Top

Published in:

01-02-2016 | Original Research

Helping Couples Fulfill the “Highest of Life’s Goals”: Mate Selection, Marriage Counselling, and Genetic Counseling in United States

Author: Devon Stillwell

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 1/2016

Abstract

This article traces the history of modern genetic counseling to mate selection and marriage counselling practices of the early-20th century. Mate selection revolved around a belief that human heredity could be improved and genetic diseases eradicated through better breeding. Marriage counselling, though interested in reproduction, was also concerned with the emotional and psychological well-being of couples. These two practices coalesced most obviously in the work of well-known geneticist Sheldon Reed. Even as marriage and genetic counselling diverged in the post-WWII period, vestiges of these practices remain in contemporary counseling experiences with family planning and genetic screening programs. Emphasizing points of continuity between “positive” eugenic ideologies and modern genetic practices elaborates the diverse origins of genetic counseling. It also exposes how genetic counselors have become involved in genetic enterprises beyond standard clinical settings, and prods at key issues in the interaction between genetic science and social values.

Almeling, R. (2011). Sex cells: The medical market for eggs and sperm. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Bittles, A. H. (2012). Consanguinity in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Bulmer, M. (2003). Francis Galton: pioneer of heredity and biometry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Comfort, N. (2012). The science of human perfection: how genes became the heart of American medicine. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRef

Cowan, R. S. (2008). Heredity and hope: the case for genetic screening. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef

Davenport, C. B. (1911). Heredity in relation to eugenics. New York: Henry Holt and Co.CrossRef

Dight, C. F. (1923). Ruled Herself by Reason; Declined to Marry Him? “Essentials of Heredity and Eugenics”, and other essays, Box 7, MHS.

Dight, C. F. (1936). Call for a new social order: some activities of Charles Fremont Dight. Minneapolis: Argus Publishing Company. Box 4, Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, MN (hereafter MHS).

Dight, C. F. (undated manuscript). Five lessons on the essentials of heredity and eugenics with a few observations on cells as a biological basis: for highschool and college Students. “Essentials of Heredity and Eugenics”, and other essays, Box 7, MHS.

Dight, C. F. (undated essay, a). Hereditary diseases. “Essentials of Heredity and Eugenics”, and Other essays, Box 7 MHS.

Dight, C. F. (undated essay, b). Selection of a marriage mate. The mental faculties that should be possessed by the person whom you marry depends very much upon your own mental faculties. “Essentials of Heredity and Eugenics”, and other essays, Box 7, MHS.

Fraser, F. C. (1959). Types of problems presented to the genetic counselors. In H. G. Hammons (Ed.), Heredity counseling (pp. 76–79). New York: Hoeber-Harper.

Fraser, F. C. (1974). Current issues in medical genetics. American Journal of Human Genetics, 26, 636–659.PubMedCentralPubMed

Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: an inquiry into its laws, and consequences. New York: D. Appleton.CrossRef

Gosney, E. S., & Popenoe, P. (1929). Sterilization for human betterment: a summary of results of 6,000 operations in California, 1909–1929. New York: Macmillan.

Hawkins, A., & Ho, A. (2012). Genetic counseling and the ethical issues around direct to consumer testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling 21(3), 367–373.

Johnson, R. J. R. (1958). Heredity explained: U team calls toss on genetic gamble. St. Paul: Pioneer Press. Sheldon Reed Info File, Dight Institute records (hereafter DI), Elmer L. Andersen Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Jordan, G. E. (1981). Reducing the odds against genetic disorders. University of Minnesota medical bulletin 20. Sheldon Reed Info File, DI.

Kessler, S. (1992). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling: VII. Thoughts on directiveness. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1(1), 9–17.CrossRefPubMed

Kevles, D. J. (1985). In the name of eugenics: Genetics and the uses of human heredity. New York: Knopf.

Kline, W. (2001). Building a better race: Gender, sexuality, and eugenics from the turn of the century to the baby boom. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Krebs, M. (1987). Book review, How to have the healthiest baby you can. Perspectives in Genetic Counseling, 9(3), 5.

Ladd-Taylor, M. (2001). Eugenics, sterilisation and modern marriage in the USA: The strange career of Paul popenoe. Gender & History, 13(2), 298–327.CrossRef

Ladd-Taylor, M. (2003). A kind of genetic social work’: Sheldon reed and the origins of genetic counseling. In G. Feldberg, M. Ladd-Taylor, A. Li, & K. McPherson (Eds.), Women, health, and nation: Canada and the United States since 1945 (pp. 67–83). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Ladd-Taylor, M. (2005). Coping with a ‘public menace’: Eugenic sterilization in Minnesota. Minnesota History, 59(6), 237–48.

Largent, M. A. (2008). Breeding contempt: The history of coerced sterilization in the United States. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Last Will and Testament. (1936). Dight Endowment Fund, 1944–1984, Correspondence and Administrative Files, Box 2, DI.

Ludmerer, K. M. (1972). Genetics and American society: an historical appraisal (p. 1972). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lwiwski, N., Greenberg, C., & Mhanni, A. (2008). Genetic testing of children at risk for adult onset conditions: when is testing indicated? Journal of Genetic Counseling 17(6), 523–525.

Marks, J. H. (1993). The training of genetic counselors: origins of a psychosocial model.”. In D. M. Bartels, B. S. LeRoy, & A. L. Caplan (Eds.), Prescribing our future: Ethical challenges in genetic counseling (15–24). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

McConkie-Rosell, A., & Spiridigliozzi, G. A. (2004). Family matters: a conceptual framework for genetic testing in children. Journal of Genetic Counseling 13(1), 9–29.

Milunsky, A. (1987). How to have the healthiest baby you can. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Mozersky, J. (2013). Risky genes: genetics, breast cancer, and Jewish identity. Abington: Routledge.

Notice of fund establishment. (1944). Dight Endowment Fund, 1944–1984, Correspondence and Administrative Files, Box 2, DI.

Oliver, C. P. (1943). Report on the organization and aims of The Dight Institute,” The Dight Institute of the University of Minnesota bulletin 1, 1–2, Charles Fremont Dight Info File, DI.

Paul, D.B. (1995). Controlling human heredity, 1865 to the present. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.

Phelps, G. (1984). The eugenics crusade of Charles Fremont dight. Minnesota History, 49(3), 99–108.PubMed

Popenoe, P. (1925). Modern marriage: A handbook. New York: Macmillan.

Popenoe, P. (1926). Problems of human reproduction. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

Popenoe, P. (1930). The child’s heredity. Baltimore: Wilkins and Williams.

Popenoe, P. (1943). Marriage: Before and after. New York: W. Funk.

Popenoe, P. (Ed.). (1977). Techniques of marriage and family counseling. Los Angeles: The American Institute of Family Relations.

Popenoe, P., & Disney, D. C. (1960). Can this marriage be saved? New York: Macmillan.

Raz, A. E. (2010). Community genetics and genetic alliances: eugenics, carrier testing, and networks of risk. London: Routledge.

Reed, S.C. (1951). Counseling in human genetics, part II,” The Dight Institute of the University of Minnesota Bulletin 7, 6–7, Bulletin, 1943–1979, Correspondence and Administrative Files, Box 1, DI.

Reed, S. C. (1955). Counseling in medical genetics. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.

Reed, S. C. (1974). A short history of genetic counseling. The Dight Institute for Human Genetics of the University of Minnesota Bulletin 14, 1-10, Dight Institute Info File, DI.

Reed, E. W., & Reed, R. (1965). Mental retardation: a family study. Philadelphia: Saunders.

Reilly, P. (1991). The surgical solution: a history of involuntary sterilization in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Reilly, P.R. (2008). Davenport and Heredity Counseling. In J.A. Witkowski & J.R. Inglis (Eds.), Davenport’s dream: 21st century reflections on heredity and eugenics (pp.159-165).

Resta, R. (1997a). Eugenics and nondirectiveness in genetic counseling.” Journal of genetic counseling, 6(2), 255–258. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Resta, R.G. (1997b). The historical perspetive: Sheldon Reed and 50 years of genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling 6(4), 375–376.

Resta, R. G. (2010). Complicated shadows: a critique of autonomy in genetic counseling. In B. S. LeRoy, P. M. Veach, & D. M. Bartels (Eds.), Genetic counseling practice: advanced concepts and skills (pp. 13–30). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

Resta, R., Biesecker, B. B., Bennett, R. L., Blum, S., Hahn, S. E., Strecker, M. N., & Williams, J. L. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(2), 77–83.CrossRefPubMed

Rochman, B. (2011). Do all women need genetic testing before pregnancy? Time.

Rogers, C. (1942). Counseling and psychotherapy: newer concepts in practice. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Rogers, C. (1965). Client-centered therapy: its current practice, implications and theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Rydell, R. W. (1993). ‘Fitter families for future firesides’: Eugenics exhibitions between the wars. In World of fairs: The century-of-progress exhibitions (pp. 38–61). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Schoen, J. (2005). Choice and coercion: birth control, sterilization, and abortion in public health and welfare. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Stern, A. M. (2005). Eugenic nation: faults and frontiers of better breeding in modern America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Stern, A. M. (2012). Telling genes: The story of genetic counseling in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Stevens, L. (1991/92). CF carrier testing: an obligation to disclose. Perspectives in Genetic Counseling 13(4), 4.

Stillwell, D. (2012). Eugenics visualized: the third international congress of eugenics, 1932. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 86, 206–236.CrossRefPubMed

Swanson, K. W. (2014). Banking on the body: the market in blood, milk, and sperm in modern America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef

Wailoo, K. (1997). Drawing blood: technology and disease in twentieth-century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Wailoo, K., & Pemberton, S. (2006). The troubled dream of genetic medicine: ethnicity and innovation in Tay-Sachs, cystic fibrosis, and sickle cell disease. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Title: Helping Couples Fulfill the “Highest of Life’s Goals”: Mate Selection, Marriage Counselling, and Genetic Counseling in United States
Author: Devon Stillwell
Publication date: 01-02-2016
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9853-5

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Helping Couples Fulfill the “Highest of Life’s Goals”: Mate Selection, Marriage Counselling, and Genetic Counseling in United States

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Cystic Fibrosis. Edited by Marcus A. Mall and J. Stuart Elborn

Comparison of Informed Consent Preferences for Multiplex Genetic Carrier Screening among a Diverse Population

Challenges of Pre- and Post-Test Counseling for Orthodox Jewish Individuals in the Premarital Phase

Review of Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) for Prenatal and Pediatric Genetic Counselors

The Life Course Perspective: a Guide for Genetic Counselors

Clients’ Perception of Outcome of Team-Based Prenatal and Reproductive Genetic Counseling in Serbian Service Using the Perceived Personal Control (PPC) Questionnaire