Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 9/2015

01-09-2015 | Clinical Research

High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA

Authors: Young-Hoo Kim, MD, Jang-Won Park, MD, Jun-Shik Kim, MD, Devarshi Rastogi, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 9/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Numerous studies have investigated the clinical and radiographic results of revision THAs with use of cementless stems and cortical strut allografts. However, to our knowledge, no long-term followup studies have evaluated patients undergoing revision THA with use of cortical strut allografts where the allografts provided the primary stability for extensively coated femoral stems in the presence of extensive femoral diaphyseal bone defects.

Question/purposes

We performed this study to determine (1) validated outcomes scores; (2) radiographic signs of fixation and allograft healing; (3) frequency of complications; and (4) survivorship of the components after use of cortical strut onlay allografts in Types IIIB and IV femoral diaphyseal bone defects.

Methods

Between 1994 and 2003, we performed 140 revision THAs in 130 patients with Paprosky Types IIIB and IV femoral diaphyseal defects. The patients were treated using extensively coated femoral stems and cortical strut allografts because primary axial or rotational stability could not be achieved without grafting. Ten of the patients (10 hips; 7.7%) were lost to followup or died before 10 years; the remaining 120 patients (130 hips) represent the study group in this retrospective study. There were 66 men and 54 women. Their mean age at the time of index surgery was 59 ± 18 years (range, 36–67 years). The primary diagnosis was predominantly osteonecrosis of the femoral head (53%). The most common reason for revision was aseptic loosening (97%), followed by periprosthetic fracture (3%). The mean time from primary to revision THA was 12 years (range, 8–27 years). The mean duration of followup was 16.1 years (range, 12–20 years).

Results

The mean Harris hip score was 39 ± 10 points before revision and improved to 86 ± 14 points at 16 years followup (p = 0.02). The mean preoperative WOMAC score was 62 ± 29 (41–91) points and improved to 22 ± 19 (11–51) points at 16 years followup (p = 0.003). Of the 130 stems, 113 (87%) had bone ingrowth, five (4%) had stable fibrous ingrowth, and 12 (9%) were unstable. All allografts were incorporated. Four hips (3%) had a displaced femoral shaft fracture at the stem tip; four (3%) had a postoperative dislocation; and six (5%) had early postoperative infection. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis, with revision or radiographic failure as the endpoint, revealed that the 16-year rate of survival of the components was 91% (95% CI, 0.88%–0.96%).

Conclusion

Supportive cortical strut onlay allografts provided high survivorship beyond 12 years of followup in revision THAs. Future studies might compare this approach with allograft-prosthesis composites, proximal femoral replacement, or modular fluted, tapered stems.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amanatullah DF, Howard JL, Siman H, Trousdale RT, Mabry TM, Berry DJ. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with extensive proximal femoral bone loss using a fluted tapered modular femoral component. Bone Joint J. 2015;97:312–317.PubMedCrossRef Amanatullah DF, Howard JL, Siman H, Trousdale RT, Mabry TM, Berry DJ. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with extensive proximal femoral bone loss using a fluted tapered modular femoral component. Bone Joint J. 2015;97:312–317.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Babis GC, Sakellariou VI, O’Connor MI, Hanssen AD, Sim FH. Proximal femoral allograft-prosthesis composites in revision hip replacement: a 12-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:349–355.PubMedCrossRef Babis GC, Sakellariou VI, O’Connor MI, Hanssen AD, Sim FH. Proximal femoral allograft-prosthesis composites in revision hip replacement: a 12-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:349–355.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Barden B, Fitzek JG, Huttegger C, Löer F. Supportive strut grafts for diaphyseal bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;387:148–155.PubMedCrossRef Barden B, Fitzek JG, Huttegger C, Löer F. Supportive strut grafts for diaphyseal bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;387:148–155.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Barrack RL, McClure JT, Burak CF, Clohisy JC, Parvizi J, Hozack W. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the patient’s perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:173–177.PubMedCrossRef Barrack RL, McClure JT, Burak CF, Clohisy JC, Parvizi J, Hozack W. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the patient’s perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:173–177.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833–1840.PubMed Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833–1840.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Bono JV, McCarthy JC, Lee J, Carangelo RJ, Turner RH. Fixation with a modular stem in revision hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:131–139.PubMed Bono JV, McCarthy JC, Lee J, Carangelo RJ, Turner RH. Fixation with a modular stem in revision hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:131–139.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973:55:1629–1632.PubMed Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973:55:1629–1632.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Brown NM, Tetreault M, Cipriano CA, Della Valle CJ, Paprosky W, Sporer S. Modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:555–560.PubMedCrossRef Brown NM, Tetreault M, Cipriano CA, Della Valle CJ, Paprosky W, Sporer S. Modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:555–560.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Buoncristiani AM, Dorr LD, Johnson C, Wan Z. Cementless revision of total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic porous replacement revision prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:403–415.PubMedCrossRef Buoncristiani AM, Dorr LD, Johnson C, Wan Z. Cementless revision of total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic porous replacement revision prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:403–415.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Duncan CP, Masri BA. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:293–304.PubMed Duncan CP, Masri BA. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:293–304.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Emerson RH Jr, Malinin TI, Cuellar AD, Head WC, Peters PC. Cortical strut allografts in the reconstruction of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty: a basic science and clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;285:35–44.PubMed Emerson RH Jr, Malinin TI, Cuellar AD, Head WC, Peters PC. Cortical strut allografts in the reconstruction of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty: a basic science and clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;285:35–44.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Engh CA, Massin P. Cementless total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic medullary locking stem: results using a survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;249:141–158.PubMed Engh CA, Massin P. Cementless total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic medullary locking stem: results using a survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;249:141–158.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;141:17–27.PubMed Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;141:17–27.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Haddad FS, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Structural proximal femoral allografts for failed total hip replacements: a minimum review of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:830–836.PubMedCrossRef Haddad FS, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Structural proximal femoral allografts for failed total hip replacements: a minimum review of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:830–836.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Haddad FS, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. Femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: classification and preoperative planning. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:83–96.PubMed Haddad FS, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. Femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: classification and preoperative planning. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:83–96.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Hamadouche M, Blanchat C, Meunier A, Kerboull L, Kerboull M. Histological findings in a proximal femoral structural allograft ten years following revision total hip arthroplasty: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:269–273.PubMedCrossRef Hamadouche M, Blanchat C, Meunier A, Kerboull L, Kerboull M. Histological findings in a proximal femoral structural allograft ten years following revision total hip arthroplasty: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:269–273.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737–755.PubMed Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737–755.PubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Head WC, Malinin TI, Mallory TH, Emerson RH Jr. Onlay cortical allografting for the femur. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:307–312.PubMedCrossRef Head WC, Malinin TI, Mallory TH, Emerson RH Jr. Onlay cortical allografting for the femur. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:307–312.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Iwase T, Otsuka H, Katayama N, Fujita H. Impaction bone grafting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty with Exeter Universal stem in Japan. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132:1487–1494.PubMedCrossRef Iwase T, Otsuka H, Katayama N, Fujita H. Impaction bone grafting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty with Exeter Universal stem in Japan. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132:1487–1494.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Jaiswal PK, Jagiello J, David LA, Blunn G, Carrington RW, Skinner JA, Cannon SR, Briggs TW. Use of an ‘internal proximal femoral replacement’ with distal fixation in revision arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:11–15.PubMedCrossRef Jaiswal PK, Jagiello J, David LA, Blunn G, Carrington RW, Skinner JA, Cannon SR, Briggs TW. Use of an ‘internal proximal femoral replacement’ with distal fixation in revision arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:11–15.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametic estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–481.CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametic estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–481.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kim YH. Cementless revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and primary cementless proximal porous-coated prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:573–581.PubMedCrossRef Kim YH. Cementless revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and primary cementless proximal porous-coated prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:573–581.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kim YH, Franks DJ. Cementless revision of cemented stem failures associated with massive femoral bone loss: a technical note. Orthop Rev. 1992;21:375–380.PubMed Kim YH, Franks DJ. Cementless revision of cemented stem failures associated with massive femoral bone loss: a technical note. Orthop Rev. 1992;21:375–380.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Kim YH, Kim JS. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:454–459.PubMedCrossRef Kim YH, Kim JS. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:454–459.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lewallen DG, Berry DJ. Periprosthetic fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty: treatment and results to date. Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:243–249.PubMed Lewallen DG, Berry DJ. Periprosthetic fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty: treatment and results to date. Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:243–249.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Lawrence JM. Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;295:172–178.PubMed Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Lawrence JM. Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;295:172–178.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:230–242.PubMedCrossRef Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:230–242.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Steinbrink K, Engelbrecht E, Fenelon GC. The total femoral prosthesis: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64:305–312.PubMed Steinbrink K, Engelbrecht E, Fenelon GC. The total femoral prosthesis: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64:305–312.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Roos BD, Roos MV, Camisa A Jr. Circumferential proximal femoral allografts in revision hip arthropalsty: four to 20 years follow-up. Hip Int. 2013;23:66–71.PubMedCrossRef Roos BD, Roos MV, Camisa A Jr. Circumferential proximal femoral allografts in revision hip arthropalsty: four to 20 years follow-up. Hip Int. 2013;23:66–71.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Wimmer MD, Randau TM, Demi MC, Ascherl R, Nöth U, Forst T, Gravius N, Wirtz D, Gravius S. Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:19.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wimmer MD, Randau TM, Demi MC, Ascherl R, Nöth U, Forst T, Gravius N, Wirtz D, Gravius S. Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:19.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Wong P, Gross AE. The use of structural allografts for treating periprosthetic fractures about the hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30:259–264.PubMedCrossRef Wong P, Gross AE. The use of structural allografts for treating periprosthetic fractures about the hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30:259–264.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Zmolek JC, Dorr LD. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the use of solid allograft. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:361–370.PubMedCrossRef Zmolek JC, Dorr LD. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the use of solid allograft. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:361–370.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA
Authors
Young-Hoo Kim, MD
Jang-Won Park, MD
Jun-Shik Kim, MD
Devarshi Rastogi, MD
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4358-y

Other articles of this Issue 9/2015

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 9/2015 Go to the issue

CORR® ORS Richard A. Brand Award for Outstanding Orthopaedic Research

A Diagnostic Serum Antibody Test for Patients With Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis