Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Home-delivered meal boxes in a family setting: a qualitative study investigating reasons for use and perceived impact on meal practices

Authors: Marjolijn Vos, Benedicte Deforche, Wendy Van Lippevelde

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cooking and consuming a homemade meal is associated with health benefits. Home-delivered meal boxes can support families in cooking this fresh meal. The current study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of the determinants of meal box use, and of the perceived impact on meal practices of parents with younger (i.e., aged 6–12 years) and older children (i.e., 13–18 years).

Methods

Four focus groups were conducted (n = 19); two with parents of younger children, and two with parents of older children. A semi-structured interview guide was developed and interviews were recorded and transcribed. Reflexive thematic analysis was performed using NVivo 1.4.

Results

Most parents mentioned practical reasons like saving time and money, as well as inspiration, as reasons to choose a home-delivered meal box. Also, tastiness and menu variation were often mentioned as determining factors by both parent groups. However, a few parents stated to stop using the meal boxes because of returning menus or too small portion sizes. Meal box providers were chosen based on the price, the freshness and the quality of the products. Moreover, positive effects on parents’ perceived cooking skills and knowledge were reported. Also, some parents mentioned positively changed attitudes towards vegetarian dishes. Lastly, parents reported healthier eating due to more appropriate portion sizes and more vegetables. A prominent difference between parent groups was that older children played a role in continuing the use of meal boxes, and helped to prepare the meals (contrary to younger children).

Conclusions

Home-delivered meal boxes might be promising to enhance families’ meal practices. This study could inform social marketeers and health promotors to adopt an optimal strategy to reach families.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lang T. Food Industrialisation and Food Power: implications for Food Governance. Dev Policy Rev. 2003;21:555–68.CrossRef Lang T. Food Industrialisation and Food Power: implications for Food Governance. Dev Policy Rev. 2003;21:555–68.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jackson P, Brembeck H, Everts J, Fuentes M, Halkier B, Hertz FD, et al. Reframing convenience food. Palgrave Macmillan; 2018. Jackson P, Brembeck H, Everts J, Fuentes M, Halkier B, Hertz FD, et al. Reframing convenience food. Palgrave Macmillan; 2018.
3.
go back to reference Halkier B. Hybridity and change in cooking skills in everyday life: conceptual contributions from a study of cooking with meal-box schemes. Appetite. 2021;165. Halkier B. Hybridity and change in cooking skills in everyday life: conceptual contributions from a study of cooking with meal-box schemes. Appetite. 2021;165.
4.
go back to reference Hertz FD, Halkier B. Meal box schemes a convenient way to avoid convenience food? Uses and understandings of meal box schemes among Danish consumers. Appetite. 2017;114:232–9.CrossRefPubMed Hertz FD, Halkier B. Meal box schemes a convenient way to avoid convenience food? Uses and understandings of meal box schemes among Danish consumers. Appetite. 2017;114:232–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Raber M, Chandra J, Upadhyaya M, Schick V, Strong LL, Durand C, et al. An evidence-based conceptual framework of healthy cooking. Prev Med Rep. 2016;4:23–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Raber M, Chandra J, Upadhyaya M, Schick V, Strong LL, Durand C, et al. An evidence-based conceptual framework of healthy cooking. Prev Med Rep. 2016;4:23–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Mills S, Brown H, Wrieden W, White M, Adams J. Frequency of eating home cooked meals and potential benefits for diet and health: cross-sectional analysis of a population-based cohort study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14. Mills S, Brown H, Wrieden W, White M, Adams J. Frequency of eating home cooked meals and potential benefits for diet and health: cross-sectional analysis of a population-based cohort study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14.
7.
go back to reference Hammons AJ, Fiese BH. Is frequency of Shared Family meals related to the Nutritional Health of children and adolescents? Pediatrics. 2011;127:1565–74.CrossRef Hammons AJ, Fiese BH. Is frequency of Shared Family meals related to the Nutritional Health of children and adolescents? Pediatrics. 2011;127:1565–74.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Eisenberg ME, Olson RE, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Bearinger LH. Correlations between Family meals and Psychosocial Well-being among adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:792–6.CrossRefPubMed Eisenberg ME, Olson RE, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Bearinger LH. Correlations between Family meals and Psychosocial Well-being among adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:792–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Snuggs S, Harvey K. Family mealtimes: a systematic umbrella review of characteristics, correlates, outcomes and interventions. Nutrients. 2023;15:2841.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Snuggs S, Harvey K. Family mealtimes: a systematic umbrella review of characteristics, correlates, outcomes and interventions. Nutrients. 2023;15:2841.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Daragan C, Tate AD, Trofholz AC, Berge JM. Exploration of parent-reported family meal dinner characteristics to inform a definition of family meals. Appetite. 2023;184. Daragan C, Tate AD, Trofholz AC, Berge JM. Exploration of parent-reported family meal dinner characteristics to inform a definition of family meals. Appetite. 2023;184.
11.
go back to reference Middleton G, Golley RK, Patterson KA, Coveney J. The Family Meal Framework: a grounded theory study conceptualising the work that underpins the family meal. Appetite. 2022;175:106071.CrossRefPubMed Middleton G, Golley RK, Patterson KA, Coveney J. The Family Meal Framework: a grounded theory study conceptualising the work that underpins the family meal. Appetite. 2022;175:106071.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Utter J, Denny S, Farrant B, Cribb S. Feasibility of a family meal intervention to address Nutrition, emotional wellbeing, and Food Insecurity of families with adolescents. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019;51:885–92.CrossRefPubMed Utter J, Denny S, Farrant B, Cribb S. Feasibility of a family meal intervention to address Nutrition, emotional wellbeing, and Food Insecurity of families with adolescents. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019;51:885–92.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Utter J, Denny S. Supporting families to Cook at Home and eat together: findings from a feasibility study. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016;48:716–22.CrossRefPubMed Utter J, Denny S. Supporting families to Cook at Home and eat together: findings from a feasibility study. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016;48:716–22.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fraser K, Love P, Campbell KJ, Ball K, Opie RS. Meal kits in the family setting: impacts on family dynamics, nutrition, social and mental health. Appetite. 2022;169. Fraser K, Love P, Campbell KJ, Ball K, Opie RS. Meal kits in the family setting: impacts on family dynamics, nutrition, social and mental health. Appetite. 2022;169.
15.
go back to reference Carman K, Sweeney LH, House LA, Mathews AE, Shelnutt KP. Acceptability and willingness to pay for a Meal Kit Program for African American families with low income: a pilot study. Nutrients. 2021;13:2881.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carman K, Sweeney LH, House LA, Mathews AE, Shelnutt KP. Acceptability and willingness to pay for a Meal Kit Program for African American families with low income: a pilot study. Nutrients. 2021;13:2881.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Birch L, Savage JS, Ventura A. Influences on the development of children’s eating behaviours: from infancy to adolescence. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2007;68:1–56. Birch L, Savage JS, Ventura A. Influences on the development of children’s eating behaviours: from infancy to adolescence. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2007;68:1–56.
17.
go back to reference Morgan DL, Krueger RA. The Focus Group Kit: volumes 1–6. SAGE Publications; 1997. Morgan DL, Krueger RA. The Focus Group Kit: volumes 1–6. SAGE Publications; 1997.
18.
go back to reference Kitzinger J. The methodology of Focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illn. 1994;16:103–21.CrossRef Kitzinger J. The methodology of Focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illn. 1994;16:103–21.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Thomas DR. A General Inductive Approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Evaluation. 2006;27:237–46.CrossRef Thomas DR. A General Inductive Approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Evaluation. 2006;27:237–46.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–57.CrossRefPubMed Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–57.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Etikan I. Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. Am J Theoretical Appl Stat. 2016;5:1.CrossRef Etikan I. Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. Am J Theoretical Appl Stat. 2016;5:1.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Vandecasteele B, Geuens M. Motivated consumer innovativeness: Concept, measurement, and validation. Int J Res Mark. 2010;27:308–18.CrossRef Vandecasteele B, Geuens M. Motivated consumer innovativeness: Concept, measurement, and validation. Int J Res Mark. 2010;27:308–18.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Olsen NV, Menichelli E, Sørheim O, Næs T. Likelihood of buying healthy convenience food: an at-home testing procedure for ready-to-heat meals. Food Qual Prefer. 2012;24:171–8.CrossRef Olsen NV, Menichelli E, Sørheim O, Næs T. Likelihood of buying healthy convenience food: an at-home testing procedure for ready-to-heat meals. Food Qual Prefer. 2012;24:171–8.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Horning ML, Hill T, Martin CL, Hassan A, Petrovskis A, Bohen L. The East Side table make-at-home meal-kit program is feasible and acceptable: a pilot study. Appetite. 2021;160:105087.CrossRefPubMed Horning ML, Hill T, Martin CL, Hassan A, Petrovskis A, Bohen L. The East Side table make-at-home meal-kit program is feasible and acceptable: a pilot study. Appetite. 2021;160:105087.CrossRefPubMed
26.
27.
go back to reference Chu YL, Farmer A, Fung C, Kuhle S, Storey KE, Veugelers PJ. Involvement in home meal preparation is associated with food preference and self-efficacy among Canadian children. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16:108–12.CrossRefPubMed Chu YL, Farmer A, Fung C, Kuhle S, Storey KE, Veugelers PJ. Involvement in home meal preparation is associated with food preference and self-efficacy among Canadian children. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16:108–12.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Vaughn AE, Ward DS, Fisher JO, Faith MS, Hughes SO, Kremers SPJ, et al. Fundamental constructs in food parenting practices: a content map to guide future research. Nutr Rev. 2016;74:98–117.CrossRefPubMed Vaughn AE, Ward DS, Fisher JO, Faith MS, Hughes SO, Kremers SPJ, et al. Fundamental constructs in food parenting practices: a content map to guide future research. Nutr Rev. 2016;74:98–117.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Mennella JA, Bobowski NK. The sweetness and bitterness of childhood: insights from basic research on taste preferences. Physiol Behav. 2015;152:502–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mennella JA, Bobowski NK. The sweetness and bitterness of childhood: insights from basic research on taste preferences. Physiol Behav. 2015;152:502–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Fischer L, Bodrick N, Mackey ER, McClenny A, Dazelle W, McCarron K, et al. Feasibility of a home-delivery produce prescription program to address Food Insecurity and Diet Quality in adults and children. Nutrients. 2022;14:2006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fischer L, Bodrick N, Mackey ER, McClenny A, Dazelle W, McCarron K, et al. Feasibility of a home-delivery produce prescription program to address Food Insecurity and Diet Quality in adults and children. Nutrients. 2022;14:2006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Fulkerson JA, Larson N, Horning M, Neumark-Sztainer D. A review of associations between Family or Shared Meal frequency and Dietary and Weight Status outcomes across the Lifespan. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46:2–19.CrossRefPubMed Fulkerson JA, Larson N, Horning M, Neumark-Sztainer D. A review of associations between Family or Shared Meal frequency and Dietary and Weight Status outcomes across the Lifespan. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46:2–19.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Khan TH, MacEachen E. An Alternative Method of Interviewing: Critical Reflections on Videoconference Interviews for Qualitative Data Collection. Int J Qual Methods. 2022;21. Khan TH, MacEachen E. An Alternative Method of Interviewing: Critical Reflections on Videoconference Interviews for Qualitative Data Collection. Int J Qual Methods. 2022;21.
Metadata
Title
Home-delivered meal boxes in a family setting: a qualitative study investigating reasons for use and perceived impact on meal practices
Authors
Marjolijn Vos
Benedicte Deforche
Wendy Van Lippevelde
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17729-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Go to the issue