Top

BMC Public Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

Home environment and noise disturbance in a national sample of multi-family buildings in Sweden-associations with medical symptoms

Authors: Juan Wang, Dan Norbäck

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Poor acoustic conditions at home can have negative health impact. The aim was to investigate home environment factors and medical symptoms associated with noise disturbance.

Methods

All adults (≥18 y) registered in selected apartments in Sweden were invited to participate in a questionnaire survey including medical questions and personal factors. Totally 5775 adults participated (response rate 46%). Information on home environment was obtained through an indoor environment questionnaire. Two-level logistic regression models (individual, municipality) were performed to estimate associations.

Results

Totally 11.9% reported noise disturbance in general at home. Noise disturbance from voice/radio/TV/music/similar sounds from neighbours (13.2%), scraping sound/footsteps/thumping from neighbours (16.5%) and road traffic (16.1%) were common. Younger age and smoking were related to more noise disturbance and more medical symptoms. Noise disturbance was related to tiredness, headache and difficulty concentrating (OR = 1.70–8.19). Renting the apartment (OR = 2.53) and living above ground floor (OR = 1.37) were related to more noise disturbance in general. Living in newer buildings (constructed from 1986 to 2005) was related to less noise disturbance in general (OR = 0.40–0.59). A warmer climate (OR = 1.95), higher municipality population density (OR = 1.24), a longer living time (OR = 1.34), construction year (1961–1975) (OR = 2.42), renting (OR = 1.80–2.32), living above ground floor (OR = 1.45) and having a bathroom fan (OR = 1.84) were associated with increased noise disturbance from neighbours. Factors associated with increased noise disturbance from installations or ventilation/fans/heat pumps included a warmer climate, higher municipality population density, construction year (1961–1995), renting and any mechanical ventilation. Higher municipality population density, construction year (especially 1961–1985) and renting were associated with more noise disturbance from traffic (OR = 1.77–3.92). Renting the apartment (OR = 1.73) and living above ground floor (OR = 1.60) were related to more severe traffic noise disturbances. Noise disturbance in general was partly a mediator of the effects of old buildings, renting the apartment and lack of mechanical ventilation on medical symptoms (% of total effect mediated by noise disturbance: 19–44.8%).

Conclusions

Noise disturbance can be associated medical symptoms. Younger age, smoking, a warmer climate, higher municipality population density and different building factors (e.g. renting the apartment, construction period 1961–1985) can be associated with noise disturbance.

Available only for authorised users

World Health Organization. Burden of Disease from Environmental Noise. Quantification of Healthy Life Years Lost in Europe. Bonn, Germany: WHO; 2011.

Gupta A, Gupta A, Jain K, Gupta S. Noise pollution and impact on children health. Indian J Pediatr. 2018;85(4):300–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-017-2579-7.CrossRefPubMed

Seidman MD, Standring RT. Noise and quality of life. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7(10):3730–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7103730.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Daiber A, Kroller-Schon S, Frenis K, Oelze M, Kalinovic S, Vujacic-Mirski K, et al. Environmental noise induces the release of stress hormones and inflammatory signaling molecules leading to oxidative stress and vascular dysfunction-Signatures of the internal exposome. BioFactors (Oxford, England). 2019;45(4):495–506.

World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for Community Noise. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization Europe; 1999.

Noise in Europe 2014. European Environment Agency, 2014. No 10/2014. https://doi.org/10.2800/763331.CrossRef

Bluhm G, Eriksson C. Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise: research in Sweden. Noise Health. 2011;13(52):212–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.80152.CrossRefPubMed

Guski R, Schreckenberg D, Schuemer R. WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Annoyance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(12):1539.CrossRefPubMedCentral

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 1996-1 acoustics - description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise - part 1: basic quantities and assessment procedures. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2003.

10.

Fields JM, De Jong RG, Gjestland T, Flindell IH, Job RFS, Kurra S, et al. Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: research and a recommendation. J Sound Vib. 2001;242(4):641–79. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2000.3384.CrossRef

11.

Lefèvre M, Chaumond A, Champelovier P, Giorgis Allemand L, Lambert J, Laumon B, et al. Understanding the relationship between air traffic noise exposure and annoyance in populations living near airports in France. Environ Int. 2020;144:106058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106058.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Kempen EV, Casas M, Pershagen G, Foraster M. WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects: A Summary. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(2):379.CrossRefPubMedCentral

13.

Dzhambov AM, Dimitrova DD. Residential road traffic noise as a risk factor for hypertension in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis of analytic studies published in the period 2011–2017. Environ Pollut (Barking, Essex : 1987). 2018;240:306–18.CrossRef

14.

Ndrepepa A, Twardella D. Relationship between noise annoyance from road traffic noise and cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis. Noise Health. 2011;13(52):251–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.80163.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Niemann H, Bonnefoy X, Braubach M, Hecht K, Maschke C, Rodrigues C, et al. Noise-induced annoyance and morbidity results from the pan-European LARES study. Noise Health. 2006;8(31):63–79. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.33537.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Persson Waye K, Bengtsson J, Agge A, Bjorkman M. A descriptive cross-sectional study of annoyance from low frequency noise installations in an urban environment. Noise Health. 2003;5(20):35–46.PubMed

17.

Lee PJ, Jeong JH. Attitudes towards outdoor and neighbour noise during the COVID-19 lockdown: a case study in London. Sustain Cities Soc. 2021;67:102768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102768.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Boverket. Statistiska urval och metoder i Bovekets projekt BETSI. Sweden: Boverket; 2010:1–86. https://www.boverket.se/sv/om-boverket/publicerat-av-boverket/publikationer/2010/statistiska-urval-och-metoder-iboverkets-projekt-betsi/. Accessed 29 Oct 2021. ISBN: 978-91-86342-48-7.

19.

Norback D, Bjornsson E, Janson C, Palmgren U, Boman G. Current asthma and biochemical signs of inflammation in relation to building dampness in dwellings. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1999;3(5):368–76.PubMed

20.

Bjerg A, Ekerljung L, Middelveld R, Dahlen SE, Forsberg B, Franklin K, et al. Increased prevalence of symptoms of rhinitis but not of asthma between 1990 and 2008 in Swedish adults: comparisons of the ECRHS and GA (2) LEN surveys. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e16082. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016082.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Burney PG, Luczynska C, Chinn S, Jarvis D. The European Community respiratory health survey. Eur Respir J. 1994;7(5):954–60. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.94.07050954.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Janson C, Anto J, Burney P, Chinn S, de Marco R, Heinrich J, et al. The European Community respiratory health survey: what are the main results so far? European Community respiratory health survey II. Eur Respir J. 2001;18(3):598–611. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.01.00205801.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Andersson K. Epidemiological approach to indoor air problems. Indoor Air. 1998;8(S4):32–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1998.tb00005.x.CrossRef

24.

Engvall K, Norrby C, Norback D. Ocular, nasal, dermal and respiratory symptoms in relation to heating, ventilation, energy conservation, and reconstruction of older multi-family houses. Indoor Air. 2003;13(3):206–11. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0668.2003.00174.x.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Lista över Sveriges kommuner. http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lista_%C3%B6ver_Sveriges_kommuner. Accessed 29 Oct 2021.

26.

Boverket. Enkätundersökning om boendes upplevda inomhusmiljö och ohälsa - resultat från projektet BETSI. Sweden: Boverket; 2009:1–154. https://docplayer.se/5125540-Boverket-enkatundersokning-om-boendes-upplevdainomhusmiljo-och-ohalsa-resultat-fran-projektet-betsi.html. Accessed 29 Oct 2021. ISBN: 978-91-86342-45-6.

27.

Wang J, Engvall K, Smedje G, Norback D. Rhinitis, asthma and respiratory infections among adults in relation to the home environment in multi-family buildings in Sweden. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105125.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Persson R, Björk J, Ardö J, Albin M, Jakobsson K. Trait anxiety and modeled exposure as determinants of self-reported annoyance to sound, air pollution and other environmental factors in the home. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2007;81(2):179–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-007-0204-1.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Eriksson C, Bodin T, Selander J. Burden of disease from road traffic and railway noise - a quantification of healthy life years lost in Sweden. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017;43(6):519–25. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3653.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Miedema HM, Oudshoorn CG. Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109(4):409–16. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109409.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Brink M, Schäffer B, Vienneau D, Foraster M, Pieren R, Eze IC, et al. A survey on exposure-response relationships for road, rail, and aircraft noise annoyance: differences between continuous and intermittent noise. Environ Int. 2019;125:277–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.043.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Lekaviciute J, Argalasova-Sobotova L. Environmental noise and annoyance in adults: research in central, eastern and South-Eastern Europe and newly independent states. Noise Health. 2013;15(62):42–54. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.107153.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Ohrström E, Björkman M, Rylander R. Noise annoyance with regard to neurophysiological sensitivity, subjective noise sensitivity and personality variables. Psychol Med. 1988;18(3):605–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329170000828X.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Ohrström E. Longitudinal surveys on effects of changes in road traffic noise-annoyance, activity disturbances, and psycho-social well-being. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;115(2):719–29. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1639333.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Öhrström E, Skånberg A, Svensson H, Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A. Institutionen för medicin afsof, Sahlgrenska a, et al. effects of road traffic noise and the benefit of access to quietness. J Sound Vib. 2006;295(1):40–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.11.034.CrossRef

36.

Koszarny Z. The estimate of well-being and self-assessed health status in urban population in various acoustic areas. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2001;52(2):165–78.PubMed

37.

Baudin C, Lefèvre M, Champelovier P, Lambert J, Laumon B, Evrard AS. Aircraft Noise and Psychological Ill-Health: The Results of a Cross-Sectional Study in France. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(8):1642.CrossRefPubMedCentral

38.

Banerjee D. Road traffic noise exposure and annoyance: a cross-sectional study among adult Indian population. Noise Health. 2013;15(66):342–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.116583.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Golmohammadi R, Darvishi E. The combined effects of occupational exposure to noise and other risk factors - a systematic review. Noise Health. 2019;21(101):125–41. https://doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_4_18.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Engvall K, Norrby C, Bandel J, Hult M, Norback D. Development of a multiple regression model to identify multi-family residential buildings with a high prevalence of sick building syndrome (SBS). Indoor Air. 2000;10(2):101–10. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.16000668.2000.010002101.x.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Home environment and noise disturbance in a national sample of multi-family buildings in Sweden-associations with medical symptoms
Authors: Juan Wang
Dan Norbäck
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12069-w

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Home environment and noise disturbance in a national sample of multi-family buildings in Sweden-associations with medical symptoms

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

The nexus between health status and health expenditure, energy consumption and environmental pollution: empirical evidence from SAARC-BIMSTEC regions

Disposal practice and factors associated with unused medicines in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study

An NIH investment in health equity - the economic impact of the Flint Center for Health Equity Solutions

Quality of web-based information at the beginning of a global pandemic: a cross-sectional infodemiology study investigating preventive measures and self care methods of the coronavirus disease 2019

Functional health and symptoms in Spain before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Antibiotic practices among household members and their domestic animals within rural communities in Cumilla district, Bangladesh: a cross-sectional survey