Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

How can we improve patients’ access to new drugs under uncertainties? : South Korea’s experience with risk sharing arrangements

Authors: Boram Lee, Eun-Young Bae, SeungJin Bae, Hyun-Jin Choi, Kyung-Bok Son, Young-Sil Lee, Suhyun Jang, Tae-Jin Lee

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

New drugs including cancer drugs and orphan drugs are becoming increasingly more expensive. Risk sharing arrangements (RSAs) could manage the risk based on both financial impact and the health outcome of new drugs if reimbursed. To improve patients’ access to new drugs under uncertainties, many developed countries have adopted RSAs. In this study, we aimed to understand the effects of RSAs in South Korea on patients’ access.

Methods

We reviewed current status of RSA drugs in South Korea. The number of appraisals and time gap between market approval and reimbursement per RSA drug were considered to quantify improvement of patients’ access as they showed how rapidly decisions on reimbursement of RSA drugs were derived. Then, we applied a comparative analysis to determine whether the RSA drugs in South Korea were reimbursed in the UK, Italy, and Australia. Most data for this study were obtained from websites of the governmental department/agencies responsible for appraisal of drug reimbursement in each country. And literatures related to RSAs were investigated as well.

Results

The eligibility for Korean RSAs had two key components - drugs for cancer and rare diseases and not having other alternative treatments. As of the first half of 2019, there were 39 RSA drugs reimbursed in South Korea, the majority of which were financial-based schemes. Refund and expenditure cap were the representative types (89.7%). After introduction of RSAs, the time gap and number of appraisals were decreased. Based on the indications of RSA drugs, the level of drug coverage in South Korea was found lower than Italy, similar to the UK, and higher than Australia.

Conclusions

RSAs in South Korea significantly enhanced patients’ access to new drugs and led to the alleviation of patients’ out-of-pocket expenses. The drug coverage of South Korea had a level comparable to that of other countries. This study provides implications for countries that have a dual mission of containing pharmaceutical expenditure and improving access to new drugs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Walker S, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Palmer S. Coverage with evidence development, only in research, risk sharing, or patient access scheme? A framework for coverage decisions. Value Health. 2012;15(3):570–9.CrossRef Walker S, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Palmer S. Coverage with evidence development, only in research, risk sharing, or patient access scheme? A framework for coverage decisions. Value Health. 2012;15(3):570–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Garrison LP, Towse A, Briggs A, de Pouvourville G, Grueger J, Mohr PE, et al. Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements-good practices for design, implementation, and evaluation: report of the ISPOR good practices for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements task force. Value Health. 2013;16(5):703–19.CrossRef Garrison LP, Towse A, Briggs A, de Pouvourville G, Grueger J, Mohr PE, et al. Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements-good practices for design, implementation, and evaluation: report of the ISPOR good practices for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements task force. Value Health. 2013;16(5):703–19.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kanavos P, Ferrario A, Tafuri G, Siviero P. Managing risk and uncertainty in health technology introduction: the role of managed entry agreements. Glob Policy. 2017;8:84–92.CrossRef Kanavos P, Ferrario A, Tafuri G, Siviero P. Managing risk and uncertainty in health technology introduction: the role of managed entry agreements. Glob Policy. 2017;8:84–92.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tuffaha HW, Scuffham PA. The Australian managed entry scheme: are we getting it right? Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36(5):555–65.CrossRef Tuffaha HW, Scuffham PA. The Australian managed entry scheme: are we getting it right? Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36(5):555–65.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wenzl M, Chapman S. Performance-based managed entry agreements for new medicines in OECD countries and EU member states: How they work and possible improvements going forward. OECD Health Working Papers, No. 115. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1787/6e5e4c0f-en. Wenzl M, Chapman S. Performance-based managed entry agreements for new medicines in OECD countries and EU member states: How they work and possible improvements going forward. OECD Health Working Papers, No. 115. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1787/​6e5e4c0f-en.
6.
go back to reference Ferrario A, Kanavos P. Managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals: the European experience. Brussels: EMiNet; 2013. Ferrario A, Kanavos P. Managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals: the European experience. Brussels: EMiNet; 2013.
7.
go back to reference Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA). Detailed evaluation criteria for drugs subject to negotiation including new drugs. 2016. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA). Detailed evaluation criteria for drugs subject to negotiation including new drugs. 2016.
8.
go back to reference National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). Detailed operation guidelines for risk-sharing drug pricing negotiation. 2016. National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). Detailed operation guidelines for risk-sharing drug pricing negotiation. 2016.
9.
go back to reference Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA). Regulation for evaluation criteria and procedures for reimbursement eligibility of drugs. 2018. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA). Regulation for evaluation criteria and procedures for reimbursement eligibility of drugs. 2018.
12.
go back to reference Spoors J. Patient access schemes in the new NHS. Br J Healthcare Manage. 2012;18(8):412–8.CrossRef Spoors J. Patient access schemes in the new NHS. Br J Healthcare Manage. 2012;18(8):412–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Espín J, Rovira J, García L. Experiences and impact of European risk-sharing schemes focusing on oncology medicines. Brussels: EMiNet; 2011. Espín J, Rovira J, García L. Experiences and impact of European risk-sharing schemes focusing on oncology medicines. Brussels: EMiNet; 2011.
14.
go back to reference Carlson JJ, Chen S, Garrison LP. Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements: An Updated International Review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35(10):1063–72.CrossRef Carlson JJ, Chen S, Garrison LP. Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements: An Updated International Review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35(10):1063–72.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pauwels K, Huys I, Vogler S, Casteels M, Simoens S. Managed Entry Agreements for Oncology Drugs: Lessons from the European Experience to Inform the Future. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:171.CrossRef Pauwels K, Huys I, Vogler S, Casteels M, Simoens S. Managed Entry Agreements for Oncology Drugs: Lessons from the European Experience to Inform the Future. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:171.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Garattini L, Curto A, van de Vooren K. Italian risk-sharing agreements on drugs: are they worthwhile? Eur J Health Econ. 2015;16(1):1–3.CrossRef Garattini L, Curto A, van de Vooren K. Italian risk-sharing agreements on drugs: are they worthwhile? Eur J Health Econ. 2015;16(1):1–3.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kim T-k. Analysis of Impacts of the supplementary schemes on the drug reimbursement decision-making under the Positive List System [master's thesis]. Seoul: Seoul National University; 2018. Kim T-k. Analysis of Impacts of the supplementary schemes on the drug reimbursement decision-making under the Positive List System [master's thesis]. Seoul: Seoul National University; 2018.
37.
go back to reference Gonçalves FR, Santos S, Silva C, Sousa G. Risk-sharing agreements, present and future. Ecancermedicalscience. 2018;12:823.CrossRef Gonçalves FR, Santos S, Silva C, Sousa G. Risk-sharing agreements, present and future. Ecancermedicalscience. 2018;12:823.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Bouvy JC, Sapede C, Garner S. Managed Entry Agreements for Pharmaceuticals in the Context of Adaptive Pathways in Europe. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:280.CrossRef Bouvy JC, Sapede C, Garner S. Managed Entry Agreements for Pharmaceuticals in the Context of Adaptive Pathways in Europe. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:280.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Vitry A, Roughead E. Managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals in Australia. Health Policy. 2014;117(3):345–52.CrossRef Vitry A, Roughead E. Managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals in Australia. Health Policy. 2014;117(3):345–52.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Lee T-J, Bae E-Y, Bae SJ, Son K-B, Yang DW, LEE B, et al. Risk sharing arrangements and post management policy. Wonju: Health Insurance Review and Service (HIRA); 2016. Lee T-J, Bae E-Y, Bae SJ, Son K-B, Yang DW, LEE B, et al. Risk sharing arrangements and post management policy. Wonju: Health Insurance Review and Service (HIRA); 2016.
42.
go back to reference Rotar AM, Preda A, Löblová O, Benkovic V, Zawodnik S, Gulacsi L, et al. Rationalizing the introduction and use of pharmaceutical products: The role of managed entry agreements in Central and Eastern European countries. Health Policy. 2018;122(3):230–6.CrossRef Rotar AM, Preda A, Löblová O, Benkovic V, Zawodnik S, Gulacsi L, et al. Rationalizing the introduction and use of pharmaceutical products: The role of managed entry agreements in Central and Eastern European countries. Health Policy. 2018;122(3):230–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
How can we improve patients’ access to new drugs under uncertainties? : South Korea’s experience with risk sharing arrangements
Authors
Boram Lee
Eun-Young Bae
SeungJin Bae
Hyun-Jin Choi
Kyung-Bok Son
Young-Sil Lee
Suhyun Jang
Tae-Jin Lee
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06919-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Health Services Research 1/2021 Go to the issue