Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Hematology | Research

Multidisciplinary team meetings in Hematology: a national mixed-methods study

Authors: Alice Polomeni, Dominique Bordessoule, Sandra Malak

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Multidisciplinary team meetings are a current international practice in cancer care, but to date, few data exist on the specificity of its practice in hematology.
In this manuscript, we present the result of the first national study, realized with quantitative and qualitative methods in France, which brings new insights in order to improve the collegial decision-making process.
To improve the effectiveness of MDTMs, the needs to focus on complex cases, to enhance patient centeredness and teamwork are relevant aspects, and a specific focus on hematological particularities is warranted to truly improve process.
Background Understanding the Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) process in different medical specialties facilitates the identification of core factors supporting effective MDTM work. Our mixed-methods study explores the participants’ perceptions of hematology MDTMs.
Design Online questionnaires collected data concerning the decision-making process, benefits and inconveniences of MDTMs for both patients and professionals. Semi-directive phone interviews were conducted and analyzed, thereby supplying qualitative data.
Results A total of 205 professionals responded to the questionnaire and 22 participated in the qualitative interviews. The data indicate the unique characteristics of hematology, including a specific definition of collegiality, the frequent solicitation of expert advice and the anticipation of treatment even prior to the occurrence of MDTMs. Additional information concerning patients’ wishes and psychosocial conditions are also needed. Participants emphasize the subjective aspects and the impact of the climate of MDTMs on medical decisions.
Conclusion Although MDTMs are recognized to be a valuable tool, organizational and relational issues may interfere with their efficiency.
To improve the effectiveness of MDTMs, the needs to focus on complex cases, to enhance patient centeredness and teamwork are relevant aspects. A specific focus on hematological particularities might be warranted to truly improve the collegial decision-making process in the context of hematology.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
7.
go back to reference Bas Theron F, Gresy B, Guillermo V, Chambaud L. Évaluation des mesures du plan cancer 2003–2007 relatives au dépistage et à l’organisation des soins. Inspection générale des affaires sociales; 2009. Bas Theron F, Gresy B, Guillermo V, Chambaud L. Évaluation des mesures du plan cancer 2003–2007 relatives au dépistage et à l’organisation des soins. Inspection générale des affaires sociales; 2009.
11.
go back to reference Soukup T, Petrides KV, Lamb BW, Sarkar S, Arora S, Shah S, Darzi A, Green JSA, Sevdalis N. The anatomy of clinical decision-making in multidisciplinary cancer meetings: a cross-sectional observational study of teams in a natural context. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(24):e3885.CrossRefPubMed Soukup T, Petrides KV, Lamb BW, Sarkar S, Arora S, Shah S, Darzi A, Green JSA, Sevdalis N. The anatomy of clinical decision-making in multidisciplinary cancer meetings: a cross-sectional observational study of teams in a natural context. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(24):e3885.CrossRefPubMed
12.
14.
15.
go back to reference Lamprell K, Arnolda G, Delaney GP, Liauw W, Braithwaite J. The challenge of putting principles into practice: Resource tensions and real-world constraints in multidisciplinary oncology team meetings. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019;15(4):199–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13166. Epub 2019/05/23. PubMed PMID: 31115170.CrossRefPubMed Lamprell K, Arnolda G, Delaney GP, Liauw W, Braithwaite J. The challenge of putting principles into practice: Resource tensions and real-world constraints in multidisciplinary oncology team meetings. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019;15(4):199–207. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ajco.​13166. Epub 2019/05/23. PubMed PMID: 31115170.CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
21.
go back to reference Habermann TM, Khurana A, Lentz R, Schmitz JJ, von Bormann AG, Young JR, Hunt CH, Christofferson SN, Nowakowski GS, McCullough KB, Horna P, Wood AJ, Macon WR, Kurtin PJ, Lester SC, Stafford SL, Chamarthy U, Khan F, Ansell SM, King RL. Analysis and impact of a multidisciplinary lymphoma virtual tumor board. Leuk Lymphoma. 2020;61(14):3351–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2020.1817432. Epub 2020/09/25. PubMed PMID: 32967496; PMCID: PMC8682150.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Habermann TM, Khurana A, Lentz R, Schmitz JJ, von Bormann AG, Young JR, Hunt CH, Christofferson SN, Nowakowski GS, McCullough KB, Horna P, Wood AJ, Macon WR, Kurtin PJ, Lester SC, Stafford SL, Chamarthy U, Khan F, Ansell SM, King RL. Analysis and impact of a multidisciplinary lymphoma virtual tumor board. Leuk Lymphoma. 2020;61(14):3351–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​10428194.​2020.​1817432. Epub 2020/09/25. PubMed PMID: 32967496; PMCID: PMC8682150.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Le Divenah A, David S, Bertrand D, Chatel T, Viallards ML. Multidisciplinary consultation meetings: decision-making in palliative chemotherapy. Sante Publique. 2013;25(2):129–35 Epub 2013/08/24 PubMed PMID: 23964537.PubMed Le Divenah A, David S, Bertrand D, Chatel T, Viallards ML. Multidisciplinary consultation meetings: decision-making in palliative chemotherapy. Sante Publique. 2013;25(2):129–35 Epub 2013/08/24 PubMed PMID: 23964537.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Ponto J. Understanding and evaluating survey research. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2015;6(2):168–71 Epub 2015 Mar 1. PMID: 26649250; PMCID: PMC4601897.PubMedPubMedCentral Ponto J. Understanding and evaluating survey research. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2015;6(2):168–71 Epub 2015 Mar 1. PMID: 26649250; PMCID: PMC4601897.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM, Ormston R. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Second Edition ed: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2013. Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM, Ormston R. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Second Edition ed: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2013.
30.
go back to reference Geerts PAF, van der Weijden T, Savelberg W, Altan M, Chisari G, Launert DR, Mesters H, Pisters Y, van Heumen M, Hermanns R, Bos GMJ, Moser A. The next step toward patient-centeredness in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: an interview study with professionals. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:1311–24. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Geerts PAF, van der Weijden T, Savelberg W, Altan M, Chisari G, Launert DR, Mesters H, Pisters Y, van Heumen M, Hermanns R, Bos GMJ, Moser A. The next step toward patient-centeredness in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: an interview study with professionals. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:1311–24. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Lamb BW, Green JS, Benn J, Brown KF, Vincent CA, Sevdalis N. Improving decision making in multidisciplinary tumor boards: prospective longitudinal evaluation of a multicomponent intervention for 1,421 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(3):412–20.CrossRefPubMed Lamb BW, Green JS, Benn J, Brown KF, Vincent CA, Sevdalis N. Improving decision making in multidisciplinary tumor boards: prospective longitudinal evaluation of a multicomponent intervention for 1,421 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(3):412–20.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Restivo L, Apostolidis T, Bouhnik AD, Garciaz S, Aurran T, Julian-Reynier C. Patients’ non-medical characteristics contribute to collective medical decision-making at multidisciplinary oncological team meetings. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0154969. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Restivo L, Apostolidis T, Bouhnik AD, Garciaz S, Aurran T, Julian-Reynier C. Patients’ non-medical characteristics contribute to collective medical decision-making at multidisciplinary oncological team meetings. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0154969. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
36.
go back to reference Gray R, Gordon B, Meredith M. Patients’ Needs: Improving the Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Cancer Services2017. Gray R, Gordon B, Meredith M. Patients’ Needs: Improving the Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Cancer Services2017.
37.
go back to reference Walsh J, Harrison JD, Young JM, Butow PN, Solomon MJ, Masya L. What are the current barriers to effective cancer care coordination? a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:132.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Walsh J, Harrison JD, Young JM, Butow PN, Solomon MJ, Masya L. What are the current barriers to effective cancer care coordination? a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:132.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Hahlweg P, Didi S, Kriston L, Harter M, Nestoriuc Y, Scholl I. Process quality of decision-making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a structured observational study. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):772.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hahlweg P, Didi S, Kriston L, Harter M, Nestoriuc Y, Scholl I. Process quality of decision-making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a structured observational study. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):772.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Horlait M, De Regge M, Baes S, Eeckloo K, Leys M. Exploring non-physician care professionals’ roles in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0263611.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Horlait M, De Regge M, Baes S, Eeckloo K, Leys M. Exploring non-physician care professionals’ roles in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0263611.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Longino H. Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press. 1990. Longino H. Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press. 1990.
41.
go back to reference Yvonnet S. An analysis of medical decision making: the case of multidisciplinary team meetings. Bull Cancer. 2022;109(3):346–57. CrossRefPubMed Yvonnet S. An analysis of medical decision making: the case of multidisciplinary team meetings. Bull Cancer. 2022;109(3):346–57. CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Taplin SH, Rodgers AB. Toward improving the quality of cancer care: addressing the interfaces of primary and oncology-related subspecialty care. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(40):3–10. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Taplin SH, Rodgers AB. Toward improving the quality of cancer care: addressing the interfaces of primary and oncology-related subspecialty care. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(40):3–10. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
go back to reference Wihl J, Rosell L, Bendahl PO, De Mattos CBR, Kinhult S, Lindell G, von Steyern FV, Nilbert M. Leadership perspectives in multidisciplinary team meetings; observational assessment based on the ATLAS instrument in cancer care. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2020;25:100231.CrossRefPubMed Wihl J, Rosell L, Bendahl PO, De Mattos CBR, Kinhult S, Lindell G, von Steyern FV, Nilbert M. Leadership perspectives in multidisciplinary team meetings; observational assessment based on the ATLAS instrument in cancer care. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2020;25:100231.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Walraven JEW, van der Meulen R, van der Hoeven JJM, Lemmens V, Verhoeven RHA, Hesselink G, Desar IME. Preparing tomorrow’s medical specialists for participating in oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: perceived barriers, facilitators and training needs. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):502. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03570-w. Epub 2022/06/28. PubMed PMID: 35761247; PMCID: PMC9238222.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Walraven JEW, van der Meulen R, van der Hoeven JJM, Lemmens V, Verhoeven RHA, Hesselink G, Desar IME. Preparing tomorrow’s medical specialists for participating in oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: perceived barriers, facilitators and training needs. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):502. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12909-022-03570-w. Epub 2022/06/28. PubMed PMID: 35761247; PMCID: PMC9238222.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Multidisciplinary team meetings in Hematology: a national mixed-methods study
Authors
Alice Polomeni
Dominique Bordessoule
Sandra Malak
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Hematology
Care
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11431-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Cancer 1/2023 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine