Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 6/2019

01-06-2019 | Human Papillomavirus | Original Paper

Exploring anal self-examination as a screening tool for women at risk for anal cancer: awareness, interest, and barriers to behavioral uptake

Authors: David A. Moskowitz, Musarrat Rahman, Dennis H. Li

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Anal cancer is the second most common human-papillomavirus-related cancer in women, with women also at an elevated risk of incidence relative to men. Anal self-examination (ASE) is an efficient way for women to screen between provider visits for potential anal masses. While studied in male populations, no research has explored women’s awareness of the self-test.

Methods

In response, 345 women recruited from online advertisements and listservs were surveyed to assess their experiences using health care, history of Pap smears, knowledge of anal cancer, awareness and attitudes surrounding ASEs, and potential educational modalities to promote ASE enactment.

Results

Results indicated the sample failed two key anal cancer knowledge tests (receiving a 68%/100% for risk factors and 61%/100% for signs/symptoms), and only 2.3% of participants had ever heard of ASEs before the survey. Most thought ASEs would be somewhat helpful as a screening tool, but little interest was shown towards future performance. Analyses revealed this disinterest was due to lack of knowledge, perceived discomfort with performing ASEs, and perceived irrelevance of ASEs.

Conclusions

Future interventions should push for a stronger role of providers (e.g., gynecologists) in anal health, education, and screening. Additionally, campaigns should be crafted to promote the ASE as an easy, at-home screening tool that could trigger an early warning for anal disease.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Parkin DM (2006) The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002. Int J Cancer 118(12):3030–3044CrossRefPubMed Parkin DM (2006) The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002. Int J Cancer 118(12):3030–3044CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2018) Cancer facts & figures 2018. American Cancer Society, Atlanta American Cancer Society (2018) Cancer facts & figures 2018. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
3.
go back to reference Moscicki AB, Darragh TM, Berry-Lawhorn JM, Roberts JM, Khan MJ, Boardman LA, Chiao E, Einstein MH, Goldstone SE, Jay N, Likes WM (2015) Screening for anal cancer in women. J Lower Genital Tract Dis 19(3 0 1):S26CrossRef Moscicki AB, Darragh TM, Berry-Lawhorn JM, Roberts JM, Khan MJ, Boardman LA, Chiao E, Einstein MH, Goldstone SE, Jay N, Likes WM (2015) Screening for anal cancer in women. J Lower Genital Tract Dis 19(3 0 1):S26CrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Chiu S, Joseph K, Ghosh S, Cornand RM, Schiller D (2015) Reasons for delays in diagnosis of anal cancer and the effect on patient satisfaction. Can Fam Physician 61(11):e509–e516PubMedPubMedCentral Chiu S, Joseph K, Ghosh S, Cornand RM, Schiller D (2015) Reasons for delays in diagnosis of anal cancer and the effect on patient satisfaction. Can Fam Physician 61(11):e509–e516PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Mitchell E, Macdonald S, Campbell NC, Weller D, Macleod U (2008) Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Br J Cancer 98(1):60CrossRefPubMed Mitchell E, Macdonald S, Campbell NC, Weller D, Macleod U (2008) Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Br J Cancer 98(1):60CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wong RK, Drossman DA, Bharucha AE, Rao SS, Wald A, Morris CB, Oxentenko AS, Ravi K, Van Handel DM, Edwards H, Hu Y (2012) The digital rectal examination: a multicenter survey of physicians’ and students’ perceptions and practice patterns. Am J Gastroenterol 107(8):1157CrossRefPubMed Wong RK, Drossman DA, Bharucha AE, Rao SS, Wald A, Morris CB, Oxentenko AS, Ravi K, Van Handel DM, Edwards H, Hu Y (2012) The digital rectal examination: a multicenter survey of physicians’ and students’ perceptions and practice patterns. Am J Gastroenterol 107(8):1157CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jones RM, Devers KJ, Kuzel AJ, Woolf SH (2010) Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis. Am J Prev Med 38(5):508–516CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jones RM, Devers KJ, Kuzel AJ, Woolf SH (2010) Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis. Am J Prev Med 38(5):508–516CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Ong JJ, Temple-Smith M, Chen M, Walker S, Grulich A, Fairley CK (2014) Exploring anal self-examination as a means of screening for anal cancer in HIV positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 14(1):1257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ong JJ, Temple-Smith M, Chen M, Walker S, Grulich A, Fairley CK (2014) Exploring anal self-examination as a means of screening for anal cancer in HIV positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 14(1):1257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Blankenship SA, Debnath P, Szlachta-McGinn AW, Maguire K, Garcia JJ, Aserlind A, Lipshultz E, Potter JE (2016) Knowledge and acceptability of anal cytology screening among women. J Lower Genital Tract Dis 20(1):90–96CrossRef Blankenship SA, Debnath P, Szlachta-McGinn AW, Maguire K, Garcia JJ, Aserlind A, Lipshultz E, Potter JE (2016) Knowledge and acceptability of anal cytology screening among women. J Lower Genital Tract Dis 20(1):90–96CrossRef
12.
go back to reference D’souza G, Rajan SD, Bhatia R, Cranston RD, Plankey MW, Silvestre A, Ostrow DG, Wiley D, Shah N, Brewer NT (2013) Uptake and predictors of anal cancer screening in men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 103(9):e88–e95CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral D’souza G, Rajan SD, Bhatia R, Cranston RD, Plankey MW, Silvestre A, Ostrow DG, Wiley D, Shah N, Brewer NT (2013) Uptake and predictors of anal cancer screening in men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 103(9):e88–e95CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Ferris D, Lambert R, Waller J, Dickens P, Kabaria R, Han CS, Steelman C, Fawole F (2013) Women’s knowledge and attitudes toward anal Pap testing. J Lower Genital Tract Dis 17(4):463–468CrossRef Ferris D, Lambert R, Waller J, Dickens P, Kabaria R, Han CS, Steelman C, Fawole F (2013) Women’s knowledge and attitudes toward anal Pap testing. J Lower Genital Tract Dis 17(4):463–468CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pitts MK, Fox C, Willis J, Anderson J (2007) What do gay men know about human papillomavirus? Australian gay men’s knowledge and experience of anal cancer screening and human papillomavirus. Sex Transm Dis 34(3):170–173CrossRefPubMed Pitts MK, Fox C, Willis J, Anderson J (2007) What do gay men know about human papillomavirus? Australian gay men’s knowledge and experience of anal cancer screening and human papillomavirus. Sex Transm Dis 34(3):170–173CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Reed AC, Reiter PL, Smith JS, Palefsky JM, Brewer NT (2010) Gay and bisexual men’s willingness to receive anal Papanicolaou testing. Am J Public Health 100(6):1123–1129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reed AC, Reiter PL, Smith JS, Palefsky JM, Brewer NT (2010) Gay and bisexual men’s willingness to receive anal Papanicolaou testing. Am J Public Health 100(6):1123–1129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Butame SA, Lawler S, Hicks JT, Wilkerson JM, Hwang LY, Baraniuk S, Ross MW, Chiao EY, Nyitray AG (2017) A qualitative investigation among men who have sex with men on the acceptability of performing a self-or partner anal exam to screen for anal cancer. Cancer Causes Control 28(10):1157–1166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Butame SA, Lawler S, Hicks JT, Wilkerson JM, Hwang LY, Baraniuk S, Ross MW, Chiao EY, Nyitray AG (2017) A qualitative investigation among men who have sex with men on the acceptability of performing a self-or partner anal exam to screen for anal cancer. Cancer Causes Control 28(10):1157–1166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Nyitray AG, Hicks JT, Hwang LY, Baraniuk S, White M, Millas S, Onwuka N, Zhang X, Brown EL, Ross MW, Chiao EY (2018) A phase II clinical study to assess the feasibility of self and partner anal examinations to detect anal canal abnormalities including anal cancer. Sex Transm Infect. 94(2):124–130CrossRefPubMed Nyitray AG, Hicks JT, Hwang LY, Baraniuk S, White M, Millas S, Onwuka N, Zhang X, Brown EL, Ross MW, Chiao EY (2018) A phase II clinical study to assess the feasibility of self and partner anal examinations to detect anal canal abnormalities including anal cancer. Sex Transm Infect. 94(2):124–130CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kaiser HF (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Measur 20(1):141–151CrossRef Kaiser HF (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Measur 20(1):141–151CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cattell RB (1966) The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1(2):245–276CrossRef Cattell RB (1966) The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1(2):245–276CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Exploring anal self-examination as a screening tool for women at risk for anal cancer: awareness, interest, and barriers to behavioral uptake
Authors
David A. Moskowitz
Musarrat Rahman
Dennis H. Li
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-019-01175-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Cancer Causes & Control 6/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine