Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Grand multiparity and the possible risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes: a dilemma to be deciphered

Authors: Ghadeer K. Al-Shaikh, Gehan H. Ibrahim, Amel A. Fayed, Hazem Al-Mandeel

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The relation between grand multiparity (GMP) and the possible adverse pregnancy outcomes is not well identified. GMP (parity ≥5 births) frequently occurs in the Arab nations; therefore, this study aimed to identify the correlation between GMP and the different adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in the Saudi population.

Method

This cohort study was conducted on a total of 3327 women from the labour ward in King Khaled University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Primiparous, multiparous and grand multiparous females were included. Socio-demographic data and pregnancy complications like gestational diabetes or hypertension, preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction were retrieved from the participants’ files. In addition, the labour ward records were used to extract information about delivery events (e.g. spontaneous preterm delivery, caesarean section [CS]) and neonatal outcomes including anthropometric measurements, APGAR score and neonatal admission to the intensive care.

Results

Primiparas responses were more frequent in comparison to multiparas and GMP (56.8% and 33%, and 10.2% respectively). In general, history of miscarriage was elevated (27.2%), and was significantly higher in GMP (58.3%, p < 0.01). Caesarean delivery was also elevated (19.5%) and was significantly high in the GMP subgroup (p < 0.01). However, after adjustment for age, GMP were less likely to deliver by CS (odds ratio: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4–0.8; p < 0.01). The two most frequent pregnancy-associated complications were gestational diabetes and spontaneous preterm delivery (12.6% and 9.1%, respectively). The former was significantly more frequent in the GMP (p < 0.01). The main neonatal complication was low birth weight (10.7%); nevertheless, neonatal admission to ICU was significantly higher in GMP (p = 0.04), and low birth weight was more common in primiparas (p < 0.01). Furthermore, logistic regression analysis revealed an insignificant increase in the maternal or neonatal risks in GMP compared to multiparas after adjustment for age.

Conclusion

Grand multiparous Saudi females have similar risks of maternal and neonatal complications compared to the other parity groups. Advanced age might play a major role on pregnancy outcomes in GMP. Nevertheless, grand multiparty might not be discouraged as long as women are provided with good perinatal care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference King PA, Duthie SJ, Ma HK. Grand multiparity: a reappraisal of the risks. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1991;36:13–6.CrossRefPubMed King PA, Duthie SJ, Ma HK. Grand multiparity: a reappraisal of the risks. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1991;36:13–6.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kaplan B, Harel L, Neri A, Rabinerson D, Goldman GA, Chayen B. Great grand multiparity--beyond the 10th delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995;50:17–9.CrossRefPubMed Kaplan B, Harel L, Neri A, Rabinerson D, Goldman GA, Chayen B. Great grand multiparity--beyond the 10th delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995;50:17–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference WHO. WHO Report. 2004. Available from: http://www.who.int/whr/2004/annex/country/can/en/. Accessed 10 Apr 2016. WHO. WHO Report. 2004. Available from: http://​www.​who.​int/​whr/​2004/​annex/​country/​can/​en/​.​ Accessed 10 Apr 2016.
4.
go back to reference Maymon E, Ghezzi F, Shoham-Vardi I, Hershkowitz R, Franchi M, Katz M, et al. Peripartum complications in grand multiparous women: para 6-9 versus para > or =10. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;81:21–5.CrossRefPubMed Maymon E, Ghezzi F, Shoham-Vardi I, Hershkowitz R, Franchi M, Katz M, et al. Peripartum complications in grand multiparous women: para 6-9 versus para > or =10. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;81:21–5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Omole-Ohonsi A, Ashimi AO. Grand multiparity: obstetric performance in Aminu Kano teaching hospital, Kano, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2011;14:6–9.CrossRefPubMed Omole-Ohonsi A, Ashimi AO. Grand multiparity: obstetric performance in Aminu Kano teaching hospital, Kano, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2011;14:6–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Shechter Y, Levy A, Wiznitzer A, Zlotnik A, Sheiner E. Obstetric complications in grand and great grand multiparous women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:1211–7.CrossRefPubMed Shechter Y, Levy A, Wiznitzer A, Zlotnik A, Sheiner E. Obstetric complications in grand and great grand multiparous women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:1211–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sosa CG, Althabe F, Belizan JM, Buekens P. Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage in vaginal deliveries in a Latin-American population. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:1313–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sosa CG, Althabe F, Belizan JM, Buekens P. Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage in vaginal deliveries in a Latin-American population. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:1313–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Kumari AS, Badrinath P. Extreme grandmultiparity: is it an obstetric risk factor? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;101:22–5.CrossRefPubMed Kumari AS, Badrinath P. Extreme grandmultiparity: is it an obstetric risk factor? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;101:22–5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fayed HM, Abid SF, Stevens B. Risk-factors in extreme grand multiparity. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1993;41:17–22.CrossRef Fayed HM, Abid SF, Stevens B. Risk-factors in extreme grand multiparity. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1993;41:17–22.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Saadia Z. Grand-multiparity in Saudi Arabia—examining the obstetric risk. Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2004;2:16–9.CrossRef Saadia Z. Grand-multiparity in Saudi Arabia—examining the obstetric risk. Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2004;2:16–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Alsammani MA, Ahmed SR. Grand multiparity: risk factors and outcome in a tertiary hospital: a comparative study. Mater Soc. 2015;27:244–7.CrossRef Alsammani MA, Ahmed SR. Grand multiparity: risk factors and outcome in a tertiary hospital: a comparative study. Mater Soc. 2015;27:244–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mgaya AH, Massawe SN, Kidanto HL, Mgaya HN. Grand multiparity: is it still a risk in pregnancy? Bmc Pregnancy Childb. 2013;13:241.CrossRef Mgaya AH, Massawe SN, Kidanto HL, Mgaya HN. Grand multiparity: is it still a risk in pregnancy? Bmc Pregnancy Childb. 2013;13:241.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Graham W, Woodd S, Byass P, Filippi V, Gon G, Virgo S, et al. Diversity and divergence: the dynamic burden of poor maternal health. Lancet. 2016;388:2164–75.CrossRefPubMed Graham W, Woodd S, Byass P, Filippi V, Gon G, Virgo S, et al. Diversity and divergence: the dynamic burden of poor maternal health. Lancet. 2016;388:2164–75.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Seidman DS, Dollberg S, Stevenson DK, Gale R. The effects of high parity and socioeconomic-status on obstetric and neonatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1991;249:119–27.CrossRefPubMed Seidman DS, Dollberg S, Stevenson DK, Gale R. The effects of high parity and socioeconomic-status on obstetric and neonatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1991;249:119–27.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Agrawal S, Agarwal A, Das V. Impact of grandmultiparity on obstetric outcome in low resource setting. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37:1015–9.CrossRefPubMed Agrawal S, Agarwal A, Das V. Impact of grandmultiparity on obstetric outcome in low resource setting. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37:1015–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Andrejevic A, Cvetkovic S, Vitosevic Z, Andrejevic L, Relic G. Multiparity, perinatal morbidity and mortality. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:71–5.PubMed Andrejevic A, Cvetkovic S, Vitosevic Z, Andrejevic L, Relic G. Multiparity, perinatal morbidity and mortality. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:71–5.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Vaswani PR, Sabharwal S. Trends in the occurrence of antenatal and perinatal complications with increasing parity. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013;63:260–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vaswani PR, Sabharwal S. Trends in the occurrence of antenatal and perinatal complications with increasing parity. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013;63:260–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Fowler-Brown AG, de Boer IH, Catov JM, Carnethon MR, Kamineni A, Kuller LH, et al. Parity and the association with diabetes in older women. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1778–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fowler-Brown AG, de Boer IH, Catov JM, Carnethon MR, Kamineni A, Kuller LH, et al. Parity and the association with diabetes in older women. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1778–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Nicholson WK, Asao K, Brancati F, Coresh J, Pankow JS, Powe NR. Parity and risk of type 2 diabetes: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2349–54.CrossRefPubMed Nicholson WK, Asao K, Brancati F, Coresh J, Pankow JS, Powe NR. Parity and risk of type 2 diabetes: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2349–54.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Federation ID. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 2013. 6th ed. Available from: http://www.idf.org/sites/default/files/Atlas-poster-2014_EN.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2016. Federation ID. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 2013. 6th ed. Available from: http://​www.​idf.​org/​sites/​default/​files/​Atlas-poster-2014_​EN.​pdf.​ Accessed 21 May 2016.
21.
go back to reference Mohammaditabar S, Kiani A, Heydari M. The survey on tendencies of Primiparous women for selecting the mode of delivery. Babol Uni of Med Sci J. 2009;11:54–9. Mohammaditabar S, Kiani A, Heydari M. The survey on tendencies of Primiparous women for selecting the mode of delivery. Babol Uni of Med Sci J. 2009;11:54–9.
22.
go back to reference Bondagji N. The Perinatal and neonatal outcome in grand-grand multiparous women, a comparative case control study. Bahrain Med Bull. 2005;27:1–5. Bondagji N. The Perinatal and neonatal outcome in grand-grand multiparous women, a comparative case control study. Bahrain Med Bull. 2005;27:1–5.
23.
go back to reference Azami-Aghdash S, Ghojazadeh M, Dehdilani N, Mohammadi M, Asl Amin Abad R. Prevalence and causes of cesarean section in Iran: systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Public Health. 2014;43:545–55.PubMedPubMedCentral Azami-Aghdash S, Ghojazadeh M, Dehdilani N, Mohammadi M, Asl Amin Abad R. Prevalence and causes of cesarean section in Iran: systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Public Health. 2014;43:545–55.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Babinszki A, Kerenyi T, Torok O, Grazi V, Lapinski RH, Berkowitz RL. Perinatal outcome in grand and great-grand multiparity: effects of parity on obstetric risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:669–74.CrossRefPubMed Babinszki A, Kerenyi T, Torok O, Grazi V, Lapinski RH, Berkowitz RL. Perinatal outcome in grand and great-grand multiparity: effects of parity on obstetric risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:669–74.CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
go back to reference Simonsen SM, Lyon JL, Alder SC, Varner MW. Effect of grand multiparity on intrapartum and newborn complications in young women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:454–60.CrossRefPubMed Simonsen SM, Lyon JL, Alder SC, Varner MW. Effect of grand multiparity on intrapartum and newborn complications in young women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:454–60.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Tai C, Urquhart R. Grandmultiparity in Malaysian women. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;17:327–34.CrossRefPubMed Tai C, Urquhart R. Grandmultiparity in Malaysian women. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;17:327–34.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Shah PS. Parity and low birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:862–75.CrossRefPubMed Shah PS. Parity and low birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:862–75.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Aliyu MH, Jolly PE, Ehiri JE, Salihu HM. High parity and adverse birth outcomes: exploring the maze. Birth. 2005;32:45–59.CrossRefPubMed Aliyu MH, Jolly PE, Ehiri JE, Salihu HM. High parity and adverse birth outcomes: exploring the maze. Birth. 2005;32:45–59.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Teguete I, Maiga AW, Leppert PC. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of grand multiparas over two decades in Mali. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:580–6.CrossRefPubMed Teguete I, Maiga AW, Leppert PC. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of grand multiparas over two decades in Mali. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:580–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Grand multiparity and the possible risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes: a dilemma to be deciphered
Authors
Ghadeer K. Al-Shaikh
Gehan H. Ibrahim
Amel A. Fayed
Hazem Al-Mandeel
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1508-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017 Go to the issue