Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Gynecologic Cancer | Original Article

How do doctors choose treatment for older gynecological cancer patients? A Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group survey of gynecologic oncologists

Authors: Makoto Yamamoto, Yoshio Yoshida, Yoshio Itani, Shinya Sato, Masayuki Futagami, Hitomi Sakai, Hiroaki Kajiyama, Masaki Fujimura, Yoichi Aoki

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The proportion of elderly Japanese people (age ≥ 65 years) is currently 27.7%, and the average life span of women is 87.14 years, both of which are unprecedented. In gynecologic cancer, evidence of treatment for the elderly is scarce, and treatment policies are determined by each facility. The aim of the present study was to investigate the status of treatment policies for elderly patients with gynecologic cancer.

Methods

A web-based questionnaire regarding how treatment strategies are currently determined for elderly patients with gynecologic cancer was conducted on gynecologic oncologists to develop a tool for the objective evaluation of treatment policy decisions for elderly patients.

Results

The responses showed that 48% of the gynecologic oncologists were aware of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), but only 6% had actually conducted CGA. Age, comorbidities, performance status, and pretreatment evaluations were regarded as important in determining the treatment strategy. Invasive treatments such as radical hysterectomy and para-aortic lymph node dissection tended to have age limits.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that awareness of CGA is low in Japan, and that elderly people may not be given standard therapy, which highlights the importance of building on these findings by gathering further evidence and developing a new tool for predicting treatment outcomes for elderly patients with gynecologic cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Annual Report on the Aging Society (2018) Cabinet office Annual Report on the Aging Society (2018) Cabinet office
3.
go back to reference Bachmann S, Finger C, Huss A et al (2010) Inpatient rehabilitation specifically designed for geriatric patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 340:c1718CrossRef Bachmann S, Finger C, Huss A et al (2010) Inpatient rehabilitation specifically designed for geriatric patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 340:c1718CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ellis G, Langhorne P (2004) Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older hospital patients. Br Med Bull 71:45–59CrossRef Ellis G, Langhorne P (2004) Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older hospital patients. Br Med Bull 71:45–59CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ellis G, Gardner M, Tsiachristas A et al (2017) Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:Cd006211PubMed Ellis G, Gardner M, Tsiachristas A et al (2017) Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:Cd006211PubMed
6.
go back to reference Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD et al (1993) Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 342(8878):1032–1036CrossRef Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD et al (1993) Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 342(8878):1032–1036CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Van Craen K, Braes T, Wellens N et al (2010) The effectiveness of inpatient geriatric evaluation and management units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr So. 58(1):83–92CrossRef Van Craen K, Braes T, Wellens N et al (2010) The effectiveness of inpatient geriatric evaluation and management units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr So. 58(1):83–92CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tinquaut F, Freyer G, Chauvin F et al (2016) Prognostic factors for overall survival in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with chemotherapy: results of a pooled analysis of three GINECO phase II trials. Gynecol Oncol 143(1):22–26CrossRef Tinquaut F, Freyer G, Chauvin F et al (2016) Prognostic factors for overall survival in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with chemotherapy: results of a pooled analysis of three GINECO phase II trials. Gynecol Oncol 143(1):22–26CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Suh DH, Kim JW, Kim HS et al (2014) Pre- and intra-operative variables associated with surgical complications in elderly patients with gynecologic cancer: the clinical value of comprehensive geriatric assessment. J Geriatr Oncol 5(3):315–322CrossRef Suh DH, Kim JW, Kim HS et al (2014) Pre- and intra-operative variables associated with surgical complications in elderly patients with gynecologic cancer: the clinical value of comprehensive geriatric assessment. J Geriatr Oncol 5(3):315–322CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Toba K (2005) The guideline for comprehensive geriatric assessment. Jpn. J. Geriatr. 42:177–180CrossRef Toba K (2005) The guideline for comprehensive geriatric assessment. Jpn. J. Geriatr. 42:177–180CrossRef
Metadata
Title
How do doctors choose treatment for older gynecological cancer patients? A Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group survey of gynecologic oncologists
Authors
Makoto Yamamoto
Yoshio Yoshida
Yoshio Itani
Shinya Sato
Masayuki Futagami
Hitomi Sakai
Hiroaki Kajiyama
Masaki Fujimura
Yoichi Aoki
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01574-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 4/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine