Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Heart Failure | Research article

Association between degree of exposure to the Hospital Value Based Purchasing Program and 30-day mortality: experience from the first four years of Medicare’s pay-for-performance program

Authors: Souvik Banerjee, Danny McCormick, Michael K. Paasche-Orlow, Meng-Yun Lin, Amresh D. Hanchate

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Hospital Value Based Purchasing Program (HVBP) in the United States, announced in 2010 and implemented since 2013 by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), introduced payment penalties and bonuses based on hospital performance on patient 30-day mortality and other indicators. Evidence on the impact of this program is limited and reliant on the choice of program-exempt hospitals as controls. As program-exempt hospitals may have systematic differences with program-participating hospitals, in this study we used an alternative approach wherein program-participating hospitals are stratified by their financial exposure to penalty, and examined changes in hospital performance on 30-day mortality between hospitals with high vs. low financial exposure to penalty.

Methods

Our study examined all hospitals reimbursed through the Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) – which include most community and tertiary acute care hospitals – from 2009 to 2016. A hospital’s financial exposure to HVBP penalties was measured by the share of its annual aggregate inpatient days provided to Medicare patients (“Medicare bed share”). The main outcome measures were annual hospital-level 30-day risk-adjusted mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF) and pneumonia patients. Using difference-in-differences models we estimated the change in the outcomes in high vs. low Medicare bed share hospitals following HVBP.

Results

In the study cohort of 1902 US hospitals, average Medicare bed share was 61 and 41% in high (n = 540) and low (n = 1362) Medicare bed share hospitals, respectively. High Medicare bed share hospitals were more likely to have smaller bed size and less likely to be teaching hospitals, but ownership type was similar among both Medicare bed share groups.. Among low Medicare bed share (control) hospitals, baseline (pre-HVBP) 30-day mortality was 16.0% (AMI), 10.9% (HF) and 11.4% (pneumonia). In both high and low Medicare bed share hospitals 30-day mortality experienced a secular decrease for AMI, increase for HF and pneumonia; differences in the pre-post change between the two hospital groups were small (< 0.12%) and not significant across all three conditions.

Conclusions

HVBP was not associated with a meaningful change in 30-day mortality across hospitals with differential exposure to the program penalty.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference VanLare JM, Conway PH. Value-based purchasing--national programs to move from volume to value. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(4):292–5.CrossRef VanLare JM, Conway PH. Value-based purchasing--national programs to move from volume to value. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(4):292–5.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Patient protection and affordable care act. Public law. 2010;111(48):759–62. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Patient protection and affordable care act. Public law. 2010;111(48):759–62.
3.
go back to reference Norton EC, Li J, Das A, Chen LM. Moneyball in Medicare. J Health Econ. 2018;61:259–73.CrossRef Norton EC, Li J, Das A, Chen LM. Moneyball in Medicare. J Health Econ. 2018;61:259–73.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lake Superior Quality Innovation Network: Understanding Hospital Value-Based Purchasing. 2019. https://www.lsqin.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/VBP-Fact-Sheet.pdf. Lake Superior Quality Innovation Network: Understanding Hospital Value-Based Purchasing. 2019. https://​www.​lsqin.​org/​wp-content/​uploads/​2017/​12/​VBP-Fact-Sheet.​pdf.​
5.
go back to reference Ryan AM, Krinsky S, Maurer KA, Dimick JB. Changes in hospital quality associated with hospital value-based purchasing. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(24):2358–66.CrossRef Ryan AM, Krinsky S, Maurer KA, Dimick JB. Changes in hospital quality associated with hospital value-based purchasing. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(24):2358–66.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Joynt KE, Harris Y, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Quality of care and patient outcomes in critical access rural hospitals. JAMA. 2011;306(1):45–52.CrossRef Joynt KE, Harris Y, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Quality of care and patient outcomes in critical access rural hospitals. JAMA. 2011;306(1):45–52.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Calikoglu S, Murray R, Feeney D. Hospital pay-for-performance programs in Maryland produced strong results, including reduced hospital-acquired conditions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(12):2649–58.CrossRef Calikoglu S, Murray R, Feeney D. Hospital pay-for-performance programs in Maryland produced strong results, including reduced hospital-acquired conditions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(12):2649–58.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rajkumar R, Patel A, Murphy K, Colmers JM, Blum JD, Conway PH, Sharfstein JM. Maryland's all-payer approach to delivery-system reform. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(6):493–5.CrossRef Rajkumar R, Patel A, Murphy K, Colmers JM, Blum JD, Conway PH, Sharfstein JM. Maryland's all-payer approach to delivery-system reform. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(6):493–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jha AK, Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. The Long-Term Effect of Premier Pay for Performance on Patient Outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2012;0(0):null. Jha AK, Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. The Long-Term Effect of Premier Pay for Performance on Patient Outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2012;0(0):null.
15.
go back to reference Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: Hospital Compare: http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/search.html; 2015. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: Hospital Compare: http://​www.​medicare.​gov/​hospitalcompare/​search.​html; 2015.
16.
go back to reference Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation/Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation. 2018 Condition-Specific Measures Updates and Specifications Report Hospital-Level 30-Day Risk-Standardized Mortality Measures. New Haven: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2018. www.qualitynet.org Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation/Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation. 2018 Condition-Specific Measures Updates and Specifications Report Hospital-Level 30-Day Risk-Standardized Mortality Measures. New Haven: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2018. www.​qualitynet.​org
17.
go back to reference Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation/Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation. 2016 Condition-Specific Measures Updates and Specifications Report: Hospital-Level 30-Day Risk-Standardized Mortality Measures. Baltimore: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2016. Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation/Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation. 2016 Condition-Specific Measures Updates and Specifications Report: Hospital-Level 30-Day Risk-Standardized Mortality Measures. Baltimore: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2016.
18.
go back to reference McGarry BE, Blankley AA, Li Y. The impact of the Medicare hospital readmission reduction program in New York state. Med Care. 2016;54(2):162–71.CrossRef McGarry BE, Blankley AA, Li Y. The impact of the Medicare hospital readmission reduction program in New York state. Med Care. 2016;54(2):162–71.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Werner RM, Kolstad JT, Stuart EA, Polsky D. The effect of pay-for-performance in hospitals: lessons for quality improvement. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(4):690–8.CrossRef Werner RM, Kolstad JT, Stuart EA, Polsky D. The effect of pay-for-performance in hospitals: lessons for quality improvement. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(4):690–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dimick JB, Ryan AM. Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach. JAMA. 2014;312(22):2401–2.CrossRef Dimick JB, Ryan AM. Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach. JAMA. 2014;312(22):2401–2.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2002. Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2002.
22.
go back to reference Ryan AM, Burgess JF Jr, Dimick JB. Why we should not be indifferent to specification choices for difference-in-differences. Health Serv Res. 2015;50(4):1211–35.CrossRef Ryan AM, Burgess JF Jr, Dimick JB. Why we should not be indifferent to specification choices for difference-in-differences. Health Serv Res. 2015;50(4):1211–35.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ. 2004;119(1):249–75.CrossRef Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ. 2004;119(1):249–75.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. Microeconometrics: methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.CrossRef Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. Microeconometrics: methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Dharmarajan K, Wang Y, Lin Z, et al. Association of changing hospital readmission rates with mortality rates after hospital discharge. JAMA. 2017;318(3):270–8.CrossRef Dharmarajan K, Wang Y, Lin Z, et al. Association of changing hospital readmission rates with mortality rates after hospital discharge. JAMA. 2017;318(3):270–8.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2016. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2016.
27.
go back to reference Eijkenaar F, Emmert M, Scheppach M, Schoffski O. Effects of pay for performance in health care: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Health Policy. 2013;110(2–3):115–30.CrossRef Eijkenaar F, Emmert M, Scheppach M, Schoffski O. Effects of pay for performance in health care: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Health Policy. 2013;110(2–3):115–30.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ryan AM. Will value-based purchasing increase disparities in care? N Engl J Med. 2013;369(26):2472–4.CrossRef Ryan AM. Will value-based purchasing increase disparities in care? N Engl J Med. 2013;369(26):2472–4.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Werner RM, Dudley RA. Medicare's new hospital value-based purchasing program is likely to have only a small impact on hospital payments. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(9):1932–40.CrossRef Werner RM, Dudley RA. Medicare's new hospital value-based purchasing program is likely to have only a small impact on hospital payments. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(9):1932–40.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Doran T, Maurer KA, Ryan AM. Impact of provider incentives on quality and value of health care. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38:449–65.CrossRef Doran T, Maurer KA, Ryan AM. Impact of provider incentives on quality and value of health care. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38:449–65.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Himmelstein DU, Ariely D, Woolhandler S. Pay-for-performance: toxic to quality? Insights from behavioral economics. Int J Health Serv. 2014;44(2):203–14.CrossRef Himmelstein DU, Ariely D, Woolhandler S. Pay-for-performance: toxic to quality? Insights from behavioral economics. Int J Health Serv. 2014;44(2):203–14.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Association between degree of exposure to the Hospital Value Based Purchasing Program and 30-day mortality: experience from the first four years of Medicare’s pay-for-performance program
Authors
Souvik Banerjee
Danny McCormick
Michael K. Paasche-Orlow
Meng-Yun Lin
Amresh D. Hanchate
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4562-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Health Services Research 1/2019 Go to the issue