Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2021

01-02-2021 | Human Papillomavirus | Original Article

Association Between Positive Human Papillomavirus Status After Conization and Disease Recurrence in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3

Authors: Masaki Kamio, Shintaro Yanazume, Shinichi Togami, Hiroaki Kobayashi

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to examine the associations of cone margin and human papillomavirus (HPV) status after conization with cytological abnormalities and disease recurrence in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3).

Methods

This is a retrospective study of 366 women with CIN3 who underwent conization at Kagoshima University Hospital between 2004 and 2017. Conization was performed using an ultrasonic scalpel. The polymerase chain reaction for detecting HPV genotypes was performed using fresh cervical cell samples. We examined the associations of margin status and HPV status after conization with cytological abnormalities and recurrence.

Results

Among 224 women with CIN3, 193 (86.2%) underwent HPV genotype testing before conization. The HPV-positive rate was 84.9%. The most common HPV genotypes before conization were HPV 16, 31, 58, 52, 18, 35, and 33. In 191 patients, the uterus was preserved after conization. Sixteen patients had pathologically positive margins, 165 had negative margins, and 10 had unclear margins. There was no significant difference in abnormal cytology and recurrence rate after conization between the three groups. Five patients with positive margins and abnormal cytology during follow-ups were HPV16- or HPV58-positive in the preoperative HPV testing. Of the 191 women, 91 (47.6%) underwent pre- and postoperative HPV genotype testing, among whom 14 (15.4%) were HPV-positive after conization. No significant difference in abnormal cytology based on HPV status after conization was found. The recurrence rate tended to be higher in HPV-positive patients than in HPV-negative patients after conization (21.4% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.05). Three patients with HPV positivity after conization and recurrence during follow-up were HPV16- or HPV58-positive.

Conclusions

HPV positivity after conization for CIN3 was associated with a high recurrence rate, especially in HPV16- and HPV58-positive patients. HPV58 has not received much attention thus far, but abnormalities in cytology and recurrence may be as likely as those associated with HPV16. Thus, a careful follow-up in such patients is recommended.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bzhalava D, Eklund C, Dillner J. International standardization and classification of human papillomavirus types. Virology. 2015;476:341–4.CrossRef Bzhalava D, Eklund C, Dillner J. International standardization and classification of human papillomavirus types. Virology. 2015;476:341–4.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wu Q, Zhao X, Fu Y, et al. A cross-sectional study on HPV testing with type 16/18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening in 11,064 Chinese women. Cancer Med. 2017;6(5):1091–101.CrossRef Wu Q, Zhao X, Fu Y, et al. A cross-sectional study on HPV testing with type 16/18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening in 11,064 Chinese women. Cancer Med. 2017;6(5):1091–101.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nagai Y, Maehama T, Asato T, et al. Persistence of human papillomavirus infection after therapeutic conization for CIN 3: is it an alarm for disease recurrence? Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79(2):294–9.CrossRef Nagai Y, Maehama T, Asato T, et al. Persistence of human papillomavirus infection after therapeutic conization for CIN 3: is it an alarm for disease recurrence? Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79(2):294–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference McCredie MR, Sharples KJ, Paul C, et al. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(5):425–34.CrossRef McCredie MR, Sharples KJ, Paul C, et al. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(5):425–34.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Froberg M, Ostensson E, Belkic K, et al. Impact of the human papillomavirus status on the development of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy at the baseline: a 9-year Swedish nested case-control follow-up study. Cancer. 2019;125(2):239–48.PubMed Froberg M, Ostensson E, Belkic K, et al. Impact of the human papillomavirus status on the development of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy at the baseline: a 9-year Swedish nested case-control follow-up study. Cancer. 2019;125(2):239–48.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Chao A, Lin CT, Hsueh S, et al. Usefulness of human papillomavirus testing in the follow-up of patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(4):1046–51.CrossRef Chao A, Lin CT, Hsueh S, et al. Usefulness of human papillomavirus testing in the follow-up of patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(4):1046–51.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kocken M, Helmerhorst TJ, Berkhof J, et al. Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment: a long-term multi-cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(5):441–50.CrossRef Kocken M, Helmerhorst TJ, Berkhof J, et al. Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment: a long-term multi-cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(5):441–50.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Simoes RB, Campaner AB. Post-cervical conization outcomes in patients with high-grade intraepithelial lesions. APMIS. 2013;121(12):1153–61.CrossRef Simoes RB, Campaner AB. Post-cervical conization outcomes in patients with high-grade intraepithelial lesions. APMIS. 2013;121(12):1153–61.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Akahira J, Konno R, Moriya T, et al. Conization by harmonic scalpel for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a clinicopathological study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2000;50(4):264–8.CrossRef Akahira J, Konno R, Moriya T, et al. Conization by harmonic scalpel for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a clinicopathological study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2000;50(4):264–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Arbyn M, Redman CWE, Verdoodt F, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(12):1665–79.CrossRef Arbyn M, Redman CWE, Verdoodt F, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(12):1665–79.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Onuki M, Matsumoto K, Sakurai M, et al. Posttreatment human papillomavirus testing for residual or recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a pooled analysis. J Gynecol Oncol. 2016;27(1):e3.CrossRef Onuki M, Matsumoto K, Sakurai M, et al. Posttreatment human papillomavirus testing for residual or recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a pooled analysis. J Gynecol Oncol. 2016;27(1):e3.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bruhn LV, Andersen SJ, Hariri J. HPV-testing versus HPV-cytology co-testing to predict the outcome after conization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(6):758–65.CrossRef Bruhn LV, Andersen SJ, Hariri J. HPV-testing versus HPV-cytology co-testing to predict the outcome after conization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(6):758–65.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Furugori M, Asai-Sato M, Katayama K, et al. Short- and long-term complications and the impact on quality of life after cervical conization by harmonic scalpel. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43(4):749–57.CrossRef Furugori M, Asai-Sato M, Katayama K, et al. Short- and long-term complications and the impact on quality of life after cervical conization by harmonic scalpel. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43(4):749–57.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Inoue Y, Yamashita T, Ishida S, et al. Detection and typing of genital high-risk HPV DNAs in cervical scrapes using E6E7-specific consensus PCR. Tumor Res. 1995;30:1–19. Inoue Y, Yamashita T, Ishida S, et al. Detection and typing of genital high-risk HPV DNAs in cervical scrapes using E6E7-specific consensus PCR. Tumor Res. 1995;30:1–19.
15.
go back to reference Kalliala I, Anttila A, Pukkala E, et al. Risk of cervical and other cancers after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2005;331(7526):1183–5.CrossRef Kalliala I, Anttila A, Pukkala E, et al. Risk of cervical and other cancers after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2005;331(7526):1183–5.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kawaguchi R, Matsumoto K, Akira S, et al. Guidelines for office gynecology in Japan: Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) and Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (JAOG) 2017 edition. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(4):766–86.CrossRef Kawaguchi R, Matsumoto K, Akira S, et al. Guidelines for office gynecology in Japan: Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) and Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (JAOG) 2017 edition. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(4):766–86.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Friebe K, Klapdor R, Hillemanns P, et al. The value of partial HPV genotyping after conization of cervical dysplasias. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017;77(8):887–93.CrossRef Friebe K, Klapdor R, Hillemanns P, et al. The value of partial HPV genotyping after conization of cervical dysplasias. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017;77(8):887–93.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Alder S, Megyessi D, Sundstrom K, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease—a 16 year follow-up study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(2):e172.e1–12.CrossRef Alder S, Megyessi D, Sundstrom K, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease—a 16 year follow-up study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(2):e172.e1–12.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ghaem-Maghami S, Sagi S, Majeed G, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(11):985–93.CrossRef Ghaem-Maghami S, Sagi S, Majeed G, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(11):985–93.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gosvig CF, Huusom LD, Andersen KK, et al. Persistence and reappearance of high-risk human papillomavirus after conization. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;131(3):661–6.CrossRef Gosvig CF, Huusom LD, Andersen KK, et al. Persistence and reappearance of high-risk human papillomavirus after conization. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;131(3):661–6.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rabasa J, Bradbury M, Sanchez-Iglesias JL, et al. Evaluation of the intraoperative human papillomavirus test as a marker of early cure at 12 months after electrosurgical excision procedure in women with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2020;127(1):99–105.CrossRef Rabasa J, Bradbury M, Sanchez-Iglesias JL, et al. Evaluation of the intraoperative human papillomavirus test as a marker of early cure at 12 months after electrosurgical excision procedure in women with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2020;127(1):99–105.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kang WD, Oh MJ, Kim SM, et al. Significance of human papillomavirus genotyping with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated by a loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(1):72 (e71–e76).CrossRef Kang WD, Oh MJ, Kim SM, et al. Significance of human papillomavirus genotyping with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated by a loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(1):72 (e71–e76).CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sakamoto J, Kamiura S, Okayama K, et al. Single type infection of human papillomavirus as a cause for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cancer in Japan. Papillomavirus Res. 2018;6:46–51.CrossRef Sakamoto J, Kamiura S, Okayama K, et al. Single type infection of human papillomavirus as a cause for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cancer in Japan. Papillomavirus Res. 2018;6:46–51.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kudoh A, Sato S, Itamochi H, et al. Human papillomavirus type-specific persistence and reappearance after successful conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Clin Oncol. 2016;21(3):580–7.CrossRef Kudoh A, Sato S, Itamochi H, et al. Human papillomavirus type-specific persistence and reappearance after successful conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Clin Oncol. 2016;21(3):580–7.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference So KA, Lee IH, Lee KH, et al. Human papillomavirus genotype-specific risk in cervical carcinogenesis. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019;30(4):e52.CrossRef So KA, Lee IH, Lee KH, et al. Human papillomavirus genotype-specific risk in cervical carcinogenesis. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019;30(4):e52.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Aerssens A, Claeys P, Beerens E, et al. Prediction of recurrent disease by cytology and HPV testing after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cytopathology. 2009;20(1):27–35.CrossRef Aerssens A, Claeys P, Beerens E, et al. Prediction of recurrent disease by cytology and HPV testing after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cytopathology. 2009;20(1):27–35.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Nam K, Chung S, Kim J, Jeon S, et al. Factors associated with HPV persistence after conization in patients with negative margins. J Gynecol Oncol. 2009;20(2):91–5.CrossRef Nam K, Chung S, Kim J, Jeon S, et al. Factors associated with HPV persistence after conization in patients with negative margins. J Gynecol Oncol. 2009;20(2):91–5.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kim YT, Lee JM, Hur SY, et al. Clearance of human papillomavirus infection after successful conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(8):1903–9.CrossRef Kim YT, Lee JM, Hur SY, et al. Clearance of human papillomavirus infection after successful conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(8):1903–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Association Between Positive Human Papillomavirus Status After Conization and Disease Recurrence in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3
Authors
Masaki Kamio
Shintaro Yanazume
Shinichi Togami
Hiroaki Kobayashi
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-020-01368-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2021 Go to the issue