Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 5/2023

Open Access 21-06-2023 | Hemicolectomy | Research

Implementation of totally robotic right hemicolectomy: lessons learned from a prospective cohort

Authors: Jeremy Meyer, Jan Wijsman, Rogier Crolla, George van der Schelling

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 5/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Robotics facilitates the realization of intra-corporeal anastomosis during right hemicolectomy and allows extracting the operative specimen through a C-section, offering potential benefits in terms of post-operative recovery and incidence of incisional hernia. Therefore, we progressively implemented robotic right hemicolectomy (robRHC) in our centre, and would like to report our initial experience with the technique. Consecutive patients who underwent robRHC within a single centre were prospectively included. Variables related to patients’ demographics, surgical procedures, post-operative recovery and pathological outcomes were collected. Sixty patients underwent robRHC in our centre. Indications for robRHC were colon cancer in 58 patients (96.7%) and polyps not amenable to endoscopic resection in 2 patients (3.3%). Fifty-eight patients underwent robRHC with D2 lymphadenectomy and central vessel ligation (96.7%), and two patients (3.3%) had robRHC associated with another procedure. All patients had intra-corporeal anastomosis. The mean ± operative time was of 200.4 ± 114.9 min. Two conversions (3.3%) to open surgery were performed. The mean ± SD length of stay was of 5.4 ± 3.8 days. Seven patients (11.7%) experienced a post-operative complication with a Clavien–Dindo score ≥ 2. Two patients (3.5%) had an anastomotic leak. The mean ± SD number of harvested lymph nodes was of 22.4 ± 7.6. All patients had negative pathological margins (R0 resection). To conclude, robotic RHC is a safe procedure, which can be implemented with satisfying peri- and post-operative outcomes. The potential benefits of the technique remain to be demonstrated by randomized controlled trials.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kennedy RH, Francis EA, Wharton R et al (2014) Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme: EnROL. J Clin Oncol 32:1804–1811CrossRefPubMed Kennedy RH, Francis EA, Wharton R et al (2014) Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme: EnROL. J Clin Oncol 32:1804–1811CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Deijen CL, Vasmel JE, de Lange-de Klerk ESM et al (2017) Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 31:2607–2615CrossRefPubMed Deijen CL, Vasmel JE, de Lange-de Klerk ESM et al (2017) Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 31:2607–2615CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMed Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF et al (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248:728–738CrossRefPubMed Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF et al (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248:728–738CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dohrn N, Klein MF, Gogenur I (2021) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 36:2147–2158CrossRefPubMed Dohrn N, Klein MF, Gogenur I (2021) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 36:2147–2158CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Miller PE, Dao H, Paluvoi N et al (2016) Comparison of 30-day postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic vs robotic colectomy. J Am Coll Surg 223:369–373CrossRefPubMed Miller PE, Dao H, Paluvoi N et al (2016) Comparison of 30-day postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic vs robotic colectomy. J Am Coll Surg 223:369–373CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Clarke EM, Rahme J, Larach T et al (2022) Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a retrospective cohort study of the Binational Colorectal Cancer Database. J Robot Surg 16:927–933CrossRefPubMed Clarke EM, Rahme J, Larach T et al (2022) Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a retrospective cohort study of the Binational Colorectal Cancer Database. J Robot Surg 16:927–933CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Shapiro R, Keler U, Segev L et al (2016) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: short- and long-term benefits in comparison with extracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 30:3823–3829CrossRefPubMed Shapiro R, Keler U, Segev L et al (2016) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: short- and long-term benefits in comparison with extracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 30:3823–3829CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E et al (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 22:1–13CrossRefPubMed Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E et al (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 22:1–13CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bollo J, Turrado V, Rabal A et al (2020) Randomized clinical trial of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy (IEA trial). Br J Surg 107:364–372CrossRefPubMed Bollo J, Turrado V, Rabal A et al (2020) Randomized clinical trial of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy (IEA trial). Br J Surg 107:364–372CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Biondi A, Di Mauro G, Morici R et al (2021) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: short-term outcomes. J Clin Med 10:5967CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Biondi A, Di Mauro G, Morici R et al (2021) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: short-term outcomes. J Clin Med 10:5967CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Creavin B, Balasubramanian I, Common M et al (2021) Intracorporeal vs extracorporeal anastomosis following neoplastic right hemicolectomy resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 36:645–656CrossRefPubMed Creavin B, Balasubramanian I, Common M et al (2021) Intracorporeal vs extracorporeal anastomosis following neoplastic right hemicolectomy resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 36:645–656CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Allaix ME, Degiuli M, Bonino MA et al (2019) Intracorporeal or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 270:762–767CrossRefPubMed Allaix ME, Degiuli M, Bonino MA et al (2019) Intracorporeal or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 270:762–767CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Vergis AS, Steigerwald SN, Bhojani FD et al (2015) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastamosis: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Can J Surg 58:63–68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vergis AS, Steigerwald SN, Bhojani FD et al (2015) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastamosis: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Can J Surg 58:63–68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Lee L, Abou-Khalil M, Liberman S et al (2017) Incidence of incisional hernia in the specimen extraction site for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 31:5083–5093CrossRefPubMed Lee L, Abou-Khalil M, Liberman S et al (2017) Incidence of incisional hernia in the specimen extraction site for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 31:5083–5093CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99:1219–1226CrossRefPubMed Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99:1219–1226CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mulder T, Crolla R, Kluytmans-van den Bergh MFQ et al (2019) Preoperative oral antibiotic prophylaxis reduces surgical site infections after elective colorectal surgery: results from a before-after study. Clin Infect Dis 69:93–99CrossRefPubMed Mulder T, Crolla R, Kluytmans-van den Bergh MFQ et al (2019) Preoperative oral antibiotic prophylaxis reduces surgical site infections after elective colorectal surgery: results from a before-after study. Clin Infect Dis 69:93–99CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Crolla R, Mulder PG, van der Schelling GP (2018) Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections. Surg Endosc 32:4562–4570CrossRefPubMed Crolla R, Mulder PG, van der Schelling GP (2018) Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections. Surg Endosc 32:4562–4570CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Giesen LJX, Dekker JWT, Verseveld M et al (2023) Implementation of robotic rectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional nationwide study. Surg Endosc 37:912–920CrossRefPubMed Giesen LJX, Dekker JWT, Verseveld M et al (2023) Implementation of robotic rectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional nationwide study. Surg Endosc 37:912–920CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Burghgraef TA, Crolla R, Fahim M et al (2022) Local recurrence of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: a multicentre cohort study evaluating the initial cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 37:1635–1645CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Burghgraef TA, Crolla R, Fahim M et al (2022) Local recurrence of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: a multicentre cohort study evaluating the initial cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 37:1635–1645CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Parisi A, Scrucca L, Desiderio J et al (2017) Robotic right hemicolectomy: analysis of 108 consecutive procedures and multidimensional assessment of the learning curve. Surg Oncol 26:28–36CrossRefPubMed Parisi A, Scrucca L, Desiderio J et al (2017) Robotic right hemicolectomy: analysis of 108 consecutive procedures and multidimensional assessment of the learning curve. Surg Oncol 26:28–36CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Farinacci F et al (2013) Robotic right colectomy for cancer with intracorporeal anastomosis: short-term outcomes from a single institution. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:807–814CrossRefPubMed Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Farinacci F et al (2013) Robotic right colectomy for cancer with intracorporeal anastomosis: short-term outcomes from a single institution. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:807–814CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Solaini L, Bazzocchi F, Cavaliere D et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32:1104–1110CrossRefPubMed Solaini L, Bazzocchi F, Cavaliere D et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32:1104–1110CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Ma S, Chen Y, Chen Y et al (2019) Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted right colectomy compared with laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 42:589–598CrossRefPubMed Ma S, Chen Y, Chen Y et al (2019) Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted right colectomy compared with laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 42:589–598CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Park JS, Kang H, Park SY et al (2019) Long-term oncologic after robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 33:2975–2981CrossRefPubMed Park JS, Kang H, Park SY et al (2019) Long-term oncologic after robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 33:2975–2981CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference de’Angelis N, Micelli-Lupinacci R, Abdalla S et al (2022) Robotic-assisted right colectomy. Official expert recommendations delivered under the aegis of the French Association of Surgery (AFC). J Visc Surg 159:212–221CrossRefPubMed de’Angelis N, Micelli-Lupinacci R, Abdalla S et al (2022) Robotic-assisted right colectomy. Official expert recommendations delivered under the aegis of the French Association of Surgery (AFC). J Visc Surg 159:212–221CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J et al (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic approach in colonic resections for cancer and benign diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 10:e0134062CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J et al (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic approach in colonic resections for cancer and benign diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 10:e0134062CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Implementation of totally robotic right hemicolectomy: lessons learned from a prospective cohort
Authors
Jeremy Meyer
Jan Wijsman
Rogier Crolla
George van der Schelling
Publication date
21-06-2023
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 5/2023
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01646-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2023

Journal of Robotic Surgery 5/2023 Go to the issue