Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Human Resources for Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

Headcount and FTE data in the European health workforce monitoring and planning process

Authors: Edmond Girasek, Eszter Kovács, Zoltán Aszalós, Edit Eke, Károly Ragány, Réka Kovács, Zoltán Cserháti, Miklós Szócska

Published in: Human Resources for Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Health workforce (HWF) planning and monitoring processes face challenges regarding data and appropriate indicators. One such area fraught with difficulties is labour activity and, more specifically, defining headcount and full-time equivalent (FTE). This study aims to review national practices in FTE calculation formulas for selected EU Member States (MS).

Methods

The research was conducted as a part of the Joint Action on European Health Workforce Planning and Forecasting. Definitions, categories and terms concerning the five sectoral professions were examined in 14 MS by conducting a survey. To gain a deeper understanding of the international data-reporting processes (Joint Questionnaire on Non-Monetary Health Care Statistics—JQ), six international expert interviews were conducted by using a semi-structured interview guide.

Results

Of the 14 investigated countries, four MS indicated that they report FTE to the JQ and that they also calculate FTE data for national planning purposes. The other countries do not use FTE data for national purposes, but most of them do use special calculations and/or estimation methods for converting headcount to FTE. The findings revealed significant differences between national calculation methods when reporting FTE data to the JQ. This diversity in terms of calculations and estimations can lead to biases with respect to international comparisons. This finding was reinforced by the expert interviews, since the experts agreed that the activities of healthcare professionals are a fundamental factor in HWF monitoring and planning. Experts underscored that activity should also be measured by FTE, and not only by headcount.

Conclusions

FTE and headcount are significant factors in HWF planning and monitoring; therefore, national data collections should place emphasis on collecting data and calculating the appropriate indicators. National FTE could serve as a call to action for HWF planners due to the lack of matching international FTE data.
At the international level, it is beneficial to monitor the trends and numbers regarding human resources and working time. For the moment, the exchange of information and mutual assistance for developing the capacity to apply common methodology could be a first step towards the standardisation of data collections.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference WHO. Working together for health: the World Health Report 2006. 2006. WHO. Working together for health: the World Health Report 2006. 2006.
4.
go back to reference Malgieri A, Michelutti P, Hoegaerden MV. Handbook on health workforce planning methodologies across EU countries. Bratislava: Ministry of Health of the Slovak Republic; 2015. Malgieri A, Michelutti P, Hoegaerden MV. Handbook on health workforce planning methodologies across EU countries. Bratislava: Ministry of Health of the Slovak Republic; 2015.
6.
go back to reference Matrix Insight Ltd, Centre for Workforce Intelligence. EU-level collaboration on forecasting health workforce needs, workforce planning and health workforce trends—a feasibility study. Brussels: European Commission; 2012. Matrix Insight Ltd, Centre for Workforce Intelligence. EU-level collaboration on forecasting health workforce needs, workforce planning and health workforce trends—a feasibility study. Brussels: European Commission; 2012.
7.
go back to reference JA on Health Workforce Planning and Forecasting. JA Health Workforce Planning and Forecasting D.051—minimum planning data requirements for health workforce planning. 2014. JA on Health Workforce Planning and Forecasting. JA Health Workforce Planning and Forecasting D.051—minimum planning data requirements for health workforce planning. 2014.
8.
go back to reference Commission; E. 2003/88/EC working time directive. In: Commission E, editor. 2003/88/EC. 2003. Commission; E. 2003/88/EC working time directive. In: Commission E, editor. 2003/88/EC. 2003.
9.
go back to reference Aszalos Z, Eke E, Kovács E, Kovács R, Cserháti Z, Girasek E, Wéber A, Hoegaerden MV. Joint action on health workforce planning and forecasting—WP4 Terminology gap analysis D041. 2015. Aszalos Z, Eke E, Kovács E, Kovács R, Cserháti Z, Girasek E, Wéber A, Hoegaerden MV. Joint action on health workforce planning and forecasting—WP4 Terminology gap analysis D041. 2015.
10.
go back to reference Diallo K, Zurn P, Gupta N, Dal Poz M. Monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health: an international perspective. Hum Resour Health. 2003;1:3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Diallo K, Zurn P, Gupta N, Dal Poz M. Monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health: an international perspective. Hum Resour Health. 2003;1:3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference OECD, Eurostat, WHO-Europe. Joint data collection on non-monetary health care statistics—guideline for completing the OECD/Eurotat/WHO-Europe Questionnaire 2015. 2014. OECD, Eurostat, WHO-Europe. Joint data collection on non-monetary health care statistics—guideline for completing the OECD/Eurotat/WHO-Europe Questionnaire 2015. 2014.
12.
go back to reference OECD. OECD statistics. Paris, France: OECD; 2015. OECD. OECD statistics. Paris, France: OECD; 2015.
13.
go back to reference European Commission. Directive on the recognition of professional qualifications. In: Commission E, editor. 2005/36/EC. 2005. European Commission. Directive on the recognition of professional qualifications. In: Commission E, editor. 2005/36/EC. 2005.
Metadata
Title
Headcount and FTE data in the European health workforce monitoring and planning process
Authors
Edmond Girasek
Eszter Kovács
Zoltán Aszalós
Edit Eke
Károly Ragány
Réka Kovács
Zoltán Cserháti
Miklós Szócska
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Human Resources for Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-016-0139-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Human Resources for Health 1/2016 Go to the issue