulose in rabbits. J Toxicol Sci 17:21–29PubMed Obara S (1992) Primary dermal and eye irritability tests of hydrophobically modified hydroxypropyl methylcellulose in rabbits. J Toxicol Sci 17:21–29PubMed
30.
go back to reference Obara S (1992) Studies on single-dose toxicity of hydrophobically modified hydroxypropyl methylcellulose in rats. J Toxicol Sci 17:13–19PubMed Obara S (1992) Studies on single-dose toxicity of hydrophobically modified hydroxypropyl methylcellulose in rats. J Toxicol Sci 17:13–19PubMed
31.
go back to reference Arantes V, Albuquerque W, Lima D, Vilela S, Lima G Jr, Duarte D, Benfica E, Filho FM, Artifon E, Sakai P (2006) Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with a new solution: 0.4% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). Gastrointest Endosc 63:AB247 Arantes V, Albuquerque W, Lima D, Vilela S, Lima G Jr, Duarte D, Benfica E, Filho FM, Artifon E, Sakai P (2006) Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with a new solution: 0.4% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). Gastrointest Endosc 63:AB247
32.
go back to reference Bacani CJ, Woodward TA, Raimondo M, Al-Haddad MA, Noh KW, Pungpapong S, Wallace MB (2007) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection with hydroxy-propyl-methyl-cellulose compared to normal saline. Gastrointest Endosc 65:AB284CrossRef Bacani CJ, Woodward TA, Raimondo M, Al-Haddad MA, Noh KW, Pungpapong S, Wallace MB (2007) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection with hydroxy-propyl-methyl-cellulose compared to normal saline. Gastrointest Endosc 65:AB284CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Conio M, Repici A, Demarquay JF, Blanchi S, Dumas R, Filiberti R (2004) EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 60:234–241PubMedCrossRef Conio M, Repici A, Demarquay JF, Blanchi S, Dumas R, Filiberti R (2004) EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 60:234–241PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Doniec JM, Lohnert MS, Schniewind B, Bokelmann F, Kremer B, Grimm H (2003) Endoscopic removal of large colorectal polyps: prevention of unnecessary surgery? Dis Colon Rectum 46:340–348PubMedCrossRef Doniec JM, Lohnert MS, Schniewind B, Bokelmann F, Kremer B, Grimm H (2003) Endoscopic removal of large colorectal polyps: prevention of unnecessary surgery? Dis Colon Rectum 46:340–348PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Jin Hyun J, Rae Chun H, Jai Chun H, Tae Jeen Y, Won Baeck C, Kyun Yu S, Sik Kim Y, Sik Lee H, Ho Um S, Woo Lee S, Hyun Choi J, Duck Kim C, Sang Ryu H, Hai Hyun J (2006) Comparison of the characteristics of submucosal injection solutions used in endoscopic mucosal resection. Scand J Gastroenterol 41:488–492PubMedCrossRef Jin Hyun J, Rae Chun H, Jai Chun H, Tae Jeen Y, Won Baeck C, Kyun Yu S, Sik Kim Y, Sik Lee H, Ho Um S, Woo Lee S, Hyun Choi J, Duck Kim C, Sang Ryu H, Hai Hyun J (2006) Comparison of the characteristics of submucosal injection solutions used in endoscopic mucosal resection. Scand J Gastroenterol 41:488–492PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Hydroxy-propyl-methyl-cellulose is a safe and effective lifting agent for endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps
Authors
A. Arezzo
N. Pagano
F. Romeo
G. Delconte
C. Hervoso
M. Morino
A. Repici
Publication date
01-05-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0133-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2009 Go to the issue