Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Brain Topography 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Original Paper

How Does Sensor-Space Group Blind Source Separation Face Inter-individual Neuroanatomical Variability? Insights from a Simulation Study Based on the PALS-B12 Atlas

Authors: Guillaume Lio, Philippe Boulinguez

Published in: Brain Topography | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Because of volume conduction and inter-individual neuroanatomical variability, similar sources in different brains may lead to variable topographies. This represents a major limitation for sensor-space group level decomposition of electroencephalographic data, a technique which introduces potential biases when aggregating individual data. To which extent this impedes subsequent source separation and localization was quantified in the present study. To this end, several simulations using an atlas of human cerebral cortex that takes into account the variability of cortical morphology (Van Essen in NeuroImage 28:635–662, 2005) were performed. For each virtual subject (up to n = 160), the orientation and location of each single simulated dipole was randomly modified as a function of the variability of the cortical shape of a given point in the brain provided by the probabilistic atlas. The resulting activity was projected on the scalp, and topographical shifts were estimated. Then, different algorithms based on second order statistics (SOS) or higher order statistics were used to recover the simulated sources from sensor space information with group blind source separation (gBSS) procedures (based on UWSOBI or EFICA, respectively). As expected, the variability of orientation of the cortical surface across subjects was found to induce substantial variability in scalp potential maps, especially if the sources originate from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex or the temporoparietal junction. These biases could be compensated for by increasing drastically the number of subjects included in the topographical analyses. By contrast, gBSS was found to be insensitive to inter-individual differences of neuroanatomy. Rather, the estimation of the spatial filters seems to be optimized for the population of interest. Thus, optimal performance of source separation and subsequent source localization did not require the inclusion of a large sample of subjects (n < 20), at least when applying SOS-based statistics that use source spectral diversity to identify and gather similar sources with variable location and orientation. The resulting conclusion that inter-individual neuroanatomical variability is not a major limitation to sensor-space gBSS methods provides boosting perspectives for this promising approach, especially for the detection and localization of task/population related neural sources.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Considering a standard value of 100 µV for the variance of EEG signal, a typical range of partially correlated brain noise is about ~0.5 for occipito/parietal alpha activity, ~0.1 for VEP or beta activities, and ~ 0.01 for early somatosensory evoked potentials and early auditory evoked potentials.
 
2
Group BSS was specifically designed to overcome these difficulties since separation focuses on components that are reproducible across subjects, provided that the method can cope with neuroanatomical differences.
 
Literature
go back to reference Albares M, Lio G, Criaud M et al (2014) The dorsal medial frontal cortex mediates automatic motor inhibition in uncertain contexts: evidence from combined fMRI and EEG studies. Hum Brain Mapp 35:5517–5531. doi:10.1002/hbm.22567 CrossRefPubMed Albares M, Lio G, Criaud M et al (2014) The dorsal medial frontal cortex mediates automatic motor inhibition in uncertain contexts: evidence from combined fMRI and EEG studies. Hum Brain Mapp 35:5517–5531. doi:10.​1002/​hbm.​22567 CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ (1995) An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput 7:1129–1159CrossRefPubMed Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ (1995) An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput 7:1129–1159CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Belouchrani A, AbedMeraim K, Cardoso JF, Moulines E (1997) A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics. IEEE Trans Signal Process 45:434–444. doi:10.1109/78.554307 CrossRef Belouchrani A, AbedMeraim K, Cardoso JF, Moulines E (1997) A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics. IEEE Trans Signal Process 45:434–444. doi:10.​1109/​78.​554307 CrossRef
go back to reference Brunner JF, Hansen TI, Olsen A, Skandsen T, Håberg A, Kropotov J (2013) Long-term test-retest reliability of the P3 NoGo wave and two independent components decomposed from the P3 NoGo wave in a visual Go/NoGo task. Int J Psychophysiol 89:106–114. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.06.005 CrossRefPubMed Brunner JF, Hansen TI, Olsen A, Skandsen T, Håberg A, Kropotov J (2013) Long-term test-retest reliability of the P3 NoGo wave and two independent components decomposed from the P3 NoGo wave in a visual Go/NoGo task. Int J Psychophysiol 89:106–114. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ijpsycho.​2013.​06.​005 CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cardoso JF (1994) On the performance of orthogonal source separation algorithms. Proc EUSIPCO’94, pp 776–779 Cardoso JF (1994) On the performance of orthogonal source separation algorithms. Proc EUSIPCO’94, pp 776–779
go back to reference Cardoso J-F (1995) The invariant approach to source separation. NOLTA Cardoso J-F (1995) The invariant approach to source separation. NOLTA
go back to reference Cardoso J, Souloumiac A (1993) Blind beamforming for non-Gaussian signals. IEE Proc-F Radar Signal Process 140:362–370CrossRef Cardoso J, Souloumiac A (1993) Blind beamforming for non-Gaussian signals. IEE Proc-F Radar Signal Process 140:362–370CrossRef
go back to reference Greenblatt RE, Ossadtchi A, Pflieger ME (2005) Local linear estimators for the bioelectromagnetic inverse problem. IEEE Trans Signal Process 53:3403–3412. doi:10.1109/TSP.2005.853201 Greenblatt RE, Ossadtchi A, Pflieger ME (2005) Local linear estimators for the bioelectromagnetic inverse problem. IEEE Trans Signal Process 53:3403–3412. doi:10.​1109/​TSP.​2005.​853201
go back to reference Jonmohamadi Y, Poudel G, Innes C, Jones RD (2013) Electromagnetic tomography via source-space-ICA. International conference of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual conference, pp 37–40. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2013.6609431 Jonmohamadi Y, Poudel G, Innes C, Jones RD (2013) Electromagnetic tomography via source-space-ICA. International conference of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual conference, pp 37–40. doi:10.​1109/​EMBC.​2013.​6609431
go back to reference Lio G, Boulinguez P (2013) Greater robustness of second order statistics than higher order statistics algorithms to distortions of the mixing matrix in blind source separation of human EEG: implications for single-subject and group analyses. NeuroImage 67:137–152. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.015 CrossRefPubMed Lio G, Boulinguez P (2013) Greater robustness of second order statistics than higher order statistics algorithms to distortions of the mixing matrix in blind source separation of human EEG: implications for single-subject and group analyses. NeuroImage 67:137–152. doi:10.​1016/​j.​neuroimage.​2012.​11.​015 CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sarvas J (1987) Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys Med Biol 32:11–22CrossRefPubMed Sarvas J (1987) Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys Med Biol 32:11–22CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tadel F, Baillet S, Mosher JC et al (2011) Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Comput Intell Neurosci Comput Intell Neurosci 2011:e879716. doi:10.1155/2011/879716 Tadel F, Baillet S, Mosher JC et al (2011) Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Comput Intell Neurosci Comput Intell Neurosci 2011:e879716. doi:10.​1155/​2011/​879716
go back to reference Tang A (2010) Applications of second order blind identification to high-density EEG-based brain imaging: a review. In: Zhang L, Lu BL, Kwok J (eds) Advances in neural networks. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 368–377 Tang A (2010) Applications of second order blind identification to high-density EEG-based brain imaging: a review. In: Zhang L, Lu BL, Kwok J (eds) Advances in neural networks. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 368–377
go back to reference Yeredor A (2000) Blind separation of Gaussian sources via second-order statistics with asymptotically optimal weighting. IEEE Signal Process Lett 7:197–200. doi:10.1109/97.847367 CrossRef Yeredor A (2000) Blind separation of Gaussian sources via second-order statistics with asymptotically optimal weighting. IEEE Signal Process Lett 7:197–200. doi:10.​1109/​97.​847367 CrossRef
Metadata
Title
How Does Sensor-Space Group Blind Source Separation Face Inter-individual Neuroanatomical Variability? Insights from a Simulation Study Based on the PALS-B12 Atlas
Authors
Guillaume Lio
Philippe Boulinguez
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Brain Topography / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0896-0267
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6792
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-016-0497-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Brain Topography 1/2018 Go to the issue