Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 1/2016

01-03-2016

Health Information Seeking and Cancer Screening Adherence Rates

Authors: Yuliya Shneyderman, Lila J. Finney Rutten, Kristopher L. Arheart, Margaret M. Byrne, Julie Kornfeld, Seth J. Schwartz

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Effective screening tools are available for many of the top cancer killers in the USA. Searching for health information has previously been found to be associated with adhering to cancer screening guidelines, but Internet information seeking has not been examined separately. The current study examines the relationship between health and cancer Internet information seeking and adherence to cancer screening guidelines for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer in a large nationally representative dataset. The current study was conducted using data from the Health Information National Trends Survey from 2003 and 2007. The study examined age-stratified models which correlated health and cancer information seeking with getting breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening on schedule, while controlling for several key variables. Internet health and cancer information seeking was positively associated with getting Pap screening on schedule, while information seeking from any sources was positively associated with getting colorectal screening on schedule. People who look for health or cancer information are more likely to get screened on schedule. Some groups of people, however, do not exhibit this relationship and, thus, may be more vulnerable to under-screening. These groups may benefit more from targeted interventions that attempt to engage people in their health care more actively.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Preventive Services US (2008) Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 149(9):627–637CrossRef Preventive Services US (2008) Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 149(9):627–637CrossRef
4.
go back to reference U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2009) Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 151(10):716–726, W-236CrossRef U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2009) Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 151(10):716–726, W-236CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, Saslow D, Brawley O (2010) Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 60(2):99–119CrossRefPubMed Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, Saslow D, Brawley O (2010) Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 60(2):99–119CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Black AT, McCulloch A, Martin RE, Kan L (2011) Young women and cervical cancer screening: what barriers persist? Can J Nurs Res 43(1):8–21PubMed Black AT, McCulloch A, Martin RE, Kan L (2011) Young women and cervical cancer screening: what barriers persist? Can J Nurs Res 43(1):8–21PubMed
7.
go back to reference Jennings-Dozier K, Lawrence D (2000) Sociodemographic predictors of adherence to annual cervical cancer screening in minority women. Cancer Nurs 23(5):350–356, quiz 357-358CrossRefPubMed Jennings-Dozier K, Lawrence D (2000) Sociodemographic predictors of adherence to annual cervical cancer screening in minority women. Cancer Nurs 23(5):350–356, quiz 357-358CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Rigal L, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Falcoff H, Bouyer J, Ringa V (2011) Do social inequalities in cervical cancer screening persist among patients who use primary care? The Paris Prevention in General Practice survey. Prev Med 53(3):199–202CrossRefPubMed Rigal L, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Falcoff H, Bouyer J, Ringa V (2011) Do social inequalities in cervical cancer screening persist among patients who use primary care? The Paris Prevention in General Practice survey. Prev Med 53(3):199–202CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gierisch JM, Bastian LA (2010) Cancer screening adherence. In: Bosworth H (ed) Improving Patient Treatment Adherence. Springer, New York Gierisch JM, Bastian LA (2010) Cancer screening adherence. In: Bosworth H (ed) Improving Patient Treatment Adherence. Springer, New York
11.
go back to reference Joseph DA, Rim SH, Seeff LC (2008) Use of colorectal cancer tests—United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006. Mortal Morb Wkly Rep 57(10):253–258 Joseph DA, Rim SH, Seeff LC (2008) Use of colorectal cancer tests—United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006. Mortal Morb Wkly Rep 57(10):253–258
12.
go back to reference Subramanian S, Klosterman M, Amonkar MM, Hunt TL (2004) Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review. Prev Med 38(5):536–550CrossRefPubMed Subramanian S, Klosterman M, Amonkar MM, Hunt TL (2004) Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review. Prev Med 38(5):536–550CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rim SH, Joseph DA, Steele CB, Thompson TD, Seeff LC (2011) Colorectal cancer screening—United States, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008. Mortal Morb Wkly Rep 60:42–46 Rim SH, Joseph DA, Steele CB, Thompson TD, Seeff LC (2011) Colorectal cancer screening—United States, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008. Mortal Morb Wkly Rep 60:42–46
14.
go back to reference Nelson DE, Kreps GL, Hesse BW, Croyle RT, Willis G, Arora NK et al (2004) The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination. J Health Commun 9(5):443–460, discussion 481-444CrossRefPubMed Nelson DE, Kreps GL, Hesse BW, Croyle RT, Willis G, Arora NK et al (2004) The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination. J Health Commun 9(5):443–460, discussion 481-444CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ling BS, Klein WM, Dang Q (2006) Relationship of communication and information measures to colorectal cancer screening utilization: results from HINTS. J Health Commun 11(Suppl 1):181–190CrossRefPubMed Ling BS, Klein WM, Dang Q (2006) Relationship of communication and information measures to colorectal cancer screening utilization: results from HINTS. J Health Commun 11(Suppl 1):181–190CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Shim M, Kelly B, Hornik R (2006) Cancer information scanning and seeking behavior is associated with knowledge, lifestyle choices, and screening. J Health Commun 11(Suppl 1):157–172CrossRefPubMed Shim M, Kelly B, Hornik R (2006) Cancer information scanning and seeking behavior is associated with knowledge, lifestyle choices, and screening. J Health Commun 11(Suppl 1):157–172CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hornik R, Parvanta S, Mello S, Freres D, Kelly B, Schwarts JD (2013) Effects of scanning (routine health information exposure) on cancer screening and prevention behaviors in the general population. J Health Commun 18(12):1422–1435PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Hornik R, Parvanta S, Mello S, Freres D, Kelly B, Schwarts JD (2013) Effects of scanning (routine health information exposure) on cancer screening and prevention behaviors in the general population. J Health Commun 18(12):1422–1435PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hesse BW, Moser RP, Rutten LJ, Kreps GL (2006) The health information national trends survey: research from the baseline. J Health Commun 11(Suppl 1):vii–xviCrossRefPubMed Hesse BW, Moser RP, Rutten LJ, Kreps GL (2006) The health information national trends survey: research from the baseline. J Health Commun 11(Suppl 1):vii–xviCrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Koch-Weser S, Bradshaw YS, Gualtieri L, Gallagher SS (2010) The Internet as a health information source: findings from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey and Implications for Health Communication. J Health Commun 15(Suppl 3):279–293CrossRefPubMed Koch-Weser S, Bradshaw YS, Gualtieri L, Gallagher SS (2010) The Internet as a health information source: findings from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey and Implications for Health Communication. J Health Commun 15(Suppl 3):279–293CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Cline RJW, Haynes KM (2001) Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res 16(6):671–692CrossRefPubMed Cline RJW, Haynes KM (2001) Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res 16(6):671–692CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, Croyle RT, Arora NK, Rimer BK, Viswanath K (2005) Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med 165(22):2618–2624CrossRefPubMed Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, Croyle RT, Arora NK, Rimer BK, Viswanath K (2005) Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med 165(22):2618–2624CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Rice RE (2006) Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys. Int J Med Inform 75(1):8–28CrossRefPubMed Rice RE (2006) Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys. Int J Med Inform 75(1):8–28CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Baker L, Wagner TH, Singer S, Bundorf MK (2003) Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA 289(18):2400–2406CrossRefPubMed Baker L, Wagner TH, Singer S, Bundorf MK (2003) Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA 289(18):2400–2406CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Cantor D, Coa K, Crystal-Mansour S, Davis T, Dipko S, Sigman R (2009) HINTS 2007 Final Report. National Cancer Institute, Rockville Cantor D, Coa K, Crystal-Mansour S, Davis T, Dipko S, Sigman R (2009) HINTS 2007 Final Report. National Cancer Institute, Rockville
27.
go back to reference Cantor D, Covell J, Davis T, Park I, Rizzo L (2005) HINTS 2005 Final Report. National Cancer Institute, Rockville Cantor D, Covell J, Davis T, Park I, Rizzo L (2005) HINTS 2005 Final Report. National Cancer Institute, Rockville
28.
go back to reference HINTS (2003) 2003 Final Report. National Cancer Institute, Rockville HINTS (2003) 2003 Final Report. National Cancer Institute, Rockville
31.
go back to reference Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2010) Mplus (Version 6.11) [Software]. Los Angeles Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2010) Mplus (Version 6.11) [Software]. Los Angeles
32.
go back to reference Dobson, AJ (2002) Binary variables and logistic regression In: Dobson AJ. An introduction to generalized linear models, 2nd edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC.; p. 115-131 Dobson, AJ (2002) Binary variables and logistic regression In: Dobson AJ. An introduction to generalized linear models, 2nd edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC.; p. 115-131
34.
go back to reference Glynn RW, Kelly JC, Coffey N, Sweeney KJ, Kerin MJ (2011) The effect of breast cancer awareness month on internet search activity—a comparison with awareness campaigns for lung and prostate cancer. BMC Cancer 11:442PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Glynn RW, Kelly JC, Coffey N, Sweeney KJ, Kerin MJ (2011) The effect of breast cancer awareness month on internet search activity—a comparison with awareness campaigns for lung and prostate cancer. BMC Cancer 11:442PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Smith SW, Nazione S, Laplante C, Kotowski MR, Atkin C, Skubisz CM et al (2009) Topics and sources of memorable breast cancer messages and their impact on prevention and detection behaviors. J Health Commun 14(3):293–307CrossRefPubMed Smith SW, Nazione S, Laplante C, Kotowski MR, Atkin C, Skubisz CM et al (2009) Topics and sources of memorable breast cancer messages and their impact on prevention and detection behaviors. J Health Commun 14(3):293–307CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Nelson W, Moser RP, Gaffey A, Waldron W (2009) Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines for U.S. women aged 25-64: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). J Womens Health (Larchmt) 18(11):1759–1768CrossRef Nelson W, Moser RP, Gaffey A, Waldron W (2009) Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines for U.S. women aged 25-64: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). J Womens Health (Larchmt) 18(11):1759–1768CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Preventive Services US (2012) Task Force. Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 156(12):880–891CrossRef Preventive Services US (2012) Task Force. Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 156(12):880–891CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Shi L, Lebrun LA, Zhu J, Tsai J (2011) Cancer screening among racial/ethnic and insurance groups in the United States: a comparison of disparities in 2000 and 2008. J Health Care Poor Underserved 22(3):945–961CrossRefPubMed Shi L, Lebrun LA, Zhu J, Tsai J (2011) Cancer screening among racial/ethnic and insurance groups in the United States: a comparison of disparities in 2000 and 2008. J Health Care Poor Underserved 22(3):945–961CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Berkowitz Z, Hawkins NA, Peipins LA, White MC, Nadel MR (2008) Beliefs, risk perceptions, and gaps in knowledge as barriers to colorectal cancer screening in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 56(2):307–314CrossRefPubMed Berkowitz Z, Hawkins NA, Peipins LA, White MC, Nadel MR (2008) Beliefs, risk perceptions, and gaps in knowledge as barriers to colorectal cancer screening in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 56(2):307–314CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Blumberg SJ, Luke JV, Cynamon ML (2006) Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution. Am J Public Health 96(5):926–931PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Blumberg SJ, Luke JV, Cynamon ML (2006) Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution. Am J Public Health 96(5):926–931PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Fahimi M, Link M, Mokdad A, Schwartz DA, Levy P (2008) Tracking chronic disease and risk behavior prevalence as survey participation declines: statistics from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system and other national surveys. Prev Chronic Dis 5(3):A80PubMedCentralPubMed Fahimi M, Link M, Mokdad A, Schwartz DA, Levy P (2008) Tracking chronic disease and risk behavior prevalence as survey participation declines: statistics from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system and other national surveys. Prev Chronic Dis 5(3):A80PubMedCentralPubMed
43.
go back to reference Gentry EM, Kalsbeek WD, Hogelin GC, Jones JT, Gaines KL, Forman MR et al (1985) The behavioral risk factor surveys: II. Design, methods, and estimates from combined state data. Am J Prev Med 1(6):9–14PubMed Gentry EM, Kalsbeek WD, Hogelin GC, Jones JT, Gaines KL, Forman MR et al (1985) The behavioral risk factor surveys: II. Design, methods, and estimates from combined state data. Am J Prev Med 1(6):9–14PubMed
47.
go back to reference Couper MP, Singer E, Levin CA, Fowler FJ, Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ (2010) Use of the Internet and ratings of information sources for medical decisions: results from the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making 30:106S–114SCrossRefPubMed Couper MP, Singer E, Levin CA, Fowler FJ, Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ (2010) Use of the Internet and ratings of information sources for medical decisions: results from the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making 30:106S–114SCrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Fleisher L, Kandadai V, Keenan E, Miller SM, Devarajan K, Ruth KJ et al (2012) Build it, and will they come? Unexpected findings from a study on a web-based intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening. J Health Commun 17(1):41–53PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Fleisher L, Kandadai V, Keenan E, Miller SM, Devarajan K, Ruth KJ et al (2012) Build it, and will they come? Unexpected findings from a study on a web-based intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening. J Health Commun 17(1):41–53PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Sequist TD, Zaslavsky AM, Colditz GA, Ayanian JZ (2011) Electronic patient messages to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 171(7):636–641PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Sequist TD, Zaslavsky AM, Colditz GA, Ayanian JZ (2011) Electronic patient messages to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 171(7):636–641PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Health Information Seeking and Cancer Screening Adherence Rates
Authors
Yuliya Shneyderman
Lila J. Finney Rutten
Kristopher L. Arheart
Margaret M. Byrne
Julie Kornfeld
Seth J. Schwartz
Publication date
01-03-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0791-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Cancer Education 1/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine