Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 4/2005

01-08-2005 | Original Paper

How painful are shockwave lithotripsy and endoscopic procedures performed at outpatient urology clinics?

Authors: Byong Chang Jeong, Hyoung Keun Park, Cheol Kwak, Seong-June Oh, Hyeon Hoe Kim

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 4/2005

Login to get access

Abstracts

Our aim was to investigate the subjective pain felt by patients during shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and endoscopic procedures such as cystoscopy, retrograde ureteral stenting, retrograde pyelography (RGP), and ureteroscopic lithotripsy performed in an outpatient clinic, and to identify how severe pain during such procedures is. We estimated subjective pain in 984 patients after SWL (186), cystoscopy (489), retrograde ureteral stenting (127), RGP (97), and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (85) performed by a single expert in an outpatient clinic using a prospective questionnaire with a ten point visual analog scale between January 2001 and December 2003. There was no premedication in any procedure except ureteroscopic lithotripsy for which an intramuscular injection of analgesics (pethidine HCl 50 mg) was used. The pain scale score in SWL was 6.62±2.27, the highest among the procedures (P<0.05). Pain scores for endoscopies were 4.48±2.07 in retrograde ureteral stenting, 3.81±2.06 in ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 3.72±1.75 in RGP, and 3.08±1.95 in cystoscopy. In this study, we observed that patients feel most pain in SWL without anesthesia, and that pain during ureteroscopic lithotripsy under local anesthesia is not high, compared with other endoscopic procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yalcinkaya F, Topaloglu H, Unal S et al. (1996) Is general anaesthesia necessary for URS in women? Int Urol Nephrol 28: 153PubMed Yalcinkaya F, Topaloglu H, Unal S et al. (1996) Is general anaesthesia necessary for URS in women? Int Urol Nephrol 28: 153PubMed
2.
go back to reference Abdel-Razzak O, Bagley DH (1993) The 6.9 F semirigid ureteroscope in clinical use. Urology 41: 45CrossRefPubMed Abdel-Razzak O, Bagley DH (1993) The 6.9 F semirigid ureteroscope in clinical use. Urology 41: 45CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Vogeli TA, Mellin HE, Ackermann R et al. (1993) Ureteroscopy under local anaesthesia with and without intravenous analgesia. Br J Urol 72: 161PubMed Vogeli TA, Mellin HE, Ackermann R et al. (1993) Ureteroscopy under local anaesthesia with and without intravenous analgesia. Br J Urol 72: 161PubMed
4.
go back to reference Schelling G, Weber W, Cullmann H et al. (1996) Patient controlled analgesia for shock wave lithotripsy: the effect of self-administered alfentanil on pain intensity and drug requirement. J Urol 155: 43CrossRefPubMed Schelling G, Weber W, Cullmann H et al. (1996) Patient controlled analgesia for shock wave lithotripsy: the effect of self-administered alfentanil on pain intensity and drug requirement. J Urol 155: 43CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dawson C, Vale JA, Whitfield HN et al. (1994) Choosing the correct pain relief for extracorporeal lithotripsy. Br J Urol 74: 302PubMed Dawson C, Vale JA, Whitfield HN et al. (1994) Choosing the correct pain relief for extracorporeal lithotripsy. Br J Urol 74: 302PubMed
6.
go back to reference Chin CM, Tay KP, Chng HC et al. (1997) Use of patient-controlled analgesia in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Br J Urol 79: 848PubMed Chin CM, Tay KP, Chng HC et al. (1997) Use of patient-controlled analgesia in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Br J Urol 79: 848PubMed
7.
go back to reference Jermini FR, Danuser H, Studer UE et al. (2002) Noninvasive anesthesia, analgesia and radiation-free extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for stones in the most distal ureter: experience with 165 patients. J Urol 168: 446CrossRefPubMed Jermini FR, Danuser H, Studer UE et al. (2002) Noninvasive anesthesia, analgesia and radiation-free extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for stones in the most distal ureter: experience with 165 patients. J Urol 168: 446CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ellerkmann RM, Dunn JS, Blomquist JL et al. (2003) A comparison of anticipated pain before and pain rating after the procedure in patients who undergo cystourethroscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189: 66CrossRefPubMed Ellerkmann RM, Dunn JS, Blomquist JL et al. (2003) A comparison of anticipated pain before and pain rating after the procedure in patients who undergo cystourethroscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189: 66CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pliskin MJ, Kreder KJ, Dresner ML (1989) Cocaine and lidocaine as topical urethral anesthetics. J Urol 141: 1117PubMed Pliskin MJ, Kreder KJ, Dresner ML (1989) Cocaine and lidocaine as topical urethral anesthetics. J Urol 141: 1117PubMed
10.
go back to reference Walsh PC, Retik AB, Wein AJ (2002) Campbell’s urology. WBSaunders,Philadelphia, p 119 Walsh PC, Retik AB, Wein AJ (2002) Campbell’s urology. WBSaunders,Philadelphia, p 119
11.
go back to reference Chaussy C, Schmiedt E, Walther V et al. (1982) First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol 127: 417PubMed Chaussy C, Schmiedt E, Walther V et al. (1982) First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol 127: 417PubMed
12.
go back to reference Drach GW, Dretler S, Newman D et al. (1986) Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 135: 1127PubMed Drach GW, Dretler S, Newman D et al. (1986) Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 135: 1127PubMed
13.
go back to reference Mobley TB, Myers DA, Jordan WR et al. (1993) Low energy lithotripsy with the Lithostar: treatment results with 19,962 renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol 149: 1419PubMed Mobley TB, Myers DA, Jordan WR et al. (1993) Low energy lithotripsy with the Lithostar: treatment results with 19,962 renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol 149: 1419PubMed
14.
go back to reference Bierkens AF, Hendrikx AJ, Berkel HV et al. (1992) Efficacy of second generation lithotriptors: a multicenter comparative study of 2,206 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatments with the Siemens Lithostar, Dornier HM4, Wolf Piezolith 2300, Direx Tripter X-1, and Breakstone lithotriptors. J Urol 148: 1052PubMed Bierkens AF, Hendrikx AJ, Berkel HV et al. (1992) Efficacy of second generation lithotriptors: a multicenter comparative study of 2,206 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatments with the Siemens Lithostar, Dornier HM4, Wolf Piezolith 2300, Direx Tripter X-1, and Breakstone lithotriptors. J Urol 148: 1052PubMed
15.
go back to reference Cass AS (1995) Comparison of first generation (Dornier HM3) and second generation (Medstone STS) lithotriptors: treatment results with 13,864 renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol 153: 588CrossRefPubMed Cass AS (1995) Comparison of first generation (Dornier HM3) and second generation (Medstone STS) lithotriptors: treatment results with 13,864 renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol 153: 588CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Park HK, Paick SH, Kim HH et al. (2004) Ureteroscopic lithotripsy under local anesthesia: analysis of the effectiveness and patient tolerability. Eur Urol 45: 670CrossRefPubMed Park HK, Paick SH, Kim HH et al. (2004) Ureteroscopic lithotripsy under local anesthesia: analysis of the effectiveness and patient tolerability. Eur Urol 45: 670CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Blute ML, Segura JW, Patterson DE (1988) Ureteroscopy. J Urol 139: 510PubMed Blute ML, Segura JW, Patterson DE (1988) Ureteroscopy. J Urol 139: 510PubMed
18.
go back to reference Dretler SP, Cho G (1989) Semirigid ureteroscopy: a new genre. J Urol 141: 1314PubMed Dretler SP, Cho G (1989) Semirigid ureteroscopy: a new genre. J Urol 141: 1314PubMed
Metadata
Title
How painful are shockwave lithotripsy and endoscopic procedures performed at outpatient urology clinics?
Authors
Byong Chang Jeong
Hyoung Keun Park
Cheol Kwak
Seong-June Oh
Hyeon Hoe Kim
Publication date
01-08-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 4/2005
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-005-0474-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2005

Urolithiasis 4/2005 Go to the issue