Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Gut disruption impairs rehabilitation in patients curatively operated for pancreaticoduodenal cancer - a qualitative study

Authors: Kristine Elberg Dengsø, Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton, Bo Marcel Christensen, Jens Hillingsø, Thordis Thomsen

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

How patients recover and resume everyday life after curative hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery with intestinal reconstruction has, to our knowledge, not previously been investigated. We wanted to explore the patient experience in order to develop our capability to support their rehabilitation and identify interventional gaps in the current post-surgical care of these patients. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to explore patients’ experiences of their gut, digestion, recovery and uptake of everyday life after HPB surgery with intestinal reconstruction.

Methods

A qualitative explorative study with semi-structured interviews with 12 patients. We analysed data using qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach.

Results

Two main themes with six sub-themes emerged from the analysis: 1. “Disrupted gut” covering the sub-themes: the weakened body; fighting cachexia; re-aligning to the altered body. 2. “Recovery work” with the sub-themes: the value of municipal rehabilitation programmes; reclaiming the sociality of meals; going back to work. The patients described overarching digestive changes, predominantly diarrhea and nausea. Diarrhea and nausea challenged rehabilitation efforts and limited patients’ participation in social activities. Patients toiled to regain strength and every-day life as it was before surgery. Current municipal rehabilitation programmes facilitated these efforts.

Conclusions

The patients articulated an overarching experience of gut disruption, predominantly presenting as nausea, diarrhea and difficulty eating. This challenged their recovery work and uptake of every-day life. Specialised follow-up at expert centres might mitigate the sequelae of gut disruption after HPB surgery. We suggest that follow-up programmes systematically monitor the experienced symptoms of gut disruption with HPB-specific PROMS. Furthermore, research into the pathophysiology of cachexia and novel interventions for reducing cachexia and weakness after curative HPB surgery is relevant.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Andersen, O., C. Iuul, and C. Erdland, Opfølgningsprogram for kræft i øvre mave-tarm T.D.H.a.M. Authority, Editor. 2015 The Danish Health and Medicine Authority www.sst.dk. p. 1–36. Accessed March 15 Mar 2015. Andersen, O., C. Iuul, and C. Erdland, Opfølgningsprogram for kræft i øvre mave-tarm T.D.H.a.M. Authority, Editor. 2015 The Danish Health and Medicine Authority www.​sst.​dk. p. 1–36. Accessed March 15 Mar 2015.
2.
go back to reference Ducreux M, et al. Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(Suppl 5):v56–68.CrossRef Ducreux M, et al. Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(Suppl 5):v56–68.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Valle JW, et al. Biliary cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v28–37.CrossRef Valle JW, et al. Biliary cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v28–37.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kapritsou M, et al. Fast-track recovery after major liver and pancreatic resection from the nursing point of view. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2014;37(3):228–33.CrossRef Kapritsou M, et al. Fast-track recovery after major liver and pancreatic resection from the nursing point of view. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2014;37(3):228–33.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sandsund C, et al. Finding a new normal: a grounded theory study of rehabilitation after treatment for upper gastrointestinal or gynaecological cancers--the patient's perspective. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2013;22(2):232–44.CrossRef Sandsund C, et al. Finding a new normal: a grounded theory study of rehabilitation after treatment for upper gastrointestinal or gynaecological cancers--the patient's perspective. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2013;22(2):232–44.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hoybye MT, et al. Research in Danish cancer rehabilitation: social characteristics and late effects of cancer among participants in the FOCARE research project. Acta Oncol. 2008;47(1):47–55.CrossRef Hoybye MT, et al. Research in Danish cancer rehabilitation: social characteristics and late effects of cancer among participants in the FOCARE research project. Acta Oncol. 2008;47(1):47–55.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gooden HM, White KJ. Pancreatic cancer and supportive care--pancreatic exocrine insufficiency negatively impacts on quality of life. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(7):1835–41.CrossRef Gooden HM, White KJ. Pancreatic cancer and supportive care--pancreatic exocrine insufficiency negatively impacts on quality of life. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(7):1835–41.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Elberg Dengso K, et al. Health-related quality of life and anxiety and depression in patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma: a prospective cohort study. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(2):198–204.CrossRef Elberg Dengso K, et al. Health-related quality of life and anxiety and depression in patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma: a prospective cohort study. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(2):198–204.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Torgerson S, Wiebe LA. Supportive care of the patient with advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2013;27(3):183–90. Torgerson S, Wiebe LA. Supportive care of the patient with advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2013;27(3):183–90.
10.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRef Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods - Integrating Theory and Practice. 4th ed. United States of America: Sage Publications Inc.; 2014. p. 832. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods - Integrating Theory and Practice. 4th ed. United States of America: Sage Publications Inc.; 2014. p. 832.
12.
go back to reference Thorne S. Interpretive Description. Qualitative Reseach for Applied Pratice 2 ed. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis group; 2016. Thorne S. Interpretive Description. Qualitative Reseach for Applied Pratice 2 ed. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis group; 2016.
13.
go back to reference Johnson JM. Handbook of interview research. Context & Method. 1st ed. California: Sage Publications, Inc; 2002. Johnson JM. Handbook of interview research. Context & Method. 1st ed. California: Sage Publications, Inc; 2002.
14.
go back to reference Hinsley R, Hughes R. 'The reflections you get': an exploration of body image and cachexia. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2007;13(2):84–9.CrossRef Hinsley R, Hughes R. 'The reflections you get': an exploration of body image and cachexia. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2007;13(2):84–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Faul LA, et al. Survivorship care planning in colorectal cancer: feedback from survivors & providers. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2012;30(2):198–216.CrossRef Faul LA, et al. Survivorship care planning in colorectal cancer: feedback from survivors & providers. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2012;30(2):198–216.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–15.CrossRef Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–15.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inform. 2004;22:63–75.CrossRef Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inform. 2004;22:63–75.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of Nursing Research. Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. 8th ed. Philadelphia: The United States of America. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of Nursing Research. Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. 8th ed. Philadelphia: The United States of America.
19.
go back to reference Bennani-Baiti N, Walsh D. What is cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome? A historical perspective. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2009;39(3):257–62.PubMed Bennani-Baiti N, Walsh D. What is cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome? A historical perspective. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2009;39(3):257–62.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Reid J, et al. Fighting over food: patient and family understanding of cancer cachexia. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009;36(4):439–45.CrossRef Reid J, et al. Fighting over food: patient and family understanding of cancer cachexia. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009;36(4):439–45.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ronga I, et al. Anorexia-cachexia syndrome in pancreatic cancer: recent advances and new pharmacological approach. Adv Med Sci. 2014;59(1):1–6.CrossRef Ronga I, et al. Anorexia-cachexia syndrome in pancreatic cancer: recent advances and new pharmacological approach. Adv Med Sci. 2014;59(1):1–6.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Piot-Ziegler C, et al. Mastectomy, body deconstruction, and impact on identity: a qualitative study. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;15(Pt 3):479–510.CrossRef Piot-Ziegler C, et al. Mastectomy, body deconstruction, and impact on identity: a qualitative study. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;15(Pt 3):479–510.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Handberg C, Nielsen CV, Lomborg K. Men's reflections on participating in cancer rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies 2000-2013. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2014;23(2):159–72.CrossRef Handberg C, Nielsen CV, Lomborg K. Men's reflections on participating in cancer rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies 2000-2013. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2014;23(2):159–72.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wells M, et al. Supporting 'work-related goals' rather than 'return to work' after cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of 25 qualitative studies. Psychooncology. 2013;22(6):1208–19.CrossRef Wells M, et al. Supporting 'work-related goals' rather than 'return to work' after cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of 25 qualitative studies. Psychooncology. 2013;22(6):1208–19.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hoving JL, Broekhuizen ML, Frings-Dresen MH. Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:117.CrossRef Hoving JL, Broekhuizen ML, Frings-Dresen MH. Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:117.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tamminga SJ, et al. Return-to-work interventions integrated into cancer care: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67(9):639–48.CrossRef Tamminga SJ, et al. Return-to-work interventions integrated into cancer care: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67(9):639–48.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bury M. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociol Health Illn. 1982;4(2):167–82.CrossRef Bury M. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociol Health Illn. 1982;4(2):167–82.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Poth JWCCN. Qualitative Inquiry And Research Design. Choosing Among Five Approaches. Fourth ed. California: SAGE Publications; 2017. p. 488. Poth JWCCN. Qualitative Inquiry And Research Design. Choosing Among Five Approaches. Fourth ed. California: SAGE Publications; 2017. p. 488.
Metadata
Title
Gut disruption impairs rehabilitation in patients curatively operated for pancreaticoduodenal cancer - a qualitative study
Authors
Kristine Elberg Dengsø
Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen
Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton
Bo Marcel Christensen
Jens Hillingsø
Thordis Thomsen
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4933-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Cancer 1/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine