Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 1/2018

01-02-2018

Health Literacy and Health-Care Engagement as Predictors of Shared Decision-Making Among Adult Information Seekers in the USA: a Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey

Authors: Lisa T. Wigfall, Andrea H. Tanner

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between health literacy, health-care engagement, and shared decision-making (SDM). We analyzed Health Information National Trends Survey 4 (cycle 3) data for 1604 information seekers who had one or more non-emergency room health-care visits in the previous year. SDM was more than two times higher among adults who “always” versus “usually/sometimes/never” take health information to doctor visits (OR = 2.54; 95 % CI 1.19–5.43). There was a twofold increase in SDM among adults who were “completely/very confident” versus “somewhat/a little/not confident” about finding health information (OR = 2.03; 95 % CI 1.37–3.02). Differences in SDM between adults who understood health information and those who had difficulty understanding health information were not statistically significant (OR = 1.39; 95 % CI 0.93–2.07). A Healthy People 2020 goal is to increase SDM. Previous research has suggested that SDM may improve health outcomes across the continuum of care. Only about half of adults report always being involved in health-care decisions. Even more alarming is the fact that SDM has not increased from 2003 to 2013. Our findings suggest that increasing health literacy has the potential to increase health-care engagement and subsequently increase SDM. Effective intervention strategies are needed to improve health literacy and promote health-care engagement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Joosten EA, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CP, de Jong CA (2008) Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom 77:219–26CrossRefPubMed Joosten EA, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CP, de Jong CA (2008) Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom 77:219–26CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R (2003) Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care 12:93–9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R (2003) Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care 12:93–9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean?(or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44:681–92CrossRefPubMed Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean?(or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44:681–92CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kim SP, Knight SJ, Tomori C, Colella KM, Schoor RA, Shih L, Kuzel TM, Nadler RB, Bennett CL (2001) Health literacy and shared decision making for prostate cancer patients with low socioeconomic status. Cancer Investig 19:684–91CrossRef Kim SP, Knight SJ, Tomori C, Colella KM, Schoor RA, Shih L, Kuzel TM, Nadler RB, Bennett CL (2001) Health literacy and shared decision making for prostate cancer patients with low socioeconomic status. Cancer Investig 19:684–91CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Stiggelbout AM, Van der Weijden T, De Wit MPT, Frosch D, Légaré F, Montori VM, Trevena L, Elwyn G (2012) Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. Br Med J 344, e256CrossRef Stiggelbout AM, Van der Weijden T, De Wit MPT, Frosch D, Légaré F, Montori VM, Trevena L, Elwyn G (2012) Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. Br Med J 344, e256CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Blanch-Hartigan D, Chawla N, Beckjord EI, Forsythe LP, de Moor JS, Hesse BW, Arora NK (2015) Cancer survivors’ receipt of treatment summaries and implications for patient-centered communication and quality of care. Patient Educ Couns 98:1274–9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Blanch-Hartigan D, Chawla N, Beckjord EI, Forsythe LP, de Moor JS, Hesse BW, Arora NK (2015) Cancer survivors’ receipt of treatment summaries and implications for patient-centered communication and quality of care. Patient Educ Couns 98:1274–9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Leyva B, Persoskie A, Ottenbacher A, Hamilton JG, Allen JD, Kobrin SC, Taplin SH. Do men receive information required for shared decision making about PSA testing? Results from a national survey. J Cancer Educ. 2015 Leyva B, Persoskie A, Ottenbacher A, Hamilton JG, Allen JD, Kobrin SC, Taplin SH. Do men receive information required for shared decision making about PSA testing? Results from a national survey. J Cancer Educ. 2015
11.
go back to reference Murray E, Charles C, Gafni A (2006) Shared decision-making in primary care: tailoring the Charles et al. model to fit the context of general practice. Patient Educ Couns 62:205–11CrossRefPubMed Murray E, Charles C, Gafni A (2006) Shared decision-making in primary care: tailoring the Charles et al. model to fit the context of general practice. Patient Educ Couns 62:205–11CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1999) Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Sci Med 49:651–61CrossRef Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1999) Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Sci Med 49:651–61CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sandman L, Munthe C (2009) Shared decision-making and patient autonomy. Theor Med Bioeth 30:289–310CrossRefPubMed Sandman L, Munthe C (2009) Shared decision-making and patient autonomy. Theor Med Bioeth 30:289–310CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sandman L, Granger BB, Ekman I, Munthe C (2012) Adherence, shared decision-making and patient autonomy. Med Health Care Philos 15:115–27CrossRefPubMed Sandman L, Granger BB, Ekman I, Munthe C (2012) Adherence, shared decision-making and patient autonomy. Med Health Care Philos 15:115–27CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sandman L, Munthe C (2010) Shared decision making, paternalism and patient choice. Health Care Anal 18:60–84CrossRefPubMed Sandman L, Munthe C (2010) Shared decision making, paternalism and patient choice. Health Care Anal 18:60–84CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K (2011) Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 155:97–107CrossRefPubMed Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K (2011) Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 155:97–107CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ratzan SC, Parker RM (2000) Health literacy: a challenge for American patients and their health care providers. Health Promot Int 15:277–83CrossRef Ratzan SC, Parker RM (2000) Health literacy: a challenge for American patients and their health care providers. Health Promot Int 15:277–83CrossRef
19.
20.
go back to reference Chan YM (2015) The confidence of health information seeking behavior from the Internet. Acad Res Int. 6. Chan YM (2015) The confidence of health information seeking behavior from the Internet. Acad Res Int. 6.
21.
go back to reference Ha S, Jung Lee Y (2011) Determinants of consumer-driven healthcare: self-confidence in information search, health literacy, and trust in information sources. Int J Pharm Healthc Mark 5:8–24CrossRef Ha S, Jung Lee Y (2011) Determinants of consumer-driven healthcare: self-confidence in information search, health literacy, and trust in information sources. Int J Pharm Healthc Mark 5:8–24CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Jensen JD, Carcioppolo N, King AJ, Scherr CL, Jones CL, Niederdieppe J (2014) The cancer information overload (CIO) scale: establishing predictive and discriminant validity. Patient Educ Couns 94:90–6CrossRefPubMed Jensen JD, Carcioppolo N, King AJ, Scherr CL, Jones CL, Niederdieppe J (2014) The cancer information overload (CIO) scale: establishing predictive and discriminant validity. Patient Educ Couns 94:90–6CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Edwards A, Mowle S, Wensing M, Wilkinson C, Kinnersley P, Grol R (2001) Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Educ Couns 43:5–22CrossRefPubMed Elwyn G, Edwards A, Mowle S, Wensing M, Wilkinson C, Kinnersley P, Grol R (2001) Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Educ Couns 43:5–22CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Moore JE, Titler MG, Kane Low L, Dalton VK, Sampselle CM (2015) Transforming patient-centered care: development of the evidence informed decision making through engagement model. Womens Health Issues 25:276–82CrossRefPubMed Moore JE, Titler MG, Kane Low L, Dalton VK, Sampselle CM (2015) Transforming patient-centered care: development of the evidence informed decision making through engagement model. Womens Health Issues 25:276–82CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Health Literacy and Health-Care Engagement as Predictors of Shared Decision-Making Among Adult Information Seekers in the USA: a Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey
Authors
Lisa T. Wigfall
Andrea H. Tanner
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1052-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Cancer Education 1/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine