Top

Published in:

01-06-2015 | Original Paper

Heuristic and Analytic Processing in Online Sports Betting

Authors: Alain d’Astous, Marc Di Gaspero

Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies | Issue 2/2015

Abstract

This article presents the results of two studies that examine the occurrence of heuristic (i.e., intuitive and fast) and analytic (i.e., deliberate and slow) processes among people who engage in online sports betting on a regular basis. The first study was qualitative and was conducted with a convenience sample of 12 regular online sports gamblers who described the processes by which they arrive at a sports betting decision. The results of this study showed that betting online on sports events involves a mix of heuristic and analytic processes. The second study consisted in a survey of 161 online sports gamblers where performance in terms of monetary gains, experience in online sports betting, propensity to collect and analyze relevant information prior to betting, and use of bookmaker odds were measured. This study showed that heuristic and analytic processes act as mediators of the relationship between experience and performance. The findings stemming of these two studies give some insights into gamblers’ modes of thinking and behaviors in an online sports betting context and show the value of the dual mediation process model for research that looks at gambling activities from a judgment and decision making perspective.

Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411–454.CrossRef

Allcock, C. (1985). How to gamble in the eighties. In J. McMillen (Ed.), Proceedings of the inaugural conference of the national association for gambling studies (pp. 240–246). Retrieved from http://www.nags.org.au/pdf/Proceedings%2085.pdf.

Andersson, P., Edman, J., & Ekman, M. (2005). Predicting in the World Cup 2002 in soccer: Performance and confidence of experts and non-experts. International Journal of Forecasting, 21, 565–576.CrossRef

ARJEL (Autorité de régulation des jeux en ligne). (2012). Statistics retrieved from www.arjel.fr/.

Ashman, T., Bowman, A. R., & Lambrinos, J. (2010). The role of fatigue in NBA wagering markets: The surprising home disadvantage situation. Journal of Sports Economics, 11, 602–613.CrossRef

Boulier, B. L. K., & Stekler, H. O. (1999). Are sports seedings good predictors? An evaluation. International Journal of Forecasting, 15, 83–91.CrossRef

Cantinotti, M., Ladouceur, R., & Jacques, C. (2004). Sports betting: Can gamblers beat randomness? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 143–147.CrossRefPubMed

Carroll, J. S., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Decision research: A field guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Chantal, Y., & Vallerand, R. J. (1996). Skill versus luck: A motivational analysis of gambling involvement. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 407–418.CrossRefPubMed

Daries, E., & Maufras, J. (2011). Gagner aux paris sportifs. Paris: Eyrolles.

Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311, 1005–1007.CrossRefPubMed

Dillon, W. R., Madden, T. J., Kirmani, A., & Mukherjee, S. (2001). Understanding what’s in a brand rating: A model for assessing brand and attribute effects and their relationship to brand equity. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 415–429.CrossRef

Entine, O. A., & Small, D. S. (2008). The role of rest in the NBA home-court advantage. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 4, 1–9.CrossRef

Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.CrossRef

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.CrossRef

Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.CrossRefPubMed

Forrest, D., & Simmons, R. (2000). Forecasting sport: The behaviour and performance of football tipsters. International Journal of Forecasting, 16, 317–331.CrossRef

Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482.CrossRefPubMed

Gilovich, T. (1983). Biaised evaluation and persistence in gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1110–1126.CrossRefPubMed

Gilovich, T., & Griffin, D. (2010). Judgment and decision making. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 542–588). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Griffin, M., Babin, B. J., & Attaway, J. (1996). Anticipation of injurious consumption outcomes and its impact on consumer attributions of blame. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 314–327.CrossRef

Griffiths, M. D. (1994). The role of cognitive bias and skill in fruit machine gambling. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 351–369.CrossRef

Henslin, J. M. (1967). Craps and magic. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 316–333.CrossRef

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute Substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Ladouceur, R., Giroux, I., & Jacques, C. (1998). Winning on the horses: How much strategy and knowledge are needed? Journal of Psychology, 132, 133–142.CrossRef

Lesieur, H. R., & Rosenthal, R. J. (1991). Pathological gambling: A review of the literature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 7, 5–39.CrossRefPubMed

MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Online Casino City. (2012). Statistics retrieved from http://online.casinocity.com/.

Paul, R. J., & Weinbach, A. P. (2002). Market efficiency and NCAA College basketball gambling. Journal of Economics and Finance, 29, 403–408.CrossRef

Paul, R. J., Weinbach, A. P., & Weinbach, C. J. (2003). Fair bets and profitability in college football gambling. Journal of Economics and Finance, 27, 236–242.CrossRef

Pavée, F. (2010). Paris sportifs en ligne: Mode d’emploi. France: RMC Sports.

Reyna, V. F. (2004). How people make decisions that involve risk. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 60–66.CrossRef

Ricketts, T., & Macaskill, A. (2004). Differentiating normal and problem gambling: A grounded theory approach. Addiction Research and Theory, 12, 77–87.CrossRef

Rosecrance, J. (1986). You can’t tell the players without a scorecard: A typology of horse players. Deviant Behavior, 7, 77–97.CrossRef

Scott, D. (1982). The winning way to successful punting. Sydney: Puntwin.

Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.CrossRefPubMed

Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.CrossRef

Sloman, S. A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 379–396). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Spence, M. T., & Brucks, M. (1997). The moderating effects of problem characteristics on experts’ and novices’ judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 233–247.CrossRef

Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

Toulemonde, Q. (2011). Paris sportifs en ligne: Comprendre—jouer—gagner. France: Amphora.

Vergin, R. C., & Sosik, J. J. (1999). No place like home: An examination of the home field advantage in gambling strategies in NFL football. Journal of Economics and Business, 51, 21–31.CrossRef

Wagenaar, W. (1988). Paradoxes of gambling behaviour. London: Erlbaum.

Williams, R. J., & Wood, R. T. (2007). Internet gambling: A comprehensive review and synthesis of the literature. Guelph: Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.

Ziemba, W. T., & Hausch, D. B. (1984). Beat the racetrack. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch.

Title: Heuristic and Analytic Processing in Online Sports Betting
Authors: Alain d’Astous
Marc Di Gaspero
Publication date: 01-06-2015
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies / Issue 2/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3602
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9438-x

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Heuristic and Analytic Processing in Online Sports Betting

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

A Passion for Gambling: A Generation-Specific Conceptual Analysis and Review of Gambling Among Older Adults in Canada

Health Behaviour and Body Mass Index Among Problem Gamblers: Results from a Nationwide Survey

Are Poker Players All the Same? Latent Class Analysis

Adolescent Online Gambling in Cyprus: Associated School Performance and Psychopathology

Just Like the Lottery? Player Behaviour and Anomalies in the Market for Football Pools

Rates of Problematic Gambling in a British Homeless Sample: A Preliminary Study