Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Hip-TEP | Research

Hip stability parameters with dual mobility, modular dual mobility and fixed bearing in total hip arthroplasty: an analytical evaluation

Authors: Domenico Tigani, Lorenzo Banci, Riccardo Valtorta, Luca Amendola

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Use of dual mobility (DM) in total hip arthroplasty has gained popularity due to the ability to reduce dislocation through increased jumping distance and impingement-free arc of movement. Recently, modular dual mobility (modDM) systems were introduced to give the possibility to use DM with standard metal-backed shells, however few has been studied to date regarding how jumping distance and the center of rotation change with modDM. The objective of this study was to evaluate, through analytical simulation, how jumping distance, center of rotation and arc of movement change between DM and standard cups with modDM or fixed bearings (FB).

Methods

3D-models of DM and standard press-fit cups with modDM or FB liners were used to simulate DM, modDM and FB implant configurations, matched for same cup size, according to same cup position and different femoral head diameters. Jumping distance was calculated and center of rotation lateralization and oscillation angles were measured for each size of these three implant configurations.

Results

Jumping distance with modDM was reduced by -3.9 mm to -8.6 mm in comparison with DM, from 48 to 64 mm size, but resulted comparable to polyethylene 36 mm FB and increased by + 1.1 mm and + 1.4 mm than ceramic 36 and 40 mm FBs for sizes > 54 mm. ModDM lateralized the center of rotation up to + 2.5 mm and + 4.0 mm in comparison with DM and FBs, respectively. Oscillation angle with modDM resulted higher than + 16°, + 23°, + 17° and + 14° in comparison to DM, 28 mm, 32 mm and 36 mm FB cups, respectively, for 56 mm cup size.

Conclusions

According to its specific design, modDM might change hip stability parameters in comparison to DM, worsening jumping distance and center of rotation position, but increasing arc of movement. As not restoring stability parameters in the same fashion, modDM implants should be properly used when DM cups are not feasible.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Cafri G, Paxton EW, Love R, Bini SA, Kurtz SM. Is There a Difference in Revision Risk Between Metal and Ceramic Heads on Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(5):1349–55.CrossRefPubMed Cafri G, Paxton EW, Love R, Bini SA, Kurtz SM. Is There a Difference in Revision Risk Between Metal and Ceramic Heads on Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(5):1349–55.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bloemheuvel EM, Van Steenbergen LN, Swierstra BA. Low revision rate of dual mobility cups after arthroplasty for acute hip fractures: report of 11,857 hip fractures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007–2019). Acta Orthop. 2021;92(1):36–9.CrossRefPubMed Bloemheuvel EM, Van Steenbergen LN, Swierstra BA. Low revision rate of dual mobility cups after arthroplasty for acute hip fractures: report of 11,857 hip fractures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007–2019). Acta Orthop. 2021;92(1):36–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Triclot P, Gouin F. Update–"Big-head": the solution to the problem of hip implant dislocation? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97(Suppl 4):S42–8.CrossRefPubMed Triclot P, Gouin F. Update–"Big-head": the solution to the problem of hip implant dislocation? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97(Suppl 4):S42–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rodriguez JA, Rathod PA. Large diameter heads: is bigger always better? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(Suppl 11):52–4.CrossRefPubMed Rodriguez JA, Rathod PA. Large diameter heads: is bigger always better? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(Suppl 11):52–4.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bousquet G, Gazielly D, Girardin P, Debiesse JL, Relave M, Israeli A. The ceramic coated cementless total hip arthroplasty. Basic concepts and surgical technique. J Orthop Surg Tech. 1985;1:15–28. Bousquet G, Gazielly D, Girardin P, Debiesse JL, Relave M, Israeli A. The ceramic coated cementless total hip arthroplasty. Basic concepts and surgical technique. J Orthop Surg Tech. 1985;1:15–28.
7.
go back to reference Farizon F, De Lavison R, Azoulay JJ, Bousquet G. Results with a cementless alumina-coated cup with dual mobility A twelve-year follow-up study. Int Orthop. 1998;22:219–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Farizon F, De Lavison R, Azoulay JJ, Bousquet G. Results with a cementless alumina-coated cup with dual mobility A twelve-year follow-up study. Int Orthop. 1998;22:219–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Charnley J, Kamangar A, Longfield MD. The optimum size of prosthetic heads in relation to the wear of plastic sockets in total replacement of the hip. Med Biol Eng. 1969;7(1):31–9.CrossRefPubMed Charnley J, Kamangar A, Longfield MD. The optimum size of prosthetic heads in relation to the wear of plastic sockets in total replacement of the hip. Med Biol Eng. 1969;7(1):31–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference McKee GK, Watson-Farrar J. Replacement of arthritic hips by the McKee-Farrar prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1966;48:245–59.CrossRef McKee GK, Watson-Farrar J. Replacement of arthritic hips by the McKee-Farrar prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1966;48:245–59.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference De Martino I, D’Apolito R, Soranoglou VG, Poultsides LA, Sculco PK, Sculco TP. Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility acetabular components: a systematic review. Bone Joint J. 2017;99(Suppl 1):18–24.CrossRefPubMed De Martino I, D’Apolito R, Soranoglou VG, Poultsides LA, Sculco PK, Sculco TP. Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility acetabular components: a systematic review. Bone Joint J. 2017;99(Suppl 1):18–24.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dubin JA, Westrich GH. Anatomic dual mobility compared to modular dual mobility in primary total hip arthroplasty: a matched cohort study. Arthroplasty Today. 2019;5(4):509–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dubin JA, Westrich GH. Anatomic dual mobility compared to modular dual mobility in primary total hip arthroplasty: a matched cohort study. Arthroplasty Today. 2019;5(4):509–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Huang RC, Malkani AL, Harwin SF, Hozack WJ, Mont MA, Higuera-Rueda CA, et al. Multicenter Evaluation of a Modular Dual Mobility Construct for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(7S):S287–91.CrossRefPubMed Huang RC, Malkani AL, Harwin SF, Hozack WJ, Mont MA, Higuera-Rueda CA, et al. Multicenter Evaluation of a Modular Dual Mobility Construct for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(7S):S287–91.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Chalmers BP, Mangold DG, Hanssen AD, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Abdel MP. Uniformly low serum cobalt levels after modular dual-mobility total hip arthroplasties with ceramic heads: a prospective study in high-risk patients. Bone Joint J. 2019;101(Suppl 6):57–61.CrossRefPubMed Chalmers BP, Mangold DG, Hanssen AD, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Abdel MP. Uniformly low serum cobalt levels after modular dual-mobility total hip arthroplasties with ceramic heads: a prospective study in high-risk patients. Bone Joint J. 2019;101(Suppl 6):57–61.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Markel DC, Bou-Akl T, Rossi MD, Pizzimenti N, Wu B, Ren W. Blood metal levels, leucocyte profiles, and cytokine profiles in patients with a modular dual-mobility hip prosthesis: early results from a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J. 2019;101(9):1035–41.CrossRefPubMed Markel DC, Bou-Akl T, Rossi MD, Pizzimenti N, Wu B, Ren W. Blood metal levels, leucocyte profiles, and cytokine profiles in patients with a modular dual-mobility hip prosthesis: early results from a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J. 2019;101(9):1035–41.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Nam D, Salih R, Nahhas CR, Barrack RL, Nunley RM. Is a modular dual mobility acetabulum a viable option for the young, active total hip arthroplasty patient? Bone Joint J. 2019;101(4):365–71.CrossRefPubMed Nam D, Salih R, Nahhas CR, Barrack RL, Nunley RM. Is a modular dual mobility acetabulum a viable option for the young, active total hip arthroplasty patient? Bone Joint J. 2019;101(4):365–71.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Heffernan C, Banerjee S, Nevelos J, Macintyre J, Issa K, Markel DC, et al. Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(5):1535–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heffernan C, Banerjee S, Nevelos J, Macintyre J, Issa K, Markel DC, et al. Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(5):1535–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Sariali E, Lazennec JY, Khiami F, Catonné Y. Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty: influence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(3):277–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sariali E, Lazennec JY, Khiami F, Catonné Y. Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty: influence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(3):277–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(2):217–20.CrossRefPubMed Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(2):217–20.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Yoshimine F. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone. J Biomech. 2005;38(1):125–32.CrossRefPubMed Yoshimine F. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone. J Biomech. 2005;38(1):125–32.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rathi P, Pereira GC, Giordani M, Di Cesare PE. The pros and cons of using larger femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013;42(8):E53–9. Rathi P, Pereira GC, Giordani M, Di Cesare PE. The pros and cons of using larger femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013;42(8):E53–9.
21.
go back to reference Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Beaulé PE. Prevention and treatment of dislocation after total hip replacement using large diameter balls. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:108–16.CrossRef Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Beaulé PE. Prevention and treatment of dislocation after total hip replacement using large diameter balls. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:108–16.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hartzler MA, Abdel MP, Sculco PK, Taunton MJ, Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD. Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(2):293–301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hartzler MA, Abdel MP, Sculco PK, Taunton MJ, Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD. Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(2):293–301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Sutter EG, McClellan TR, Attarian DE, Bolognesi MP, Lachiewicz PF, Wellman SS. Outcomes of Modular Dual Mobility Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(9):S220–4.CrossRefPubMed Sutter EG, McClellan TR, Attarian DE, Bolognesi MP, Lachiewicz PF, Wellman SS. Outcomes of Modular Dual Mobility Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(9):S220–4.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tarity TD, Koch CN, Burket JC, Wright TM, Westrich GH. Fretting and Corrosion at the Backside of Modular Cobalt Chromium Acetabular Inserts: A Retrieval Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(3):1033–9.CrossRefPubMed Tarity TD, Koch CN, Burket JC, Wright TM, Westrich GH. Fretting and Corrosion at the Backside of Modular Cobalt Chromium Acetabular Inserts: A Retrieval Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(3):1033–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lombardo DJ, Siljander MP, Gehrke CK, Moore DD, Karadsheh MS, Baker EA. Fretting and Corrosion Damage of Retrieved Dual-Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty Systems. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(6):1273–8.CrossRefPubMed Lombardo DJ, Siljander MP, Gehrke CK, Moore DD, Karadsheh MS, Baker EA. Fretting and Corrosion Damage of Retrieved Dual-Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty Systems. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(6):1273–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Kolz JM, Wyles CC, Van Citters DW, Chapman RM, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. In Vivo Corrosion of Modular Dual-Mobility Implants: a retrieval study. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(11):3326–9.CrossRefPubMed Kolz JM, Wyles CC, Van Citters DW, Chapman RM, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. In Vivo Corrosion of Modular Dual-Mobility Implants: a retrieval study. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(11):3326–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
28.
go back to reference Romero J, Wach A, Silberberg S, Chiu YF, Westrich G, Wright TM, et al. 2020 Otto Aufranc Award: Malseating of modular dual mobility liners. Bone Joint J. 2020;102(Suppl 7):20–6.CrossRefPubMed Romero J, Wach A, Silberberg S, Chiu YF, Westrich G, Wright TM, et al. 2020 Otto Aufranc Award: Malseating of modular dual mobility liners. Bone Joint J. 2020;102(Suppl 7):20–6.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Affatato S, Castiello E, Amendola L, Comitini S, Prudhon JL, Tigani D. Revision of a Monoblock Metal-on-Metal Cup Using a Dual Mobility Component: Is It a Reasonable Option? Materials. 2020;13(9):2040.CrossRefPubMedCentral Affatato S, Castiello E, Amendola L, Comitini S, Prudhon JL, Tigani D. Revision of a Monoblock Metal-on-Metal Cup Using a Dual Mobility Component: Is It a Reasonable Option? Materials. 2020;13(9):2040.CrossRefPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference De Smet K, Van Der Straeten C. Design issues and comparison of hip resurfacing prostheses. In: De Smet, K, Campbell PN, Van Der Straeten C, editors. The Hip Resurfacing Handbook. A practical guide to the use and management of modern hip resurfacings. Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK; 2013. p. 88. De Smet K, Van Der Straeten C. Design issues and comparison of hip resurfacing prostheses. In: De Smet, K, Campbell PN, Van Der Straeten C, editors. The Hip Resurfacing Handbook. A practical guide to the use and management of modern hip resurfacings. Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK; 2013. p. 88.
Metadata
Title
Hip stability parameters with dual mobility, modular dual mobility and fixed bearing in total hip arthroplasty: an analytical evaluation
Authors
Domenico Tigani
Lorenzo Banci
Riccardo Valtorta
Luca Amendola
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Hip-TEP
Hip-TEP
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05280-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2022 Go to the issue