Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 2/2023

29-11-2022 | Hip Dislocation | Original Paper

Hip arthroplasty dislocation risk calculator: evaluation of one million primary implants and twenty-five thousand dislocations with deep learning artificial intelligence in a systematic review of reviews

Authors: Philippe Hernigou, Olivier Barbier, Philippe Chenaie

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 2/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to provide an overview of the possibility regarding the artificial intelligence application in orthopaedics to predict dislocation with a calculator according to the type of implant (hemiarthroplasty, standard total hip arthroplasty, dual mobility, constrained cups) after primary arthroplasty.

Material and methods

Among 75 results for primary arthroplasties, 26 articles were reviews on dislocation after hemiarthroplasty, 40 after standard total hip arthroplasty, seven about primary dual-mobility arthroplasty (DM THA), and two reviews about constrained implants. Although our search method for systematic reviews covers ten years (2012–2022), none for dual mobility was published before 2016, showing a recent explosion of original articles on this subject. A total of 1,069,565 implants and 26,488 dislocations in primary arthroplasties are included in these 75 reviews. We used a supervised learning model in which models assign objects to groups as input and artificial neural network (ANN) with nodes, hidden layers, and output layers. We considered only four implant types as the input layer. We considered the patient’s factors (indication for THA, demographics, spine surgery, and neurologic disease) as the second input values (hidden layer). We considered the implant position as the third input (hidden layer) property including head size, combined anteversion, or spinopelvic alignment. Surgery-related factors, approach, capsule repair, etc. were the fourth input values (hidden layer). The output was a post-operative dislocation or not within three months.

Results

The accuracy for predicting dislocation with this systematic review was 95%. Dislocation risk, based on the type of implant, was wide-ranging, from 0 to 3.9% (mean 0.31%) for the 3045 DM THA, from 0.2 to 1.2% (overall 0.91%) for the 457 constrained liners, from 1.76 to 4.2% (mean 2.1%) for 895,734 conventional total hip arthroplasties, and from 0.76 to 12.2% (mean 4.5%) for 170,329 hemiarthroplasties. In the conventional THA group, many factors increase the risk of dislocation according to the calculator, and only a few (big head, anterior approach) decrease the risk, but not very significantly. In the hemiarthroplasty group, many factors can increase the risk of dislocation until 30%, but none could decrease the risk. According to the calculator, the DM THA and the constrained liner markedly decreased the risk and were not affected by implant position, spine surgery, and spinopelvic position.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this study is the first to yield an implant-specific dislocation risk calculator that incorporates the patient’s comorbidities, the position of components, and surgery factors affecting instability risk.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kunutsor SK, Barrett MC, Beswick AD, Judge A, Blom AW, Wylde V, et al. (2019) Risk factors for dislocation after primary total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 125 studies involving approximately five million hip replacements. Lancet Rheumatol;1:e111e21 Kunutsor SK, Barrett MC, Beswick AD, Judge A, Blom AW, Wylde V, et al. (2019) Risk factors for dislocation after primary total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 125 studies involving approximately five million hip replacements. Lancet Rheumatol;1:e111e21
3.
go back to reference Buckland AJ, Puvanesarajah V, Vigdorchik J, Schwarzkopf R, Jain A, Klineberg EO, Hart RA, Callaghan JJ, Hassanzadeh H (2017) Dislocation of a primary total hip arthroplasty is more common in patients with a lumbar spinal fusion. Bone Joint J 99-B(5):585–91CrossRef Buckland AJ, Puvanesarajah V, Vigdorchik J, Schwarzkopf R, Jain A, Klineberg EO, Hart RA, Callaghan JJ, Hassanzadeh H (2017) Dislocation of a primary total hip arthroplasty is more common in patients with a lumbar spinal fusion. Bone Joint J 99-B(5):585–91CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lundberg SM, Lee S-I. A (2017) Unified approach to interpreting model predictions. NIPS; New York: Curran Associates;. pp. 4765–4774 Lundberg SM, Lee S-I. A (2017) Unified approach to interpreting model predictions. NIPS; New York: Curran Associates;. pp. 4765–4774
17.
go back to reference Skoogh O, Tsikandylakis G, Mohaddes M, Nemes S, Odin D, Grant P, Rolfson O (2019) Contemporary posterior surgical approach in total hip replacement: still more reoperations due to dislocation compared with direct lateral approach? An observational study of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register including 156,979 hips. Acta Orthop 90(5):411–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1610269CrossRef Skoogh O, Tsikandylakis G, Mohaddes M, Nemes S, Odin D, Grant P, Rolfson O (2019) Contemporary posterior surgical approach in total hip replacement: still more reoperations due to dislocation compared with direct lateral approach? An observational study of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register including 156,979 hips. Acta Orthop 90(5):411–416. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​17453674.​2019.​1610269CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Jobory A, Kärrholm J, Hansson S, Åkesson K, Rogmark C (2021) Dislocation of hemiarthroplasty after hip fracture is common and the risk is increased with posterior approach: result from a national cohort of 25,678 individuals in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 92(4):413–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1906517CrossRef Jobory A, Kärrholm J, Hansson S, Åkesson K, Rogmark C (2021) Dislocation of hemiarthroplasty after hip fracture is common and the risk is increased with posterior approach: result from a national cohort of 25,678 individuals in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 92(4):413–418. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​17453674.​2021.​1906517CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Norambuena GA, Wyles CC, Van Demark RE 3rd, Trousdale RT (2019) Effect of dislocation timing following primary total hip arthroplasty on the risk of redislocation and revision. Hip Int 29(5):489–495CrossRef Norambuena GA, Wyles CC, Van Demark RE 3rd, Trousdale RT (2019) Effect of dislocation timing following primary total hip arthroplasty on the risk of redislocation and revision. Hip Int 29(5):489–495CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Blanco JF, da Casa C, Fidalgo H, García-Iglesias MA, González-Garcia L, Burón-Alvarez I, Sañudo S, García-Alonso M. (2022) Effect of hip hemiarthroplasty dislocation on mortality after hip fracture surgery. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 13:S1888–4415(22)00229–6.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2022.08.006 Blanco JF, da Casa C, Fidalgo H, García-Iglesias MA, González-Garcia L, Burón-Alvarez I, Sañudo S, García-Alonso M. (2022) Effect of hip hemiarthroplasty dislocation on mortality after hip fracture surgery. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 13:S1888–4415(22)00229–6.https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​recot.​2022.​08.​006
24.
go back to reference Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Takeda M, Sato J, Domae Y (2012) Efficacy of an abduction brace in preventing initial dislocation in the early postoperative period after primary total hip arthroplasty. Surg Sci. 5–10. 4236/ ss. 2012. 33026 Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Takeda M, Sato J, Domae Y (2012) Efficacy of an abduction brace in preventing initial dislocation in the early postoperative period after primary total hip arthroplasty. Surg Sci. 5–10. 4236/ ss. 2012. 33026
25.
go back to reference Smith TO, Jepson P, Beswick A, Sands G, Drummond A, Davis ET, Sackley CM (2016) Assistive devices, hip precautions, environmental modifications and training to prevent dislocation and improve function after hip arthroplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 10. 1002/ 14651 858. CD010 815. pub2 Smith TO, Jepson P, Beswick A, Sands G, Drummond A, Davis ET, Sackley CM (2016) Assistive devices, hip precautions, environmental modifications and training to prevent dislocation and improve function after hip arthroplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 10. 1002/ 14651 858. CD010 815. pub2
26.
go back to reference Valcarenghi J, Martinov S, Chahidi E, Jennart H, Bui Quoc E, Dimanche MC, Hupez A, Bhogal H, Hafez K, Callewier A, Bath O, Hernigou J (2022) Hip fractures re-operation compared with death at two year in elderly patients: lowest risk of revision with dual mobility total hip arthroplasty than with bipolar hemiarthroplasty or internal fixation of Garden I and II. Int Orthop 46(9):1945–1953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05479-xCrossRef Valcarenghi J, Martinov S, Chahidi E, Jennart H, Bui Quoc E, Dimanche MC, Hupez A, Bhogal H, Hafez K, Callewier A, Bath O, Hernigou J (2022) Hip fractures re-operation compared with death at two year in elderly patients: lowest risk of revision with dual mobility total hip arthroplasty than with bipolar hemiarthroplasty or internal fixation of Garden I and II. Int Orthop 46(9):1945–1953. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00264-022-05479-xCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hartzler MA, Abdel MP, Sculco PK, Taunton MJ, Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD (2018) Otto Aufranc Award: dual-mobility constructs in revision THA reduced dislocation, rerevision, and reoperation compared with large femoral heads. Clin Orthop Relat Res 476(2):293–301CrossRef Hartzler MA, Abdel MP, Sculco PK, Taunton MJ, Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD (2018) Otto Aufranc Award: dual-mobility constructs in revision THA reduced dislocation, rerevision, and reoperation compared with large femoral heads. Clin Orthop Relat Res 476(2):293–301CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Esposito CI, Carroll KM, Sculco PK, Padgett DE, Jerabek SA, Mayman DJ (2018) Total hip arthroplasty patients with fixed spinopelvic alignment are at higher risk of hip dislocation. J Arthroplasty 33(5):1449–1454CrossRef Esposito CI, Carroll KM, Sculco PK, Padgett DE, Jerabek SA, Mayman DJ (2018) Total hip arthroplasty patients with fixed spinopelvic alignment are at higher risk of hip dislocation. J Arthroplasty 33(5):1449–1454CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Elbuluk AM, Slover J, Anoushiravani AA, Schwarzkopf R, Eftekhary N, Vigdorchik JM (2018) The cost-effectiveness of dual mobility in a spinal deformity population with high risk of dislocation: a computer-based model. Bone Joint J 100-B(10):1297–302CrossRef Elbuluk AM, Slover J, Anoushiravani AA, Schwarzkopf R, Eftekhary N, Vigdorchik JM (2018) The cost-effectiveness of dual mobility in a spinal deformity population with high risk of dislocation: a computer-based model. Bone Joint J 100-B(10):1297–302CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Hip arthroplasty dislocation risk calculator: evaluation of one million primary implants and twenty-five thousand dislocations with deep learning artificial intelligence in a systematic review of reviews
Authors
Philippe Hernigou
Olivier Barbier
Philippe Chenaie
Publication date
29-11-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05644-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

International Orthopaedics 2/2023 Go to the issue