Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 4/2007

01-04-2007 | Gastrointestinal

Gradient-enhanced volume rendering: an image processing strategy to facilitate whole small bowel imaging with MRI

Authors: Michael Wyss, Johannes M. Froehlich, Michael A. Patak, Christoph F. Juli, Markus B. Scheidegger, Christoph L. Zollikofer, Klaus U. Wentz

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

MRI of the small bowel with positive contrast from orally administered contrast agent is a promising non-invasive imaging method. The aim of our study was to introduce small bowel MRI in a display format that clinicians are accustomed to and that maximizes the amount of information visualized on a single image. Twelve healthy volunteers, median age 32 years (range 18–49 years) participated in the study. A mixture of 20 ml Gd-DOTA (Dotarem), 0.8 g/kg body weight psyllium fibre (Metamucil) and 1.2 l water were sequentially administered over a period of 4 h. Imaging was performed on a 1.5 T unit (Philips Gyroscan, Intera). Fat-saturated, 3D, gradient echo imaging was performed while the patient was in apnea (30 s). Bowel motion was reduced with 40 mg intravenously administered scopolamine (Buscopan). A 3D, gradient-enhanced, volume rendering technique was applied to the 3D data sets. Standard projections [left anterior oblique (LAO), right anterior oblique (RAO), supine and prone] resembling conventional enteroclysis were successfully generated within fewer than 10 min processing time. Reconstructions were reproducible and provided an entire overview of the small bowel. In addition thin-slab volume rendering allowed an overlap-free display of individual structures. Positive contrast from orally administered contrast agent, combined with a gradient enhanced volume rendering method, allows the reconstruction of the small bowel in a pattern resembling conventional double-contrast enteroclysis. Segmental display without overlay is possible.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Dixon PM, Roulston ME, Nolan DJ (1993) The small bowel enema: a ten year review. Clin Radiol 47:46–48PubMedCrossRef Dixon PM, Roulston ME, Nolan DJ (1993) The small bowel enema: a ten year review. Clin Radiol 47:46–48PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Patak MA, Froehlich JM, von Weymarn C, Ritz MA, Zollikofer CL, Wentz K (2001) Non-invasive distension of the small bowel for magnetic-resonance imaging. Lancet 358:987–988PubMedCrossRef Patak MA, Froehlich JM, von Weymarn C, Ritz MA, Zollikofer CL, Wentz K (2001) Non-invasive distension of the small bowel for magnetic-resonance imaging. Lancet 358:987–988PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Singer AJ, Richman PB, Kowalska A, Thode HC Jr (1999) Comparison of patient and practitioner assessments of pain from commonly performed emergency department procedures. Ann Emerg Med 33:652–658PubMed Singer AJ, Richman PB, Kowalska A, Thode HC Jr (1999) Comparison of patient and practitioner assessments of pain from commonly performed emergency department procedures. Ann Emerg Med 33:652–658PubMed
5.
go back to reference Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, Umschaden M, Haselbach H (2000) Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 215:717–725PubMed Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, Umschaden M, Haselbach H (2000) Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 215:717–725PubMed
6.
go back to reference Maglinte DD, Lappas JC, Heitkamp DE, Bender GN, Kelvin FM (2003) Technical refinements in enteroclysis. Radiol Clin North Am 41:213–229PubMedCrossRef Maglinte DD, Lappas JC, Heitkamp DE, Bender GN, Kelvin FM (2003) Technical refinements in enteroclysis. Radiol Clin North Am 41:213–229PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rubesin SE (2003) Simplified approach to differential diagnosis of small bowel abnormalities. Radiol Clin North Am 41:343–364, viiPubMedCrossRef Rubesin SE (2003) Simplified approach to differential diagnosis of small bowel abnormalities. Radiol Clin North Am 41:343–364, viiPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tsalafoutas IA, Chrysovergis DA, Maniatis PN, et al (2005) Radiation doses to patients from enteroclysis. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 113:162–167PubMedCrossRef Tsalafoutas IA, Chrysovergis DA, Maniatis PN, et al (2005) Radiation doses to patients from enteroclysis. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 113:162–167PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Heggie JC (2005) Patient doses in multi-slice CT and the importance of optimisation. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 28:86–96PubMed Heggie JC (2005) Patient doses in multi-slice CT and the importance of optimisation. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 28:86–96PubMed
10.
go back to reference Paulsen SR, Huprich JE, Fletcher JG et al (2006) CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases. Radiographics 26:641–657; discussion 657–662PubMedCrossRef Paulsen SR, Huprich JE, Fletcher JG et al (2006) CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases. Radiographics 26:641–657; discussion 657–662PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Patak MA, Mortele KJ, Ros PR (2005) Multidetector row CT of the small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am 43:1063–1077, viiiPubMedCrossRef Patak MA, Mortele KJ, Ros PR (2005) Multidetector row CT of the small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am 43:1063–1077, viiiPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hara AK, Leighton JA, Sharma VK, Fleischer DE (2004) Small bowel: preliminary comparison of capsule endoscopy with barium study and CT. Radiology 230:260–265PubMedCrossRef Hara AK, Leighton JA, Sharma VK, Fleischer DE (2004) Small bowel: preliminary comparison of capsule endoscopy with barium study and CT. Radiology 230:260–265PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Delvaux M, Gerard G (2006) Capsule endoscopy in 2005: facts and perspectives. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20:23–39PubMedCrossRef Delvaux M, Gerard G (2006) Capsule endoscopy in 2005: facts and perspectives. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20:23–39PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ha AS, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Laufer I, Herlinger H (2004) Radiographic examination of the small bowel: survey of practice patterns in the United States. Radiology 231:407–412PubMedCrossRef Ha AS, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Laufer I, Herlinger H (2004) Radiographic examination of the small bowel: survey of practice patterns in the United States. Radiology 231:407–412PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Levoy M (1988) Display of surfaces from volume data. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 8:29–37CrossRef Levoy M (1988) Display of surfaces from volume data. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 8:29–37CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Levoy M (1991) Methods for improving the efficiency and versatility of volume rendering. Prog Clin Biol Res 363:473–488PubMed Levoy M (1991) Methods for improving the efficiency and versatility of volume rendering. Prog Clin Biol Res 363:473–488PubMed
17.
go back to reference Borthne AS, Abdelnoor M, Hellund JC, et al (2005) MR imaging of the small bowel with increasing concentrations of an oral osmotic agent. Eur Radiol 15:666–671PubMedCrossRef Borthne AS, Abdelnoor M, Hellund JC, et al (2005) MR imaging of the small bowel with increasing concentrations of an oral osmotic agent. Eur Radiol 15:666–671PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Narin B, Ajaj W, Gohde S, et al (2004) Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn’s disease: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 14:1535–1542PubMedCrossRef Narin B, Ajaj W, Gohde S, et al (2004) Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn’s disease: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 14:1535–1542PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ajaj W, Goehde SC, Schneemann H, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF, Lauenstein TC (2004) Oral contrast agents for small bowel MRI: comparison of different additives to optimize bowel distension. Eur Radiol 14:458–464PubMedCrossRef Ajaj W, Goehde SC, Schneemann H, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF, Lauenstein TC (2004) Oral contrast agents for small bowel MRI: comparison of different additives to optimize bowel distension. Eur Radiol 14:458–464PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Patak MA, Froehlich J, von Weymarn C, Zollikofer CL, Wentz K (2003) Evaluation of Crohn’s disease activity with MRI. In: ISMRM 11th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition, Toronto Patak MA, Froehlich J, von Weymarn C, Zollikofer CL, Wentz K (2003) Evaluation of Crohn’s disease activity with MRI. In: ISMRM 11th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition, Toronto
21.
go back to reference Rieber A, Aschoff A, Nussle K, et al (2000) MRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 10:1377–1382PubMedCrossRef Rieber A, Aschoff A, Nussle K, et al (2000) MRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 10:1377–1382PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schunk K (2002) Small bowel magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease. Top Magn Reson Imaging 13:409–425PubMedCrossRef Schunk K (2002) Small bowel magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease. Top Magn Reson Imaging 13:409–425PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Borthne AS, Abdelnoor M, Rugtveit J, Perminow G, Reiseter T, Klow NE (2006) Bowel magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric patients with oral mannitol MRI compared to endoscopy and intestinal ultrasound. Eur Radiol 16:207–214PubMedCrossRef Borthne AS, Abdelnoor M, Rugtveit J, Perminow G, Reiseter T, Klow NE (2006) Bowel magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric patients with oral mannitol MRI compared to endoscopy and intestinal ultrasound. Eur Radiol 16:207–214PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Laghi A, Paolantonio P, Iafrate F, Altomari F, Miglio C, Passariello R (2002) Oral contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging of the bowel. Top Magn Reson Imaging 13:389–396PubMedCrossRef Laghi A, Paolantonio P, Iafrate F, Altomari F, Miglio C, Passariello R (2002) Oral contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging of the bowel. Top Magn Reson Imaging 13:389–396PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bueno G, Musse O, Heitz F, Armspach JP (2001) Three-dimensional segmentation of anatomical structures in MR images on large data bases. Magn Reson Imaging 19:73–88PubMedCrossRef Bueno G, Musse O, Heitz F, Armspach JP (2001) Three-dimensional segmentation of anatomical structures in MR images on large data bases. Magn Reson Imaging 19:73–88PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kunert T, Cardenas CE, Diehl S, Duber C, Meinzer HP (2002) Problems of interactive segmentation. Biomed Tech (Berl) 47 [Suppl 1 Pt 2]:933–935CrossRef Kunert T, Cardenas CE, Diehl S, Duber C, Meinzer HP (2002) Problems of interactive segmentation. Biomed Tech (Berl) 47 [Suppl 1 Pt 2]:933–935CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lievin M, Ritter L, Hanssen N, Jansen T, Keeve E (2002) Interactive 3D segmentation and inspection of volumetric medial datasets. Biomed Tech (Berl) 47 [Suppl 1 Pt 1]:75–78 Lievin M, Ritter L, Hanssen N, Jansen T, Keeve E (2002) Interactive 3D segmentation and inspection of volumetric medial datasets. Biomed Tech (Berl) 47 [Suppl 1 Pt 1]:75–78
28.
go back to reference Froehlich JM, Patak MA, von Weymarn C, Juli CF, Zollikofer CL, Wentz KU (2005) Small bowel motility assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:370–375PubMedCrossRef Froehlich JM, Patak MA, von Weymarn C, Juli CF, Zollikofer CL, Wentz KU (2005) Small bowel motility assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:370–375PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Gradient-enhanced volume rendering: an image processing strategy to facilitate whole small bowel imaging with MRI
Authors
Michael Wyss
Johannes M. Froehlich
Michael A. Patak
Christoph F. Juli
Markus B. Scheidegger
Christoph L. Zollikofer
Klaus U. Wentz
Publication date
01-04-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0472-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

European Radiology 4/2007 Go to the issue