Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Reproductive Health
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research

Health care providers’ opinions on abortion: a study for the implementation of the legal abortion public policy in the Province of Santa Fe, Argentina

Authors: Silvina Ramos, Mariana Romero, Agustina Ramón Michel

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In Argentina, abortion has been decriminalized under certain circumstances since the enactment of the Penal Code in 1922. Nevertheless, access to abortion under this regulatory framework has been extremely limited in spite of some recent changes. This article reports the findings of the first phase of an operations research study conducted in the Province of Santa Fe, Argentina, regarding the implementation of the local legal and safe abortion access policy.

Methods

The project combined research and training to generate a virtuous circle of knowledge production, decision-making, and the fostering of an informed healthcare policy. The project used a pre-post design of three phases: baseline, intervention, and evaluation. It was conducted in two public hospitals. An anonymous self-administered questionnaire (n = 157) and semi-structured interviews (n = 27) were applied to gather information about tacit knowledge about the regulatory framework; personal opinions regarding abortion and its decriminalization; opinions on the requirements needed to carry out legal abortions; and service’s responses to women in need of an abortion.

Results

Firstly, a fairly high percentage of health care providers lack accurate information on current legal framework. This deficit goes side by side with a restrictive understanding of both health and rape indications. Secondly, while a great majority of health care providers support abortion under the circumstances consider in the Penal Code, most of them are reluctant towards unrestricted access to abortion. Thirdly, health care providers’ willingness to perform abortions is noticeably low given that only half of them are ready to perform an abortion when a woman’s life is at risk. Willingness is even lower for each of the other current legal indications.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that there are important challenges for the implementation of a legal abortion policy. Results of the study call for specific strategies targeting health care providers in order to better inform about current legal abortion regulations and to sensitize them about abortion social determinants. The interpretation of the current legal framework needs to be broadened in order to reflect a comprehensive view of the health indication, and stereotypes regarding women’s sexuality and abortion decisions need to be dismantled.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad (CEDES): Morbilidad Materna Severa en la Argentina: Prevención y Calidad de la Atención para Reducir la Incidencia y las Consecuencias Adversas del Aborto. 2005, Buenos Aires: Comisión Nacional Salud Investiga, Ministerio de Salud de la Nación
2.
Pantelides E, Mario S: Estimación de la magnitud del aborto inducido en la Argentina. Notas de Población (CEPAL). 2009, 87: 95-120.
3.
4.
World Health Organization (WHO): Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2008. 2011, Geneva: World Health Organization
5.
6.
7.
8.
Ramón Michel A: El fenómeno de inaccesibilidad al aborto no punible. Aborto y Justicia Reproductiva. Edited by: Bergallo P. 2011, Buenos Aires: Editores del Puerto, 137-200.
9.
Carbajal M: El aborto en Debate: Aportes para una Discusión Pendiente. 2009, Buenos Aires: Paidós
10.
Fisher A, Laing J, Stoeckel J, Townsend J: Handbook for Family Planning Operations Research Design. 1998, New York: Population Council
11.
Fisher A, Foreit J: Designing HIV/AIDS Intervention Studies: an Operations Research Handbook. 2002, New York: Population Council
12.
Brandeau M, Sainfort F, Pierskalla W: Operations Research and Health Care: a Handbook of Methods and Applications. 2004, Boston: Kluwer Academic
13.
International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF): Aborto Legal: Regulaciones Sanitarias Comparadas. 2007, New York: IPPF/RHO
14.
Collumbien M, Busza J, Cleland J, Campbell O: Social Science Methods for Research on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2012, Geneva: World Health Organization
15.
Bart Johnston H, Schurmann A, Oliveras E, Akhter H: Scaled up and marginalized: a review of Bangladesh’s menstrual regulation. Social Determinants Approaches to Public Health: from Concept to Practice. Edited by: Blas E, Sommerfeld J, Sivasanka A. 2011, Geneva: World Health Organization, 9-24.
16.
Panisset U, Koehlmoos T, Alkhatib A, Pantoja T, Singh P, Kengey-Kayondo J: Implementation research evidence uptake and use for policy-making. BMC Health Res Policy Syst. 2012, 12 (1): 1-
17.
Gilson L: Health Policy and Systems Research: a Methodology Reader. 2012, Geneva: Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. World Health Organization
18.
Simmons R, Ghiron L, Fajans P: Scaling up Health Service Delivery: From Pilot Innovations to Policies and Programmes. 2007, Geneva: World Health Organization
19.
Madon T, Kupfer L, Hofman K, Glass R: Public health. Implementation science. Science. 2007, 318 (5857): 1728-1729. 10.1126/science.1150009.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Campbell D, Stanley J, Gage N: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. 1963, Boston: Houghton Mifflin
21.
Ramos S, Viladrich A: Abortos Hospitalizados Entrada y Salida de Emergencia. 1993, CEDES: Buenos Aires
22.
Cruess S, Cruess R: Professionalism and medicine’s social contract with society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006, 449: 170-176.PubMed
23.
May C: Agency and implementation: understanding the embedding of healthcare innovations in practice. Soc Sci Med. 2013, 78: 26-33.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Silva M, Billings D, García S, Lara D: Physicians’ agreement with and willingness to provide abortion services in the case of pregnancy from rape in Mexico. Contraception. 2009, 79: 56-64. 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.07.016.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Luker K: Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. 1984, Berkeley: University of California Press
26.
Kane G: Abortion law reform in Latin America: lessons for advocacy. Gender Dev. 2008, 16 (2): 361-375. 10.1080/13552070802120558.CrossRef
27.
Shiffman J, Smith S: Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality. Lancet. 2007, 370 (9595): 1370-1379. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61579-7.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Joffe C, Weitz T, Stacey C: Uneasy allies: pro-choice physicians, feminist health activists and the struggle for abortion rights. Sociol Health Illn. 2004, 26 (6): 775-796. 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00418.x.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Aries N: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the evolution of abortion policy, 1951–1973: The Politics of Science. Am J Public Health. 2003, 93 (11): 1810-1819. 10.2105/AJPH.93.11.1810.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Gasman N, Blandon M, Crane B: Abortion, social inequity, and women’s health: obstetrician-gynecologists as agents of change. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006, 94 (3): 310-316. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.04.018.CrossRef
31.
Petracci M: Sondeos y políticas: la opinión pública sobre derechos sexuales y reproductivos en la Argentina, 2003–2006. Opinión Pública. Una Mirada Desde América Latina. Edited by: Braun M, Straw C. 2009, Buenos Aires: Emecé, 429-441.
32.
García López S, Lara Pineda D, Goldman L: Conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas de los médicos mexicanos sobre el aborto: resultados de una encuesta nacional. Gac Med Mex. 2003, 139: 91-102.
33.
Shotorbani S, Zimmerman F, Bell J, Ward D, Assef N: Attitudes and intentions of future health care providers toward abortion provision. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004, 36 (2): 58-63. 10.1363/3605804.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Kestler E: Obstetrician–gynecologists’ knowledge of and attitudes toward medical abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012, 116: 120-123. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.015.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Pace L, Grossman D, Chávez S, Távara L, Lara D, Guerrero Vásquez R: Legal abortion in Peru: knowledge, attitudes and practices among a group of physician leaders. Gac Med Mex. 2006, 142: 91-94.PubMed
36.
Faundes A, Alves Duarte G, Andalaft Neto J, Olivatto A, Martins Simone R: Conhecimento, Opinião e Conduta de Ginecologistas e Obstetras Brasileiros sobre o Aborto Induzido. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2004, 26 (2): 89-96. 10.1590/S0100-72032004000200002.CrossRef
37.
Oppezzi M: Percepciones, Prácticas y Actitudes de los Profesionales Médicos en la Atención del Aborto: Un Estudio en el Subsector Público de Salud de la Provincia del Neuquén. 2011, Programa de Salud Sexual y Reproductiva Subsecretaria de Salud - Provincia de Neuquén y Programa Nacional de Salud Reproductiva y Procreación Responsable, In press
38.
Guillaume A, Lerner S: El aborto en América Latina y El Caribe: Una Revisión de la Literatura de los Años 1990–2005. 2007, Paris: Centro de Estudios de Población y Desarrollo (CEPED)
39.
Metadata
Title
Health care providers’ opinions on abortion: a study for the implementation of the legal abortion public policy in the Province of Santa Fe, Argentina
Authors
Silvina Ramos
Mariana Romero
Agustina Ramón Michel
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-72

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Reproductive Health 1/2014 Go to the issue

Research

Fetal demise and associated factors following umbilical cord prolapse in Mulago hospital, Uganda: a retrospective study

Research

Perceptions of and preferences for federally-funded family planning clinics

Research

The experience of dysmenorrhoea among Ghanaian senior high and university students: pain characteristics and effects

Research

Maternal near miss and death among women with severe hypertensive disorders: a Brazilian multicenter surveillance study

Research

The social context of adolescent women’s use of modern contraceptives in Zimbabwe: a multilevel analysis

Research

Perspectives of professionals participating in the Brazilian Network for the Surveillance of Severe Maternal Morbidity regarding the implementation of routine surveillance: a qualitative study