Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research

Hybrid FES-robot cooperative control of ambulatory gait rehabilitation exoskeleton

Authors: Antonio J del-Ama, Ángel Gil-Agudo, José L Pons, Juan C Moreno

Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Abstract

Robotic and functional electrical stimulation (FES) approaches are used for rehabilitation of walking impairment of spinal cord injured individuals. Although devices are commercially available, there are still issues that remain to be solved. Control of hybrid exoskeletons aims at blending robotic exoskeletons and electrical stimulation to overcome the drawbacks of each approach while preserving their advantages. Hybrid actuation and control have a considerable potential for walking rehabilitation but there is a need of novel control strategies of hybrid systems that adequately manage the balance between FES and robotic controllers. Combination of FES and robotic control is a challenging issue, due to the non-linear behavior of muscle under stimulation and the lack of developments in the field of hybrid control. In this article, a cooperative control strategy of a hybrid exoskeleton is presented. This strategy is designed to overcome the main disadvantages of muscular stimulation: electromechanical delay and change in muscle performance over time, and to balance muscular and robotic actuation during walking.
Experimental results in healthy subjects show the ability of the hybrid FES-robot cooperative control to balance power contribution between exoskeleton and muscle stimulation. The robotic exoskeleton decreases assistance while adequate knee kinematics are guaranteed. A new technique to monitor muscle performance is employed, which allows to estimate muscle fatigue and implement muscle fatigue management strategies. Kinesis is therefore the first ambulatory hybrid exoskeleton that can effectively balance robotic and FES actuation during walking. This represents a new opportunity to implement new rehabilitation interventions to induce locomotor activity in patients with paraplegia.
Acronym list: 10mWT: ten meters walking test; 6MWT: six minutes walking test; FSM: finite-state machine; t-FSM: time-domain FSM; c-FSM: cycle-domain FSM; FES: functional electrical stimulation; HKAFO: hip-knee-ankle-foot orthosis; ILC: iterative error-based learning control; MFE: muscle fatigue estimator; NILC: Normalized stimulation output from ILC controller; PID: Proportional-Integral-derivative Control; PW: Stimulation pulse width; QUEST: Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology; SCI: Spinal cord injury; TTI: torque-time integral; VAS: Visual Analog Scale.
Literature
1.
Merrit JL, Yoshida MK: Knee-ankle-foot orthoses: indications and practical applications of long leg braces. Phys Med Rehabil. 2000, 14: 395-422.
2.
Fatone S: A review of the literature pertaining to KAFOs and HKAFOs for ambulation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2006, 18 (3): 137-168.CrossRef
3.
Esquenazi A, Talaty M, Packel A, Saulino M: The ReWalk powered exoskeleton to restore ambulatory function to individuals with thoracic-level motor-complete spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012, 91 (11): 911-921. 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318269d9a3.CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
Popovic MR, Keller T, Papas IPI, Dietz V, Morari M: Surface-stimulation technology for grasping and walking neuroprostheses. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2001, 20: 82-93.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Thrasher TA, Popovic MR: Functional electrical stimulation of walking: function, exercise and rehabilitation. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2008, 51 (6): 452-460. 10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.05.006.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Nightingale EJ, Raymond J, Middleton JW, Crosbie J, Davis GM: Benefits of fes gait in a spinal cord injured population. Spinal Cord. 2007, 45 (10): 646-657. 10.1038/sj.sc.3102101.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Gorgey AS, Black CD, Elder CP, Dudley Ga: Effects of electrical stimulation parameters on fatigue in skeletal muscle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009, 39 (9): 684-692. 10.2519/jospt.2009.3045.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Binder-Macleod SA, Snyder-Mackler L: Muscle fatigue: clinical implications for fatigue assessment and neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Phys Therapy. 1993, 73 (12): 902-910.
10.
Franken HM, Member S, Veltink PH, Fidder M, Boom HBK, Subjects A: Fatigue of intermittently stimulated paralyzed human quadriceps during imposed cyclical lower leg movements. Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 1992, 3: 1341-1342.CrossRef
11.
Riess J, Abbas JJ: Adaptative control of cyclic movements as muscles fatigue using functional electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2001, 9 (3): 326-330. 10.1109/7333.948462.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Vette AH, Masani K, Kim JY, Popovic MR: Closed-loop control of functional electrical stimulation-assisted arm-free standing in individuals with spinal cord injury: a feasibility study. Neuromodulation: J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2009, 12: 22-32. 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2009.00184.x.CrossRef
13.
Ferguson KA, Polando G, Kobetic R, Triolo RJ, Marsolais EB: Walking with a hybrid orthosis system. Spinal Cord. 1999, 37 (11): 800-804. 10.1038/sj.sc.3100922.CrossRefPubMed
14.
del-Ama AJ, Koutsou AD, Moreno JC, De-los Reyes, Gil-Agudo Á, Pons JL: Review of hybrid exoskeletons to restore gait following spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012, 49 (4): 497-514. 10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0043.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Popovic D, Tomovic R, Schwirtlich L: Hybrid assistive system-the motor neuroprosthesis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1989, 36 (7): 729-737. 10.1109/10.32105.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Kobetic R, To CSC, Schnellenberger JJR, Audu MLM, Bulea TCT, Gaudio R, Pinault G, Tashman S, Triolo RRJ: Development of hybrid orthosis for standing, walking, and stair climbing after spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009, 46 (3): 447-462. 10.1682/JRRD.2008.07.0087.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Obinata G, Ogisu T, Hase K, Kim Y, Genda E: State estimation of walking phase and functional electrical stimulation by wearable device. Proc. Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society EMBC 2009. 2009, Minessota (USA), 5901-5904.CrossRef
18.
Farris RJ, Quintero HA, Withrow TJ, Goldfarb M: Design of a joint-coupled orthosis for FES-aided gait. 2009 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR 2009. 2009, Kyoto (Japan), 246-252.CrossRef
19.
Gharooni S, Heller B, Tokhi MO: A new hybrid spring brake orthosis for controlling hip and knee flexion in the swing phase. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2001, 9: 106-107. 10.1109/7333.918283.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Stauffer Y, Allemand Y, Bouri M, Fournier J, Clavel R, Metrailler P, Brodard R, Reynard F: The WalkTrainer–a new generation of walking reeducation device combining orthoses and muscle stimulation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2009, 17: 38-45.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Goldfarb M, Durfee WK: Design of a controlled-brake orthosis for FES-aided gait. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1996, 4: 13-24. 10.1109/86.486053.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Ohashi T, Obinata G, Shimada Y, Ebata K: Control of hybrid FES system for restoration of paraplegic locomotion. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, 1993. 1993, IEEE, 96-101.CrossRef
23.
Vallery H, Buss M: Towards a hybrid motor neural prosthesis for gait rehabilitation: a project description. J Automatic Control. 2005, 15: 19-22.
24.
del-Ama AJ, Moreno JC, Gil-Agudo Á, De-los Reyes, Pons JL: Online assessment of human-robot interaction for hybrid control of walking. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2012, 12: 215-225.CrossRef
25.
Hayes K, Hsieh J, Wolfe D, Potter P, Delaney G: Classifying incomplete spinal cord injury syndromes: algorithms based on the international standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000, 81 (5): 644-652. 10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90049-2.CrossRefPubMed
26.
del-Ama AJ, Moreno JC, Gil-Agudo Á, Palazón R: A design to compensate gait. 12th International Conference on New Actuators and 6th International Exhibition on Smart Actuators and Drive Systems, Actuator 2010. 2010, Bremen (Germany), 131-131.
27.
Riener R, Lunenburger L, Jezernik S, Anderschitz M, Colombo G, Dietz V, Lünenburger L: Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005, 13 (3): 380-394. 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.848628.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Moreno JC, Brunetti F, Rocon E, Pons J: Immediate effects of a controllable knee ankle foot orthosis for functional compensation of gait in patients with proximal leg weakness. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008, 46 (1): 43-53. 10.1007/s11517-007-0267-x.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Downey RJ, Bellman M, Sharma N, Wang Q, Gregory CM, Dixon WE: A novel modulation strategy to increase stimulation duration in neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Muscle Nerve. 2011, 44 (3): 382-387.PubMed
30.
Murdock G, Hubley-Kozey C: Effect of a high intensity quadriceps fatigue protocol on knee joint mechanics and muscle activation during gait in young adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011, 112 (2): 439-449.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Malesević NM, Popović LZ, Schwirtlich L, Popović DB: Distributed low-frequency functional electrical stimulation delays muscle fatigue compared to conventional stimulation. Muscle Nerve. 2010, 42 (4): 556-562. 10.1002/mus.21736.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Tepavac D, Schwirtlich L: Detection and prediction of FES-induced fatigue. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1997, 7: 39-50. 10.1016/S1050-6411(96)00008-9.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Chesler NC, Durfee WK: Surface EMG as fatigue indicator during FES-induced isometric muscle contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1997, 7: 27-37. 10.1016/S1050-6411(96)00016-8.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Estigoni EH, Fornusek C, Smith RM, Davis GM: Evoked EMG and muscle fatigue during isokinetic FES-cycling in individuals with SCI. Neuromodulation. 2011, 14 (4): 349-355. 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00354.x.CrossRefPubMed
35.
del-Ama AJ, Bravo-Esteban E, Moreno JC, Gómez-Soriano J, Koutsou AD, Gil-Agudo Á Pons: Knee muscle fatigue estimation during isometric artificially elicited contractions in incomplete spinal cord injured subjects. 2012 International Conference on Neurorehabilitation (ICNR2012): Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation. Edited by: Pons JL, Torricelli D, Pajaro M. 2012, Toledo (Spain): Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 329-333.
36.
del-Ama AJ, Koutsou AD, Bravo-Esteban E, Gómez-Soriano J, Gil-Agudo Á, Pons JL, Moreno JC: A comparison of customized strategies to manage muscle fatigue in isometric artificially elicited muscle contractions for incomplete SCI subjects. J Autom Control. 2013, 21 (1): 19-25. 10.2298/JAC1301019A.CrossRef
37.
Kantrowitz A: A Report of the Maimonides Hospital. 1960, New York, Brooklyn
38.
Kralj A, Bajd T, Turk R, Krajnik J, Benko H: Others: Gait restoration in paraplegic patients: a feasibility demonstration using multichannel surface electrode FES. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1983, 20: 3-20.
39.
Graupe D, Cerrel-Bazo H, Kern H, Carraro U: Walking performance, medical outcomes and patient training in FES of innervated muscles for ambulation by thoracic-level complete paraplegics. Neurol Res. 2008, 30 (2): 123-130. 10.1179/174313208X281136.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Marsolais EB, Kobetic R: Functional electrical stimulation for walking in paraplegia. J Bone Joint Surg. 1987, 69 (5): 728-733.PubMed
41.
Popovic DB, Popovic MB, Dosen S: Neural prostheses for walking restoration. J Automatic Control. 2008, 18 (2): 63-71. 10.2298/JAC0802063P.CrossRef
42.
Riener R: Model-based development of neuroprosthesis for paraplegic patients. Philos Trans R Soc Lond. 1999, 354 (1385): 877-894. 10.1098/rstb.1999.0440.CrossRef
43.
Andrews B, Baxendale R, Barnett R, Phillips G, Yamazaki T, Paul J, Freeman P: Hybrid FES orthosis incorporating closed loop control and sensory feedback. J Biomed Eng. 1988, 10 (2): 189-195. 10.1016/0141-5425(88)90099-4.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Popovic D, Radulovic M, Schwirtlich L, Jaukovic N: Automatic vs hand-controlled walking of paraplegics. Med Eng Phys. 2003, 25 (1): 63-73. 10.1016/S1350-4533(02)00188-1.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Franken HM, Veltink PH, Baardman G, Redmeyer Ra, Boom HB: Cycle-to-cycle control of swing phase of paraplegic gait induced by surface electrical stimulation. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1995, 33 (3 Spec No): 440-451.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Jezernik S, Wassink RGV, Keller T: Sliding mode closed-loop control of, FES: controlling the shank movement. IEEE Trans Bio-med Engs. 2004, 51 (2): 263-272. 10.1109/TBME.2003.820393.CrossRef
47.
Ajoudani A, Erfanian A: A neuro-sliding-mode control with adaptive modeling of uncertainty for control of movement in paralyzed limbs using functional electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009, 56 (7): 1771-1780.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Gollee H, Murray-Smith DJ, Jarvis JC: A nonlinear approach to modeling of electrically stimulated skeletal muscle. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2001, 48 (4): 406-415. 10.1109/10.915705.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Jonić S, Janković T, Gajić V, Popović D: Three machine learning techniques for automatic determination of rules to control locomotion. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999, 46 (3): 300-310. 10.1109/10.748983.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Kobravi H, Erfanian A: Decentralized adaptive robust control based on sliding mode and nonlinear compensator for the control of ankle movement using functional electrical stimulation of. J Neural Eng. 2009, 6 (4): 046007-10.1088/1741-2560/6/4/046007.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Freeman C, Hughes A, Burridge J, Chappell P, Lewin P, Rogers E: Iterative learning control of FES applied to the upper extremity for rehabilitation. Control Eng Prac. 2009, 17 (3): 368-381. 10.1016/j.conengprac.2008.08.003.CrossRef
52.
Nguyen R, González AM, Micera S, Morari M: Increasing muscular participation in robot-assisted gait training using FES. 16th Annual international FES Society Conference, IFESS2011. 2011, Sao Paulo (Brasil),
53.
Kurosawa K, Futami R, Watanabe T, Hoshimiya N: Joint angle control by FES using a feedback error learning controller. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005, 13 (3): 359-371. 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.847355.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Ibrahim B, Huq M, Tokhi M: Identification of active properties of knee joint using GA optimization. World Acad Sci Eng Technol. 2009, 55: 441-446.
55.
Lynch CL, Popovic MR: A stochastic model of knee angle in response to electrical stimulation of the quadriceps and hamstrings muscles. Artif Organs. 2011, 35 (12): 1169-1174. 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01228.x.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Bristow D, Tharayil M, Alleyne A: A survey of iterative learning control. IEEE Control Syst. 2006, 26 (3): 96-114.CrossRef
57.
Jackson AB, Carnel CT, Ditunno JF, Read MS, Boninger ML, Schmeler MR, Williams SR, Donovan WH, Apt OTRL, Others: Outcome measures for gait and ambulation in the spinal cord injury population. J Spinal Cord. 2008, 31 (5): 487-499.
58.
Demers L, Monette M, Lapierre Y, Arnold DL, Wolfson C: Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2002, 15 (24): 21-30.CrossRef
59.
Botter A, Oprandi G, Lanfranco F, Allasia S, Maffiuletti Na, Minetto MA: Atlas of the muscle motor points for the lower limb: implications for electrical stimulation procedures and electrode positioning. Euro J Appl Physiol. 2011, 111 (10): 2461-2471. 10.1007/s00421-011-2093-y.CrossRef
60.
Ziegler JG, Nichols N: Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Trans ASME. 1942, 64 (11): 759-765.
61.
Fuhr T, Quintern J, Riener R, Schmidt G: Walking with WALK! A cooperative, patient-driven neuroprosthetic system. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2008, 27: 38-48.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Nguyen R, Micera S, Morari M: Iterative learning control for FES of the ankle. 16th Annual international FES Society Conference, IFESS2011, Vienna (Austria). 2011,
63.
Bulea TC, Kobetic R, Triolo RJ: Restoration of stance phase knee flexion during walking after spinal cord injury using a variable impedance orthosis. 33th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2011, 608-611.
64.
Piazza S, Torricelli D, Brunetti F, Pons JL: A novel FES control paradigm based on muscle synergies for postural rehabilitation therapy with hybrid exoskeletons. 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). 2012, 1868-1871.CrossRef
65.
Harvey LA, Smith MB, Davis GM, Engel S: Functional outcomes attained by T9-12 paraplegic patients with the walkabout and the isocentric reciprocal gait orthoses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997, 78 (7): 706-711. 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90077-0.CrossRefPubMed
66.
Whittle M, Cochrane G, Chase A: A comparative trial of two walking systems for paralysed people. Spinal Cord. 1991, 29 (2): 97-102. 10.1038/sc.1991.13.CrossRef
67.
Sykes L, Ross E: Objective measurement of use of the reciprocating gait orthosis (RGO) and the electrically augmented RGO in adult patients with spinal cord lesions. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1996, 20 (2): 182-190.PubMed
68.
Olmos L, Freixes O, Gatti M, Cozzo D, Fernandez S, Vila C, Agrati P, Rubel I: Comparison of gait performance on different environmental settings for patients with chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008, 46 (5): 331-334. 10.1038/sj.sc.3102132.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Hybrid FES-robot cooperative control of ambulatory gait rehabilitation exoskeleton
Authors
Antonio J del-Ama
Ángel Gil-Agudo
José L Pons
Juan C Moreno
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1743-0003
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-27

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2014 Go to the issue

Research

Foot force direction control during a pedaling task in individuals post-stroke

Research

Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis

Research

Movement-generated afference paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation: an associative stimulation paradigm

Research

New generation of wearable goniometers for motion capture systems

Research

Contributions of lower extremity kinematics to trunk accelerations during moderate treadmill running

Review

Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review