Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2020

01-02-2020 | Heart Surgery | Original Article

Robotic repair of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection: the initial experience and technical details

Authors: Burak Onan, Unal Aydin, Ersin Kadirogullari, Ismihan Selen Onan, Onur Sen, Zeynep Kahraman

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

This study reports our initial experience with robotic-assisted partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection (PAPVC) repair. From May 2013 through September 2018, 20 patients (12 male and 8 female) underwent robotic-assisted repair of a right-sided (n = 19) or a left-sided (n = 1) PAPVC. The mean age was 24.6 ± 9.4 years (range 14–44) and the mean body mass index was 22.3 ± 4.6. Seventeen patients had a right-sided supra-cardiac PAPVC with sinus venosus atrial septal defect, two had a right-sided cardiac PAPVC to the right atrium and one had a left-sided cardiac PAPVC to the coronary sinus. Associated anomalies included patent foramen ovale (n = 2) and left persistent superior vena cava (n = 1). All patients were operated on successfully. No conversion to mini-thoracotomy or sternotomy was needed. Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic clamping times were 114.8 ± 17.3 (range 90–150) and 66.5 ± 15.8 (range 44–90) minutes, respectively. Repair techniques included the single-patch repair with baffle through right atriotomy (n = 16), the 2-patch repair (n = 1) using lateral transcaval incision and intracardiac re-routing (n = 3). The mean ventilation time was 4.2 ± 1.2 h and hospital stay was 3.1 ± 0.1 days. No phrenic nerve injury, sinus node dysfunction, re-exploration or blood transfusion was noted. No residual shunting or venous obstruction was found on echocardiograms. Follow-up was a mean of 1.7 years (range 3–36 months). There was no follow-up mortality. Totally, endoscopic robotic-assisted PAPVC repair is a feasible procedure in selected adult patients. It is a less invasive alternative to traditional incisions, mini-thoracotomy and endoscopic approaches. In the future, new generation robotic devices may offer an alternative for younger patients with this pathology.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gillinov AM, Mihaljevic T, Javadikasgari H et al (2018) Early results of robotically assisted mitral valve surgery: analysis of the first 1000 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 155:82–91CrossRef Gillinov AM, Mihaljevic T, Javadikasgari H et al (2018) Early results of robotically assisted mitral valve surgery: analysis of the first 1000 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 155:82–91CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Torracca L, Ismeno G, Alfieri O (2001) Totally endoscopic computer-enhanced atrial septal defect closure in six patients. Ann Thorac Surg 72:1354–1357CrossRef Torracca L, Ismeno G, Alfieri O (2001) Totally endoscopic computer-enhanced atrial septal defect closure in six patients. Ann Thorac Surg 72:1354–1357CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Argenziano M, Oz MC, Kohmoto T et al (2003) Totally endoscopic atrial septal defect repair with robotic assistance. Circulation 108(Suppl 1):191–194 Argenziano M, Oz MC, Kohmoto T et al (2003) Totally endoscopic atrial septal defect repair with robotic assistance. Circulation 108(Suppl 1):191–194
4.
go back to reference Bonaros N, Schachner T, Oehlinger A et al (2006) Robotically assisted totally endoscopic atrial septal defect repair: insights from operative times, learning curves, and clinical outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 82:687–693CrossRef Bonaros N, Schachner T, Oehlinger A et al (2006) Robotically assisted totally endoscopic atrial septal defect repair: insights from operative times, learning curves, and clinical outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 82:687–693CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Xiao C, Gao C, Yang M et al (2014) Totally robotic atrial septal defect closure: 7-year single-institution experience and follow-up. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 19:933–937CrossRef Xiao C, Gao C, Yang M et al (2014) Totally robotic atrial septal defect closure: 7-year single-institution experience and follow-up. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 19:933–937CrossRef
6.
go back to reference İyigün T, Kaya M, Gülbeyaz S et al (2017) Patient body image, self-esteem, and cosmetic results of minimally invasive robotic cardiac surgery. Int J Surg 39:88–94CrossRef İyigün T, Kaya M, Gülbeyaz S et al (2017) Patient body image, self-esteem, and cosmetic results of minimally invasive robotic cardiac surgery. Int J Surg 39:88–94CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Onan B, Kadirogullari E, Guler S, Kahraman Z (2018) Robotic-assisted removal of an Amplatzer atrial septal occluder device for residual shunting, closure of septal defect and simultaneous tricuspid annuloplasty. J Robot Surg 12:185–188CrossRef Onan B, Kadirogullari E, Guler S, Kahraman Z (2018) Robotic-assisted removal of an Amplatzer atrial septal occluder device for residual shunting, closure of septal defect and simultaneous tricuspid annuloplasty. J Robot Surg 12:185–188CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Onan B, Aydin U, Basgoze S, Bakir I (2016) Totally endoscopic robotic repair of coronary sinus atrial septal defect. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 23:662–664CrossRef Onan B, Aydin U, Basgoze S, Bakir I (2016) Totally endoscopic robotic repair of coronary sinus atrial septal defect. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 23:662–664CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Onan B, Aydin U, Turkvatan A, Bakir I (2016) Robot-assisted repair of right partial anomalous pulmonary venous return. J Card Surg 31:394–397CrossRef Onan B, Aydin U, Turkvatan A, Bakir I (2016) Robot-assisted repair of right partial anomalous pulmonary venous return. J Card Surg 31:394–397CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pirelli L, Kliger CA, Patel NC et al (2017) Minimally invasive robotically assisted repair of partial anomalous venous connection. Innovations (Phila) 12:71–73CrossRef Pirelli L, Kliger CA, Patel NC et al (2017) Minimally invasive robotically assisted repair of partial anomalous venous connection. Innovations (Phila) 12:71–73CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Said SM, Burkhart HM, Schaff HV et al (2012) Single-patch, 2-patch, and caval division techniques for repair of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connections: does it matter? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143:896–903CrossRef Said SM, Burkhart HM, Schaff HV et al (2012) Single-patch, 2-patch, and caval division techniques for repair of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connections: does it matter? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143:896–903CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nicholson IA, Chard RB, Nunn GR, Cartmill TB (2000) Transcaval repair of the sinus venosus syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:741–744CrossRef Nicholson IA, Chard RB, Nunn GR, Cartmill TB (2000) Transcaval repair of the sinus venosus syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:741–744CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Okonta KE, Tamatey M (2012) Is double or single patch for sinus venosus atrial septal defect repair the better option in prevention of postoperative venous obstruction? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 15:900–903CrossRef Okonta KE, Tamatey M (2012) Is double or single patch for sinus venosus atrial septal defect repair the better option in prevention of postoperative venous obstruction? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 15:900–903CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Iyer AP, Somanrema K, Pathak S, Manjunath PY, Pradhan S, Krishnan S (2007) Comparative study of single- and 2-patch techniques for sinus venosus atrial septal defect with partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133:656–659CrossRef Iyer AP, Somanrema K, Pathak S, Manjunath PY, Pradhan S, Krishnan S (2007) Comparative study of single- and 2-patch techniques for sinus venosus atrial septal defect with partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133:656–659CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Stewart RD, Bailliard F, Kelle AM, Backer CL, Young L, Mavroudis C (2007) Evolving surgical strategy for sinus venosus atrial septal defect: effect on sinus node function and late venous obstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 84:1651–1655CrossRef Stewart RD, Bailliard F, Kelle AM, Backer CL, Young L, Mavroudis C (2007) Evolving surgical strategy for sinus venosus atrial septal defect: effect on sinus node function and late venous obstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 84:1651–1655CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zubritskiy A, Arkhipov A, Khapaev T et al (2016) The Warden procedure can be successfully performed using minimally invasive cardiac surgery without cross clamping. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 22:225–227CrossRef Zubritskiy A, Arkhipov A, Khapaev T et al (2016) The Warden procedure can be successfully performed using minimally invasive cardiac surgery without cross clamping. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 22:225–227CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wang F, Li M, Xu X et al (2011) Totally thoracoscopic surgical closure of atrial septal defect in small children. Ann Thorac Surg 92:200 – 3CrossRef Wang F, Li M, Xu X et al (2011) Totally thoracoscopic surgical closure of atrial septal defect in small children. Ann Thorac Surg 92:200 – 3CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robotic repair of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection: the initial experience and technical details
Authors
Burak Onan
Unal Aydin
Ersin Kadirogullari
Ismihan Selen Onan
Onur Sen
Zeynep Kahraman
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00943-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2020 Go to the issue