Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Women's Health 1/2021

01-12-2021 | Human Papillomavirus | Research article

Barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening among adolescents and young people: a systematic review

Authors: Abirami Kirubarajan, Shannon Leung, Xinglin Li, Matthew Yau, Mara Sobel

Published in: BMC Women's Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Though cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death globally, its incidence is nearly entirely preventable. Young people have been an international priority for screening as this population has historically been under-screened. However, in both high-income and low-income countries, young people have not been screened appropriately according to country-specific guidelines. The aim of this systematic review was to systematically characterize the existing literature on barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening (CCS) among adolescents and young people globally.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines of three key databases: Medline-OVID, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Supplementary searches were done through ClinicialTrials.Gov and Scopus. Databases were examined from 1946 until the date of our literature searches on March 12th 2020. We only examined original, peer-reviewed literature. Articles were excluded if they did not specifically discuss CCS, were not specific to individuals under the age of 35, or did not report outcomes or evaluation. All screening, extraction, and synthesis was completed in duplicate with two independent reviewers. Outcomes were summarized descriptively. Risk of bias for individual studies was graded using an adapted rating scale based on the Risk of Bias Instrument for Cross-Sectional Surveys of Attitudes and Practices.

Results

Of the 2177 original database citations, we included 36 studies that met inclusion criteria. The 36 studies included a total of 14,362 participants, and around half (17/36, 47.2%) of studies specifically targeted students. The majority of studies (31/36, 86.1%) discussed barriers and facilitators to Pap testing specifically, while one study analyzed self-sampling (1/36, 2.8%), one study targeted HPV DNA testing (1/36, 2.8%), and the remainder (4/36, 11.1%) were not specified. Our systematic review found that there are three large categories of barriers for young people: lack of knowledge/awareness, negative perceptions of the test, and systemic barriers to testing. Facilitators included stronger relationships with healthcare providers, social norms, support from family, and self-efficacy.

Conclusion

There are unique barriers and facilitators that affect CCS rates in adolescents and young people. Health systems and healthcare providers worldwide should address the challenges for this unique population.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Behtash N, Mehrdad N. Cervical cancer: screening and prevention. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2006;7(4):683.PubMed Behtash N, Mehrdad N. Cervical cancer: screening and prevention. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2006;7(4):683.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, Bray F. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Global Health. 2020;8(2):e191-203.PubMedCrossRef Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, Bray F. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Global Health. 2020;8(2):e191-203.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sankaranarayanan R, Gaffikin L, Jacob M, Sellors J, Robles S. A critical assessment of screening methods for cervical neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2005;89:S4-12.CrossRef Sankaranarayanan R, Gaffikin L, Jacob M, Sellors J, Robles S. A critical assessment of screening methods for cervical neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2005;89:S4-12.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nuovo J, Melnikow J, Howell L. New tests for cervical cancer screening. Am Fam Physician. 2001;64(5):780.PubMed Nuovo J, Melnikow J, Howell L. New tests for cervical cancer screening. Am Fam Physician. 2001;64(5):780.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Islam RM, Billah B, Hossain MN, Oldroyd J. Barriers to cervical cancer and breast cancer screening uptake in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev APJCP. 2017;18(7):1751. Islam RM, Billah B, Hossain MN, Oldroyd J. Barriers to cervical cancer and breast cancer screening uptake in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev APJCP. 2017;18(7):1751.
8.
go back to reference Albrow R, Blomberg K, Kitchener H, Brabin L, Patnick J, Tishelman C, Törnberg S, Sparén P, Widmark C. Interventions to improve cervical cancer screening uptake amongst young women: a systematic review. Acta Oncol. 2014;53(4):445–51.PubMedCrossRef Albrow R, Blomberg K, Kitchener H, Brabin L, Patnick J, Tishelman C, Törnberg S, Sparén P, Widmark C. Interventions to improve cervical cancer screening uptake amongst young women: a systematic review. Acta Oncol. 2014;53(4):445–51.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Peto J, Gilham C, Fletcher O, Matthews F. The cervical cancer screening epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. Lancet. 2004;364:8. Peto J, Gilham C, Fletcher O, Matthews F. The cervical cancer screening epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. Lancet. 2004;364:8.
10.
go back to reference Jepson R, Clegg A, Forbes C, Lewis R, Sowden A, Kleijnen J. The determinants of screening uptake and interventions for increasing uptake: A systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2000;4:i–vii, 1–133. Jepson R, Clegg A, Forbes C, Lewis R, Sowden A, Kleijnen J. The determinants of screening uptake and interventions for increasing uptake: A systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2000;4:i–vii, 1–133.
11.
go back to reference Ferrer HB, Trotter C, Hickman M, Audrey S. Barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination of young women in high-income countries: a qualitative systematic review and evidence synthesis. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):700.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ferrer HB, Trotter C, Hickman M, Audrey S. Barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination of young women in high-income countries: a qualitative systematic review and evidence synthesis. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):700.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bradley J, Risi L, Denny L. Widening the cervical cancer screening net in a South African township: who are the underserved? Health Care Women Int. 2004;25(3):227–41.PubMedCrossRef Bradley J, Risi L, Denny L. Widening the cervical cancer screening net in a South African township: who are the underserved? Health Care Women Int. 2004;25(3):227–41.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lancucki L, Fender M, Koukari A, Lynge E, Mai V, Mancini E, et al. A fall-off in cervical screening coverage of younger women in developed countries. J Med Screen. 2010;17:91–6.PubMedCrossRef Lancucki L, Fender M, Koukari A, Lynge E, Mai V, Mancini E, et al. A fall-off in cervical screening coverage of younger women in developed countries. J Med Screen. 2010;17:91–6.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Llorca J, Rodriguez-Cundin P, Dierssen-Sotos T, Prieto-Salceda D. Cervical cancer mortality is increasing in Spanish women younger than 50. Cancer Lett. 2006;240(1):36–40.PubMedCrossRef Llorca J, Rodriguez-Cundin P, Dierssen-Sotos T, Prieto-Salceda D. Cervical cancer mortality is increasing in Spanish women younger than 50. Cancer Lett. 2006;240(1):36–40.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Anorlu RI. Cervical cancer: the sub-Saharan African perspective. Reprod Health Matters. 2008;16(32):41–9.PubMedCrossRef Anorlu RI. Cervical cancer: the sub-Saharan African perspective. Reprod Health Matters. 2008;16(32):41–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Garland S, Park SN, Ngan HY, Frazer I, Tay EH, Chen CJ, Bhatla N, Pitts M, Shin HR, Konno R, Smith J. The need for public education on HPV and cervical cancer prevention in Asia: opinions of experts at the AOGIN conference. Vaccine. 2008;26(43):5435–40.PubMedCrossRef Garland S, Park SN, Ngan HY, Frazer I, Tay EH, Chen CJ, Bhatla N, Pitts M, Shin HR, Konno R, Smith J. The need for public education on HPV and cervical cancer prevention in Asia: opinions of experts at the AOGIN conference. Vaccine. 2008;26(43):5435–40.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Abotchie PN, Shokar NK. Cervical cancer screening among college students in Ghana: knowledge and health beliefs. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19(3):412–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Abotchie PN, Shokar NK. Cervical cancer screening among college students in Ghana: knowledge and health beliefs. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19(3):412–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Agboeze J, Nwali M, Ezeani N. Cervical cancer screening knowledge and behavior among female undergraduate students in a Nigerian University. J Glob Oncol. 2018;4(Supplement 2):3s.CrossRef Agboeze J, Nwali M, Ezeani N. Cervical cancer screening knowledge and behavior among female undergraduate students in a Nigerian University. J Glob Oncol. 2018;4(Supplement 2):3s.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Akujobi CN, Ikechebelu JI, Onunkwo I, Onyiaorah IV. Knowledge, attitude and practice of screening for cervical cancer among female students of a tertiary institution in South Eastern Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2008;11(3):216–9.PubMed Akujobi CN, Ikechebelu JI, Onunkwo I, Onyiaorah IV. Knowledge, attitude and practice of screening for cervical cancer among female students of a tertiary institution in South Eastern Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2008;11(3):216–9.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Al-Naggar RA, Low WY, Isa ZM. Knowledge and barriers towards cervical cancer screening among young women in Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(4):867–73.PubMed Al-Naggar RA, Low WY, Isa ZM. Knowledge and barriers towards cervical cancer screening among young women in Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(4):867–73.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Al-Shaikh GK, Almussaed EM, Fayed AA, Khan FH, Syed SB, Al-Tamimi TN, Elmorshedy HN. Knowledge of Saudi female university students regarding cervical cancer and acceptance of the human papilloma virus vaccine. Saudi Med J. 2014;35(10):1223.PubMedPubMedCentral Al-Shaikh GK, Almussaed EM, Fayed AA, Khan FH, Syed SB, Al-Tamimi TN, Elmorshedy HN. Knowledge of Saudi female university students regarding cervical cancer and acceptance of the human papilloma virus vaccine. Saudi Med J. 2014;35(10):1223.PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Albuquerque CL, Costa MD, Nunes FM, Freitas RW, Azevedo PR, Fernandes JV, Rego JV, Barreto HM. Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the Pap test among women in northeastern Brazil. Sao Paulo Med J. 2014;132(1):3–9.PubMedCrossRef Albuquerque CL, Costa MD, Nunes FM, Freitas RW, Azevedo PR, Fernandes JV, Rego JV, Barreto HM. Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the Pap test among women in northeastern Brazil. Sao Paulo Med J. 2014;132(1):3–9.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Alwahaibi NY, Alramadhani NM, Alzaabi AM, Alsalami WA. Knowledge, attitude and practice of Pap smear among Omani women. Ann Trop Med Public Health. 2017;10(2):396.CrossRef Alwahaibi NY, Alramadhani NM, Alzaabi AM, Alsalami WA. Knowledge, attitude and practice of Pap smear among Omani women. Ann Trop Med Public Health. 2017;10(2):396.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Annan FM, Asante KO, Kugbey N. Perceived seriousness mediates the influence of cervical cancer knowledge on screening practices among female university students in Ghana. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):1–8.CrossRef Annan FM, Asante KO, Kugbey N. Perceived seriousness mediates the influence of cervical cancer knowledge on screening practices among female university students in Ghana. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):1–8.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ayinde OA, Omigbodun AO, Ilesanmi AO. Awareness of cervical cancer, Papanicolaou’s smear and its utilisation among female undergraduates in Ibadan. Afr J Reprod Health. 2004;8:68–80.PubMedCrossRef Ayinde OA, Omigbodun AO, Ilesanmi AO. Awareness of cervical cancer, Papanicolaou’s smear and its utilisation among female undergraduates in Ibadan. Afr J Reprod Health. 2004;8:68–80.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bigaard J, Mortensen JH, Kvernrød AB. Barriers for young women to participate in the Danish cervical screening program. J Global Oncol. 2018;4(Supplement 2):55s.CrossRef Bigaard J, Mortensen JH, Kvernrød AB. Barriers for young women to participate in the Danish cervical screening program. J Global Oncol. 2018;4(Supplement 2):55s.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Binka C, Nyarko SH, Doku DT. Cervical cancer knowledge, perceptions and screening behaviour among female university students in Ghana. J Cancer Educ. 2016;31(2):322–7.PubMedCrossRef Binka C, Nyarko SH, Doku DT. Cervical cancer knowledge, perceptions and screening behaviour among female university students in Ghana. J Cancer Educ. 2016;31(2):322–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Black AT, McCulloch A, Martin RE, Kan L. Young women and cervical cancer screening: what barriers persist? Can J Nurs Res Arch. 2011;8–21. Black AT, McCulloch A, Martin RE, Kan L. Young women and cervical cancer screening: what barriers persist? Can J Nurs Res Arch. 2011;8–21.
32.
go back to reference Blomberg K, Tishelman C, Ternestedt BM, Törnberg S, Levál A, Widmark C. How can young women be encouraged to attend cervical cancer screening? Suggestions from face-to-face and internet focus group discussions with 30-year-old women in Stockholm, Sweden. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(1):112–20.PubMedCrossRef Blomberg K, Tishelman C, Ternestedt BM, Törnberg S, Levál A, Widmark C. How can young women be encouraged to attend cervical cancer screening? Suggestions from face-to-face and internet focus group discussions with 30-year-old women in Stockholm, Sweden. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(1):112–20.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Blomberg K, Widmark C, Ternestedt BM, Törnberg S, Tishelman C. Between youth and adulthood: focus group discussions with 30-year-old women about cervical cancer and its prevention in urban Sweden. Cancer Nurs. 2011;34(3):E11-20.PubMedCrossRef Blomberg K, Widmark C, Ternestedt BM, Törnberg S, Tishelman C. Between youth and adulthood: focus group discussions with 30-year-old women about cervical cancer and its prevention in urban Sweden. Cancer Nurs. 2011;34(3):E11-20.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Byrd TL, Peterson SK, Chavez R, Heckert A. Cervical cancer screening beliefs among young Hispanic women. Prev Med. 2004;38(2):192–7.PubMedCrossRef Byrd TL, Peterson SK, Chavez R, Heckert A. Cervical cancer screening beliefs among young Hispanic women. Prev Med. 2004;38(2):192–7.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Duffett-Leger LA, Letourneau NL, Croll JC. Cervical cancer screening practices among university women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37(5):572–81.PubMedCrossRef Duffett-Leger LA, Letourneau NL, Croll JC. Cervical cancer screening practices among university women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37(5):572–81.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Head KJ, Cohen EL. Young women’s perspectives on cervical cancer prevention in Appalachian Kentucky. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(4):476–87.PubMedCrossRef Head KJ, Cohen EL. Young women’s perspectives on cervical cancer prevention in Appalachian Kentucky. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(4):476–87.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hobbs M. Adolescents had poor knowledge about Papanicolaou (cervical) smear screening and identified many barriers to being screened. Evid Based Nurs. 2000;3(3):188–95.CrossRef Hobbs M. Adolescents had poor knowledge about Papanicolaou (cervical) smear screening and identified many barriers to being screened. Evid Based Nurs. 2000;3(3):188–95.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Hoque ME. Awareness of cervical cancer, Papanicolau’s smear and its utilization among female, final year undergraduates in Durban, South Africa. J Cancer Res Ther. 2013;9(1):25.PubMedCrossRef Hoque ME. Awareness of cervical cancer, Papanicolau’s smear and its utilization among female, final year undergraduates in Durban, South Africa. J Cancer Res Ther. 2013;9(1):25.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Lorenzi NP, Termini L, Longatto Filho A, Tacla M, de Aguiar LM, Beldi MC, Ferreira-Filho ES, Baracat EC, Soares-Júnior JM. Age-related acceptability of vaginal self-sampling in cervical cancer screening at two university hospitals: a pilot cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):963.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lorenzi NP, Termini L, Longatto Filho A, Tacla M, de Aguiar LM, Beldi MC, Ferreira-Filho ES, Baracat EC, Soares-Júnior JM. Age-related acceptability of vaginal self-sampling in cervical cancer screening at two university hospitals: a pilot cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):963.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Jayasinghe Y, Rangiah C, Gorelik A, Ogilvie G, Wark JD, Hartley S, Garland SM. Primary HPV DNA based cervical cancer screening at 25 years: Views of young Australian women aged 16–28 years. J Clin Virol. 2016;76:S74-80.PubMedCrossRef Jayasinghe Y, Rangiah C, Gorelik A, Ogilvie G, Wark JD, Hartley S, Garland SM. Primary HPV DNA based cervical cancer screening at 25 years: Views of young Australian women aged 16–28 years. J Clin Virol. 2016;76:S74-80.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Jubelirer SJ, Blanton MF, Blanton PD, Zhang J, Foster D, Monk J, Kuhn G, Hanshew D. Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors relative to cervical cancer and the Pap smear among adolescent girls in West Virginia. J Cancer Educ. 1996;11(4):230–2.PubMed Jubelirer SJ, Blanton MF, Blanton PD, Zhang J, Foster D, Monk J, Kuhn G, Hanshew D. Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors relative to cervical cancer and the Pap smear among adolescent girls in West Virginia. J Cancer Educ. 1996;11(4):230–2.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Kahn JA, Chiou V, Allen JD, Goodman E, Perlman SE, Emans SJ. Beliefs about Papanicolaou smears and compliance with Papanicolaou smear follow-up in adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153(10):1046–54.PubMedCrossRef Kahn JA, Chiou V, Allen JD, Goodman E, Perlman SE, Emans SJ. Beliefs about Papanicolaou smears and compliance with Papanicolaou smear follow-up in adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153(10):1046–54.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Kaneko N. Factors associated with cervical cancer screening among young unmarried Japanese women: results from an internet-based survey. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18(1):132.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kaneko N. Factors associated with cervical cancer screening among young unmarried Japanese women: results from an internet-based survey. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18(1):132.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Kim HW. Factors related to the perceptions of susceptibility and severity in cervix cancer among unmarried university women in Korea. J Women’s Health. 2014;23(4):29–29. Kim HW. Factors related to the perceptions of susceptibility and severity in cervix cancer among unmarried university women in Korea. J Women’s Health. 2014;23(4):29–29.
45.
go back to reference Kim HW. Attitudetoward the PAP test among the sexually active unmarried women. J Women’s Health. 2019;28(6):2–3. Kim HW. Attitudetoward the PAP test among the sexually active unmarried women. J Women’s Health. 2019;28(6):2–3.
46.
47.
go back to reference Lee HY, Lee MH. Barriers to cervical cancer screening and prevention in young Korean immigrant women: implications for intervention development. J Transcult Nurs. 2017;28(4):353–62.PubMedCrossRef Lee HY, Lee MH. Barriers to cervical cancer screening and prevention in young Korean immigrant women: implications for intervention development. J Transcult Nurs. 2017;28(4):353–62.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Najem GR, Batuman F, Smith AM. Papanicolaou test status among inner-city adolescent girls. Am J Prev Med. 1996;12(6):482–6.PubMedCrossRef Najem GR, Batuman F, Smith AM. Papanicolaou test status among inner-city adolescent girls. Am J Prev Med. 1996;12(6):482–6.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Ogbonna FS. Knowledge, attitude, and experience of cervical cancer and screening among Sub-saharan African female students in a UK University. Ann Afr Med. 2017;16(1):18.PubMedPubMedCentral Ogbonna FS. Knowledge, attitude, and experience of cervical cancer and screening among Sub-saharan African female students in a UK University. Ann Afr Med. 2017;16(1):18.PubMedPubMedCentral
50.
go back to reference Okoeki MO, Steven A, Geddes L. Psychological factors affecting participation in cervical screening for young women: a qualitative study. Lancet. 2016;388:S82.CrossRef Okoeki MO, Steven A, Geddes L. Psychological factors affecting participation in cervical screening for young women: a qualitative study. Lancet. 2016;388:S82.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Oshima S, Maezawa M. Perception of cervical cancer screening among Japanese university students who have never had a pap smear: a qualitative study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(7):4313–8.PubMedCrossRef Oshima S, Maezawa M. Perception of cervical cancer screening among Japanese university students who have never had a pap smear: a qualitative study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(7):4313–8.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Pan XF, Zhao ZM, Sun J, Chen F, Wen QL, Liu K, Song GQ, Zhang JJ, Wen Y, Fu CJ, Yang CX. Acceptability and correlates of primary and secondary prevention of cervical cancer among medical students in southwest China: implications for cancer education. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e110353.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pan XF, Zhao ZM, Sun J, Chen F, Wen QL, Liu K, Song GQ, Zhang JJ, Wen Y, Fu CJ, Yang CX. Acceptability and correlates of primary and secondary prevention of cervical cancer among medical students in southwest China: implications for cancer education. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e110353.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Waller J, Jackowska M, Marlow L, Wardle J. Exploring age differences in reasons for nonattendance for cervical screening: a qualitative study. BJOG Int J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2012;119(1):26–32.CrossRef Waller J, Jackowska M, Marlow L, Wardle J. Exploring age differences in reasons for nonattendance for cervical screening: a qualitative study. BJOG Int J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2012;119(1):26–32.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Kahn JA, Goodman E, Slap GB, Huang B, Emans SJ. Intention to return for Papanicolaou smears in adolescent girls and young women. Pediatrics. 2001;108(2):333–41.PubMedCrossRef Kahn JA, Goodman E, Slap GB, Huang B, Emans SJ. Intention to return for Papanicolaou smears in adolescent girls and young women. Pediatrics. 2001;108(2):333–41.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Hoque ME, Ghuman S, Coopoosmay R, Van Hal G. Cervical cancer screening among university students in South Africa: use of health belief model. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;21:424.CrossRef Hoque ME, Ghuman S, Coopoosmay R, Van Hal G. Cervical cancer screening among university students in South Africa: use of health belief model. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;21:424.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Nabalamba, A., and W. Millar. 2007. “Going to the doctor”. Health Reports. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 82–003. Vol. 18 no. 1. (accessed January 11, 2017) Nabalamba, A., and W. Millar. 2007. “Going to the doctor”. Health Reports. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 82–003. Vol. 18 no. 1. (accessed January 11, 2017)
58.
go back to reference Black WC, Nease Jr RF, Tosteson AN. Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age. J Nat Cancer Inst. 1995;87(10):720–731. Black WC, Nease Jr RF, Tosteson AN. Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age. J Nat Cancer Inst. 1995;87(10):720–731.
59.
go back to reference Lam AC, Aggarwal R, Cheung S, Stewart EL, Darling G, Lam S, Xu W, Liu G, Kavanagh J. Predictors of participant nonadherence in lung cancer screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer. 2020. Lam AC, Aggarwal R, Cheung S, Stewart EL, Darling G, Lam S, Xu W, Liu G, Kavanagh J. Predictors of participant nonadherence in lung cancer screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer. 2020.
60.
go back to reference Schootman M, Jeffe DB, Baker EA, Walker MS. Effect of area poverty rate on cancer screening across US communities. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(3):202–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Schootman M, Jeffe DB, Baker EA, Walker MS. Effect of area poverty rate on cancer screening across US communities. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(3):202–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Bennett KJ, Pumkam C, Bellinger JD, Probst JC. Cancer screening delivery in persistent poverty rural counties. J Primary Care Community Health. 2011;2(4):240–9.CrossRef Bennett KJ, Pumkam C, Bellinger JD, Probst JC. Cancer screening delivery in persistent poverty rural counties. J Primary Care Community Health. 2011;2(4):240–9.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Arnett MJ, Thorpe RJ, Gaskin DJ, Bowie JV, LaVeist TA. Race, medical mistrust, and segregation in primary care as usual source of care: findings from the exploring health disparities in integrated communities study. J Urban Health. 2016;93(3):456–67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Arnett MJ, Thorpe RJ, Gaskin DJ, Bowie JV, LaVeist TA. Race, medical mistrust, and segregation in primary care as usual source of care: findings from the exploring health disparities in integrated communities study. J Urban Health. 2016;93(3):456–67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
go back to reference McDonald JT, Kennedy S. Insights into the ‘healthy immigrant effect’: health status and health service use of immigrants to Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(8):1613–27.PubMedCrossRef McDonald JT, Kennedy S. Insights into the ‘healthy immigrant effect’: health status and health service use of immigrants to Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(8):1613–27.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Kennedy S, Kidd MP, McDonald JT, Biddle N. The healthy immigrant effect: patterns and evidence from four countries. J Int Migr Integr. 2015;16(2):317–32. Kennedy S, Kidd MP, McDonald JT, Biddle N. The healthy immigrant effect: patterns and evidence from four countries. J Int Migr Integr. 2015;16(2):317–32.
66.
go back to reference Barnholtz-Sloan J, Patel N, Rollison D, Kortepeter K, MacKinnon J, Giuliano A. Incidence trends of invasive cervical cancer in the United States by combined race and ethnicity. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20(7):1129–38.PubMedCrossRef Barnholtz-Sloan J, Patel N, Rollison D, Kortepeter K, MacKinnon J, Giuliano A. Incidence trends of invasive cervical cancer in the United States by combined race and ethnicity. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20(7):1129–38.PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Johnson CE, Mues KE, Mayne SL, Kiblawi AN. Cervical cancer screening among immigrants and ethnic minorities: a systematic review using the Health Belief Model. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2008;12(3):232–41.PubMedCrossRef Johnson CE, Mues KE, Mayne SL, Kiblawi AN. Cervical cancer screening among immigrants and ethnic minorities: a systematic review using the Health Belief Model. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2008;12(3):232–41.PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Ferris DG, Batish S, Wright TC, Cushing C, Scott EH. A neglected lesbian health concern: cervical neoplasia. J Fam Pract. 1996;43(6):581–4.PubMed Ferris DG, Batish S, Wright TC, Cushing C, Scott EH. A neglected lesbian health concern: cervical neoplasia. J Fam Pract. 1996;43(6):581–4.PubMed
69.
go back to reference Clark MA, Boehmer U, Rosenthal S. Cancer screening in lesbian and bisexual women and trans men. In: Cancer and the LGBT Community 2015 (pp. 83–98). Springer, Cham. Clark MA, Boehmer U, Rosenthal S. Cancer screening in lesbian and bisexual women and trans men. In: Cancer and the LGBT Community 2015 (pp. 83–98). Springer, Cham.
70.
go back to reference Tracy JK, Lydecker AD, Ireland L. Barriers to cervical cancer screening among lesbians. J Womens Health. 2010;19(2):229–37.CrossRef Tracy JK, Lydecker AD, Ireland L. Barriers to cervical cancer screening among lesbians. J Womens Health. 2010;19(2):229–37.CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Johnson M, Wakefield C, Garthe K. Qualitative socioecological factors of cervical cancer screening use among transgender men. Prev Med Rep. 2020;17:101052.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Johnson M, Wakefield C, Garthe K. Qualitative socioecological factors of cervical cancer screening use among transgender men. Prev Med Rep. 2020;17:101052.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
72.
go back to reference Sundstrom B, Smith E, Delay C, Luque JS, Davila C, Feder B, Paddock V, Poudrier J, Pierce JY, Brandt HM. A reproductive justice approach to understanding women’s experiences with HPV and cervical cancer prevention. Soc Sci Med. 2019;232:289–97.PubMedCrossRef Sundstrom B, Smith E, Delay C, Luque JS, Davila C, Feder B, Paddock V, Poudrier J, Pierce JY, Brandt HM. A reproductive justice approach to understanding women’s experiences with HPV and cervical cancer prevention. Soc Sci Med. 2019;232:289–97.PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Luszczynska A, Durawa AB, Scholz U, Knoll N. Empowerment beliefs and intention to uptake cervical cancer screening: three psychosocial mediating mechanisms. Women Health. 2012;52(2):162–81.PubMedCrossRef Luszczynska A, Durawa AB, Scholz U, Knoll N. Empowerment beliefs and intention to uptake cervical cancer screening: three psychosocial mediating mechanisms. Women Health. 2012;52(2):162–81.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening among adolescents and young people: a systematic review
Authors
Abirami Kirubarajan
Shannon Leung
Xinglin Li
Matthew Yau
Mara Sobel
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Women's Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6874
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01264-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Women's Health 1/2021 Go to the issue