Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The European Journal of Health Economics 5/2014

01-06-2014 | Editorial

Health technology assessments in England: an analysis of the NICE Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme

Authors: William Green, John Hutton

Published in: The European Journal of Health Economics | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

Many countries undertaking health technology assessments (HTAs) to inform decisions on the reimbursement of technologies focus solely on the analysis of pharmaceuticals [1, 2]. In the UK, the responsibility for undertaking HTAs falls mainly to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). NICE is an independent organisation whose role is to provide guidance on health technologies and clinical practice for the National Health Service (NHS) in England and Wales [3], and it is regarded as a world leader in the HTA field. In contrast to HTA bodies in most other countries, NICE has been given a wider remit to assess the full range of technologies (i.e. not just pharmaceuticals) [4]. There are difficulties present when assessing non-pharmaceutical health technologies, which can reduce the applicability of methods routinely used in the assessment of pharmaceuticals. Nevertheless, it is important not to undertake HTAs only on those technologies where the assessment process is straightforward, otherwise the allocation of resources between the different types of technology may be distorted by an imbalance in the information supporting decisions [2]. In order to overcome the aforementioned difficulties and ensure that the assessments of all forms of health technology are useful in decision-making, NICE has developed four appraisal programmes that are each overseen by a separate committee (technology appraisals, medical technologies, diagnostics and public health). …
Footnotes
1
On the other hand, the MTEP guidance may be more acceptable in certain non-UK countries, such as France and Germany, where there is no attempt to measure health benefits in a standardised way. However, these countries do place a great emphasis on the need for evidence from RCTs and are reluctant to base decisions on the reimbursement of new technologies on alternative data sources, as the MTEP does.
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference Drummond, M., Schwartz, J., Jonsson, B., Luce, B., Neumann, P., Siebert, U., Sullivan, S.: Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 24(3), 244–258 (2008)PubMed Drummond, M., Schwartz, J., Jonsson, B., Luce, B., Neumann, P., Siebert, U., Sullivan, S.: Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 24(3), 244–258 (2008)PubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Sorenson, C., Tarricone, R., Siebert, U., Drummond, M.: Applying health economics for policy decision making: do devices differ from drugs? Europace 13, 54–58 (2011)CrossRef Sorenson, C., Tarricone, R., Siebert, U., Drummond, M.: Applying health economics for policy decision making: do devices differ from drugs? Europace 13, 54–58 (2011)CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Drummond, M., Sculpher, M., Torrance, G., O’Brien, B., Stoddart, G.: Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005) Drummond, M., Sculpher, M., Torrance, G., O’Brien, B., Stoddart, G.: Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)
8.
go back to reference Cookson, R., Hutton, J.: Regulating the economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals and medical devices: a European perspective. Health Policy 63, 167–178 (2003)PubMedCrossRef Cookson, R., Hutton, J.: Regulating the economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals and medical devices: a European perspective. Health Policy 63, 167–178 (2003)PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Taylor, R., Iglesias, C.: Assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of medical devices and drugs: are they that different? Value Health 12(4), 404–406 (2009)PubMedCrossRef Taylor, R., Iglesias, C.: Assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of medical devices and drugs: are they that different? Value Health 12(4), 404–406 (2009)PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Health technology assessments in England: an analysis of the NICE Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme
Authors
William Green
John Hutton
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
The European Journal of Health Economics / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1618-7598
Electronic ISSN: 1618-7601
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-013-0539-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

The European Journal of Health Economics 5/2014 Go to the issue