Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nephrology 4/2015

01-08-2015 | Original Article

Hemodialysis in satellite dialysis units: incidence of patient fallback to the in-center dialysis unit

Authors: Aurore Barthelemy, Thierry Lobbedez, Clemence Bechade, Patrick Henri, Jean-Marie Batho, Eric Cardineau, Alain Jeanson, Isabelle Landru, Françoise Lefort, Jacky Potier, Elie Zagdoun, Pascal Thibon

Published in: Journal of Nephrology | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient fallbacks occur when a patient treated in a satellite dialysis unit (SDU) must be transferred to an in-center dialysis unit. Fallbacks have an impact on the in-center dialysis unit organization. This study was carried out to estimate the incidence and risk factors of patient fallback.

Methods

Between 01/01/2006 and 31/12/2010 there were 193 patients starting dialysis in SDUs in one French region. The primary outcome was the incidence of temporary and permanent fallbacks with or without hospitalization. A survival analysis and binomial negative regression were used for the statistical analysis.

Results

Among the 193 patients, 117 (60.6 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 53.3–67.6) had at least one fallback, which occurred within a median of 249 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 71–469) after the first session in the SDU. The median number of fallbacks by subject was 1 (IQR: 0–4). The median duration of the fallback period was 4 days (IQR: 1–8) and median number of dialysis sessions during the fallback time was 1 (IQR: 1–3). Of the 494 temporary fallbacks, 210 were due to patient hospitalization, the main cause of which was cardiovascular disease. At univariate analysis, patients permanently transferred to in-center hemodialysis units were older, had more peripheral arteriopathy, cancer and arrhythmia. At multivariate analysis, peripheral arteriopathy (relative risk [RR] 2.06, 95 % CI 1.05–4.09) and the center (center 2: RR 0.42, 95 % CI 0.21–0.84; center 3: RR 2.88, 95 % CI 1.20–6.91) were significantly associated with the number of fallbacks.

Conclusion

Fallback is a common event in hemodialysis patients treated in SDUs. Yet, the SDU system operates well since a third of patients treated in these units are still in SDUs at 2 years of follow-up. Factors associated with patient fallback are the center and cardiovascular disease.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ministère de la santé, de la famille et des personnes handicapées. Décret n° 2002-1198 du 23 septembre 2002 relatif aux conditions techniques de fonctionnement des établissements de santé qui exercent l’activité de traitement de l’insuffisance rénale chronique par la pratique de l’épuration extrarénale et modifiant le code de la santé publique :troisième partie : Décrets. JO n° 224 du 25 septembre 2002, p. 15813 Ministère de la santé, de la famille et des personnes handicapées. Décret n° 2002-1198 du 23 septembre 2002 relatif aux conditions techniques de fonctionnement des établissements de santé qui exercent l’activité de traitement de l’insuffisance rénale chronique par la pratique de l’épuration extrarénale et modifiant le code de la santé publique :troisième partie : Décrets. JO n° 224 du 25 septembre 2002, p. 15813
3.
go back to reference Diamant MJ, Young A, Gallo K et al (2011) Hemodialysis in a satellite unit: clinical performance target attainment and health-related quality of life. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6:1692–1699PubMedCrossRef Diamant MJ, Young A, Gallo K et al (2011) Hemodialysis in a satellite unit: clinical performance target attainment and health-related quality of life. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6:1692–1699PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Malmström RK, Roine RP, Heikkilä A et al (2008) Cost analysis and health-related quality of life of home and self-care satellite haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:1990–1996PubMedCrossRef Malmström RK, Roine RP, Heikkilä A et al (2008) Cost analysis and health-related quality of life of home and self-care satellite haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:1990–1996PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mazairac AHA, Grooteman MPC, Blankestijn PJ et al (2012) Differences in quality of life of hemodialysis patients between dialysis centers. Qual Life Res 21:299–307PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mazairac AHA, Grooteman MPC, Blankestijn PJ et al (2012) Differences in quality of life of hemodialysis patients between dialysis centers. Qual Life Res 21:299–307PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Diamant MJ, Harwood L, Movva S et al (2010) A comparison of quality of life and travel-related factors between in-center and satellite-based hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5:268–274PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Diamant MJ, Harwood L, Movva S et al (2010) A comparison of quality of life and travel-related factors between in-center and satellite-based hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5:268–274PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Prakash S, Austin PC, Oliver MJ, Garg AX, Blake PG, Hux JE (2007) Regional effects of satellite haemodialysis units on renal replacement therapy in non-urban Ontario Canada. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22:2297–2303PubMedCrossRef Prakash S, Austin PC, Oliver MJ, Garg AX, Blake PG, Hux JE (2007) Regional effects of satellite haemodialysis units on renal replacement therapy in non-urban Ontario Canada. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22:2297–2303PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Soroka SD, Kiberd BA, Jacobs P (2005) The marginal cost of satellite versus in-center hemodialysis. Hemodial Int 9:196–201PubMedCrossRef Soroka SD, Kiberd BA, Jacobs P (2005) The marginal cost of satellite versus in-center hemodialysis. Hemodial Int 9:196–201PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Roderick P, Armitage A, Nicholson T et al (2004) A clinical and cost evaluation of hemodialysis in renal satellite units in England and Wales. Am J Kidney Dis 44:121–131PubMedCrossRef Roderick P, Armitage A, Nicholson T et al (2004) A clinical and cost evaluation of hemodialysis in renal satellite units in England and Wales. Am J Kidney Dis 44:121–131PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lindsay RM, Hux J, Holland D et al (2009) An investigation of satellite hemodialysis fallbacks in the province of Ontario. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4:603–608PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lindsay RM, Hux J, Holland D et al (2009) An investigation of satellite hemodialysis fallbacks in the province of Ontario. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4:603–608PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rayner HC, Pisoni RL, Bommer J et al (2004) Mortality and hospitalization in haemodialysis patients in five European countries: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Nephrol Dial Transplant 19:108–208PubMedCrossRef Rayner HC, Pisoni RL, Bommer J et al (2004) Mortality and hospitalization in haemodialysis patients in five European countries: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Nephrol Dial Transplant 19:108–208PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Arneson TJ, Liu J, Qiu Y, Gilbertson DT, Foley RN, Collins AJ (2010) Hospital treatment for fluid overload in the Medicare hemodialysis population. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5:1054–1063PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Arneson TJ, Liu J, Qiu Y, Gilbertson DT, Foley RN, Collins AJ (2010) Hospital treatment for fluid overload in the Medicare hemodialysis population. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5:1054–1063PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schoonover KL, Hickson LJ, Norby SM et al (2013) Risk factors for hospitalization among older, incident hemodialysis patients. Nephrology (Carlton) 18:712–717CrossRef Schoonover KL, Hickson LJ, Norby SM et al (2013) Risk factors for hospitalization among older, incident hemodialysis patients. Nephrology (Carlton) 18:712–717CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ng LJ, Chen F, Pisoni RL et al (2011) Hospitalization risks related to vascular access type among incident US hemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 26:3659–3666PubMedCrossRef Ng LJ, Chen F, Pisoni RL et al (2011) Hospitalization risks related to vascular access type among incident US hemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 26:3659–3666PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lacson E Jr, Wang W, Lazarus JM, Hakim RM (2010) Change in vascular access and hospitalization risk in long term hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5:1996–2003PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lacson E Jr, Wang W, Lazarus JM, Hakim RM (2010) Change in vascular access and hospitalization risk in long term hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5:1996–2003PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference US Renal Data System, USRDS (2013) Annual data report: atlas of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the united states, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda US Renal Data System, USRDS (2013) Annual data report: atlas of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the united states, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda
18.
go back to reference Usvyat LA, Kooman JP, van der Sande FM et al (2014) Dynamics of hospitalizations in hemodialysis patients: results from a large US provider. Nephrol Dial Transplant 29:442–448PubMedCrossRef Usvyat LA, Kooman JP, van der Sande FM et al (2014) Dynamics of hospitalizations in hemodialysis patients: results from a large US provider. Nephrol Dial Transplant 29:442–448PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Hemodialysis in satellite dialysis units: incidence of patient fallback to the in-center dialysis unit
Authors
Aurore Barthelemy
Thierry Lobbedez
Clemence Bechade
Patrick Henri
Jean-Marie Batho
Eric Cardineau
Alain Jeanson
Isabelle Landru
Françoise Lefort
Jacky Potier
Elie Zagdoun
Pascal Thibon
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Nephrology / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1121-8428
Electronic ISSN: 1724-6059
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-014-0153-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Journal of Nephrology 4/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine