Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 4/2018

01-04-2018 | Original Contributions

Health Care Institutions Volume Is Significantly Associated with Postoperative Outcomes in Bariatric Surgery

Authors: Laurent Brunaud, Stephanie Polazzi, Jean-Christophe Lifante, Lea Pascal, David Nocca, Antoine Duclos

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The volume of bariatric surgery has significantly increased over the past decade with concomitant postoperative outcomes improvement. The goal of this nationwide study was to estimate the volume-outcome relationship in bariatric surgery at the hospital level.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional analysis of all patients who underwent bariatric surgery procedure in France from January 2011 to December 2014 was designed. Volume-outcome relationship was analyzed using generalized estimating equations.

Results

We identified 184,332 inpatient stays for bariatric surgical procedures performed in 606 hospitals. Health care institutions performing more than 200 bariatric cases per year were significantly associated with shorter average length of stay (p < 0.001) and less frequent need for intensive or critical care unit (p = 0.003) during the index stay in comparison with lower volume institutions. Reoperations rate increased from 3.1% [95% CI, 2.8–3.3] (n = 5627) at 1 month to 4.9% [4.6–5.2] at 3 months and 8.2% [7.8–8.7] at 6 months. The risk of reoperation after gastric bypass was 1.37 times less frequent in higher volume institutions (≥ 200 inpatient stays per year, p = 0.003), while it was 1.26 times more frequent after gastric banding in higher volume institutions (p = 0.057) and was unaltered regarding sleeve gastrectomy (p = 0.819).

Conclusion

This study showed for the first time in bariatric surgery that reoperation rate after gastric bypass or sleeve significantly increased at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Health care institutions performing more than 200 bariatric cases per year were significantly associated with improved postoperative outcomes and less frequent need for reoperation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Volume-outcome association in bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;256:60–71.CrossRefPubMed Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Volume-outcome association in bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;256:60–71.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, Frampton GK. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014;8:art n°: CD003641. Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, Frampton GK. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014;8:art n°: CD003641.
3.
go back to reference Zhang R, Borisenko O, Telegina I, et al. Systematic review of risk prediction models for diabetes after bariatric surgery. Br J Surg. 2016;103:1420–7.CrossRefPubMed Zhang R, Borisenko O, Telegina I, et al. Systematic review of risk prediction models for diabetes after bariatric surgery. Br J Surg. 2016;103:1420–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Berger ER, Huffman KM, Fraker T, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for bariatric surgery readmissions. Ann Surg. 2016;Jul 18; (Epub ahead of print) Berger ER, Huffman KM, Fraker T, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for bariatric surgery readmissions. Ann Surg. 2016;Jul 18; (Epub ahead of print)
5.
go back to reference Brown JJ, Boyle M, Mahawar K, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding survival in a high-volume bariatric unit. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1614–8.CrossRefPubMed Brown JJ, Boyle M, Mahawar K, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding survival in a high-volume bariatric unit. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1614–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lazzati A, Audureau E, Hemery F, et al. Reduction in early mortality outcomes after bariatic surgery in France between 2007 and 2012: a nationwide study of 133,000 obese patients. Surgery. 2016;159:467–74.CrossRefPubMed Lazzati A, Audureau E, Hemery F, et al. Reduction in early mortality outcomes after bariatic surgery in France between 2007 and 2012: a nationwide study of 133,000 obese patients. Surgery. 2016;159:467–74.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Stenberg E, Szabo E, Agren G, et al. Early complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Ann Surg. 2014;260:1040–7.CrossRefPubMed Stenberg E, Szabo E, Agren G, et al. Early complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Ann Surg. 2014;260:1040–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Markar SR, Penna M, Karthikesalingam A, et al. The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on clinical outcome following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1126–34.CrossRefPubMed Markar SR, Penna M, Karthikesalingam A, et al. The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on clinical outcome following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1126–34.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lazzati A, De Antonio M, Paolino L, et al. Natural history of adjustable gastric banding: lifespan and revisional rate. Ann Surg. 2016;Jul 18; (Epub ahead of print) Lazzati A, De Antonio M, Paolino L, et al. Natural history of adjustable gastric banding: lifespan and revisional rate. Ann Surg. 2016;Jul 18; (Epub ahead of print)
11.
go back to reference Debs T, Petrucciani N, Kassir R, Iannelli A, Ben amor I, Gugenheim J. Trends of bariatric surgery in France during the last 10 years: analysis of 267,466 procedures from 2005-2014. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;12:1602–1610. Debs T, Petrucciani N, Kassir R, Iannelli A, Ben amor I, Gugenheim J. Trends of bariatric surgery in France during the last 10 years: analysis of 267,466 procedures from 2005-2014. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;12:1602–1610.
12.
go back to reference Duclos A, Polazzi S, Lipsitz SR, et al. Temporal variation in surgical mortality within French hospitals. Med Care. 2013;51:1085–93.CrossRefPubMed Duclos A, Polazzi S, Lipsitz SR, et al. Temporal variation in surgical mortality within French hospitals. Med Care. 2013;51:1085–93.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Chantry AA, Deneux-Tharaux C, Cans C, et al. Hospital discharge data can be used for monitoring procedures and intensive care related to severe maternal morbidity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1014–22.CrossRefPubMed Chantry AA, Deneux-Tharaux C, Cans C, et al. Hospital discharge data can be used for monitoring procedures and intensive care related to severe maternal morbidity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1014–22.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–9.CrossRefPubMed Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Caillet P, Payet C, Polazzi S, et al. Increased mortality for elective surgery during summer vacation: a longitudinal analysis of nationwide data. PLoS One. 2015;25:e0137754.CrossRef Caillet P, Payet C, Polazzi S, et al. Increased mortality for elective surgery during summer vacation: a longitudinal analysis of nationwide data. PLoS One. 2015;25:e0137754.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lindenauer PK, Lagu T, Shieh MS, et al. Association of diagnosis coding with trends in hospitalizations and mortality of patients with pneumonia, 2003-2009. JAMA. 2012;307:1405–13.CrossRefPubMed Lindenauer PK, Lagu T, Shieh MS, et al. Association of diagnosis coding with trends in hospitalizations and mortality of patients with pneumonia, 2003-2009. JAMA. 2012;307:1405–13.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Blondet JJ, Morton JM, Nguyen NT. Hospital accreditation and bariatric surgery: is it important? Adv Surg. 2015;49:123–9.CrossRefPubMed Blondet JJ, Morton JM, Nguyen NT. Hospital accreditation and bariatric surgery: is it important? Adv Surg. 2015;49:123–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC. The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns? Health Serv Res. 1987;22:157–82.PubMedPubMedCentral Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC. The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns? Health Serv Res. 1987;22:157–82.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Blackstone R, Dimick JB, Nguyen NT. Accreditation in metabolic and bariatric surgery: pro and cons. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:198–202.CrossRefPubMed Blackstone R, Dimick JB, Nguyen NT. Accreditation in metabolic and bariatric surgery: pro and cons. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:198–202.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Nguyen B, Nguyen VQ, et al. Outcomes of bariatric surgery performed at accredited vs non accredited centers. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:467–74.CrossRefPubMed Nguyen NT, Nguyen B, Nguyen VQ, et al. Outcomes of bariatric surgery performed at accredited vs non accredited centers. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:467–74.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Talsma AK, Lingsma HF, Steyerberg EW, et al. The 30-day versus in-hospital and 90-day mortality after esophagectomy as indicators for quality of care. Ann Surg. 2014;260:267–73.CrossRefPubMed Talsma AK, Lingsma HF, Steyerberg EW, et al. The 30-day versus in-hospital and 90-day mortality after esophagectomy as indicators for quality of care. Ann Surg. 2014;260:267–73.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Jamieson GG, Mathew G, Ludemann R, et al. Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate. Br J Surg. 2004;9:943–7.CrossRef Jamieson GG, Mathew G, Ludemann R, et al. Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate. Br J Surg. 2004;9:943–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Smith MD, Patterson E, Wahed AS, et al. Relationship between surgeon volume and adverse outcomes after RYGBP in Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:118–25.CrossRefPubMed Smith MD, Patterson E, Wahed AS, et al. Relationship between surgeon volume and adverse outcomes after RYGBP in Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:118–25.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Smith MD, Patterson E, Wahed AS, et al. Can technical factors explain the volume-outcome relationship in gastric bypass surgery ? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:623–9.CrossRefPubMed Smith MD, Patterson E, Wahed AS, et al. Can technical factors explain the volume-outcome relationship in gastric bypass surgery ? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:623–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worlwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;10:1822–32.CrossRef Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worlwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;10:1822–32.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Masoomi H, Magno CP, et al. Trends in use of bariatric surgery 2003-2008. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:261–6.CrossRefPubMed Nguyen NT, Masoomi H, Magno CP, et al. Trends in use of bariatric surgery 2003-2008. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:261–6.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Khan S, Rock K, Baskara A, et al. Trends in bariatric surgery from 2008 to 2012. Am J Surg. 2015;211:1041–6.CrossRefPubMed Khan S, Rock K, Baskara A, et al. Trends in bariatric surgery from 2008 to 2012. Am J Surg. 2015;211:1041–6.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Young MT, Phelan MJ, Nguyen NT. Male vs female patients who underwent bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222:226–31.CrossRefPubMed Young MT, Phelan MJ, Nguyen NT. Male vs female patients who underwent bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222:226–31.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Li K, Zou J, Tang J, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26:3031–44.CrossRefPubMed Li K, Zou J, Tang J, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26:3031–44.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Lois AW, Frelich MJ, Sahr NA, et al. The relationship between duration of stay and readmissions in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Surgery. 2015;158:501–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lois AW, Frelich MJ, Sahr NA, et al. The relationship between duration of stay and readmissions in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Surgery. 2015;158:501–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Nimeri A, Mohamed A, El Hassan E, et al. Are results of bariatric surgery different in the middle east ? early experience of an international bariatric surgery program and an ACS NSQIP outcomes comparison. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:1082–8.CrossRefPubMed Nimeri A, Mohamed A, El Hassan E, et al. Are results of bariatric surgery different in the middle east ? early experience of an international bariatric surgery program and an ACS NSQIP outcomes comparison. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:1082–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Health Care Institutions Volume Is Significantly Associated with Postoperative Outcomes in Bariatric Surgery
Authors
Laurent Brunaud
Stephanie Polazzi
Jean-Christophe Lifante
Lea Pascal
David Nocca
Antoine Duclos
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2969-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Obesity Surgery 4/2018 Go to the issue