Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Statement

Harmonisation of imaging dosimetry in clinical practice: practical approaches and guidance from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative

Authors: Eliseo Vano, Guy Frija, Wolfram Stiller, Efstathios Efstathopoulos, Claudio Granata, Reinhard Loose, Graciano Paulo, Dean Pekarovic, Johan Sjöberg, Lluís Donoso-Bach, on behalf of the European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

The European Directive 2013/59/EURATOM requires member states of the European Union to ensure justification and optimisation of the radiological procedures and to include information on patient exposure as part of the report of the examinations. The EuroSafe Imaging campaign of the European Society of Radiology created a working group (WG) on “Dosimetry for imaging in clinical practice” with the aim to help with the dosimetry aspects required by European and national regulations. The primary focus topics were selected and a survey among the experts of the WG, allowed suggesting some initial consensus approaches.
For information on patient exposure, it was agreed to include the dosimetric values reported by the imaging modalities (validated by a medical physics expert). It was also suggested to prepare educational material on dosimetric quantities for patients. Individual optimisation was considered a challenge, especially for interventional procedures. In these cases, patient and occupational doses should be part of the global optimisation process and trigger levels should be defined to avoid skin radiation injuries. Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) always need to be considered for comparison with periodic patient dose audits. In the case of accidental or unintended exposures, a report should be produced for the Quality Assurance programme, together with an educational note to avoid the repetition of incidents. Dose registry and management systems should allow fulfilling the regulatory requirements of national and European regulations. In a second step, and after the initial experience with the Directive implementation, a wider survey will be considered.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2015) Summary of the European Directive 2013/59/Euratom: Essentials for Health Professionals in Radiology. Insights Imaging 6:411–417CrossRef European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2015) Summary of the European Directive 2013/59/Euratom: Essentials for Health Professionals in Radiology. Insights Imaging 6:411–417CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ et al (2017) ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging. Ann ICRP 46(1):1–143 Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ et al (2017) ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging. Ann ICRP 46(1):1–143
7.
go back to reference European Commission Guidelines on Clinical Audit for Medical Radiological Practice (Diagnostic Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy) (2010). Radiation Protection Directive No. 159; ISSN 1681-6803. European Commission Guidelines on Clinical Audit for Medical Radiological Practice (Diagnostic Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy) (2010). Radiation Protection Directive No. 159; ISSN 1681-6803.
9.
go back to reference López PO, Dauer LT, Loose R et al (2018) ICRP Publication 139: Occupational Radiological Protection in Interventional Procedures [published correction appears in Ann ICRP. Ann ICRP 47(2):1–112 López PO, Dauer LT, Loose R et al (2018) ICRP Publication 139: Occupational Radiological Protection in Interventional Procedures [published correction appears in Ann ICRP. Ann ICRP 47(2):1–112
10.
go back to reference Vano E, Sanchez RM, Fernandez JM (2018) Strategies to optimise occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology using simultaneous registration of patient and staff doses. J Radiol Prot 38(3):1077–1088CrossRef Vano E, Sanchez RM, Fernandez JM (2018) Strategies to optimise occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology using simultaneous registration of patient and staff doses. J Radiol Prot 38(3):1077–1088CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Valentin J (2000) Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP 30(2):7–67 Valentin J (2000) Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP 30(2):7–67
Metadata
Title
Harmonisation of imaging dosimetry in clinical practice: practical approaches and guidance from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative
Authors
Eliseo Vano
Guy Frija
Wolfram Stiller
Efstathios Efstathopoulos
Claudio Granata
Reinhard Loose
Graciano Paulo
Dean Pekarovic
Johan Sjöberg
Lluís Donoso-Bach
on behalf of the European Society of Radiology (ESR)
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00859-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Insights into Imaging 1/2020 Go to the issue