Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2018

01-05-2018 | Editorial

How Can the Intractable Problem of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain (CMP) Be Effectively Managed? The Need for a Well-Integrated Systems Approach

Author: Daniel C. Cherkin, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Special Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) has long been one of the most clinically challenging conditions. The inability of clinicians to identify specific underlying causes of CMP for most patients and the lack of highly effective treatments continues to frustrate both clinicians and patients. Clinician desires to relieve their patients’ suffering in conjunction with patients’ often desperate demands for pain relief have led to increased use of invasive, costly, and higher risk treatments. Unfortunately, these treatments have failed to reduce the debilitating effects of CMP on patients1 and have been accompanied by significant adverse effects. Of particular concern has been the proliferation of opioid prescriptions that has devastated the lives of many patients, families, and communities.2 Fortunately, research has identified safe, effective, and sometimes cost-effective treatment options for the most common types of CMP.3,4 These treatments are now recommended as first-line alternatives to opioids and other pharmacological treatments.5
Literature
1.
go back to reference Martin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK, et al. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA. 2008; 299:656–664. A published erratum appears in JAMA 2008;299:2630.CrossRefPubMed Martin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK, et al. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA. 2008; 299:656–664. A published erratum appears in JAMA 2008;299:2630.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, Skelly A, Hashimoto R, Weimer M, Fu R, Dana T, Kraegel P, Griffin J, Grusing S, Brodt E. Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 169. (Prepared by the Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290–2012-00014-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 16-EHC004-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016. Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, Skelly A, Hashimoto R, Weimer M, Fu R, Dana T, Kraegel P, Griffin J, Grusing S, Brodt E. Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 169. (Prepared by the Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290–2012-00014-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 16-EHC004-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016.
4.
go back to reference Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER). Cognitive and Mind-Body Therapies for Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain: Effectiveness and Value, 2017. Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER). Cognitive and Mind-Body Therapies for Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain: Effectiveness and Value, 2017.
5.
go back to reference Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2017;166(7):514–530.CrossRefPubMed Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2017;166(7):514–530.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2011. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2011. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
7.
go back to reference Nijs J, Clark J, Malfliet A, Ickmans K, Voogt L, Don S, den Bandt H, Goubert D, Kregel J, Coppieters I, Dankaerts W. In the spine or in the brain? Recent advances in pain neuroscience applied in the intervention for low back pain. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35 Suppl 107(5):108–115. Nijs J, Clark J, Malfliet A, Ickmans K, Voogt L, Don S, den Bandt H, Goubert D, Kregel J, Coppieters I, Dankaerts W. In the spine or in the brain? Recent advances in pain neuroscience applied in the intervention for low back pain. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35 Suppl 107(5):108–115.
Metadata
Title
How Can the Intractable Problem of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain (CMP) Be Effectively Managed? The Need for a Well-Integrated Systems Approach
Author
Daniel C. Cherkin, PhD
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue Special Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4362-5

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2018

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine