Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 7/2011

01-07-2011 | Original Paper

How much tibial resection is required in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors: Christoph Schnurr, György Csécsei, Jochen Nessler, Peer Eysel, Dietmar Pierre König

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 7/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to calculate the optimal tibial resection depth in total knee arthroplasty. The data from 464 navigated total knee arthroplasties were analysed. An implant with a minimum insert thickness of 8 mm was used. Data regarding leg axis, joint line, insert thickness and tibial resection depth were recorded by the navigation device. An algorithm was developed to calculate the optimal tibial resection depth. The required tibial resection significantly correlates with the preoperative leg axis (p < 0.001). In valgus deformities the required resection depth averaged 5.1 mm and was significantly reduced compared to knees with a neutral leg axis (6.8 mm, p < 0.001) and varus deformities (8.0 mm, p < 0.001). Manufacturers recommend undercutting the high side of the tibial plateau to the depth of the thinnest insert available. However, our study demonstrates that in valgus deformities a reduced tibial resection depth is preferable. Hence, unnecessary bone loss can be avoided.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bae DK, Song SJ, Yoon KH (2010) Total knee arthroplasty following closed wedge high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 34:283–287PubMedCrossRef Bae DK, Song SJ, Yoon KH (2010) Total knee arthroplasty following closed wedge high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 34:283–287PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bathis H, Shafizadeh S, Paffrath T, Simanski C, Grifka J, Luring C (2006) Are computer assisted total knee replacements more accurately placed? A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Orthopade 35:1056–1065PubMedCrossRef Bathis H, Shafizadeh S, Paffrath T, Simanski C, Grifka J, Luring C (2006) Are computer assisted total knee replacements more accurately placed? A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Orthopade 35:1056–1065PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Berend ME, Small SR, Ritter MA, Buckley CA (2009) The effects of bone resection depth and malalignment on strain in the proximal tibia after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25:314–318PubMedCrossRef Berend ME, Small SR, Ritter MA, Buckley CA (2009) The effects of bone resection depth and malalignment on strain in the proximal tibia after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25:314–318PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chiu KY, Yau WP, Ng TP, Tang WM (2008) The accuracy of extramedullary guides for tibial component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32:467–471PubMedCrossRef Chiu KY, Yau WP, Ng TP, Tang WM (2008) The accuracy of extramedullary guides for tibial component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32:467–471PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Elkus M, Ranawat CS, Rasquinha VJ, Babhulkar S, Rossi R, Ranawat AS (2004) Total knee arthroplasty for severe valgus deformity. Five to fourteen-year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86:2671–2676 Elkus M, Ranawat CS, Rasquinha VJ, Babhulkar S, Rossi R, Ranawat AS (2004) Total knee arthroplasty for severe valgus deformity. Five to fourteen-year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86:2671–2676
7.
go back to reference Engh GA (2003) The difficult knee: severe varus and valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:58–63 Engh GA (2003) The difficult knee: severe varus and valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:58–63
8.
go back to reference Favorito PJ, Mihalko WM, Krackow KA (2002) Total knee arthroplasty in the valgus knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 10:16–24PubMed Favorito PJ, Mihalko WM, Krackow KA (2002) Total knee arthroplasty in the valgus knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 10:16–24PubMed
9.
go back to reference Fehring TK, Christie MJ, Lavernia C, Mason JB, McAuley JP, MacDonald SJ, Springer BD (2008) Revision total knee arthroplasty: planning, management, and controversies. Instr Course Lect 57:341–363PubMed Fehring TK, Christie MJ, Lavernia C, Mason JB, McAuley JP, MacDonald SJ, Springer BD (2008) Revision total knee arthroplasty: planning, management, and controversies. Instr Course Lect 57:341–363PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hartel MJ, Loosli Y, Gralla J, Kohl S, Hoppe S, Roder C, Eggli S (2009) The mean anatomical shape of the tibial plateau at the knee arthroplasty resection level: an investigation using MRI. Knee 16:452–457PubMedCrossRef Hartel MJ, Loosli Y, Gralla J, Kohl S, Hoppe S, Roder C, Eggli S (2009) The mean anatomical shape of the tibial plateau at the knee arthroplasty resection level: an investigation using MRI. Knee 16:452–457PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lee K, Goodman SB (2008) Current state and future of joint replacements in the hip and knee. Expert Rev Med Devices 5:383–393PubMedCrossRef Lee K, Goodman SB (2008) Current state and future of joint replacements in the hip and knee. Expert Rev Med Devices 5:383–393PubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference Martin JW, Whiteside LA (1990) The influence of joint line position on knee stability after condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 259:146–156 Martin JW, Whiteside LA (1990) The influence of joint line position on knee stability after condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 259:146–156
14.
15.
go back to reference Patil S, D’Lima DD, Fait JM, Colwell CW Jr (2007) Improving tibial component coronal alignment during total knee arthroplasty with use of a tibial planing device. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:381–387PubMedCrossRef Patil S, D’Lima DD, Fait JM, Colwell CW Jr (2007) Improving tibial component coronal alignment during total knee arthroplasty with use of a tibial planing device. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:381–387PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS, Elkus M, Rasquinha VJ, Rossi R, Babhulkar S (2005) Total knee arthroplasty for severe valgus deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(Suppl 1):271–284PubMedCrossRef Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS, Elkus M, Rasquinha VJ, Rossi R, Babhulkar S (2005) Total knee arthroplasty for severe valgus deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(Suppl 1):271–284PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schnurr C, Nessler J, Konig DP (2009) Is referencing the posterior condyles sufficient to achieve a rectangular flexion gap in total knee arthroplasty? Int Orthop 33:1561–1565PubMedCrossRef Schnurr C, Nessler J, Konig DP (2009) Is referencing the posterior condyles sufficient to achieve a rectangular flexion gap in total knee arthroplasty? Int Orthop 33:1561–1565PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Whittaker JP, Dharmarajan R, Toms AD (2008) The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:981–987PubMedCrossRef Whittaker JP, Dharmarajan R, Toms AD (2008) The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:981–987PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yau WP, Leung A, Liu KG, Yan CH, Wong LL, Chiu KY (2007) Interobserver and intra-observer errors in obtaining visually selected anatomical landmarks during registration process in non-image-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:1150–1161PubMedCrossRef Yau WP, Leung A, Liu KG, Yan CH, Wong LL, Chiu KY (2007) Interobserver and intra-observer errors in obtaining visually selected anatomical landmarks during registration process in non-image-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:1150–1161PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
How much tibial resection is required in total knee arthroplasty?
Authors
Christoph Schnurr
György Csécsei
Jochen Nessler
Peer Eysel
Dietmar Pierre König
Publication date
01-07-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 7/2011
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1025-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2011

International Orthopaedics 7/2011 Go to the issue