Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

How do we deliver our findings? Analysis of podium presentations at shoulder meetings

Authors: Joan Miquel, Fernando Santana, Albert Barrera, Carlos Torrens

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the time structure of oral presentations delivered at three shoulder congresses: shoulder sessions at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Meeting, European Foundation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) Congress, and International Congress of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (ICSES).

Methods

A total of 160 oral presentations at the 2016 AAOS Annual Meeting, 17th EFORT Congress, and 13th ICSES were included. Podium presentations were categorized by topic, congress, inclusion of video support, and nationality of the speaker. Total time and time dedicated to each section of the presentation (introduction, methods, results, discussion and conclusions) were collected for all podium presentations.

Results

Approximately 34% of speakers exceeded time constraints. No differences were found in the times that presenters used for the introduction, methods, results, and conclusions sections (p > 0.05). However, when extended introductions were delivered, the results and conclusions sections were shortened (r = − 0.2 and r = − 0.21, respectively). Inclusion of video support tended to result in exceedance of time limits (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

One third of the shoulder surgeons exceeded time constraints in their conference presentations, and no distinctions were found in time allocations for different sections of the presentations. Longer introductions may lead to time restriction in the results and conclusions sections.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anholt RRH. Dazzle‘em with style: the art of oral scientific presentation. New York: Freeman; 2006. Anholt RRH. Dazzle‘em with style: the art of oral scientific presentation. New York: Freeman; 2006.
2.
go back to reference Booth V. Communicating in science: writing a scientific paper and speaking at scientific meetings. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. Booth V. Communicating in science: writing a scientific paper and speaking at scientific meetings. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
3.
go back to reference Tierney EP. How to make effective presentations. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1996. Tierney EP. How to make effective presentations. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1996.
4.
go back to reference Davis M, Davis KJ, Dunagan MM. Scientific papers and presentations. 3rd ed. San Diego: Elsevier Science Publishing Co Inc; 2012. Davis M, Davis KJ, Dunagan MM. Scientific papers and presentations. 3rd ed. San Diego: Elsevier Science Publishing Co Inc; 2012.
5.
go back to reference Solagberu BA. How to present a paper at a scientific meeting. West Afr J Med. 2004;23:260–3.PubMed Solagberu BA. How to present a paper at a scientific meeting. West Afr J Med. 2004;23:260–3.PubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Waljee JF, Larson BP, Chang KWC, Ono S, Holland AL, Haase SC, Chung KC. Developing the art of scientific presentation. J Hand Surg. 2012;37:2580–8.e1-2.CrossRef Waljee JF, Larson BP, Chang KWC, Ono S, Holland AL, Haase SC, Chung KC. Developing the art of scientific presentation. J Hand Surg. 2012;37:2580–8.e1-2.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Farrokhyar F, Dath D, Amin N, Bhandari M, Kelly S, Kolkin A, et al. Standardized methodological assessment of research presentations (SHARP): development of a new instrument. Am J Surg. 2014;207:964–73.CrossRefPubMed Farrokhyar F, Dath D, Amin N, Bhandari M, Kelly S, Kolkin A, et al. Standardized methodological assessment of research presentations (SHARP): development of a new instrument. Am J Surg. 2014;207:964–73.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Mills CB, Weldon LJ. Reading text from computer screens. ACM Computer Surv. 1987;19:329–57.CrossRef Mills CB, Weldon LJ. Reading text from computer screens. ACM Computer Surv. 1987;19:329–57.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Zerwic JJ, Grandfield K, Kavanaugh K, Berger B, Graham L, Mershon M. Tips for better visual elements in posters and podium presentations. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2010;23:267. Zerwic JJ, Grandfield K, Kavanaugh K, Berger B, Graham L, Mershon M. Tips for better visual elements in posters and podium presentations. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2010;23:267.
11.
go back to reference Musial JL, Rubinfeld IS, Parker AO, Reickert CA, Adams SA, et al. Developing a scoring rubric for resident research presentations: a pilot study. J Surg Res. 2007;142:304–7.CrossRefPubMed Musial JL, Rubinfeld IS, Parker AO, Reickert CA, Adams SA, et al. Developing a scoring rubric for resident research presentations: a pilot study. J Surg Res. 2007;142:304–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wiese J, Varosy P, Tierney L. Improving oral presentation skills with a clinical reasoning curriculum: a prospective controlled study. Am J Med. 2002;112:212–8.CrossRefPubMed Wiese J, Varosy P, Tierney L. Improving oral presentation skills with a clinical reasoning curriculum: a prospective controlled study. Am J Med. 2002;112:212–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
How do we deliver our findings? Analysis of podium presentations at shoulder meetings
Authors
Joan Miquel
Fernando Santana
Albert Barrera
Carlos Torrens
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0942-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2018 Go to the issue