Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 3/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Article

Guidelines for anti-scatter grid use in pediatric digital radiography

Authors: Shannon Fritz, A. Kyle Jones

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pediatric radiography presents unique challenges in balancing image quality and patient dose. Removing the anti-scatter grid reduces patient dose but also reduces image contrast. The benefit of using an anti-scatter grid decreases with decreasing patient size.

Objective

To determine patient thickness thresholds for anti-scatter grid use by comparing scatter-to-primary ratio for progressively thinner patients without a grid to the scatter-to-primary ratio for a standard adult patient with a grid.

Materials and methods

We used Solid Water™ phantoms ranging in thickness from 7 cm to 16 cm to simulate pediatric abdomens. The scatter-to-primary ratio without a grid was measured for each thickness at 60 kVp, 70 kVp and 80 kVp for X-ray fields of view (FOV) of 378 cm2, 690 cm2 and 1,175 cm2 using indirect digital radiography (iDR) and computed radiography (CR). We determined thresholds for anti-scatter grid use by comparing the intersection of a fit of scatter-to-primary ratio versus patient thickness with a standard adult scatter-to-primary ratio measured for a 23-cm phantom thickness at 80 kVp with an anti-scatter grid. Dose area product (DAP) was also calculated.

Results

The scatter-to-primary ratio depended strongly on FOV and weakly on kVp; however DAP increased with decreasing kVp. Threshold thicknesses for grid use varied from 5 cm for a 14 × 17-cm FOV using iDR to 12 cm for an 8 × 10-cm FOV using computed radiography.

Conclusions

Removing the anti-scatter grid for small patients reduces patient dose without a substantial increase in scatter-to-primary ratio when the FOV is restricted appropriately. Radiologic technologists should base anti-scatter grid use on patient thickness and FOV rather than age.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carlton RR, Adler AM (2012) The grid. In: Principles of radiographic imaging: an art and a science, 5th edn. Delmar Cengage Learning, Clifton Park, pp 257–272 Carlton RR, Adler AM (2012) The grid. In: Principles of radiographic imaging: an art and a science, 5th edn. Delmar Cengage Learning, Clifton Park, pp 257–272
6.
go back to reference Ween B, Olstad M, Jakobsen JA et al (2009) Pediatric digital chest radiography, comparison of grid versus non-grid techniques. Eur J Radiography 1:201–206CrossRef Ween B, Olstad M, Jakobsen JA et al (2009) Pediatric digital chest radiography, comparison of grid versus non-grid techniques. Eur J Radiography 1:201–206CrossRef
7.
go back to reference IEC International Standard 60627 (2001) Diagnostic X-ray imaging equipment—characteristics of general purpose and mammographic antiscatter grids. International Electrochemical Commission, ISBN 2-8318-5953-0 IEC International Standard 60627 (2001) Diagnostic X-ray imaging equipment—characteristics of general purpose and mammographic antiscatter grids. International Electrochemical Commission, ISBN 2-8318-5953-0
8.
go back to reference Hall EJ (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–706PubMedCrossRef Hall EJ (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–706PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE et al (2007) American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 4:272–284PubMedCrossRef Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE et al (2007) American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 4:272–284PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Conway BJ, Duff JE, Fewell TR et al (1990) A patient-equivalent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposures from automatic exposure controlled X-ray examinations of the abdomen and lumbo-sacral spine. Med Phys 17:448–453PubMedCrossRef Conway BJ, Duff JE, Fewell TR et al (1990) A patient-equivalent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposures from automatic exposure controlled X-ray examinations of the abdomen and lumbo-sacral spine. Med Phys 17:448–453PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yaffe M, Fenster A, Johns HE (1977) Xenon ionization detectors for fan beam computed tomography scanners. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1:419–428PubMedCrossRef Yaffe M, Fenster A, Johns HE (1977) Xenon ionization detectors for fan beam computed tomography scanners. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1:419–428PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Floyd CE Jr, Lo JY, Chotas HG et al (1991) Quantitative scatter measurement in digital radiography using a photostimulable phosphor imaging system. Med Phys 18:408–413PubMedCrossRef Floyd CE Jr, Lo JY, Chotas HG et al (1991) Quantitative scatter measurement in digital radiography using a photostimulable phosphor imaging system. Med Phys 18:408–413PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fetterly KA, Schueler BA (2007) Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems. Phys Med Biol 52:4863–4880PubMedCrossRef Fetterly KA, Schueler BA (2007) Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems. Phys Med Biol 52:4863–4880PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rosenstein M, Beck TJ, Warner GG (1979) Handbook of selected organ doses for projections common in pediatric radiology. HEW Publication FDA pp. 79–8079 Rosenstein M, Beck TJ, Warner GG (1979) Handbook of selected organ doses for projections common in pediatric radiology. HEW Publication FDA pp. 79–8079
18.
go back to reference Rosenstein M (1988) Handbook of selected tissue doses for projections common in diagnostic radiology. HEW Publication FDA pp. 89–8031 Rosenstein M (1988) Handbook of selected tissue doses for projections common in diagnostic radiology. HEW Publication FDA pp. 89–8031
19.
go back to reference Maher KP (1993) Comparison of scatter measurement techniques in digital fluoroscopy. Phys Med Biol 38:1977–1983CrossRef Maher KP (1993) Comparison of scatter measurement techniques in digital fluoroscopy. Phys Med Biol 38:1977–1983CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yaffe MJ, Johns PC (1983) Scattered radiation in diagnostic radiology—magnitudes, effects, and methods of reduction. J Appl Photogr Eng 9:184–195 Yaffe MJ, Johns PC (1983) Scattered radiation in diagnostic radiology—magnitudes, effects, and methods of reduction. J Appl Photogr Eng 9:184–195
21.
go back to reference Kleinman PL, Strauss KJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children’s hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1611–1619PubMedCrossRef Kleinman PL, Strauss KJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children’s hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1611–1619PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Aichinger H, Dierker J, Joite-Barfuß S et al (2012) Scattered radiation. In: Radiation exposure and image quality in X-Ray diagnostic radiology, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 53–66CrossRef Aichinger H, Dierker J, Joite-Barfuß S et al (2012) Scattered radiation. In: Radiation exposure and image quality in X-Ray diagnostic radiology, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 53–66CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Curry TS III, Dowdey JE, Murry RC Jr (1990) Christensen’s physics of diagnostic radiology, 4th edn. Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins, Philadelphia Curry TS III, Dowdey JE, Murry RC Jr (1990) Christensen’s physics of diagnostic radiology, 4th edn. Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins, Philadelphia
24.
go back to reference Goske MJ, Charkot E, Herrmann T et al (2011) Image Gently: challenges for radiologic technologists when performing digital radiography in children. Pediatr Radiol 41:611–619PubMedCrossRef Goske MJ, Charkot E, Herrmann T et al (2011) Image Gently: challenges for radiologic technologists when performing digital radiography in children. Pediatr Radiol 41:611–619PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Guidelines for anti-scatter grid use in pediatric digital radiography
Authors
Shannon Fritz
A. Kyle Jones
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2824-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Pediatric Radiology 3/2014 Go to the issue