Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 3/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Paper

How do Breast Imaging Centers Communicate Results to Women with Limited English Proficiency and Other Barriers to Care?

Authors: Erin N. Marcus, Tulay Koru-Sengul, Feng Miao, Monica Yepes, Lee Sanders

Published in: Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Research suggests that women with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) and ethnic minority women are at increased risk of being inadequately informed of their mammogram result. The purpose of this study is to explore breast imaging centers’ communication practices and assess how these centers accommodate women with low literacy and LEP. A 35-question survey was distributed to a national association of more than 700 breast health centers. Descriptive analysis of the overall sample and Fisher’s exact or Chi squared testing to distinguish differences between subgroups were performed. Respondents from 206 centers completed questionnaires. 29 % of respondents stated that more than a quarter of their patients were black, 27 % of respondents stated that more than a quarter of their patients were Hispanic/Latina, and 13 % of respondents stated that more than a quarter of their patients had LEP. Overall, 18 % of respondents reported they do not routinely telephone patients with results, 15 % do not have multilingual staff or translators available to answer questions, and 69 % send result letters in English only. Of note, 69 % use patient navigators. Centers reported systemic strengths and barriers to clear communication of mammography results. Our findings are consistent with past investigations identifying a general need to improve the communication of breast imaging results and suggesting that result notification letters alone are inadequate in ensuring that every woman understands her personal results and follow-up plan.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kaplan CP, Crane LA, Stewart S, Juarez-Reyes M. Factors affecting follow-up among low-income women with breast abnormalities. J Women’s Health. 2004;13:195–206.CrossRef Kaplan CP, Crane LA, Stewart S, Juarez-Reyes M. Factors affecting follow-up among low-income women with breast abnormalities. J Women’s Health. 2004;13:195–206.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dolan NC, Feinglass J, Priyanth A, Haviley C, Sorensen AV, Venta LA. Measuring satisfaction with mammography results reporting. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:157–62.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dolan NC, Feinglass J, Priyanth A, Haviley C, Sorensen AV, Venta LA. Measuring satisfaction with mammography results reporting. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:157–62.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Levin K, Brauening PM, O’Malley M, Pisano E, Barrett E, Earp J. Communicating results of diagnostic mammography: what do patients think?*. Acad Radiol. 2000;7:1069–76.PubMedCrossRef Levin K, Brauening PM, O’Malley M, Pisano E, Barrett E, Earp J. Communicating results of diagnostic mammography: what do patients think?*. Acad Radiol. 2000;7:1069–76.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Moy BB. Barriers to repeat mammography: cultural perspectives of African-American, Asian, and Hispanic women. Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England). 2006;15:623–34.CrossRef Moy BB. Barriers to repeat mammography: cultural perspectives of African-American, Asian, and Hispanic women. Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England). 2006;15:623–34.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Raza S, Rosen MP, Chorny K, Mehta TS, Hulka CA, Baum JK. Patient expectations and costs of immediate reporting of screening mammography: talk isn’t cheap. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:579–83.PubMedCrossRef Raza S, Rosen MP, Chorny K, Mehta TS, Hulka CA, Baum JK. Patient expectations and costs of immediate reporting of screening mammography: talk isn’t cheap. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:579–83.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zapka JG. Processes of care in cervical and breast cancer screening and follow-up–the importance of communication. Prev Med. 2004;39:81–90.PubMedCrossRef Zapka JG. Processes of care in cervical and breast cancer screening and follow-up–the importance of communication. Prev Med. 2004;39:81–90.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zapka JG. Print information to inform decisions about mammography screening participation in 16 countries with population-based programs. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63:126–37.PubMedCrossRef Zapka JG. Print information to inform decisions about mammography screening participation in 16 countries with population-based programs. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63:126–37.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference McCarthy BD, Yood MU, Janz NK, Boohaker EA, Ward RE, Johnson CC. Evaluation of factors potentially associated with inadequate follow-up of mammographic abnormalities. Cancer. 1996;77:2070–6.PubMedCrossRef McCarthy BD, Yood MU, Janz NK, Boohaker EA, Ward RE, Johnson CC. Evaluation of factors potentially associated with inadequate follow-up of mammographic abnormalities. Cancer. 1996;77:2070–6.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mojica CM, Bastani R, Ponce NA, Boscardin WJ. Latinas with abnormal breast findings: patient predictors of timely diagnostic resolution. J Women’s Health. 2007;16:1468–77.CrossRef Mojica CM, Bastani R, Ponce NA, Boscardin WJ. Latinas with abnormal breast findings: patient predictors of timely diagnostic resolution. J Women’s Health. 2007;16:1468–77.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yabroff KR, Breen N, Vernon SW, Meissner HI, Freedman AN, Ballard-Barbash R. What factors are associated with diagnostic follow-up after abnormal mammograms? Findings from a US National Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:723–32.PubMed Yabroff KR, Breen N, Vernon SW, Meissner HI, Freedman AN, Ballard-Barbash R. What factors are associated with diagnostic follow-up after abnormal mammograms? Findings from a US National Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:723–32.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Kerner JF, Yedidia M, Padgett D, et al. Realizing the promise of breast cancer screening: clinical follow-up after abnormal screening among black women. Prevent Med. 2003;37:92–101.CrossRef Kerner JF, Yedidia M, Padgett D, et al. Realizing the promise of breast cancer screening: clinical follow-up after abnormal screening among black women. Prevent Med. 2003;37:92–101.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jones B, Dailey A, Calvocoressi L, et al. Inadequate follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms: findings from the race differences in screening mammography process study (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16:809–21.PubMedCrossRef Jones B, Dailey A, Calvocoressi L, et al. Inadequate follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms: findings from the race differences in screening mammography process study (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16:809–21.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Press R, Carrasquillo O, Sciacca R, Giardina E. Racial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogram. J Women’s Health. 2008;17:923–30.CrossRef Press R, Carrasquillo O, Sciacca R, Giardina E. Racial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogram. J Women’s Health. 2008;17:923–30.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Karliner LLS, Ma L, Hofmann M, Kerlikowske K. Language barriers, location of care, and delays in follow-up of abnormal mammograms. Med Care. 2012;50:171–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Karliner LLS, Ma L, Hofmann M, Kerlikowske K. Language barriers, location of care, and delays in follow-up of abnormal mammograms. Med Care. 2012;50:171–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Priyanth A, Feinglass J, Dolan NC, Haviley C, Venta LA. Patient satisfaction with the communication of mammographic results before and after the mammography quality standards reauthorization act of 1998. Am J Radiol. 2002;178:451–6. Priyanth A, Feinglass J, Dolan NC, Haviley C, Venta LA. Patient satisfaction with the communication of mammographic results before and after the mammography quality standards reauthorization act of 1998. Am J Radiol. 2002;178:451–6.
18.
go back to reference Karliner LS, Kaplan CP, Juarbe T, Pasick R, Perez-Stable EJ. Poor patient comprehension of abnormal mammography results. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:432–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Karliner LS, Kaplan CP, Juarbe T, Pasick R, Perez-Stable EJ. Poor patient comprehension of abnormal mammography results. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:432–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jones BA, Reams K, Calvocoressi L, Dailey A, Kasl SV, Liston NM. Adequacy of communicating results from screening mammograms to african-american and white women. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:531–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Jones BA, Reams K, Calvocoressi L, Dailey A, Kasl SV, Liston NM. Adequacy of communicating results from screening mammograms to african-american and white women. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:531–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Marcus EN, DelToro Y, Pereyra M, Romilly AP, Velasquez V, Yepes M, Sanders L. Mammography result notification letters: can most women understand them? JGIM. 2009;24(Suppl 1):S119. Marcus EN, DelToro Y, Pereyra M, Romilly AP, Velasquez V, Yepes M, Sanders L. Mammography result notification letters: can most women understand them? JGIM. 2009;24(Suppl 1):S119.
21.
go back to reference Marcus EN, Sanders L, Pereyra M, DelToro Y, Romilly AP, Yepes M, Webb Hooper M, Jones BA. Mammography result letters: are they easy to read and understand? J Women’s Health. 2011;20:545–51.CrossRef Marcus EN, Sanders L, Pereyra M, DelToro Y, Romilly AP, Yepes M, Webb Hooper M, Jones BA. Mammography result letters: are they easy to read and understand? J Women’s Health. 2011;20:545–51.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C. The health literacy of America’s Adults: Results From the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Institute of Education Science, National Center for Education Statistics. NCES; 2006. p. 483. Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006483.pdf. Accessed Feb 28 2012. Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C. The health literacy of America’s Adults: Results From the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Institute of Education Science, National Center for Education Statistics. NCES; 2006. p. 483. Available at: http://​nces.​ed.​gov/​pubs2006/​2006483.​pdf. Accessed Feb 28 2012.
23.
go back to reference Shea J, Beers B, McDonald V, Quistberg D, Ravenell K, Asch D. Assessing health literacy in African American and caucasian adults: disparities in rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine (REALM) scores. Fam Med. 2004;36:575–81.PubMed Shea J, Beers B, McDonald V, Quistberg D, Ravenell K, Asch D. Assessing health literacy in African American and caucasian adults: disparities in rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine (REALM) scores. Fam Med. 2004;36:575–81.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Battaglia TA, Roloff K, Posner MA, Freund KM. Improving follow-up to abnormal breast cancer screening in an urban population. Cancer. 2007;109:359–67.PubMedCrossRef Battaglia TA, Roloff K, Posner MA, Freund KM. Improving follow-up to abnormal breast cancer screening in an urban population. Cancer. 2007;109:359–67.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ell K, Vourlekis B, Lee PJ, Xie B. Patient navigation and case management following an abnormal mammogram: a randomized clinical trial. Prev Med. 2007;44:26–33.PubMedCrossRef Ell K, Vourlekis B, Lee PJ, Xie B. Patient navigation and case management following an abnormal mammogram: a randomized clinical trial. Prev Med. 2007;44:26–33.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Palmieri FM, Deperi ER, Mincey BA, Smith JA, Wen LK, Chewar DM, Abaya R, Colon-Otero G, Perez EA. Comprehensive diagnostic program for medically underserved women with abnormal breast screening evaluations in an urban population. Mayo Clin Proceed. 2009;84:317–22.CrossRef Palmieri FM, Deperi ER, Mincey BA, Smith JA, Wen LK, Chewar DM, Abaya R, Colon-Otero G, Perez EA. Comprehensive diagnostic program for medically underserved women with abnormal breast screening evaluations in an urban population. Mayo Clin Proceed. 2009;84:317–22.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lown BA, Roy E, Gorman P, Sasson JP. Women’s and residents’ experiences of communication in the diagnostic mammography suite. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77:328–37.PubMedCrossRef Lown BA, Roy E, Gorman P, Sasson JP. Women’s and residents’ experiences of communication in the diagnostic mammography suite. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77:328–37.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Jones BA, Culler CS, Kasl SV. Is variation in the quality of mammographic services race linked? J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2001;12:113–26.PubMedCrossRef Jones BA, Culler CS, Kasl SV. Is variation in the quality of mammographic services race linked? J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2001;12:113–26.PubMedCrossRef
30.
31.
go back to reference Phillips C, Rothstein J, Beaver K, Sherman BJ, Freund KM, Battaglia TA. Patient navigation to increase mammography screening among inner city women. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;6:123–9.CrossRef Phillips C, Rothstein J, Beaver K, Sherman BJ, Freund KM, Battaglia TA. Patient navigation to increase mammography screening among inner city women. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;6:123–9.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Zapka J, Taplin SH, Anhang Price R, Cranos C, Yabroff R. Factors in quality care—the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests—problems in the steps and interfaces of care. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2010;40:58–71. Zapka J, Taplin SH, Anhang Price R, Cranos C, Yabroff R. Factors in quality care—the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests—problems in the steps and interfaces of care. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2010;40:58–71.
34.
go back to reference Barton M, Morley DS, Moore S, Allen D, Kleinman KP, Emmons KM, Fletcher SW. Decreasing women’s anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:529–38.PubMedCrossRef Barton M, Morley DS, Moore S, Allen D, Kleinman KP, Emmons KM, Fletcher SW. Decreasing women’s anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:529–38.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Lobb R, Allen JD, Emmons KM, Ayanian JZ. Timely care after an abnormal mammogram among low-income women in a public breast cancer screening program. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:521–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lobb R, Allen JD, Emmons KM, Ayanian JZ. Timely care after an abnormal mammogram among low-income women in a public breast cancer screening program. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:521–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Masi C, Blackman D, Peek M. Interventions to enhance breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment among racial and ethnic minority women. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64:195S–242S.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Masi C, Blackman D, Peek M. Interventions to enhance breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment among racial and ethnic minority women. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64:195S–242S.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Baker DW, Hayes R, Fortier JP. Interpreter use and satisfaction with interpersonal aspects of care for Spanish-speaking patients. Med Care. 1998;36:1461–70.PubMedCrossRef Baker DW, Hayes R, Fortier JP. Interpreter use and satisfaction with interpersonal aspects of care for Spanish-speaking patients. Med Care. 1998;36:1461–70.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Ngo-Metzger Q, Sorkin DH, Phillips RS, Greenfield S, Massagli MP, Clarridge B, Kaplan SH. Providing high-quality care for limited English proficient patients: the importance of language concordance and interpreter use. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:324–30.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ngo-Metzger Q, Sorkin DH, Phillips RS, Greenfield S, Massagli MP, Clarridge B, Kaplan SH. Providing high-quality care for limited English proficient patients: the importance of language concordance and interpreter use. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:324–30.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Weech-Maldonado R, Morales LS, Elliott M, Spritzer K, Marshall G, Hays RD. Race/ethnicity, language, and patients’ assessments of care in medicaid managed care. Health Ser Res. 2003;38:789–808.CrossRef Weech-Maldonado R, Morales LS, Elliott M, Spritzer K, Marshall G, Hays RD. Race/ethnicity, language, and patients’ assessments of care in medicaid managed care. Health Ser Res. 2003;38:789–808.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Karliner L, Kim S, Meltzer D, et al. Influence of language barriers on outcomes of hospital care for general medicine inpatients. J Hosp Med. 2010;5:276–82.PubMedCrossRef Karliner L, Kim S, Meltzer D, et al. Influence of language barriers on outcomes of hospital care for general medicine inpatients. J Hosp Med. 2010;5:276–82.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Carney PA. An assessment of the likelihood, frequency, and content of verbal communication between radiologists and women receiving screening and diagnostic mammography. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:1056–63.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Carney PA. An assessment of the likelihood, frequency, and content of verbal communication between radiologists and women receiving screening and diagnostic mammography. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:1056–63.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Collins KC, Hughes DL, Doty MM, Ives BL, Edwards JN, Tenney K. Report: diverse communities, common concerns: assessing health care quality for minority Americans. New York: Commonwealth Fund; 2002. Collins KC, Hughes DL, Doty MM, Ives BL, Edwards JN, Tenney K. Report: diverse communities, common concerns: assessing health care quality for minority Americans. New York: Commonwealth Fund; 2002.
45.
go back to reference DeVoe JE, Fryer GE, Phillips R, Green L. Receipt of preventive care among adults: insurance status and usual source of care. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:786–91.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef DeVoe JE, Fryer GE, Phillips R, Green L. Receipt of preventive care among adults: insurance status and usual source of care. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:786–91.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Mayberry RM, Mili F, Ofili E. Racial and ethnic differences in access to medical care. Med Care. 2000;57:108–45.CrossRef Mayberry RM, Mili F, Ofili E. Racial and ethnic differences in access to medical care. Med Care. 2000;57:108–45.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
How do Breast Imaging Centers Communicate Results to Women with Limited English Proficiency and Other Barriers to Care?
Authors
Erin N. Marcus
Tulay Koru-Sengul
Feng Miao
Monica Yepes
Lee Sanders
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1557-1912
Electronic ISSN: 1557-1920
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-012-9771-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 3/2014 Go to the issue