Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2017

01-09-2017 | Original Article

Hepatobilio-pancreatic robotic surgery: initial experience from a single center institute

Authors: Yolanda Quijano, Emilio Vicente, Benedetto Ielpo, Hipolito Duran, Eduardo Diaz, Isabel Fabra, Luis Malave, Valentina Ferri, Carlos Plaza, Jan Lammel Lindemann, Vito D’Andrea, Riccardo Caruso

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The use of robotic surgery in the hepatobilio-pancreatic (HBP) field is still limited. Our aim is to present our early experience of robotic liver resection. A retrospective review of robotic pancreatic and liver resection was performed at Sanchinarro University hospital from October 2010 to April 2016. Since the beginning of the robotic program in our center, 22 hepatic procedures and 45 pancreatic robotic procedures have been performed. Of the 21 patients subjected to liver resection, 13 (65%) were for malignancy. There were two left hepatectomies, one right hepatectomy, one associated liver partition and portal vein ligation staged procedure (both steps by robotic approach), three bisegmentectomies and three segmentectomies, eight wedge resections, and three pericystectomies. The mean operating time was 282 min. The overall conversion rate and postoperative complication rate were 4.7 and 19%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 13.4 days (range 4–64 days). Of the 45 patients subjected to pancreatic resection, 22 were male and 23 female. The average age of all patients was 62 years (range 31–82 years). The mean operating room (OR) time was 370 min (120–780 min). Among the procedures performed were 15 pancreatico-duodenectomies, 19 distal pancreatectomies, and 11 enucleations. All procedures in the HBP area were R0. Our early experience shows that robotic surgery is a safe and feasible procedure in the HBP area. The complication and mortality rates are comparable to those of open surgery, but with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Scott DJ, Young WN, Tesfay ST, Frawley WH, Rege RV, Jones DB (2001) Laparoscopic skills training. Am J Surg 182(2):137–142CrossRefPubMed Scott DJ, Young WN, Tesfay ST, Frawley WH, Rege RV, Jones DB (2001) Laparoscopic skills training. Am J Surg 182(2):137–142CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Smith CD, Farrel TM, McNatt SS, Metreveli RE (2001) Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills. Am J Surg 181:547–550CrossRefPubMed Smith CD, Farrel TM, McNatt SS, Metreveli RE (2001) Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills. Am J Surg 181:547–550CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement. Ann Surg 250:825–830CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement. Ann Surg 250:825–830CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection 2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841CrossRefPubMed Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection 2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Ellison EC (2003) Robotic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 13:33–36CrossRef Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Ellison EC (2003) Robotic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 13:33–36CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefPubMed Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chan OC, Tang CN, Lai EC, Yang GP, Li MK (2011) Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18(4):471–480CrossRefPubMed Chan OC, Tang CN, Lai EC, Yang GP, Li MK (2011) Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18(4):471–480CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6, 336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6, 336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Post hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB 13(8):528–535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Post hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB 13(8):528–535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nguyen KT, Geller DA (2010) Laparoscopic liver resection. current update. Surg Clin N Am 90:749–760CrossRefPubMed Nguyen KT, Geller DA (2010) Laparoscopic liver resection. current update. Surg Clin N Am 90:749–760CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ito K, Ito H, Are C et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: a matched pair case control study. J Gastrointest Surg 13(12):2276–2283CrossRefPubMed Ito K, Ito H, Are C et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: a matched pair case control study. J Gastrointest Surg 13(12):2276–2283CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F et al (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford) 12(8):583–586CrossRef Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F et al (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford) 12(8):583–586CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259:549–555CrossRefPubMed Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259:549–555CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ho CM, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H et al (2013) Systematic review of robotic liver resection. Surg Endosc 27(3):732–739CrossRefPubMed Ho CM, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H et al (2013) Systematic review of robotic liver resection. Surg Endosc 27(3):732–739CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Spampinato MG, Coratti A, Bianco L et al (2014) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study. Surg Endosc 28:2973–2979CrossRefPubMed Spampinato MG, Coratti A, Bianco L et al (2014) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study. Surg Endosc 28:2973–2979CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Buchs NC, Oldani G, Orci LA et al (2014) Current status of robotic liver resection: a systematic review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 14(2):237–246CrossRefPubMed Buchs NC, Oldani G, Orci LA et al (2014) Current status of robotic liver resection: a systematic review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 14(2):237–246CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM, Duan WD, Lu F, Dong JH (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253(2):342CrossRefPubMed Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM, Duan WD, Lu F, Dong JH (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253(2):342CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8(5):408–410CrossRefPubMed Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8(5):408–410CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreatico-duodenectomy feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145(1):19–23CrossRefPubMed Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreatico-duodenectomy feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145(1):19–23CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Briggs CD, Mann CD, Irving GRB et al (2009) Systematic review of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. J Gastrointestinal Surg 13(6):1129–1137CrossRef Briggs CD, Mann CD, Irving GRB et al (2009) Systematic review of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. J Gastrointestinal Surg 13(6):1129–1137CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Duran H, Ielpo B, Caruso R, Ferri V, Quijano Y, Diaz E, Fabra I, Oliva C, Olivares S, Vicente E (2014) Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center. Int J Med Robot Comput Assisted Surg 10(3):280–285CrossRef Duran H, Ielpo B, Caruso R, Ferri V, Quijano Y, Diaz E, Fabra I, Oliva C, Olivares S, Vicente E (2014) Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center. Int J Med Robot Comput Assisted Surg 10(3):280–285CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, Choudry H, Tsung A, Bartlett DL, Hughes SJ, Lee KK, Moser AJ, Zeh HJ (2013) Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg 257(1):128–132CrossRefPubMed Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, Choudry H, Tsung A, Bartlett DL, Hughes SJ, Lee KK, Moser AJ, Zeh HJ (2013) Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg 257(1):128–132CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Ielpo B, Caruso R, Prestera A, De Luca GM, Duran H, Diaz E, Fabra I, Olivares S, Quijano Y, Vicente E (2015) Arterial pseudoaneurysms following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: a single center experience. JOP 16(1):8–9 Ielpo B, Caruso R, Prestera A, De Luca GM, Duran H, Diaz E, Fabra I, Olivares S, Quijano Y, Vicente E (2015) Arterial pseudoaneurysms following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: a single center experience. JOP 16(1):8–9
29.
go back to reference Vicente E, Quijano Y, Ielpo B (2014) Arterial resection for pancreatic cancer: a modern surgeon should change its behavior according to the new therapeutic options. G Chir 35(1–2):5–14PubMedCentral Vicente E, Quijano Y, Ielpo B (2014) Arterial resection for pancreatic cancer: a modern surgeon should change its behavior according to the new therapeutic options. G Chir 35(1–2):5–14PubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Addeo P, Buchs NC, Ayloo SM, Bianco FM (2011) Robotic extended pancreatectomy with vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic tumors. Pancreas 40(8):1264–1270CrossRefPubMed Giulianotti PC, Addeo P, Buchs NC, Ayloo SM, Bianco FM (2011) Robotic extended pancreatectomy with vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic tumors. Pancreas 40(8):1264–1270CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh HJ (2013) 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg 258(4):554–559PubMedPubMedCentral Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh HJ (2013) 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg 258(4):554–559PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Hepatobilio-pancreatic robotic surgery: initial experience from a single center institute
Authors
Yolanda Quijano
Emilio Vicente
Benedetto Ielpo
Hipolito Duran
Eduardo Diaz
Isabel Fabra
Luis Malave
Valentina Ferri
Carlos Plaza
Jan Lammel Lindemann
Vito D’Andrea
Riccardo Caruso
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0663-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2017 Go to the issue