Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Guided growth with tension band plate or definitive epiphysiodesis for treatment of limb length discrepancy?

Authors: Paul Borbas, Christoph A. Agten, Andrea B. Rosskopf, Andreas Hingsammer, Karim Eid, Leonhard E. Ramseier

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

It is not exactly known whether guided growth or definitive epiphysiodesis techniques are superior in treating limb length discrepancy (LLD). The purpose of the present study was therefore to find out if definitive epiphysiodesis is associated with more powerful LLD correction than tension band plate epiphysiodesis.

Methods

Pediatric patients with LLD treated either with tension band plating as a guided growth technique (temporary epiphysiodesis) or a percutaneous drilling technique (definitive epiphysiodesis) around the knee and a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included in this retrospective study. Radiographic measurements were performed by two independent reviewers. The reduction in side difference between preoperative radiographs and last follow-up was calculated and compared between surgical techniques.

Results

Thirty-eight patients (mean age 13.6 years) were included, 17 treated with temporary and 21 with definitive epiphysiodesis. Average follow-up was at 578 days. The reduction of the LLD in 12 months was 5.7 mm in patients treated with temporary epiphysiodesis and 8.4 mm with definitive epiphysiodesis, respectively (p = 0.22). In both groups, LLD could be statistically significantly reduced after 12 and 24 months. Definitive epiphysiodesis had a lower revision rate (4.8% vs. 17.6%). Intra- and interobserver reliability of the measurements was excellent.

Conclusions

As in earlier studies supposed, temporary epiphysiodesis with tension band plating seems to correct LLD less powerful compared to definitive percutaneous epiphysiodesis. However, in the present study, the differences of LLD correction were not statistically significant. We do not recommend the use of tension band plates for LLD correction due to inferior correction with higher complication and revision rate.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ruzbarsky JJ, Goodbody C, Dodwell E. Closing the growth plate: a review of indications and surgical options. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2017;29(1):80–6.CrossRef Ruzbarsky JJ, Goodbody C, Dodwell E. Closing the growth plate: a review of indications and surgical options. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2017;29(1):80–6.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Phemister DB. Operative arrestment of longitudinal growth of bone in the treatment of deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1933;15:1–15. Phemister DB. Operative arrestment of longitudinal growth of bone in the treatment of deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1933;15:1–15.
3.
go back to reference Canale ST, Russell TA, Holcomb RL. Percutaneous epiphysiodesis: experimental study and preliminary clinical results. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986;6(2):150–6.CrossRef Canale ST, Russell TA, Holcomb RL. Percutaneous epiphysiodesis: experimental study and preliminary clinical results. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986;6(2):150–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ramseier LE, Sukthankar A, Exner GU. Minimal invasive epiphysiodesis using a modified “Canale”-technique for correction of angular deformities and limb leg length discrepancies. J Child Orthop. 2009;3(1):33–7.CrossRef Ramseier LE, Sukthankar A, Exner GU. Minimal invasive epiphysiodesis using a modified “Canale”-technique for correction of angular deformities and limb leg length discrepancies. J Child Orthop. 2009;3(1):33–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Blount WP, Clarke GR. Control of bone growth by epiphyseal stapling; a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1949;31A(3):464–78.CrossRef Blount WP, Clarke GR. Control of bone growth by epiphyseal stapling; a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1949;31A(3):464–78.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nouth F, Kuo LA. Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws (PETS): prospective case study and review. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24(6):721–5.CrossRef Nouth F, Kuo LA. Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws (PETS): prospective case study and review. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24(6):721–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Stevens PM. Guided growth for angular correction: a preliminary series using a tension band plate. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27(3):253–9.CrossRef Stevens PM. Guided growth for angular correction: a preliminary series using a tension band plate. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27(3):253–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bayhan IA, Karatas AF, Rogers KJ, Bowen JR, Thacker MM. Comparing percutaneous physeal epiphysiodesis and eight-plate epiphysiodesis for the treatment of limb length discrepancy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015;37(5):323-7.CrossRef Bayhan IA, Karatas AF, Rogers KJ, Bowen JR, Thacker MM. Comparing percutaneous physeal epiphysiodesis and eight-plate epiphysiodesis for the treatment of limb length discrepancy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015;37(5):323-7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lykissas MG, Jain VV, Manickam V, Nathan S, Eismann EA, McCarthy JJ. Guided growth for the treatment of limb length discrepancy: a comparative study of the three most commonly used surgical techniques. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2013;22(4):311–7.CrossRef Lykissas MG, Jain VV, Manickam V, Nathan S, Eismann EA, McCarthy JJ. Guided growth for the treatment of limb length discrepancy: a comparative study of the three most commonly used surgical techniques. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2013;22(4):311–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gaumetou E, Mallet C, Souchet P, Mazda K, Ilharreborde B. Poor efficiency of eight-plates in the treatment of lower limb discrepancy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36(7):715–9.CrossRef Gaumetou E, Mallet C, Souchet P, Mazda K, Ilharreborde B. Poor efficiency of eight-plates in the treatment of lower limb discrepancy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36(7):715–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lauge-Pedersen H, Hagglund G. Eight plate should not be used for treating leg length discrepancy. J Child Orthop. 2013;7(4):285–8.CrossRef Lauge-Pedersen H, Hagglund G. Eight plate should not be used for treating leg length discrepancy. J Child Orthop. 2013;7(4):285–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Stewart D, Cheema A, Szalay EA. Dual 8-plate technique is not as effective as ablation for epiphysiodesis about the knee. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(8):843–6.CrossRef Stewart D, Cheema A, Szalay EA. Dual 8-plate technique is not as effective as ablation for epiphysiodesis about the knee. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(8):843–6.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1959.CrossRef Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1959.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: Wiley; 1986. p. 431. Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: Wiley; 1986. p. 431.
15.
go back to reference Kaymaz B, Komurcu E. Comment on the article “Dual 8-plate technique is not as effective as ablation for epiphysiodesis about the knee” by Stewart et al. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(8):e67.CrossRef Kaymaz B, Komurcu E. Comment on the article “Dual 8-plate technique is not as effective as ablation for epiphysiodesis about the knee” by Stewart et al. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(8):e67.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Guided growth with tension band plate or definitive epiphysiodesis for treatment of limb length discrepancy?
Authors
Paul Borbas
Christoph A. Agten
Andrea B. Rosskopf
Andreas Hingsammer
Karim Eid
Leonhard E. Ramseier
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1139-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2019 Go to the issue