Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology 11/2013

01-11-2013 | Letter to the Editor

Handwritten versus scanned signature on the invitation letter: does it make any difference in participation in a population-based study?

Authors: Marcela Fu, Jose M. Martínez-Sánchez, Xisca Sureda, Cristina Martínez, Montse Ballbè, Lucía Baranda, Anna Riccobene, Esteve Fernández

Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

Excerpt

Research based on surveys requires considering some strategies aimed at increasing participation and minimizing potential bias attributable to nonresponse. Some methods have been used in the cover letter accompanying postal questionnaires, including the use of a personalized salutation, a personal approach, a postscript, a colored signature, different number of signatures of the principal investigators, or handwritten versus scanned/printed signatures of the principal investigator [17]. We are unaware of studies using these strategies on the invitation letter to promote participation in face-to-face surveys. Thus, we aimed to ascertain if there are differences in participation rates in a population-based face-to-face survey when the invitation letters include handwritten or scanned signatures. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Clausen JA, Ford RN. Controlling bias in mailing questionnaires. J Am Stat Assoc. 1947;42:497–511.CrossRef Clausen JA, Ford RN. Controlling bias in mailing questionnaires. J Am Stat Assoc. 1947;42:497–511.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Scott P, Edwards P. Personally addressed hand-signed letters increase questionnaire response: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:111.PubMedCrossRef Scott P, Edwards P. Personally addressed hand-signed letters increase questionnaire response: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:111.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Maheux B, Legault C, Lambert J. Increasing response rates in physicians’ mail surveys: an experimental study. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:638–9.PubMedCrossRef Maheux B, Legault C, Lambert J. Increasing response rates in physicians’ mail surveys: an experimental study. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:638–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Leece P, Bhandari M, Sprague S, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH, Tornetta P. Does flattery work? A comparison of 2 different cover letters for an international survey of orthopedic surgeons. Can J Surg. 2006;49:90–5.PubMed Leece P, Bhandari M, Sprague S, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH, Tornetta P. Does flattery work? A comparison of 2 different cover letters for an international survey of orthopedic surgeons. Can J Surg. 2006;49:90–5.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Dodd DK, Boswell DL, Litwin WJ. Survey response rate as a function of number of signatures, signature ink color, and postscript on covering letter. Psychol Rep. 1988;63:538.CrossRef Dodd DK, Boswell DL, Litwin WJ. Survey response rate as a function of number of signatures, signature ink color, and postscript on covering letter. Psychol Rep. 1988;63:538.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dodd DK, Markwiese BJ. Survey response rate as a function of personalized signature on cover letter. J Soc Psychol. 1987;127:97–8. Dodd DK, Markwiese BJ. Survey response rate as a function of personalized signature on cover letter. J Soc Psychol. 1987;127:97–8.
7.
go back to reference McKenzie-McHarg K, Tully L, Gates S, Ayers S, Brocklehurst P. Effect on survey response rate of hand written versus printed signature on a covering letter: randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN67566265]. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5:52.PubMedCrossRef McKenzie-McHarg K, Tully L, Gates S, Ayers S, Brocklehurst P. Effect on survey response rate of hand written versus printed signature on a covering letter: randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN67566265]. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5:52.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Archer J. Sex differences in social behavior: are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible? Performance Characteristics of the ARCHITECT Galectin-3 Assay. Am Psychol. 1996;51:909–17.PubMedCrossRef Archer J. Sex differences in social behavior: are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible? Performance Characteristics of the ARCHITECT Galectin-3 Assay. Am Psychol. 1996;51:909–17.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hare-Mustin RT, Marecek J. The meaning of difference: gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. Am Psychol. 1988;43:455–64.CrossRef Hare-Mustin RT, Marecek J. The meaning of difference: gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. Am Psychol. 1988;43:455–64.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, Diguiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009: MR000008. Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, Diguiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009: MR000008.
Metadata
Title
Handwritten versus scanned signature on the invitation letter: does it make any difference in participation in a population-based study?
Authors
Marcela Fu
Jose M. Martínez-Sánchez
Xisca Sureda
Cristina Martínez
Montse Ballbè
Lucía Baranda
Anna Riccobene
Esteve Fernández
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-013-9838-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

European Journal of Epidemiology 11/2013 Go to the issue