Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 1/2007

01-02-2007

Gunther Tulip Retrievable Inferior Vena Caval Filters: Indications, Efficacy, Retrieval, and Complications

Authors: S. Looby, M.F. Given, T. Geoghegan, A. McErlean, M.J. Lee

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated the Gunther Tulip (GT) retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter with regard to indications, filtration efficacy, complications, retrieval window, and use of anticoagulation.

Method

A retrospective study was performed of 147 patients (64 men, 83 women; mean age 58.8 years) who underwent retrievable GT filter insertion between 2001 and 2005. The indications for placement included a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis with a contraindication to anticoagulation (n = 68), pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis while on anticoagulation (n = 49), prophylactic filter placement for high-risk surgical patients with a past history of pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis (n = 20), and a high risk of pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis (n = 10). Forty-nine of the 147 patients did not receive anticoagulation (33.7%) while 96 of 147 patients did, 82 of these receiving warfarin (56.5%), 11 receiving low-molecular weight heparins (7.58%), and 3 receiving antiplatelet agents alone (2.06%).

Results

Filter placement was successful in 147 patients (100%). Two patients had two filters inserted. Of the 147 patients, filter deployment was on a permanent basis in 102 and with an intention to retrieve in 45 patients. There were 36 (80%) successful retrievals and 9 (20%) failed retrievals. The mean time to retrieval was 33.6 days. The reasons for failed retrieval included filter struts tightly adherent to the IVC wall (5/9), extreme filter tilt (2/9), and extensive filter thrombus (2/9). Complications included pneumothorax (n = 4), failure of filter expansion (n = 1), and breakthrough pulmonary embolism (n = 1). No IVC thrombotic episodes were recorded.

Discussion

The Gunther Tulip retrievable filter can be used as a permanent or a retrievable filter. It is safe and efficacious. GT filters can be safely retrieved at a mean time interval of 33.6 days. The newly developed Celect filter may extend the retrieval interval.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hann C, Streiff M (2005) The role of vena caval filters in the management of venous thromboembolism. Blood Rev 19:179–202PubMedCrossRef Hann C, Streiff M (2005) The role of vena caval filters in the management of venous thromboembolism. Blood Rev 19:179–202PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Virchow RLK (1998) Thrombosis and emboli. Science History Publications, Canton, MA, USA Virchow RLK (1998) Thrombosis and emboli. Science History Publications, Canton, MA, USA
3.
go back to reference Trouseau A (1865) Phlegmasia alba dolens. Clinique Medicale de l’hotel dieu de Paris, vol 3. Bailliere, Paris, pp 654–712 Trouseau A (1865) Phlegmasia alba dolens. Clinique Medicale de l’hotel dieu de Paris, vol 3. Bailliere, Paris, pp 654–712
4.
go back to reference Greenfield LJ, Proctor MC (2000) The percutaneous Greenfield filter: Outcomes and practice patterns. J Vasc Surg 32:888–893PubMedCrossRef Greenfield LJ, Proctor MC (2000) The percutaneous Greenfield filter: Outcomes and practice patterns. J Vasc Surg 32:888–893PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Stein PD, Kayali F, Olsen RE (2004) Twenty-one year trends in the use of inferior vena cava filters. Arch Intern Med 164:1541–1545PubMedCrossRef Stein PD, Kayali F, Olsen RE (2004) Twenty-one year trends in the use of inferior vena cava filters. Arch Intern Med 164:1541–1545PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Athanasoulis CA, Kaufmann JA, Halpern EF, et al. (2000) Inferior vena caval filters: Review of a 26 year single center clinical experience. Radiology 216:54–66PubMed Athanasoulis CA, Kaufmann JA, Halpern EF, et al. (2000) Inferior vena caval filters: Review of a 26 year single center clinical experience. Radiology 216:54–66PubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Imberti D, Bianchi M, Farina A (2005) Clinical experience with retrievable vena cava filters: Results of a prospective observational multicenter study. J Thromb Haemost 3:1370PubMedCrossRef Imberti D, Bianchi M, Farina A (2005) Clinical experience with retrievable vena cava filters: Results of a prospective observational multicenter study. J Thromb Haemost 3:1370PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Neuerburg JM, Gunther RW, et al. (1997) Results of a multicenter study of the retrievable Tulip Vena Cava Filter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 20:10–16PubMedCrossRef Neuerburg JM, Gunther RW, et al. (1997) Results of a multicenter study of the retrievable Tulip Vena Cava Filter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 20:10–16PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Terhaar OA, Lyon SM, Given MF, et al. (2004). Extended interval for retrieval of Gunther Tulip filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:1257–1262PubMed Terhaar OA, Lyon SM, Given MF, et al. (2004). Extended interval for retrieval of Gunther Tulip filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:1257–1262PubMed
11.
go back to reference Wallace Ml, et al. (2004) Use of inferior vena caval filters and survival in patients with malignancy. Cancer 101:1902–1907PubMedCrossRef Wallace Ml, et al. (2004) Use of inferior vena caval filters and survival in patients with malignancy. Cancer 101:1902–1907PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rosenthal D, Wellons ED, Lai KM, et al. (2005) Retrievable inferior vena caval filters: Early clinical experience. J Cardiovasc Surg 45: 163–166 Rosenthal D, Wellons ED, Lai KM, et al. (2005) Retrievable inferior vena caval filters: Early clinical experience. J Cardiovasc Surg 45: 163–166
14.
go back to reference Kaskarelis IS, Chlapoutaki M, Skarpalezos DE, et al. (2006) Clinical experience with Gunther temporary inferior vena cava filters. Clin Imaging 30:108–113PubMedCrossRef Kaskarelis IS, Chlapoutaki M, Skarpalezos DE, et al. (2006) Clinical experience with Gunther temporary inferior vena cava filters. Clin Imaging 30:108–113PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Grande WJ, Trerotola SO, Reilly PM, et al. (2005) Experience with the recovery filter as a retrievable inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:1189–1193PubMed Grande WJ, Trerotola SO, Reilly PM, et al. (2005) Experience with the recovery filter as a retrievable inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:1189–1193PubMed
17.
go back to reference Joels CS, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) Complications of inferior vena cava filters. Am Surg 69:654–659PubMed Joels CS, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) Complications of inferior vena cava filters. Am Surg 69:654–659PubMed
18.
go back to reference Linkins LA, Choi PT, Douketis JD (2003) Clinical impact of bleeding in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism: A meta analysis. Ann Intern Med 163:1285–1293CrossRef Linkins LA, Choi PT, Douketis JD (2003) Clinical impact of bleeding in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism: A meta analysis. Ann Intern Med 163:1285–1293CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kinney TB (2003) Update on inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:425–440PubMed Kinney TB (2003) Update on inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:425–440PubMed
20.
go back to reference Wicky S, Doenz F, Meuwly JY, et al. (2003) Clinical experience with retrievable Gunther Tulip vena caval filters. J Endovasc Ther 10:994–1000PubMedCrossRef Wicky S, Doenz F, Meuwly JY, et al. (2003) Clinical experience with retrievable Gunther Tulip vena caval filters. J Endovasc Ther 10:994–1000PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Neuerburg JM, et al. (1997) Results of a multicenter study of the retrievable Tulip vena cava filter: Early clinical experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 20:10–16PubMedCrossRef Neuerburg JM, et al. (1997) Results of a multicenter study of the retrievable Tulip vena cava filter: Early clinical experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 20:10–16PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Millward S, Oliva V, Bell SD, et al. (2001) Gunther Tulip retrievable vena cava filter: Results from the Registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:1053–1058PubMed Millward S, Oliva V, Bell SD, et al. (2001) Gunther Tulip retrievable vena cava filter: Results from the Registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:1053–1058PubMed
23.
go back to reference Neuerburg JM, Handt S, Beckert K, et al. (2001) Percutaneous retrieval of the Tulip vena cava filter: Feasibility, short and long-term changes. An experimental study in dogs. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 24:418–423PubMedCrossRef Neuerburg JM, Handt S, Beckert K, et al. (2001) Percutaneous retrieval of the Tulip vena cava filter: Feasibility, short and long-term changes. An experimental study in dogs. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 24:418–423PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mohan CR, Hoballah JJ, Sharp WJ, et al (1998) Comparative efficacy and complications of vena caval filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9:594–601CrossRef Mohan CR, Hoballah JJ, Sharp WJ, et al (1998) Comparative efficacy and complications of vena caval filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9:594–601CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Decousus H, Leizorovicz, Parent F, et al (1998) A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis. Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med 338:409–441PubMedCrossRef Decousus H, Leizorovicz, Parent F, et al (1998) A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis. Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med 338:409–441PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Crochet DP, et al. (1999) Long term follow up of Vena Tech LGM filter: predictors and frequency of caval occlusion. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10:137–142PubMed Crochet DP, et al. (1999) Long term follow up of Vena Tech LGM filter: predictors and frequency of caval occlusion. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10:137–142PubMed
27.
go back to reference Asch MR (2002) Initial experience in humans with a new retrievable inferior vena cava filter. Radiology 225:835–844PubMed Asch MR (2002) Initial experience in humans with a new retrievable inferior vena cava filter. Radiology 225:835–844PubMed
28.
go back to reference Gunther RW, et al. (2005) New optional IVC filter for percutaneous retrieval: In vitro evaluation of embolus capturing efficiency. Rofo 177:632–636PubMed Gunther RW, et al. (2005) New optional IVC filter for percutaneous retrieval: In vitro evaluation of embolus capturing efficiency. Rofo 177:632–636PubMed
Metadata
Title
Gunther Tulip Retrievable Inferior Vena Caval Filters: Indications, Efficacy, Retrieval, and Complications
Authors
S. Looby
M.F. Given
T. Geoghegan
A. McErlean
M.J. Lee
Publication date
01-02-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-006-0093-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 1/2007 Go to the issue