Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Globalization and Health 1/2010

Open Access 01-12-2010 | Research

Health and historical levels of freedom

Authors: Samantha L Biggs, Evelyn M Dell, Vanessa L Dixon, Michel R Joffres, Chris Beyrer, Kumanan Wilson, James J Orbinski, Mills J Edward

Published in: Globalization and Health | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The link between political freedom and health is unclear. We aimed to determine the association by exploring the relationship of historical and cumulative freedom levels with important health outcomes.

Methods

We obtained countrywide health indicators for life expectancy, infant mortality, maternal mortality ratio, % low birth weight babies, Gini coefficient (a measure of wealth inequality) and various markers of freedom based on political rights and civil liberties. We applied multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between health indicators and within-country years of freedom as determined by Freedom House rankings.

Results

The total proportion of free years from 1972-2005, the duration of current freedom level, and the Gini coefficient show independent positive associations with health indicators, which remain after the adjustment for national wealth, total government expenditure, and spending on health. Countries identified as having high total proportion of free years demonstrated significantly better health outcomes than countries with low levels of freedom (life expectancy, Odds Ratio [OR] 7.2, 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 2.3-22.6, infant mortality OR 19.6, 95% CI, 5.6-67.7, maternal mortality ratio, OR 24.3, 95% CI, 6.2-94.9, and % low birth weight babies OR 3.8, 95% CI, 1.4-10.8). This was also the case for infant mortality (OR 3.4, 95% CI, 1.0-8.4), maternal mortality ratio (OR 4.0, 95% CI, 1.2-12.8), and % low birth weight babies (OR 2.6, 95% CI, 1.0-6.6) among countries considered as having medium levels of freedom.

Interpretation

We found strong associations between country-level freedom and important health outcomes. The cumulative level of freedom over time shows stronger associations with all health indicators than the duration of current freedom level.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Benaroyo L: Rudolf Virchow and the scientific approach to medicine. Endeavor. 1998, 22: 114-7. 10.1016/S0160-9327(98)01136-3.CrossRef Benaroyo L: Rudolf Virchow and the scientific approach to medicine. Endeavor. 1998, 22: 114-7. 10.1016/S0160-9327(98)01136-3.CrossRef
2.
11.
go back to reference World Bank: World Development Indicators 2007 [CD-ROM]. 2006, Washington: World Bank World Bank: World Development Indicators 2007 [CD-ROM]. 2006, Washington: World Bank
15.
17.
go back to reference Alvarez-Dardet C, Franco-Giraldo A: Democratisation and health after the fall of the Wall. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006, 60: 669-71. 10.1136/jech.2005.038273.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Alvarez-Dardet C, Franco-Giraldo A: Democratisation and health after the fall of the Wall. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006, 60: 669-71. 10.1136/jech.2005.038273.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sen A: Development as Freedom. 1999, Anchor, London, ISBN-13: 978-0385720274 Sen A: Development as Freedom. 1999, Anchor, London, ISBN-13: 978-0385720274
Metadata
Title
Health and historical levels of freedom
Authors
Samantha L Biggs
Evelyn M Dell
Vanessa L Dixon
Michel R Joffres
Chris Beyrer
Kumanan Wilson
James J Orbinski
Mills J Edward
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Globalization and Health / Issue 1/2010
Electronic ISSN: 1744-8603
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-6-11

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Globalization and Health 1/2010 Go to the issue