Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

How do individuals rate their health compared to others? findings based on a nationally representative sample in Germany

Authors: André Hajek, Hans-Helmut König

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study is to explore the determinants of health comparisons (i.e., how individuals rate their health compared to other individuals in their age bracket) in the general adult population (total sample and in different age groups).

Methods

Data were used from the general adult population in Germany (wave 46, n = 3,876 individuals; November 2021 to January 2022), based on the GESIS panel, which is a probability-based mixed-mode panel. Health comparisons were used as outcome measure. Socioeconomic, lifestyle-related and health-related determinants were included in regression analysis. Robustness checks were conducted.

Results

Regressions showed that more favorable health comparisons were associated with being male (among individuals up to 39 years), higher age (among the total sample), higher education (among the total sample and individuals up to 39 years), higher income (among the total sample and individuals aged 40 to 64 years), not “being married, and living together with a spouse” (among the total sample), never eating meat (among the total sample, individuals up to 39 years and particularly individuals aged 40 to 64 years), drinking alcohol (among the total sample, individuals aged 40 to 64 years and individuals aged 65 years and over), a higher frequency of sports activities (all groups) and a higher satisfaction with health (also in all groups).

Conclusion

In addition to the evident link between health satisfaction and health comparisons, regression analysis revealed that certain socioeconomic factors, such as a higher income level, along with positive lifestyle-related factors - especially among middle-aged individuals - were significantly associated with more positive health comparisons. This knowledge is required in order to support individuals at risk for negative health comparisons. This is important because negative health comparisons can contribute to poor well-being and poor health outcomes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Easterlin RA. Does money buy happiness? The public interest. 1973;30:3.
2.
Easterlin RA. Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and households in economic growth. Elsevier; 1974. pp. 89–125.
3.
Ferrer-i-Carbonell A. Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. J Public Econ. 2005;89(5–6):997–1019.CrossRef
4.
Hajek A, König H-H. Feeling too old? Consequences for subjective well-being. Longitudinal findings from the German ageing survey. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020;90:104127.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Hajek A, König H-H. Negative health comparisons decrease affective and cognitive well-being in older adults. Evidence from a population-based longitudinal study in Germany. Front Psychol. 2016;7:999.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Hajek A, König H-H. Effect of health comparisons on functional health and depressive symptoms-results of a population-based longitudinal study of older adults in Germany. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0156235.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Hajek A, König H-H. Self-efficacy moderates the relationship between health comparisons and social exclusion: results of the German ageing survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):1–7.CrossRef
8.
Hajek A, König HH. The role of optimism, self-esteem, and self‐efficacy in moderating the relation between health comparisons and subjective well‐being: results of a nationally representative longitudinal study among older adults. Br J Health Psychol. 2019;24(3):547–70.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Hajek A, König H-H. The role of optimism, self-esteem, and self-efficacy in moderating the relation between health comparisons and subjective well-being: results of a nationally representative longitudinal study among older adults. Br J Health Psychol. 2019;24(3):547–70.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Hajek A, König H-H. Health comparisons and loneliness and perceived social isolation: a brief overview and empirical evidence. In: Hajek A, Riedel-Heller SG, König HH, editors. Loneliness and social isolation in Old Age: correlates and implications. Volume 1. London: Routledge; 2023. pp. 121–9.CrossRef
11.
12.
Braveman P, Gottlieb L. The social determinants of health: it’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(Suppl 2):19–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Bosnjak M, Dannwolf T, Enderle T, et al. Establishing an open probability-based mixed-mode panel of the general population in Germany: the GESIS panel. Social Sci Comput Rev. 2018;36(1):103–15.CrossRef
14.
Pötzschke S, Weiß B. Die Nutzung Des GESIS Panel als offene Umfrageinfrastruktur für innovative Forschungsprojekte. Informationsdienst Soziale Indikatoren. 2020(65):34–8.
15.
Guma J. What influences individual perception of health? Using machine learning to disentangle self-perceived health. SSM-Population Health. 2021;16:100996.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Cannella V, Villar F, Serrat R, Tulle E. Psychosocial aspects of participation in competitive sports among older athletes: a scoping review. Gerontologist. 2022;62(8):e468–e80.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Von Hippel PT. New confidence intervals and bias comparisons show that maximum likelihood can beat multiple imputation in small samples. Struct Equation Modeling: Multidisciplinary J. 2016;23(3):422–37.CrossRef
18.
Lin L, Liao S, Yan Z, Liu C, Wang Q, Wang F. The level of expectations regarding aging among older adults: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association; 2023.
19.
Braveman P, Gottlieb L. The social determinants of health: it’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(1suppl2):19–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
21.
Davis SK, Xu R, Riestra P, et al. Association of adiponectin and socioeconomic status in African American men and women: the Jackson heart study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:1–11.CrossRef
22.
Fabiani H, Mudjihartini N, Lestari W. Dietary omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids ratio is correlated with high molecular weight adiponectin level in Indonesian office workers. Int J Nutr Pharmacol Neurol Dis. 2021;11(1):64–70.CrossRef
23.
Jang SJ, Song D, Baek K, Zippay A. Double child and elder care responsibilities and emotional exhaustion of an older sandwiched generation: the mediating effect of self-care. Int Social Work. 2021;64(4):611–24.CrossRef
24.
Downward P, Rasciute S. The relative demands for sports and leisure in England. Eur Sport Manage Q. 2010;10(2):189–214.CrossRef
25.
26.
27.
Guasch-Ferré M, Satija A, Blondin SA, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of red meat consumption in comparison with various comparison diets on cardiovascular risk factors. Circulation. 2019;139(15):1828–45.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Farvid MS, Sidahmed E, Spence ND, Mante Angua K, Rosner BA, Barnett JB. Consumption of red meat and processed meat and cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021;36:937–51.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Horton S, Dionigi RA, Gard M, Baker J, Weir P. Don’t sit back with the geraniums, get out: the complexity of older women’s stories of sport participation. J Amateur Sport. 2018;4(1):24–51.CrossRef
30.
Smart RG, Ogborne AC. Beliefs about the cardiovascular benefits of drinking wine in the adult population of Ontario. Am J Drug Alcohol Abus. 2002;28(2):371–8.CrossRef
31.
Hajek A, Bock J-O, Weyerer S, König H-H. Correlates of alcohol consumption among germans in the second half of life. Results of a population-based observational study. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):1–13.CrossRef
32.
Baumgartner H, Weijters B, Pieters R. The biasing effect of common method variance: some clarifications. J Acad Mark Sci. 2021;49:221–35.CrossRef
33.
Stadtmüller S, Minderop I, Weyandt K. GESIS Panel Technical Report Recruitment 2021 (i11 and i12) Related to ZA5664 and ZA5665. Cologne: GESIS; 2023.
34.
Siegers R, Steinhauer HW, Schütt J. SOEP-Core v37-Documentation of sample sizes and panel attrition in the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP)(1984 until 2020). SOEP Survey Papers; 2022.
Metadata
Title
How do individuals rate their health compared to others? findings based on a nationally representative sample in Germany
Authors
André Hajek
Hans-Helmut König
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17600-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Go to the issue

Research

Barriers and enabling structural forces affecting access to antiretroviral therapy in Nigeria

Research

Epidemiological characteristics of neuroendocrine neoplasms in Beijing: a population-based retrospective study

Research

Good practice in reaching and treating refugees in addiction care in Germany – a Delphi study

Research

The relationship between physical activity and the health of primary and secondary school teachers: the chain mediating effects of body image and self-efficacy

Research

Association between socioeconomic status and post-stroke depression in middle-aged and older adults: results from the China health and retirement longitudinal study

Research

Socio-demographic predictors of not having private dental insurance coverage: machine-learning algorithms may help identify the disadvantaged