Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cognitive Therapy and Research 2/2019

01-04-2019 | Brief Report

High Spider-Fearful and Low Spider-Fearful Individuals Differentially Perceive the Speed of Approaching, but not Receding, Spider Stimuli

Authors: Julian Basanovic, Laurence Dean, John H. Riskind, Colin MacLeod

Published in: Cognitive Therapy and Research | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

The looming vulnerability model of fear predicts that high fearful individuals, as compared to low fearful individuals, will display a heightened tendency to perceive feared stimuli as moving disproportionately quickly when such stimuli are approaching, but not when they are receding. Experiments testing this prediction have been compromised by methodological limitations that preclude their ability to determine its validity. The present study employed a novel methodology designed to overcome these limitations to examine whether individuals with heightened levels of spider-fear exhibit this predicted perceptual bias. Two groups of participants who differed in spider-fear completed a perceptual task that presented stimulus pairs comprising spider and butterfly images under two movement conditions. In one condition images displayed approaching movement, while in the other condition images displayed receding movement. Participants were required to indicate which stimulus they perceived to move fastest. As predicted, it was found that participants with heightened spider-fear demonstrated a significantly greater tendency than low spider-fearful participants to perceive the spider stimuli as moving fastest, only when stimuli displayed approaching movement. Implications and avenues for future research are discussed.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
80% power (1 − β = 0.80) to detect a medium sized ANOVA interaction effect involving between-subject and within-subject factors (ηp2 = 0.06), in the presence of a small correlation (r = .1) amongst repeated measurements, when employing a 0.05 alpha criterion for significance (Faul et al. 2007).
 
2
The set of images used in the experiment can be obtained by contacting the Corresponding Author.
 
3
Post-hoc analyses determined that this interaction effect was not moderated by the magnitude of the relative difference in movement speed between stimulus pair images.
 
Literature
go back to reference Riskind, J. H., & Williams, N. L. (1999). Cognitive case conceptualization and treatment of anxiety disorders: Implications of the looming vulnerability model. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 13(4), 295–315.CrossRef Riskind, J. H., & Williams, N. L. (1999). Cognitive case conceptualization and treatment of anxiety disorders: Implications of the looming vulnerability model. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 13(4), 295–315.CrossRef
go back to reference Watts, F. N., & Sharrock, R. (1984). Fear and time estimation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 597–598.CrossRef Watts, F. N., & Sharrock, R. (1984). Fear and time estimation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 597–598.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
High Spider-Fearful and Low Spider-Fearful Individuals Differentially Perceive the Speed of Approaching, but not Receding, Spider Stimuli
Authors
Julian Basanovic
Laurence Dean
John H. Riskind
Colin MacLeod
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Cognitive Therapy and Research / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0147-5916
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9970-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Cognitive Therapy and Research 2/2019 Go to the issue